Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:12:37.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secondary Structure of Decorin-Derived Peptides in Solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2016

Axel T. Neffe ,
Stefania Federico  and
Andreas Lendlein
Axel T. Neffe*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Kantstrasse 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
Stefania Federico
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Kantstrasse 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
Andreas Lendlein
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Kantstrasse 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Decorin is a small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycan supporting collagen fibril formation by controlling the rate of collagen fibrillogenesis and fibril dimensions. Peptides derived from the inner surface of decorin have been shown to bind to collagen, while peptides derived from the outer surface do not display such binding affinity. As typical secondary structural elements such as β-sheets and α-helical regions were found in the decorin X-ray crystal structure, here it was investigated by Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy in solution, whether the same structural elements can be found in the derived peptides. Here it is shown that the peptide derived from decorin’s outer surface has the propensity to adopt helical conformation, as it was found in the crystal structure. The results were more pronounced in 80 vol% TFE solution, which led to an increase in the number as well as the length of helices. In contrast, peptides derived from the inner surface had a higher tendency to adopt β-sheet conformation, also in TFE, which corresponds to the conformation of the original sequence in the crystal structure of decorin. This suggests that the peptides derived from decorin adopt the structures present in the native protein.

Keywords

biomaterialbiomimetic (assembly)structural
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 27: Biomaterials and Soft Materials , 2016 , pp. 1965 - 1970
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hindle, K. L., Bella, J., and Lovell, S. C., Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 77, 342–358 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, P. G., McEwan, P. A., Dodd, C. M., Bergmann, E. M., Bishop, P. N., and Bella, J., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15633–15638 (2004).Google Scholar
Federico, S., Pierce, B. F., Piluso, S., Wischke, C., Lendlein, A., and Neffe, A. T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 10980–10984 (2015).Google Scholar
Tyndall, J. D. A. and Fairlie, D. P., J. Mol. Recognit. 12, 363–370 (1999).Google Scholar
Haubner, R., Gratias, R., Diefenbach, B., Goodman, S. L., Jonczyk, A., and Kessler, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 7461–7472 (1996).Google Scholar
Assa-Munt, N., Jia, X., Laakkonen, P., and Ruoslahti, E., Biochemistry 40, 2373–2378 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, M., Collins, S. R., Toyama, B. H., and Weissman, J. S., Nature 442, 585–589 (2006).Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-H., Yang, J. T., and Chau, K. H., Biochemistry 13, 3350–3359 (1974).Google Scholar
Kaiser, E. T. and Kezdy, F. J., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 1137–1143 (1983).Google Scholar
Roccatano, D., Colombo, G., Fioroni, M., and Mark, A. E., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12179–12184 (2002).Google Scholar
Whitmore, L. and Wallace, B. A., Biopolymers 89, 392–400 (2008).Google Scholar
Sreerama, N. and Woody, R. W., Anal. Biochem. 287, 252–260 (2000).Google Scholar
Andrade, M. A., Chacón, P., Merelo, J. J., and Morán, F., Prot. Eng. 6, 383–390 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar