Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:47:16.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical behavior of reinforced concrete with waste-tire particles under an indirect tensile test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2019

Sandra L. Rodríguez R. ,
Luis S. Hernández H. ,
Francisco G. Pérez-Gutiérrez.  and
Jorge H. Díaz A
Sandra L. Rodríguez R.
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosi, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava N°8, C.P. 78290, San Luis Potosi, S.L.P., Mexico
Luis S. Hernández H.
Affiliation:
Metallurgy Institute, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosi, Sierra Leona N°550, C.P. 78210, San Luis Potosi, S.L.P., Mexico
Francisco G. Pérez-Gutiérrez.
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosi, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava N°8, C.P. 78290, San Luis Potosi, S.L.P., Mexico
Jorge H. Díaz A*
Affiliation:
Metallurgy Institute, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosi, Sierra Leona N°550, C.P. 78210, San Luis Potosi, S.L.P., Mexico
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

The incorporation of triturated tire particles as an aggregate in the concrete mixture is one of the ways to take advantage of this Waste Rubber (WR) in order to improve concrete properties, such as mechanical behavior. In this research we evaluated mechanical behavior of concrete specimens prepared with different amounts WR, which partially substituted the fine aggregate, under an indirect tensile test. In contrast with other’s researcher’s findings, our results show that the specimens with 5% WR present the highest value of indirect tensile strength (TP) of 4.36 MPa. Polynomial relationships between TP and compression strength (f´c), where Tp ranges from 0.1f´c to 0.2f´c. Specimens with the 0, 5 and 10% WR content show two types of failure: normal tension and tiple-cleft failure, described in the norm ASTM 1144-89. Nevertheless, specimens with 15 and 20% WR show a new failure not described in the norm, which is thought to be occurring due to the high amount of WR used.

Keywords

cement & concreteinterfacestrengthpolymer
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 54: International Materials Research Congress XXVIII , 2019 , pp. 2931 - 2937
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Strukar Kristina Kalman S. Tanja, Millicevic Ivana and Busic Robert, Enginnering Structures 188, 452-468 (2019).Google Scholar
NTC Concrete Design, “Complementary Technical Norms for the Design and Construction of Concrete Structures”, SMIE, 2014.Google Scholar
ACI 363, “State-of-the-Art Report on High-Strength Concrete”, American Concrete Int., 1997.Google Scholar
FIB, “Model Code for Concrete Structures”, International Federation for Structural Concrete, 2010.Google Scholar
EN1992-1-1, “Design of Concrete Structures. General Rules for Buildings”, 1992.Google Scholar
AS 3600, “Concrete Structures Properties of Materials”, Standards Australia International Ltd., 2009.Google Scholar
ACI 318.111, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete”, American Concrete Int., 2011.Google Scholar
Reyes, A., presented at the 3 Symposium on Buildings and Pre-stressed Systems of 2010, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico, 2010.Google Scholar
Barra Bizinotto, Marilda, Francesc, Jordana R., Verónica, Royano G. and Enric, Vázquez R., Bachelor Thesis, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 2009.Google Scholar
Osama, Youssf, Mills Julie, E. and Reza, Hassanli, Construction and Building Materials 125, 175-183 (2016).Google Scholar
Su, H., Yang, J., Ling, T.C., Ghataora, G.S. and Dirar, S., J. Clean. 91, 288–296 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelisser, F., Zavarise, N., Arent, T. and Michael, A., J. Clean Prod. 19, 757–763 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, T., Chaudhary, S. and Sharma, R. K., J. Clean Prod. 7, 1–10, (2015).Google Scholar
Moustafa, A. and Elgawady, M. A., Constr. Build. Mater. 93, 249–256 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
María José, García N., Dennis F., Inga B., Fernando A., Moscoso N. and Diego W., Ortíz M., presented at the 3rd National Congress AMICA of 2017, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco, Mexico, 2017.Google Scholar
Liu, Hanbing, Wang, Xianqiang, Jiao, Yubo and Tao, Sha, Materials 9, 172-184 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rojas Yheyson J., G. and Rojas Esthefany L., G., Bachelor Thesis, National Univesity of Santa Chimbote, 2015.Google Scholar
Eraso V. Herwin, F. and Natalia, Ramos R., Bachelor Thesis, Pontifical Javeriana Univesity, 2015.Google Scholar
Agampodi, Mendis S.M, Safat, Al-Deenand Mahmud, Ashraf, Construction and Building Materials 137, 354-366 (2017).Google Scholar
Gerges Najib, N., Issa Camille, A. and Fawaz Samer, A., Case of Studies in Construction Materials xxx. e00184, 1-13 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najim Halid, B. and Hall, Matthew R., Construction and Building Materials 27, 521-530 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACI 211.1-91, “Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweigth, and Mass Concrete”, American Concrete Int., 1991.Google Scholar
ASTM C136/C136M, “Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis od Fine and Coarse Aggregates”, ASTM Int., 2014.Google Scholar
ASTM C 150-07, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement”, ASTM Int., 2007.Google Scholar
Samiha, Ramdani, Abdelhamid, Guettala, Benmalek, ML and Aguiar José, B., Journal of Building Engineering 21, 302-311 (2019).Google Scholar
ASTM C31/C31M, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field”, ASTM Int., 2006.Google Scholar
ASTM C496-96, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens”, ASTM Int, 1996.Google Scholar
Claudia B, Flores V.., Sandra L, Rodríguez R.., Imelda, Esparza A., Gerardo F, Pérez G.., Luis S, Hernández H.. and Jorge P, García C.., presented at the XXV International Materials Research Congress IMRC of 2016, Cancún, México, 2016.Google Scholar
ASTM C1144-89, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength for Brittle Nuclear Waste Forms”, ASTM Int, 2011.Google Scholar