Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:56:47.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defects in SiC for Quantum Computing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2019

Renu Choudhary
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames IA, USA50011
Rana Biswas*
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames IA, USA50011 Departments of Physics and Astronomy, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Microelectronics Research Center, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa50011, USA
Bicai Pan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Durga Paudyal
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames IA, USA50011
*
Get access

Abstract

Many novel materials are being actively considered for quantum information science and for realizing high-performance qubit operation at room temperature. It is known that deep defects in wide-band gap semiconductors can have spin states and long coherence times suitable for qubit operation. We theoretically investigate from ab-initio density functional theory (DFT) that the defect states in the hexagonal silicon carbide (4H-SiC) are potential qubit materials. The DFT supercell calculations were performed with the local-orbital and pseudopotential methods including hybrid exchange-correlation functionals. Di-vacancies in SiC supercells yielded defect levels in the gap consisting of closely spaced doublet just above the valence band edge, and higher levels in the band gap. The divacancy with a spin state of 1 is charge neutral. The divacancy is characterized by C-dangling bonds and a Si-dangling bonds. Jahn-teller distortions and formation energies as a function of the Fermi level and single photon interactions with these defect levels will be discussed. In contrast, the anti-site defects where C, Si are interchanged have high formation energies of 5.4 eV and have just a single shallow defect level close to the valence band edge, with no spin. We will compare results including the defect levels from both the electronic structure approaches.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Seo, H., Paul, A. L. F. Klimov, V., Miao, K. C., Galli, G., Awschalom, D. D., Nature Comm. 7, 12796 (2016).Google Scholar
Bockstedte, M., Schütz, F., Garratt, T., Ivády, V. and Gali, A., Nature Quantum Materials, 3 31 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. R., Koehl, W. F., Varley, J. B., Janotti, A., Buckley, B. B., Van de Walle, C. G., and Awschalom, D. D., J. Appl. Phys. 109, 102417 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, J. M., Artacho, E., Gale, J. D., Garcia, A., Junquera, J., Ordejon, P., Sanchez-Portal, D., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 , 2745 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. R., Koehl, W. F., Varley, J. B., Janotti, A., Buckley, B. B., Van de Walle, C. G., and Awschalom, D. D., PNAS, 107, 8513 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar