Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:12:09.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3D Printable Resources for Engaging STEM Students in Laboratory Learning Activities and Outreach Programs: Inexpensive and User-Friendly Instrument Kits for Educators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2018

Lon A. Porter Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Wabash College, 301 W. Wabash Ave., Crawfordsville, IN 47933, U.S.A.
*
Get access

Abstract

Continued advances in digital design software and 3D printing methods enable innovative approaches in the development of new educational tools for laboratory-based STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) learning. The decreasing cost of 3D printing equipment and greater access provided by university fabrication centers afford unique opportunities for educators to transcend the limitations of conventional modes of student engagement with analytical instrumentation. This work shares successful efforts at Wabash College to integrate user-friendly and inexpensive 3D printed instruments kits into introductory STEM coursework. The laboratory kits and activities described provide new tools for engaging students in the exploration of instrument design and performance. These experiences provide effective ways to assist active-learners in discovering the technology and fundamental principles of analysis and deliberately confront the “black box” perception of instrumentation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M. P., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., (111), 84108415, (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, E. N., “A modular approach to chemical instrumentation”, J. Chem. Educ., (40), 7375, (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. M., “3D-printing your lab equipment—it’s cheaper than you think,” Elsevier Connect, 2013. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/3d-printing-your-lab-equipment-its-cheaper-than-you-think [Accessed: 03-Mar-2018].Google Scholar
Porter, L. A. Jr., Washer, B. M., Hakim, M. H., and Dallinger, R. F., “User-Friendly 3D Printed Colorimeter Models for Student Exploration of Instrument Design and Performance”, J. Chem. Educ., (93), 13051309, (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, L. A. Jr., Chapman, C. A., and Alaniz, J. A., “Simple and Inexpensive 3D Printed Filter Fluorometer Designs: User-Friendly Instrument Models for Laboratory Learning and Outreach Activities”, J. Chem. Educ., (94), 105111, (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, L. A. Jr., “High-Impact Practices in Materials Science Education: Student Research Internships Leading to Pedagogical Innovation in STEM Laboratory Learning Activities”, MRS Adv., (2), 16671672, (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. J., Núñez, J. R. R., Maxwell, E. J., and Algar, W. R., “Build Your Own Photometer: A Guided-Inquiry Experiment To Introduce Analytical Instrumentation”, J. Chem. Educ., (93), 166171, (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar