Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:10:09.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women with disabilities: from discrimination and violence towards an ethics of reciprocity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Rita Barbuto  and
Emilia Napolitano
Rita Barbuto*
Affiliation:
Disabled People's International Italia, Lamezia Terme (Catanzaro)
Emilia Napolitano*
Affiliation:
Disabled People's International Italia, Lamezia Terme (Catanzaro)
*
∗Corresponding author. Emails: [email protected]
∗[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since 2001 DPI Italia, the Italian section of Disabled People's International, has played an important role in a series of research projects in the European Commission's Daphne Programme on violence against women with disabilities. Several different types of violence have been identified, from sexual abuse to removal of women's control over their environment to invasion of their privacy in healthcare contexts to control of their reproductive capacity, particularly of women with intellectual disabilities. In the light of these projects, and of the CRPD's recognition of the multiple discriminations experienced by many women with disabilities, the article argues for a shift away from an ethics of care and dependency towards one of equal reciprocal relations between disabled women and others and to a bioethics grounded not in exceptional need but in everyday life. Peer counselling among disabled women is particularly important in effecting this shift.

Keywords

womendisabilitysexualitymultiple discriminationpeer counselling
Type
Articles
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 19 , Issue 2: Disability rights and wrongs in Italy , May 2014 , pp. 161 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angrisani, Silvia, La Capria, Cristina, Marone, Francesca and Tuozzi, Carolina. 2002. Quando la relazione prende forma. Questioni educative al cinema. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.Google Scholar
Baratella, Paola, and Littamè, Elena. 2009. I diritti delle persone con disabilità. Dalla Convenzione Internazionale ONU alle buone pratiche. Turin: Erickson.Google Scholar
Barbuto, Rita, Ferrarese, Vincenza, Griffo, Giampiero, Napolitano, Emilia, and Spinuso, Gianna. 2006. Consulenza alla pari. Da vittime della storia a protagonisti della vita. Lamezia Terme: Comunità.Google Scholar
Galati, Marina, and Barbuto, Rita. 2008. Donne, disabilità e salute. Questioni etiche, strategie e strumenti di tutela nelle politiche per la salute e le pari opportunità. Lamezia Terme: Comunità, Coordinamento nazionale comunità di accoglienza.Google Scholar
Galati, Marina, Barbuto, Rita, Coppedè, Nunzia, Meduri, Maria, and Napolitano, Emilia. 2003. Una possibile autonomia: itinerari di donne con disabilità tra empowerment ed advocacy. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1995. Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 2011. Practical Ethics. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (originally published 1979).Google Scholar
Waxman, Barbara Faye. 1994. “Up against Eugenics: Disabled Women's Challenge to Receive Reproductive Health Services.” Sexuality and Disability 12(2):155–171.Google Scholar
Women With Disabilities Australia. 2013. Dehumanised: The Forced Sterilisation of Women and Girls with Disabilities in Australia. WWDA Submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Involuntary or Coerced Sterilisation of People with Disabilities in Australia http://www.wwda.org.au Google Scholar