Article contents
Mussolini's charisma∗
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 January 2016
Summary
Mussolini was the prototype of twentieth-century charismatic dictators. His personal charisma antedated the founding of Fascism and the formal construction of collective charisma through the movement and the personality cult. First forged in the socialist movement, Mussolini's charisma assumed a new guise when he became a supporter of Italy's intervention in the First World War. He acquired an aura for the third time as Fascist leader. There were always tensions between the Duce and Fascism as the latter embodied the collective charisma of a movement. Nevertheless, Fascist ideology and culture incorporated the idea of the charismatic leader as a focus and source of authority on the model of the Catholic Church. Although it was difficult by the 1930s to distinguish between the believer's exaltation and courtly adulation, Mussolini exercised a personal charisma for many Fascists even after his death.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Modern Italy , Volume 3 , Issue 2: Charisma and the cult of personality in modern Italy , November 1998 , pp. 219 - 235
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy
References
Notes
1. Biondi, D., La fabbrica del duce, Vallecchi, Bologna, 1967; Melograni, P., ‘The cult of the Duce in Mussolini's Italy’, Journal of Contemporary History, 1976, pp. 221–37; Ostenc, M., ‘La mystique du Chef et la jeunesse fasciste de 1919 à 1926’, Mélanges de l'Ecole française de Rome, 1, 1978, pp. 275–80; Hasler, A. B., ‘Das Duce–Bild in der Faschistchen Literatur’, Quellen und Forschungen, 60, 1980, pp. 421–506; De Felice, R. and Goglia, L., Mussolini. Il mito, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1983; Petersen, J., ‘Mussolini: Wirklicheit und Mythos eines Diktators’, in Mithos und Moderne, Frankfurt a. M., 1983, pp. 242–60; Passerini, L., Mussolini immaginario, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1991; Imbriani, A. M., Gli italiani e il duce. Il mito di Mussolini negli ultimi anni del fascismo (1938–1943), Liguori, Naples, 1992.Google Scholar
2. See for example: Hamon, L. and Mabileau, A. (eds), La personnalisation du pouvoir. Université de Dijon, Paris, 1964; Rustow, D. A., Philosophers and Kings. Studies in Leadership , Braziller, G., New York, 1970; J. MacGregor Bums, Leadership, Harper & Row, New York, 1978; Cavalli, L., Il capo carismatico, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1981; Held, J., The Cult of Power. Dictators in the Twentieth Century, Boulder, New York, 1983; Schweitzer, A., The Age of Charisma, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984. An exception is Bach, M., Die charismatischen Führerdiktaturen, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 1990.Google Scholar
3. Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Free Press, New York, 1964, p. 358.Google Scholar
4. Tucker, R. C., Stalin as Revolutionary, Chatto and Windus, London, 1974, chapter 2.Google Scholar
5. Tucker, R. C., ‘The rise of the Stalin personality cult’, American Historical Review, 2, 1979, pp. 347–66.Google Scholar
6. Quoted in Megaro, G., Mussolini dal mito alla realtà, Milan, 1947, p. 365.Google Scholar
7. Ibid., p. 366.Google Scholar
8. On Gramsci's ‘Mussolinianism’, see Romano, S. F., Antonio Gramsci, Einaudi, Turin, 1965, p. 281.Google Scholar
9. Toscani, I., ‘I giovani, il socialismo e la guerra’, Avanti!, November 29 1914, quoted in De Felice, R., Mussolini il rivoluzionario, Einaudi, Turin, 1965, p. 281.Google Scholar
10. Zibordi, G., ‘Continuando a discutere di cose interne di famiglia’, Critica Sociale, 1 August 1914.Google Scholar
11. Zibordi, G., ‘La logica d'una crisi’, Critica Sociale, 16 November 1914.Google Scholar
12. Quoted in Rafanelli, L., Una donna e Mussolini, Rizzoli, Milan, 1975, p. 33.Google Scholar
13. La Voce, 13 December 1913.Google Scholar
14. L'Unità, 19 June 1914.Google Scholar
15. Letter from Roadolfo Savelli to Giuseppe Prezzolini in the Archivio Prezzolini, Lugano, quoted in Gentile, E., Il mito dello Stato nuovo dall'antigiolittismo al fascismo, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1982, p. 122.Google Scholar
16. ‘Agathon’ (pseudonym of Henri Massis and Alfred de Tarde), Les jeunes gens d'aujourd' hui, Paris, 1913, pp. 144–5.Google Scholar
17. Papini, G., ‘Crispi’, Il Regno, 29 May 1904.Google Scholar
18. D'Annunzio, G., Elettra, Mondadori, Verona, 1953, p. 108.Google Scholar
19. See Gentile, E., ‘From the Cultural Revolt of the Giolittian Era to the Ideology of Fascism’, in Coppa, F. J. (ed.), Studies in Modern Italian History. From the Risorgimento to the Republic, Lang, New York, 1986, pp. 103–17; and ‘The Myth of National Regeneration in Italy: from the Modernist Avant-Garde to Fascism’, in Affron, M. and Antliff, M. (eds), Fascist Visions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
20. Quoted in Gentile, , Il mito dello Stato nuovo, p. 128.Google Scholar
21. Reproduced in Gentile, E. (ed.), Mussolini e La Voce, Sansoni, Florence, 1976, pp. 163–75.Google Scholar
22. Letter from Arcangelo Di Staso to Prezzolini, G., 26 February 1917, in Prezzolini, G., Il tempo della Voce, Vallecchi, Milan–Florence, 1960, p. 719.Google Scholar
23. Il popolo d'Italia, 29 November 1914.Google Scholar
24. Rossi, C., Mussolini com'era, Rome, 1947, p. 75.Google Scholar
25. See Gentile, E., Storia del partito fascista, 1919–1922. Movimento e milizia, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1989.Google Scholar
26. Gradi, M., Il sindacato net fascismo, ISC, Rome, 1987, p. 45. The allusion is to Mussolini's experience as a teacher (translator's note).Google Scholar
27. Grandi, D., ‘Pensiero di Peretola’, L'Assalto, 6 August 1921.Google Scholar
28. L'Assalto, 13 August 1921.Google Scholar
29. See Gentile, , Storia del partito fascista, chapter IV.Google Scholar
30. Pellizzi, C., Fascismo aristocrazia, Alpes, Milan, 1925, p. 8.Google Scholar
31. ‘Riforma burocratica’, Polemica Fascista, 21 October 1923.Google Scholar
32. The crisis within the Fascist Party and the challenge to Mussolini's personal charisma can be seen as a specific case of the relationship between charismatic leadership and ‘factional conflicts’, in the sense that the phrase is used in the analysis of National Socialism by Nyomarkay, J., Charisma and Factionalism in the Nazi Party, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1967.Google Scholar
33. Bencini, A., ‘Le ragioni della crisi’, La Scure, 23 December 1922.Google Scholar
34. Rivoire, M., Vita e morte del fascismo, Milan, 1947, p. 107.Google Scholar
35. Il Caffè, 11 July 1924.Google Scholar
36. Fortunato, G., Dopo la guerra sovvertitrice, Laterza, Bari, 1922, now in Fortunate, G., Il Mezzogiorno e lo Stato italiano, Vallecchi, Florence, 1973, vol. II, p. 702.Google Scholar
37. Atti parlamentari. Senato del Regno, Legislature XXVI, Sessione I, 1921–23, Discussioni, Tornata dell'8 giungo 1923, pp. 49–98.Google Scholar
38. Quoted in De Felice, R., Mussolini il fascista, Einaudi, Turin, 1966, p. 78.Google Scholar
39. Quaderni di ‘Giustizia e Libertà’, 6, March 1933, p. 103.Google Scholar
40. See De Felice, R., Mussolini il fascista, tomo II, Einaudi, Turin, 1968, pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
41. Turati, A., Ragioni ideali di vita fascista, Rome, no date, p. 79.Google Scholar
42. Turati, A., Una rivoluzione e un capo, Rome-Milan, no date. Turati, , Ragioni ideali , p. 58.Google Scholar
43. Il primo libro del fascista, Rome, 1939, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
44. Gentile, , La via italiana al totalitarismo, p. 148: ‘a Caesaristic type of charismatic dictatorship which was integrated into an institutional structure based on a single party and on the mobilization of the masses. It underwent a continual construction process aimed at making it correspond to the myth of the totalitarian state. This myth was consciously adopted as an organizational model for the political system and functioned in a concrete sense as a fundamental credo and behavioural code imposed on both individuals and the masses.’ Google Scholar
45. Pellizzi, C., Il partito educatore, Rome, 1941, p. 30.Google Scholar
46. Costamagna, C., Storia e dottrina del fascismo, Turin, 1938, p. 419.Google Scholar
47. At the end of the 1930s there was an important debate amongst the regime's jurists and ideologists around the problem of the Duce role in a Fascist state ‘after Mussolini’: see Gentile, , La via italiana al totalitarismo, pp. 203 ff.Google Scholar
48. See Michels, R., Corso di sociologia politico, Milan, 1927.Google Scholar
49. Il partito nazionale fascista, Rome, 1936, p. 50.Google Scholar
50. Panunzio, , Teoria generale, p. 518.Google Scholar
51. Gentile, G., Fascismo e cultura, Milan, 1928, p. 47.Google Scholar
52. Quoted in Gentile, E., introduction to Giuriati, G., La parabola di Mussolini, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1981, p. XXVII. For Dante's enigmatic allegorical figure of the Hound destined to vanquish the she-wolf of covetousness and greed, see Inferno, I, 101ff (translator's note).Google Scholar
53. Archivio Centrale dello Stato, Segr. pari, del Duce, Carteggio Riservato, b. 65.Google Scholar
54. Giuriati, , La parabola di Mussolini, p. 39.Google Scholar
55. Cianetti, T., Memorie, Rizzoli, Milan, 1983, p. 373.Google Scholar
56. Bottai, G., Diario 1935–1944, Guerri, G. B. (ed.), Rizzoli, Milan, 1982, pp. 246–7.Google Scholar
57. De Begnac, Y., Palazzo Venezia. Storia di un regime, Rome, 1950, p. 131.Google Scholar
58. Rafanelli, , Una donna e Mussolini, p. 52, p. 103.Google Scholar
59. Quoted in De Felice, and Goglia, , Mussolini. Il mito, p. 99.Google Scholar
60. Sarjatti, M., Dux, Mondadori, Milan, 1930, p. 134.Google Scholar
61. Dinale, O., Quarant'anni di colloqui con lui, Clarrocca, Milan, 1962, p. 192.Google Scholar
62. D'Aroma, N., Mussolini segreto, L. Cappelli, Bologna, 1958, p. 194.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by