Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:54:00.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fascist Samurais: the Japanese race in the Italian imaginary during the Second World War and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2020

Michele Monserrati
Michele Monserrati*
Affiliation:
Comparative Literature and Romance Languages, Williams College, MA, USA
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between 1938 and 1943, Fascist intellectuals debated the problem of how to create a racial policy that would encompass the Japanese within the Aryan doctrine. This article demonstrates how internal divisions in the Fascist party over racial issues generated alternative versions of pro-Japanese propaganda, which influenced the racial thinking of the Italian far-right even long after the Second World War. I show how Italian racial theories developed to underpin the alliance with Japan were transnational in scope, as they involved both German and Italian scholars in a common effort to lobby state racial policies. Specifically, I consider George Montandon and Julius Evola as two transnational actors engaged in building a case for the inclusion of the Japanese in the family of Aryan races, speaking either from a ‘biological’ or ‘spiritual’ perspective. While by the end of the Second World War the ‘biological’ thesis for the inclusion of the Japanese race had evaporated, the ‘spiritual’ thesis would continue to influence a generation of Italian far-right militants, especially during the ‘Years of Lead’. To make sense of this legacy, I suggest that the foundational myth of Italian Fascism, based on the spiritual heritage of the multiethnic Roman empire, responded to the neofascist quest for transnational affiliations against Western materialism.

Tra il 1938 e il 1943, gli intellettuali fascisti si posero il problema di come includere l'alleato giapponese nel contesto della dottrina ariana. Questo articolo dimostra come, a causa di divisioni interne al partito fascista sulle questioni razziali, due versioni alternative di propaganda filo-giapponese hanno influenzato il pensiero razziale dell'estrema destra italiana, anche molto tempo dopo la seconda guerra mondiale. L'articolo mostra come le teorie razziali italiane sviluppate per sostenere l'alleanza con il Giappone sono di natura transnazionale, poiché hanno coinvolto studiosi tedeschi e italiani in uno sforzo comune per fare pressione sulle politiche razziali dei propri rispettivi paesi. In particolare, considero George Montandon e Julius Evola come due operatori transnazionali impegnati a giustificare l'inclusione dei giapponesi nel novero delle razze ariane, a partire da una prospettiva ‘biologica’ o ‘spirituale’. Se alla fine della seconda guerra mondiale tramonta la tesi ‘biologica’ per l'inclusione della razza giapponese, al contrario la tesi ‘spirituale’ avrebbe continuato a influenzare una generazione di militanti italiani di estrema destra, specialmente durante gli ‘Anni del piombo’. La spiegazione che l'articolo offre per dare conto di questa longevità della proposta spiritualista conduce a considerare il mito prevalente del fascismo italiano, che è basato sull'eredità spirituale e multietnica dell'impero romano. Questo mito ‘ultra-nazionale’ ha offerto una risposta al bisogno di gruppi neofascisti alla ricerca di una coalizione transnazionale per combattere le forze del materialismo occidentale.

Keywords

Italian Fascism and neofascismSecond World War Axis powersAinutransnational fascismFascist race theoriesGerman Nazism
Type
Research Articles
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 63 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Association for the Study of Modern Italy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basilone, L. 2019. ‘Through East Asia to the Sound of “Giovinezza”: Italian Travel Literature on China, Korea and Japan during the Fascist Ventennio ’. Modern Italy 24 (4): 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesch, O. 2014. Inventing the Way of the Samurai: Nationalism, Internationalism, and Bushidō in Modern Japan. Oxford, UK and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, P. 2019. ‘The Great Divide? Notions of Racism in Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany: New Answers to an Old Problem’. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 24 (1): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, H.-J. 2017. ‘Images of German-Japanese Similarities and Affinities in National-Socialist Germany (1943–1945)’. In Mutual Perceptions and Images in Japanese-German Relations 1860–2010, edited by Saaler, S., Akira, K. and Nobuo, T., 313–326. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Conklin, A. L. 2013. In the Museum of Man: Race, Anthropology, and Empire in France, 1850–1950. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
De Aldisio, E. 1940. ‘La razza giapponese’. La difesa della razza 7 (5) (February): 30–33.Google Scholar
De Donno, F. 2006. ‘La razza ario-mediterranea. Ideas of Race and Citizenship in Colonial and Fascist Italy, 1885–1941’. Interventions. International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 8 (3): 394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evola, J. (1961) 2003. Ride the Tiger: A Survival Manual for the Aristocrats of the Soul, translated by Godwin, J. and Fontana, C.. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.Google Scholar
Evola, J. (1994) 2009 (3rd ed). Zen: The Religion of the Samurai, translated by Stucco, G.. Sequim, WA: Holmes Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Evola, J. 2011. Metaphysics of War: Battle, Victory & Death in the World of Tradition, translated by Morgan, J. B.. 3rd English ed. London: Arktos Media.Google Scholar
Evola, J. 2015. A Traditionalist Confronts Fascism. Selected Essays, translated by Kopff, C.. London: Arktos Media.Google Scholar
Evola, J. 2018. East & West: Comparative Studies in Pursuit of Tradition, edited by Johnson, G. and Cleary, C.. San Francisco: Counter-Currents Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, F. 1996. Threats to Democracy: The Radical Right in Italy after the War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, E. 1996. The Sacralization of Politics in Fascist Italy, translated by Botsford, K.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gillette, A. 2002. Racial Theories in Fascist Italy. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, G. 2019. Race, Nation and Gender in Modern Italy: Intersectional Representations in Visual Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziani, F. 1943. ‘Superiorità e “inferiorità” dell'arianesimo’. La difesa della razza 16 (20 June): 12–13.Google Scholar
Gregor, A. J. 2005. Mussolini's Intellectuals: Fascist Social and Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. 2018. Fascism: An Introduction to Comparative Fascist Studies. Cambridge, UK and Medford, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Guénon, R. 1937. La crisi del mondo moderno, translated by Evola, J.. Milan: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. T. 2002. ‘Introduction. Julius Evola's Political Endeavors’. In Men Among the Ruins: Postwar Reflections of a Radical Traditionalist by Evola, J., translated by Stucco, G. and edited by Moynihan, M., 57–589. Rochester, VT.: Inner Traditions (E-book).Google Scholar
Hedinger, D. 2017. ‘The Spectacle of Global Fascism: The Italian Blackshirt Mission to Japan's Asian Empire’. Modern Asian Studies 51 (6): 1999–2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, R. 2015. The Fascist Effect: Japan and Italy, 1915–1952. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hofmann, R. and Hedinger, D.. 2017. ‘Editorial – Axis Empires: Towards a Global History of Fascist Imperialism’. Journal of Global History 12 (2): 161–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobel, M. and Puccini, S.. 1991. ‘L'etnologia alla deriva: il caso Montandon’. La Ricerca Folklorica 24: 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, G. 2015. ‘Racism under Negotiation: The Japanese Race in the Nazi-German Perspective’. In Race and Racism in Modern East Asia: Interactions, Nationalism, Gender and Lineage, edited by Kowner, R. and Demel, W., 217–241. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Krebs, G. 2017. ‘German Perspectives on Japanese Heroism during the Nazi Era’. In Mutual Perceptions and Images in Japanese-German Relations 1860–2010, edited by Saaler, S., Akira, K. and Nobuo, T., 327–348. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Kreiner, J. 1990. ‘Changing Images: Japan and the Ainu as Perceived by Europe’. In Rethinking Japan: Social Sciences, Ideology & Thought, edited by Boscaro, A., Gatti, F. and Raveri, M., 134–145. Folkestone, UK: Japan Library.Google Scholar
Kreiner, J. 1999. ‘The European Image of the Ainu as Reflected in Museum Collections’. In Ainu Spirit of a Northern People, edited by Fitzhugh, W. and Dubreuil, C., 125–131. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Landra, G. 1939a. ‘L'ologenesi del Rosa’. La difesa della razza 2 (10) (20 March): 11–14.Google Scholar
Landra, G. 1939b. ‘La razza italiana nella teoria dell'ologenesi’. La difesa della razza 2 (11) (5 April): 11Google Scholar
Landra, G. 1940. ‘Gli studi di G. Montandon sulla preistoria del Giappone’. La difesa della razza 20 (4) (December): 12–14.Google Scholar
Levin, M. G. 1963. Ethnic Origins of the Peoples of Northeastern Asia. Published for the Arctic Institute of North America by University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Maraini, F. 1942. Gli Iku-Bashui degli Ainu, Tokyo: Istituto di Cultura Italiana di TokyoGoogle Scholar
Maraini, F. 2001. Gli ultimi pagani: appunti di viaggio di un etnologo poeta, Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Miyake, T. 2018. ‘Il Giappone Made in Italy: civiltà, nazione, razza nell'orientalismo italiano’. In Orizzonti giapponesi: ricerche, idee, prospettive, edited by Cestari, M., Coci, G., Moro, D. and Specchio, A., 607–627. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
Montandon, G. 1927. Au pays des Aïnou. Exploration anthropologique. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Montandon, G. 1929. Enciclopedia italiana di scienze, lettere e arti, 33. Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Montandon, G. 1937. La civilisation Aïnou et les cultures arctiques. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Nitobe, I. (1917) 1940. Bushido: l'anima del Giappone; traduzione dal testo inglese di B. Balbi. Naples: Casa editrice italo-cino-giapponese.Google Scholar
Orbach, D. 2017. ‘Colonialism through the Mirror: Japan in the Eyes of the SS and the German Conservative Resistance’. In Mutual Perceptions and Images in Japanese-German Relations 1860–2010, edited by Saaler, S., Akira, K. and Nobuo, T., 349–366. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Patriarca, S. and Deplano, V.. 2018. ‘Nation, “Race”, and Racisms in Twentieth-Century Italy’. Modern Italy 23 (4): 349–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendas, D. O., Roseman, M. and Wetzell, R.F.. 2017. ‘Introduction’. In Beyond the Racial State: Rethinking Nazi Germany, edited by Pendas, D.O., Roseman, M. and Wetzell, R.F., 1–28. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piana, F. 2016. ‘The Dangers of “Going Native”: George Montandon in Siberia and the International Committee of the Red Cross, 1919–1922’. Contemporary European History 25 (2): 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savino, G. 2015. ‘From Evola to Dugin: The Neo-Eurasianist Connection in Italy’. Eurasianism and the European Far Right: Reshaping the Europe-Russia Relationship, edited by Laruelle, M., 97–124. Lanham, MD and New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Scaligero, M. 1941. ‘Fronte unico ario’. La difesa della razza 8 (February): 21–24.Google Scholar
Spang, C.W. 2006. ‘Karl Haushofer Re-Examined: Geopolitics as a Factor of Japanese-German Rapprochement in the Inter-War Years?’ In Japanese-German Relations, 1895–1945: War, Diplomacy and Public Opinion, edited by Spang, C.W. and Wippich, R.-H., 139–157. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spengler, O. 1957. Il tramonto dell'Occidente: lineamenti di una morfologia della storia mondiale, translated by Evola, J.. Milan: Longanesi.Google Scholar
Tosti, A. 1940. ‘Razza giapponese’. La difesa della razza 1 (November): 21–25.Google Scholar
Vlora, A.K. 1942. ‘La razza giapponese’. La difesa della razza 23 (October): 7–11.Google Scholar