Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:05:05.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dossettiani and the Concept of the Secular State in the Constitutional Debates: 1946–7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Gino Bedani
Gino Bedani*
Affiliation:
Department of Italian, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

It is now generally accepted that the members of the Constituent Assembly who were charged with drafting the Constitution concentrated their efforts on formulating the ideals to be expressed in it at the expense of the institutional arrangements of the new Republic. This has generally been viewed as resulting from a combination of two factors: their weak grasp of the liberal principles underpinning liberal parliamentary democracy, and a concomitant error of judgement in assuming that sufficient stress on the ideals of the Constitution would guarantee the basis of a healthy democracy. This article sets out to examine the input of the most influential Catholic group, the dossettiani, and argues, against the error of judgement thesis, that in fact their rejection of the concept of the secular state was a more fundamental denial of important principles of a pluralist democracy than has usually been supposed. The article also places their contribution within the context of the Church's aim to create a ‘Christian civilization’, and further suggests that the model of Catholic Action which inspired its collateral vision of Catholic forces was corrosive of a pluralist vision of correct institutional arrangements. The article ends by suggesting that these factors may have weighed more heavily on subsequent distortions of Italian democracy than has so far been supposed.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , 1996 , pp. 3 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

∗ For an explanation of terms marked with an asterisk please refer to the preceding glossary.Google Scholar

1 ‘Il fantasma della costituente’, la Repubblica, 15 February 1996, p. 4.Google Scholar

2 Romeo, G. A., La stagione costituente in Italia (1943–47), Franco Angeli, Milan, 1992, pp. 8–9. Romeo also raises the question of the extent to which the section dealing with the institutions and organization of the Republic was of secondary importance to the Communists and Socialists as part of the ‘superstructure’ of society.Google Scholar

3 See Scoppola, P., La repubblica dei partiti, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1991, pp. 161–207.Google Scholar

4 In this respect, the relatively more secular Sturzian tradition represented by the Christian Democrat leader De Gasperi was not so attuned to developments in Catholic social teaching, and was largely marginalized among Catholic intellectuals by the late 1930s. For more detailed accounts of these developments see Pombeni, P., Il gruppo dossettiano e la fondazione della democrazia italiana (1938–1948), Il Mulino, Bologna, 1979, pp. 152ff, and Giovagnoli, A., La cultura democristiana. Tra chiesa cattolica e identità italiana 1918–1948, Laterza, Bari-Rome, 1991, pp. 211ff. See also Scoppola's illuminating observations in La ‘nuova cristianità’ perduta, Edizioni Studium, Rome, 1986, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar

5 Romeo, , La stagione costituente in Italia, p. 215.Google Scholar

6 Traniello, F., Città dell'uomo. Cattolici, partito e stato nella storia d'Italia, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1990, p. 249.Google Scholar

7 For a comprehensive account of these tensions, see Pollard, J.F., The Vatican and Italian Fascism, 1929–32. A Study in Conflict, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 For these developments in the strategic thinking of the papacy see Moro, R., La formazione della classe dirigente cattolica (1929–1937), Il Mulino, Bologna, 1979, pp. 110 ff.Google Scholar

9 Ibid, pp. 110–111.Google Scholar

10 The membership of Catholic Action grew from 2,156,000 in 1938 to 2,774,719 in 1941.Google Scholar

11 Giovagnoli, A., La cultura democristiana, p. 134. The author proceeds, however, to discuss De Gasperi's reservations regarding the Church's role in politics.Google Scholar

12 For an exploration of the importance of this historical link, and the distinctiveness of Italian Catholicism, see Bedani, G., Church and State in Italian History. Origins of the Present Crisis, Inaugural lecture, University College of Swansea, 1994.Google Scholar

13 See Di Nolfo, E., Le paure e le speranze degli Italiani (1943–1953), Mondadori, Milan, 1986, p. 209.Google Scholar

14 Giovagnoli, , La cultura democristiana, pp. 82 and 182–183. See also Scoppola's illuminating observations in La ‘nuova cristianità’ perduta, pp. 41–47.Google Scholar

15 For a discussion of the emergence among Italian Catholic intellectuals of an ecclesiology stressing the laity's role in establishing Christian values in a rapidly secularizing world see Moro, , La formazione della classe dirigente cattolica, pp. 526–550.Google Scholar

16 Moro, R., ‘I movimenti intellettuali cattolici’, in Cultura politica e partiti nell'età della Costituente, ed. Ruffilli, R., 2 vols, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1979, I, pp. 159–261 (p. 225).Google Scholar

17 Romeo, , La stagione costituente in Italia, p. 139. For confirmation of this from La Pira's private correspondence see La casa comune, una costituzione per l'uomo, ed. U. De Siervo, Cultura Editrice, Florence, 1979, pp. 47–48.Google Scholar

18 Moro, Aldo, Cultura e impegno politico, Edizioni Studium, Rome, 1992, p. 37.Google Scholar

19 Scoppola has noted how the activity of these intellectuals ‘nevertheless remains within the cultural horizons dominated by the figure of the Pope’ (La ‘nuova cristianità’ perduta, p. 46), whose theological influence is visible well beyond Article 7 of the Constitution to which Scoppola points.Google Scholar

20 In this regard the papal Christmas radio messages of 1942 and 1944 were interpreted by the dossettiani as confirmation of the view of democracy ‘as the formal system of state sanctioned by natural law’, Pombeni, , Il gruppo dossettiano e la fondazione della democrazia italiana, p. 123. See Dossetti's ‘Il problema della democrazia’ in Giuseppe Dossetti, Costituzione e Resistenza, Sapere 2000, Rome, 1995, pp. 63–68, written in 1945, where he outlines his conception of ‘a true democracy based on the unchanging principles of natural law and revealed truths’ (p. 68). For an analysis of the factors which contributed to giving the dossettiani a unique position of influence on the Catholic side see Moro, R., ‘I movimenti intellettuali cattolici’, pp. 166ff. Google Scholar

21 See La Costituzione della Repubblica net lavori preparatori della Assemblea Costituente, 8 vols, Camera dei Deputati, Rome, 1970, I, pp. 313–324.Google Scholar

22 For a comprehensive exposition of these views see La Pira's own Premesse della politica, LEF, Florence, 1945, pp. 109ff.Google Scholar

23 La Costituzione della Repubblica nei lavori preparatori, I, p. 322–323.Google Scholar

24 Ibid., p. 324.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., I, p. 318.Google Scholar

26 La Pira, G., Premesse della politica, pp. ix and xii.Google Scholar

27 For a detailed account of the policy statements produced by these bodies see Casella, M., Cattolici e Costituente. Orientamenti e iniziative del cattolicesimo organizzato (1945–1947), Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Naples, 1987, pp. 287–355. These activities were buttressed by the whole range of Catholic reviews and newspapers: see Ruffilli, R. (ed.), Costituente e lotta politica. La stampa e le scelte costituzionali, Vallecchi, Florence, 1978.Google Scholar

28 See, for example, Dossetti's arguments (La Costituzione della Repubblica nei lavori preparatori, VI, pp. 633–634), and those of La Pira (Ibid., p. 655 and Ibid., I, p. 315) against their interlocutors from the ‘area laica’∗. The integration of democracy into the new giusnaturalismo led Moro to present ‘the family […] as a limit on the state, not in the normal sense of the word, but as the guarantee of democracy itself (p. 635).Google Scholar

29 Ibid., VI, pp. 375 and 655–660.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., pp. 632–633.Google Scholar

31 La Pira, , ibid., p. 503. See also pp. 505–507 with speeches by Moro. See also VIII, p. 2110. The speeches are interesting for illustrating the more nuanced approach of the dossettiani by comparison with traditionalists like Mastrojanni (not in the DC) who insists on women's ‘natural’ place in the home and Corsanego, who insists more doggedly on the husband's role as ‘head’ of the family (ibid., II, p. 1147).Google Scholar

32 Ibid., I, p. 549.Google Scholar

33 La Pira, , ibid., VI, p. 147.Google Scholar

34 Dossetti, , Costituzione e Resistenza, p. 116.Google Scholar

35 See La Pira's, last-ditch attempt to revive the question, La Costituzione della Repubblica nei lavori preparatori, V, pp. 4589–4590. For the text of the guidelines see Casella, , Cattolici e Costituente, pp. 297–298.Google Scholar

36 La Costituzione della Repubblica nei lavori preparatori, VI, p. 805.Google Scholar

37 Ibid.Google Scholar

38 See ibid., pp. 167, 333 and 810; and the speech of Aldo Moro, ibid., I, pp. 368–374, especially pp. 373–374.Google Scholar

39 Fanfani, A., ‘Storia dei primi tre articoli della Costituzione’, Humanitas, a.I, 1947, pp. 422–425 (p. 425).Google Scholar

40 La Pira autobiografico. Pagine antologiche, ed. Mazzei, F., Società Editrice Internazionale, Turin, 1994, p. 57.Google Scholar

41 See my ‘Pluralism, Integralism and the Framing of the Republican Constitution in Italy: the Role of the Catholic Left’, in Sguardi sull'Italia, forthcoming, to be published by Italian Studies .Google Scholar

42 La Pira, , La Costituzione della Repubblica nei lavori preparatori, I, p. 318.Google Scholar

43 Moro, A., Al di là della politica e altri scritti. ‘Studium’ 1942–1952, Edizioni Studium, Rome, 1982, p. 121. See also his short article ‘Riforme di struttura e rinnovamento interiore’, ibid., pp. 317–318, where he stresses the futility of structural reforms without a renewal of spiritual values. This rejection of the Sturzian tradition of the weak state was, of course, supported by orthodox developments in Catholic social teaching derived from Pius XI's encyclical Quadragesimo Anno, where state intervention was given strong approval.Google Scholar

44 Dossetti, , La Costituzione della Repubblica nei lavori preparatori, I, p. 551. See also La Pira, , ibid., VI, pp. 720–721. This refers to the agreement to include the Lateran Pacts in the Constitution.Google Scholar

45 La Pira, , ibid., I, p. 322.Google Scholar

46 Ibid., p. 323.Google Scholar

47 Moro, , ibid., VI, p. 147.Google Scholar

48 Ibid., p. 792.Google Scholar

49 Moro, , Al di là della politica, p. 293.Google Scholar

50 See also Guido Gonella's report to the DC's National Congress in Rome in April 1946, where he defends the concept of a ‘Stato cristiano’ against that of the ‘Stato laico’, and adds: ‘The Christian ethic, after conquering people's private lives and consciences, must finally conquer public life’, Dai congressi DC dell'Italia liberata (1943–1944) alla prima assise nazionale (1946), ed. Danè, C., DC-Spes, Rome, 1986, pp. 154–186 (p. 162).Google Scholar

51 There were, however, for a brief period, some openings in this direction in the Osservatore Romano between 1943 and 1946, which included discussion among Catholics of the difference between the concepts of ‘laicità’ and ‘laicismo’. But such openings were unrepresentative and overshadowed by the insistence on the rejection of secularization, the first cause of the crisis of civilization, and on the affirmation of religion as providing the ‘most important elements of public life’. Freedom of conscience, moreover, was clearly defined as approving of tolerance towards individuals but decisively not ‘the coexistence of different beliefs’. See Long, G., Alle origini del pluralismo confessionale. Il dibattito sulla libertà religiosa nell'età della Costituente, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1990, pp. 224–225.Google Scholar

52 Moro, , Al di là della politica, p. 203.Google Scholar

53 Fanfani, A., ‘Prospettive di sviluppo democratico’, in Malgeri, F. (ed.), Storia della Democrazia Cristiana, 3 vols, Edizioni Cinque Lune, Rome, 1987–88, m, pp. 427–472 (p. 461).Google Scholar

54 See his articles, written in 1955, now contained in Sturzo, L., Politica di questi anni. Consensi e critiche (dal gennaio 1954 al dicembre 1956), Zanichelli, Bologna, 1968, especially pp. 198–203 and 259.Google Scholar

55 See Fontana, S., Il destino politico dei cattolici, Mondadori, Milan, 1995, pp. 26ff, where the author discusses the corrosive influence of Dossetti in relation to the notion of the ‘neutral’ state, and Fanfani's role, after De Gasperi's death, in transporting ‘at the level of organization and statutes the Dossettian idea of the party’ into the service of ‘the historical project of a new Christianity’ (p. 27).Google Scholar