Article contents
Institutional and industrial changes in the Italian South: the case of Brindisi
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 January 2016
Summary
This article proposes an institutionalist reading of the processes of industrial and employment change taking place in the clothing industry in Brindisi, Italy, during the 1990s. In contrast to more orthodox economic interpretations that focus on the separation between the economy and institutions, this article assumes the centrality of institutions for an understanding of industrial and employment performances and their change over time. Institutions profoundly affect the pursuit of the objectives of profit and efficiency in that they influence the definition of what can be considered as rational in a given institutional configuration and compatible with the values that a given society holds as socially and economically legitimate.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy
References
Notes
1. Bruno, Michael and Sachs, Jeoffrey, Economics of Worldwide Stagflation , Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1985. Drèze, Jacques and Bean, Charles, Europe's Unemployment Problem, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., 1991. Grossman, Sanford and Hart, Oliver, ‘Implicit Contracts, Moral Hazard, and Unemployment’, American Economic Review, 71, 2, 1991, pp. 301–7.Google Scholar
2. Jevons, , Menger and Walras are traditionally considered as the authors of the ‘marginalist revolution’ that, by redefining the theory of value of the classical economists, made the economy a theory of choices entirely detached from institutional variables. Such a position much be distinguished from that put forward by the new insitutionalism. Although conceiving an initial state of nature without any institutions, this strand of literature holds that the definition of institutional arrangements is necessary in order to facilitate market interaction and to strengthen efficiency in an economic system affected by transaction costs linked to uncertainty and lack of information. See Coase, Ronald, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica , 4, 1937, pp. 386–405. Williamson, Oliver, Le istituzioni economiche del capitalismo, F. Angeli, Milan, 1988.Google Scholar
3. OECD, Employment Outlook , Paris, 1997 and 1999. Artis, Michael, ‘The Unemployment Problem’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 3, 1998, pp. 98–109. Jackman, Richard, Wage Setting Behaviour in a Monetary Union–A Role for the European Social Partnerships, paper presented at the conference of the National Bank of Austria, Vienna 10–11 June 1999.Google Scholar
4. Marx, Karl, Il capitale , Riuniti, Rome, 1977. Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation, Beacon Paperback, Boston, 1944.Google Scholar
5. Costabile, Lilia, ‘Institutions, Social Custom and Efficiency Wage Models: Alternative Approaches’, Cambridge Journal of Economics , 19, 5, 1995, pp. 605–23.Google Scholar
6. Martin, Ron, ‘Institutional Approaches in Economic Geography’, in Sheppard, Eric and Barnes, Trevor (ed.), A Companion to Economic Geography , Blackwell, Oxford, 2000, pp. 77–94.Google Scholar
7. Svimez (Associazione per lo sviluppo dell'industria nel Mezzogiorno), Gli investimenti industriali agevolati nel Mezzogiorno, 1951–1968 , Giuffrè, Milan, 1971.Google Scholar
8. Hodgson defines institutions as ‘way[s] of thought or action of some prevalence and permanence, which [are] embedded in the habits of a group or the customs of a people. They are formal (e.g. rules, laws and organizations) as well as informal or tacit (e.g. habits, routines, etc.)’. Hodgson, Geoffrey, ‘The Approach to Institutional Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature , 36, 1, 1998, pp. 166–92.Google Scholar
9. Granovetter, Mark, ‘The Strength of the Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology , 78, 6, 1973, pp. 1360–80, and ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3, 1985, pp. 481-510.Google Scholar
10. Powell, Walter and DiMaggio, Paul, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Trigilia, Carlo, Sociologia Economica , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1998.Google Scholar
12. Aglietta, Micheal, Theory of Capitalist Regulation , Calmann-Levy, London, 1979. Boyer, Robert, ‘Labour Institutions and Economic Growth: A Survey and a “Regulationist” Approach’, Labour, 7, 1993, pp. 25–72. Boyer, Robert, The Search for Labour Market Flexibility, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Salais, Robert, ‘Flexibilité et conventions du travail: une approche’, Economie Appliquée , 44, 2, 1991, pp. 5–32. Salais, Robert, ‘Labour Conventions, Economic Fluctuations and Flexibility’, in Storper, Michael and Scott, Alan (eds), Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development, Routledge, London, 1992, pp. 276–99. Storper, Michael and Salais, Robert, Worlds of Production, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1997.Google Scholar
14. Martin, Ron, ‘Institutional Approaches in Economic Geography’, in Sheppard, Eric and Barnes, Trevor (ed.), A Companion to Economic Geography , Blackwell, Oxford, 2000, pp. 77–94.Google Scholar
15. Hine, David, Governing Italy: The Politics of Bargained Pluralism , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
16. Martinelli, Flavia, The Governance of Post-War Development and Policy in Southern Italy: Notes for a Critical Reappraisal , paper presented at the Second European Urban and Regional Studies Conference, 17–20 September 1998, University of Durham, UK.Google Scholar
17. Ibid. Google Scholar
18. Mingione, Enzo, ‘Italy: The Resurgence of Regionalism’, International Affairs , 69, 1993, pp. 305–18.Google Scholar
19. Ginsborg, Paul, L'Italia del tempo presente , Einaudi, Turin, 1998.Google Scholar
20. Diamanti, Ilvo, Il Male del Nord: Lega, localismo, secessione , Donzelli, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar
21. Viesti, Gianfranco, ‘Cosa succede nell'economia del Mezzogiorno? Le trasformazioni 1990–1995’, Meridiana , 26–27, 1996, pp. 91–130.Google Scholar
22. Del Monte, Alfredo, Istituzioni, intervento pubblico e sviluppo del Mezzogiorno , ISPE, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar
23. Viesti, , ‘Cosa succede’, pp. 91–130.Google Scholar
24. IRI–Institute for Industrial Reconstruction, and ENI–National Hydrocarbon Board.Google Scholar
25. It should be remembered that state-controlled enterprises were obliged to locate at least 40 per cent of their total investments and 60 per cent of new investments in the South.Google Scholar
26. Ginsborg, Paul, Italy and its Discontents , Allen Lane, London, 2001, p. 298.Google Scholar
27. Il Sole-24-Ore, Libro Bianco sul Lavoro , 2002.Google Scholar
28. These countries have changed the world geography of production and consumption in that, on the one hand, they have strengthened their own indigenous industries while, on the other, they have become preferred locations for Western producers who compete on the basis of lower labour costs.Google Scholar
29. Armstrong, Harvey and Taylor, Jim, Regional Economics and Policy , Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 1993.Google Scholar
30. Istat, , Censimento intermedio dell'industria , Istat, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar
31. Capriati, Michele, Il settore del tessile-abbigliamento nel Mezzogiorno , Rapporto per Artigianform, 1995.Google Scholar
32. The importance of the sector would increase if it were possible to quantify those working in it unofficially.Google Scholar
33. di Brindisi, Provincia, Sviluppo ed innovazione dell'economia agricola e rurale attraverso l'integrazione e la diversificazione produttiva , PIT, No. 8, 2000.Google Scholar
34. di Commercio, Camera, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Brindisi, La congiuntura economica in provincia di Brindisi , 1999.Google Scholar
35. As stated, precise data on employment/unemployment in the submerged economy of the industry is not available. Istat, , Censimento intermedio dell'industria , Istat, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar
36. Perrucci, Robert, ‘Embedded Corporatism’, The Sociological Quarterly , 35, 3, 1994, pp. 487–506. Usui, Chikako and Colignon, Richard, ‘Corporate Restructuring: Converging World Pattern or Societally Specific Embeddedness?’, The Sociological Quarterly, 37, 4, 1996, pp. 551–78. Powell, and DiMaggio, , The New Institutionalism. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Interview held in Francavilla Fontana (Brindisi), May 1999.Google Scholar
38. Schoenberger, Erica, The Cultural Crisis of the Firm , Blackwell, Oxford Mass., 1997, p. 120.Google Scholar
39. For example, as explained by the owner of one company: ‘The workers have strange ideas. This area has no credibility at all on the wider clothing market and this is all the fault of the unions. They have consistently raised their voices against the poorer local enterprises but they haven't appreciated that the big firms, above all those in the North East, have maintained production for years on the back of an irregular workforce.’ Interview held in Francavilla Fontana (Brindisi), May 1999.Google Scholar
40. Interview held in Latiano (Brindisi), May 1999.Google Scholar
41. Interview held in Ceglie Messapica (Brindisi), June 1999.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by