Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:04:50.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heresy and heroics: The debate on the alleged ‘crisis’ in Italian industrial design around 1960

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Kjetil Fallan
Kjetil Fallan*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the course of the 1950s, Italian industrial design underwent a period of professionalisation and rose to international fame under the banners of ‘Made in Italy’ and ‘la linea italiana’. Seen in retrospect, Italian design retained this position during the 1960s, with the onset of avant-garde ‘pop-design’ and ‘anti-design’. Yet this future development was by no means a given in the Italian design community at the turn of the decade. At this crucial moment, between the rationality of the first postwar period and the playfulness of the second, allegations of a ‘crisis’ in Italian industrial design raised a storm in the professional community for a brief period around 1960. This article analyses this heated debate, focusing on its most pronounced manifestation: the discussions in the Associazione per il Disegno Industriale (ADI) and the design magazine Stile Industria following the jury's decision to withhold the Gran Premio Nazionale Compasso d'Oro for 1959.

Keywords

Italian industrial designStile IndustriaCompasso d'OroAssociazione per il Disegno Industriale (ADI)
Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , August 2009 , pp. 257 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfieri, B. 1960. 1939–1959 appunti per una storia del disegno industriale in Italia. Stile Industria 7, no. 26–27: 3–28.Google Scholar
Anselmi, A.T. 1959. Compasso d'Oro 1959. Stile Industria 6, no. 24: 32–3, 40.Google Scholar
Anselmi, A.T. 1960a. Crisi del disegno o crisi del premio? Stile Industria 7, no. 26–27: xi–xii.Google Scholar
Anselmi, A.T. 1960b. La discussione all'ADI. Stile Industria 7, no. 26–7: xii–xiv.Google Scholar
Anselmi, A.T. 1960c. La nostra inchiesta. Stile Industria 7, no. 26–7: xiv–xxviii.Google Scholar
Anselmi, A.T. 1962a. Motociclette: Il dopomostra. Stile Industria 9, no. 36: 17–22.Google Scholar
Anselmi, A.T. 1962b. La Vespa verso il formalismo? Stile Industria 9, no. 40: xiii.Google Scholar
Banham, R. 1959. Neoliberty: The Italian retreat from modern architecture. Architectural Review 117, no. 4: 230–55.Google Scholar
Banham, R. 1960. Theory and design in the First Machine Age . London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Castronovo, V. 1980. L'industria italiana dall'ottocento a oggi . Milan: Oscar Mondadori.Google Scholar
Fallan, K. 2007. Modern transformed: The domestication of industrial design culture in Norway, c.1940–1970. , Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Frateili, E. 1989. Continuità e trasformazione: Una storia del design italiano, 1928–1988 . Milan: Greco.Google Scholar
Grassi, A., and Pansera, A.. 1984. Atlante del design italiano 1940/1980 . Milan: Fabbri.Google Scholar
Grassi, A., and Pansera, A.. 1986. L'Italia del design: Trent'anni di dibattito . Casale Monferrato: Marietti.Google Scholar
De Grazia, V. 2005. Irresistible empire: America's advance through twentieth-century Europe. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1987. Science in action . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Naylor, G. 1997. Theory and design: The Banham factor. The Ninth Reyner Banham Memorial Lecture. Journal of Design History 10, no. 3: 241–52.Google Scholar
Pansera, A. 1978. Storia e Cronaca della Triennale . Milan: Longanesi.Google Scholar
Pansera, A. 1993. Storia del disegno industriale italiano . Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Portoghesi, P. 1958. Dal neorealismo al neoliberty. Comunitá 13, no. 65: 78–9.Google Scholar
Rizzi, R., Steiner, A., and Origoni, F., eds. 1998. Design Italiano: Compasso d'Oro ADI . Zingonia: CLAC.Google Scholar
Rogers, E.N. 1946. Ricostruzione: Dall'oggetto d'uso alla città, Conferenza tenuta a Zurigo il 3 Novembre 1946 per invito dello Schweizerischer Werkbund. Domus 19, no. 215: 2–5.Google Scholar
Rosselli, A. 1954a. Stile Industria. Domus 27, no. 292: 82.Google Scholar
Rosselli, A. 1954b. ‘Industrial Design’ alla X Triennale. Stile Industria 1, no. 2: 2.Google Scholar
Rosselli, A. 1955. Helsingborg 55. Stile Industria 2, no. 5: 3–6.Google Scholar
Rosselli, A. 1957. Triennale Europea. Stile Industria 3, no. 13: 0–1.Google Scholar
Rosselli, A. 1959. Olivetti Diaspron 82. Stile Industria 6, no. 24: 16–18.Google Scholar
Sapelli, G. 1990. Le trasformazioni sociali e la differenziazione industriale. In Civiltá delle macchine: Tecnologie, prodotti, progetti, dell'industria meccanica italiana dalla ricostruzione all'Europa , ed. Castronovo, V. and Sapelli, G.. Milan: Fabbri.Google Scholar
Whiteley, N. 2002. Reyner Banham: Historian of the immediate future . Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wickman, K. 2003. Design olympics: The Milan triennials. In Scandinavian design behind the myth: Fifty years of design from the Nordic countries , ed. Halén, W. and Wickman, K.. Stockholm: Arvinius/Form.Google Scholar