Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T19:20:06.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Casa delle Libertà: A House of Cards?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Ilvo Diamanti  and
Elisa Lello
Ilvo Diamanti
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology, University of Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’, via Saffi 15, 61029 Urbino. E-mail: [email protected]
Elisa Lello
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology, University of Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’, via Saffi 15, 61029 Urbino. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Italian centre-right was ‘constructed’ by Silvio Berlusconi in the run-up to the 1994 general election, which marked the beginning of the Second Republic. It includes Forza Italia, the National Alliance, the Northern League and the Union of Christian Democrats (UDC), parties which are all very different in terms of their political identities, histories, geographies and social composition. The centre-right thus looks like a complex mosaic, whose pieces stay together only thanks to the role of the leader and his ‘personal party’, Forza Italia, and to the use of the media and political marketing to communicate with the electorate. These are the twin pillars of ‘the Berlusconi model’. This article contends that Berlusconi represents both a resource and a limit for the centre-right, as it is difficult for such a heterogeneous coalition to define a common identity and pursue coherent political projects and policies while relying so heavily on the role of the leader. This explains the cyclical alternation within the coalition of phases of integration and rapprochement with others of tension and open conflict. Since the coalition's election victory in 2001, it has found it difficult to meet the contrasting demands of its diverse electorate for neo-liberalism, devolution, major public works, infrastructure creation and tax cuts. This task has been made more problematic by the international instability and economic stagnation of recent years. This article puts forward the hypothesis that ‘the Berlusconi model’, which gave life to the centre-right, now appears to be worn out and will prove difficult to revive.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 10 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Italy under Berlusconi , May 2005 , pp. 9 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. On the effects of electoral reform on the party system, see Sartori, Giovanni, Come sbagliare le riforme , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1995 and, by the same author, ‘Il sistema elettorale resta cattivo’, in Pasquino, Gianfranco (ed.), Dall'Ulivo al governo Berlusconi: le elezioni del 13 maggio 2001 e il sistema politico italiano, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2002, pp. 107–15; see also Agosta, Antonio, ‘Maggioritario e proporzionale’, in Diamanti, Ilvo and Mannheimer, Renato (eds), Milano a Roma: Guida all'Italia elettorale del 1994, Donzelli, Rome, 1994, pp. 15–27; Melchionda, Enrico, ‘L'alternanza prevista: La competizione nei collegi uninominali’, in Pasquino, Gianfranco (ed.), Dall'Ulivo al governo Berlusconi: le elezioni del 13 maggio 2001 e il sistema politico italiano, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2002, pp. 23–105; D'Alimonte, Roberto and Bartolini, Stefano (eds), Maggioritario finalmente? La transizione elettorale 1994–2001, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2002; Bartolini, Stefano, Chiaramonte, Alessandro and D'Alimonte, Roberto, ‘The Italian Party System between Parties and Coalitions’, West European Politics, 27, 1, January 2004, pp. 1–19; Sanchez, Omar, ‘An Open-Ended Transition: The Effects of Electoral Reform in Italy’, Journal of European Area Studies, 10, 2, 2002, pp. 259–81. For a comparative analysis of the changes in the political class with other countries, see Best, Heinrich and Cotta, Maurizio, Parliamentary Representatives in Europe, 1848–2000: Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.Google Scholar

2. The 81/93 Law introduced direct elections for the posts of Mayor and Provincial President. The 1/99 Law brought in directly elected Regional Presidents. The 277/93 Law reformed the electoral system for the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate.Google Scholar

3. By way of comparison, see also the comments on this topic by Pasquino, Gianfranco, La transizione a parole , Bologna, il Mulino, 2000.Google Scholar

4. On the transformations in the relationships between citizens and political parties in the transition to the ‘Second Republic’, see Bardi, Luciano and Morlino, Leonardo, ‘Italy: Tracing the Roots of the Great Transformation’, in Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter (eds), How Parties Organize: Adaptation and Change in Western Democracies , London, Sage, 1994, pp. 242–77; Morlino, Leonardo, ‘The Three Phases of Italian Parties’, in Diamond, Larry and Gunther, Richard (eds), Political Parties and Democracy, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 2001, pp. 109–42. For further analysis of the Italian ‘transition’ and the elections which accompanied it, see Ignazi, Piero and Katz, Richard S. (eds), Italian Politics: The Year of the Tycoon, Westview Press, Oxford, 1996; Gangemi, Giuseppe and Riccamboni, Gianni (eds), Le elezioni della transizione, Utet, Turin, 1997; Donovan, Mark, ‘A Second Republic for Italy?’, Political Studies Review, 1, 1, 2003, pp. 18–33.Google Scholar

5. This term was coined by Ignazi, Piero in Il polo escluso: profilo del Movimento Sociale Italiano , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1989; see also Ignazi, Piero, Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003 and Tarchi, Marco, Dal MSI ad AN, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1997.Google Scholar

6. Between the end of 1994 when the Northern League left the first Berlusconi government, thus bringing it down, and 2000, the League was not part of Berlusconi's alliance system.Google Scholar

7. Diamanti, Ilvo, ‘La politica come marketing’, Micromega , 2, 1994, pp. 60–77.Google Scholar

8. For an analysis of the organizational model of Italia, Forza, see Poli, Emanuela, Forza Italia. Struttura, Leadership e radicamento territoriale , Il Mulino, Bologna, 2001; Paolucci, Caterina, ‘Forza Italia: un non-parti aux portes de la victoire’, Critique Internationale, 10, January 2001, pp. 12–20; Golia, C., Dentro Forza Italia. Organizzazione e militanza, Marsilio, Venice, 1997; Galdo, Antonio, Saranno potenti? Storia, declino e nuovi protagonisti della classe dirigente italiana , Sperling, & Kupfer, Milan, 2003. Galdo quotes a number of interesting and important remarks by Dell'Utri, Marcello, the influential and controversial Publitalia manager and advisor to Berlusconi.Google Scholar

9. See respectively Calise, Mauro, Il partito personale , Laterza, Rome–Bari, 2000 and Panebianco, Angelo, ‘Partiti di massa, formula vuota’, Corriere della Sera, 20 June 1994.Google Scholar

10. The AN was created in the run-up to the 1994 elections between the MSI and smaller groups and individuals on the Right. In 1995, the MSI dissolved into the AN with only the hardliners, led by Rauti, Pino, remaining outside.Google Scholar

11. On the persistence of, and differences in, the Left-Right cleavage after 1994, see the comments by Ricolfi, Marco, ‘Ancora destra e sinistra?’, Polena , 1, 2004, pp. 9–39.Google Scholar

12. The paradoxical relationship between ‘old’ and ‘new’ in Italian politics is discussed in Mastropaolo, Alfio, Antipolitica: alle origini della crisi italiana , L'Ancora, Naples, 2000. Regarding the mix of old and new in FI, see Farrell, Joseph, ‘Berlusconi and Forza Italia: New Force for Old?’, Modern Italy, 1, 1, 1995, pp. 40–52 and MacCarthy, Patrick, ‘Forza Italia: the New Politics and Old Values of a Changing Italy’, in Gundle, Stephen and Parker, Simon (eds), The New Italian Republic: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi, Routledge, London, 1996, pp. 130–46.Google Scholar

13. As emphasised by Nevola, Gaspare, ‘Strategie in campagna elettorale: Il caso delle elezioni del 1994’, in Gangemi, Giuseppe and Riccamboni, Gianni (eds), Le elezioni della transizione: Il sistema politico italiano alla prova del voto 1994–1996 , Utet, Turin, 1997, pp. 97–122; Rodriguez, Mario, ‘La comunicazione politica’, in Diamanti, Ilvo and Mannheimer, Renato, (eds), Milano a Roma: Guida all'Italia elettorale del 1994, Donzelli, Rome, 1994, pp. 135–42; Guizzardi, Gustavo, ‘Messaggi e immagini’, in Diamanti, Ilvo and Mannheimer, Renato (eds) Milano a Roma: Guida all'Italia elettorale del 1994, Donzelli, Rome, 1994, pp. 143–50; Cartocci, Roberto, ‘Voto, valori e religione’, in Caciagli, Mario and Corbetta, Piergiorgio (eds), Le ragioni dell'elettore: Perché ha vinto il centro-destra nelle elezioni italiane del 2001, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2003, pp. 165–201.Google Scholar

14. The Italian electoral law was dubbed the ‘Mattarellum’ by Giovanni Sartori, in Come sbagliare. It took its name from the President of the Parliamentary Commission which had devised it, Sergio Mattarella.Google Scholar

15. Diamanti, Ilvo, Bianco, rosso, verde…e azzurro: Mappe e colori dell'Italia politica , Il Mulino, Bologna, 2003.Google Scholar

16. See the data from the LaPolis 2004 research project in Tables 5 and 6.Google Scholar

17. See Diamanti, Ilvo, La Lega: Geografia, storia e sociologia di un nuovo soggetto politico , Donzelli, Rome, 1993; Diamanti, Ilvo, Il male del Nord, Donzelli, Rome, 1996; Diamanti, Ilvo, Bianco, rosso, verde; On the different territorial models of development, see Bagnasco, Arnaldo, Tre Italie: la problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1977. The models of sociopolitical regulation in industrial districts are discussed in Sivini, Giordano, ‘Socialisti e cattolici in Italia: Dalla società allo Stato’, in Sivini, Giordano (ed.), Sociologia dei partiti politici, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1971, pp. 71–104; Trigilia, Carlo, Le subculture politiche territoriali, Milan, Feltrinelli, 1981 and Trigilia, Carlo, Grandi partiti, piccole imprese, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1986. Also see the analysis by Messina, Patrizia, Regolazione politica dello sviluppo locale: Veneto ed Emilia Romagna a confronto, Turin, Utet, 2001.Google Scholar

18. Diamanti, , La Lega and Il Male del Nord ; note also the data from the LaPolis 2004 research project cited in Tables 5 and 6.Google Scholar

19. Diamanti, , Bianco, rosso, verde. Google Scholar

20. The different profiles of FI voters in the north and south are constructed according to data from the Italian National Election Studies (ITANES) research project conducted by the Istituto Carlo Cattaneo in Bologna. Data from 3,209 interviews was collated in May and June 2001. See Diamanti, Bianco, rosso, verde and ITANES, Perché ha vinto il centro-destra , Il Mulino, Bologna, 2001. See also Table 5.Google Scholar

21. These observations are also based on the ITANES research project.Google Scholar

22. Sartori, Giovanni, ‘Il sistema elettorale resta cattivo’, in Pasquino, (ed.), Dall'Ulivo al governo Berlusconi , pp. 107–15.Google Scholar

23. See ITANES, Perché ha vinto il centro-destra ; Pasquino, Gianfranco, ‘Berlusconi's Victory: The Italian General Elections of 2001’, South European Society and Politics , 6, 1, 2001, pp. 125–37; Pasquino, , Dall'Ulivo al governo Berlusconi ; Caciagli, and Corbetta, , Le ragioni dell'elettore. Google Scholar

24. Diamanti, Ilvo and Mannheimer, Renato, ‘Le basi sociali del voto: la frattura che attraversa i ceti medi’, in Caciagli, and Corbetta, , Le ragioni dell'elettore , pp. 139–63.Google Scholar

25. ITANES, Perché ha vinto il centro-destra ; and Corbetta, Piergiorgio, ‘Forza Italia: il nuovo che non c'è’, il Mulino , 3, 2002, pp. 479–89.Google Scholar

26. As indicated by the surveys conducted by Ispo between 2001 and 2004, available at http://www.sondaggipoliticoelettorali.it. See also the statistics cited in recent years by the journal Political and Economic Trends: gli scenari evolutivi della politica e dell'economia. Google Scholar

27. See Sani, Giorgio, ‘Il fattore B’, in Caciagli, and Corbetta, , Le ragioni dell'elettore , pp. 275–99; Schadee, Hans M.A. and Segatti, Paolo, ‘Informazione politica, spazio elettorale ed elettori in movimento’ in Caciagli and Corbetta, Le ragioni dell'elettore, pp. 339–69. On the opinion climate during the electoral campaign, see Mancini, Paolo, ‘Agenda dei media e agenda degli elettori’, Comunicazione Politica, 1, 2002, pp. 31–50; and Marletti, Carlo, ‘Il ciclo dell'antipolitica e i risultati delle elezioni del 13 maggio in Italia: verso un nuovo clima d'opinione?’ Comunicazione Politica, 1, 2002, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar

28. Biorcio, Roberto, ‘Forza Italia, partito di riferimento’, il Mulino , 4, 2001, pp. 623–34.Google Scholar

29. For a critical account of the first years of the Berlusconi government, see Ariemma, Igino and Manichini, Stefano, Alla deriva: il fallimento della politica economica e sociale del governo Berlusconi , Editori Riuniti, Rome, 2003.Google Scholar

30. As revealed in recent surveys conducted by Demos-Eurisko, Ipsos and Ispo. See http://www.sondaggipoliticoelettorali.it Google Scholar

31. This expression was used to describe Berlusconi by Marco Follini, who became Secretary of the UDC after the party's leader, Pierferdinando Casini, was elected President of the Chamber of Deputies.Google Scholar

32. As regards the significance of recent European elections in Italy, see the comments by Feltrin, Paolo, ‘Un primo sguardo ai risultati delle elezioni europee del 2004 in Italia’, Polena , 2, 2004, pp. 9–28; Feltrin, Paolo and Fabrizio, Davide, ‘Le elezioni europee 2004: tipo di competizione, sistemi elettorali e offerta partitica’, Polena, 1, 2004, pp. 59–91. On the relationship between local elections and the general election in 2001, see Baldini, Gianfranco, ‘Tra locale e nazionale: voto comunale e voto politico’, in Caciagli and Corbetta, Le ragioni dell'elettore, pp. 407–36.Google Scholar

33. Poli, Emanuela, Forza Italia. Il Mulino, Bologna, 2001.Google Scholar

34. Diamanti, , Bianco, Rosso, verde. Google Scholar

35. The data presented here was collected by LaPolis (Università di Urbino) as part of a research project ‘Territorio, elezioni e società: dopo il 1994’ (‘Territory, elections and society since 1994’). The project was directed by Ilvo Diamanti and received funding from the Ministry for Education: University and Research (MIUR) in 2003 (for 2004–05) and was co-financed by the other universities participating in the project: Milano–Bicocca, Roma III and Salerno. The surveys cited here were performed during June–July 2004 and the interviews were conducted using the Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) method on a sample of 2,288 people representative of the adult Italian population in terms of gender, age and geopolitical area of residence. For further information on this research project, see http://www.uniurb.it/lapolis.Google Scholar

36. Schadee, and Segatti, ‘Informazione politica’; Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, La comunicazione politica , Il Mulino, Bologna, 2004; Sani, Giacomo, ‘Televisione e consensi elettorali: sette lezioni in forma di dialogo’, Comunicazione Politica, 1, 2004, pp. 73–105; Baldini, Gianfranco, Bucchi, Massimiano and Fava, Terenzio, ‘Comunicazione politica e decisione di voto: una ricerca sulle elezioni comunali del 1999’, in Sani, Giacomo (ed.), Mass Media ed elezioni, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2001, pp. 225–74.Google Scholar

37. See Telese's, Luca interview with Dell'Utri, Marcello in Il Giornale , 17 December 2004.Google Scholar