Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:27:05.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the ICF: Italian network strategies for job placement of persons with disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Fabio Corbisiero
Fabio Corbisiero*
Affiliation:
University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
*
∗Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Second National Conference on Disability, held in Bari in 2003, took the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), adopted by all WHO member states in 2001, as its frame of reference for future action and policies on disability. The ICF broke decisively with the medical model by seeing disability as an interaction between a biological and psychological condition and environmental and attitudinal barriers. Although existing Italian legislation on access to work for persons with disabilities, particularly Law 68/1999 on ‘collocamento mirato’ (targeted placement), anticipated some of the principles and definitions of the ICF, its implementation in practice was often snared in complex bureaucratic procedures and compromised by narrowly medical assessments of impairment and by considerable variations in standard from region to region. In 2009–2011 a pilot project, Progetto ICF4, was launched in 11 regions of Italy. It applied ICF principles, using Social Network Analysis (SNA) to assess the suitability of a work environment in terms of the networks of relations between the different actors involved in it. The way this has functioned in practice is illustrated by a case study of Teramo, one of the provinces in the pilot.

Keywords

ICFsocial modeltargeted placementSocial Network Analysisties
Type
Articles
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 19 , Issue 2: Disability rights and wrongs in Italy , May 2014 , pp. 199 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandt, E. N., and Pope, A. M., eds. 1997. Disability in America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. 1999. “A Working Social Model? Disability and Work in the 21st Century.” Paper presented at the Disability Studies Conference and Seminar, Apex International Hotel, Edinburgh, December 9.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S., Everett, M., and Freeman, L. 2002. Ucinet 6.0 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies. http://www.analytictech.com.Google Scholar
Crow, L. 1996. “Including All of our Lives: Renewing the Social Model Of Disability.” In Exploring the Divide, edited by Barnes, C., and Mercer, G., 55–72. Leeds: Disability Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020: A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Growth, COM(2010) 2020. Brussels: European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF Google Scholar
European Commission. 2007. Situation of Disabled People in the European Union: the European Action Plan 2008–9 COM(2007)738 final. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Ferrucci, F., ed. 2005. “Disabilità e politiche sociali.” Sociologia e politiche sociali 8:24–29.Google Scholar
Griffo, F., ed. 2007. “L'inclusione come strumento dei diritti umani.” In Dialogo interculturale, diritti umani e cittadinanza, edited by Mascia, Marco, 167–182. Padua: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Ministero del lavoro e della previdenza sociale. 2006. Terza relazione al Parlamento sullo stato di attuazione della legge 12 marzo 1999. no. 68 “Norme per il diritto al lavoro dei disabili. Anni 2004–2005.” Rome: Author.Google Scholar
Prinz, C. 2002. “Towards a Coherent Policy Mix.” Paper presented at Active Labour Market Policies for People with Disabilities, OECD, Brussels, July.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. 1890. Über sociale Differenzierung: sociologische und psychologische Untersuchungen (On Social Differentiation: Sociological and Psychological Investigations). Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
UN. 2006. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Method and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WHO. 1980. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
WHO. 1999. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Functioning and Disability. Beta-2 draft, short version. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
WHO. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
WHO. 2013. World Health Statistics. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar