Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:18:07.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1956 and the PSI: The end of ‘ten winters’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Ilaria Favretto
Ilaria Favretto*
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano, Facoltà di Scienze Politiche, Dipartimento di Storia della Società e delle Istituzioni, Via Livorno 1, 20122 Milano Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The focus of this article is the revisionist course which the Italian Socialist Party embarked upon after 1956 and which led up to the first Centre-Left government. The article challenges two quite well established views. One view is that the transformation experienced by the PSI during the 1956-64 period was simply tactically expedient and devoid of any substance and consistency. This article argues, by contrast, that these years represented, in Alessandro Pizzorno's words, a veritable ‘Copernican revolution’. This period of revisionism was as important as the better-known revisionisms elaborated during the same period by other European Socialist parties such as the German SPD or British Labour. The second main argument is that ‘structural reformism’, the new strategy adopted by the PSI after 1956, was not, as it has often been described, an expression of ‘duplicity’ owing to the party's incapacity to behave like a genuinely reformist party - a phenomenon that has allegedly long characterized parties of the Left. Instead, the strategy was reflected in the changes to European socialism during the early 1960s. In particular, this period marked a contrast to the previous years which were characterized by the dominance of ideas of ‘redistributive’ socialism, à la Anthony Crosland. This period marked also a shift among Socialist parties towards the acceptance of greater state controls over the economy by way of public planning and ownership.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , May 2000 , pp. 25 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. See for instance, Sabbatucci, Giovanni, Il riformismo impossibile. Storia del socialismo italiano, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1991, p. 12; Salvadori, Massimo, Tenere la sinistra. La crisi italiana e i nodi del riformismo, Marsilio, Venice, 1992, pp. 161–77; Ernesto Galli della Loggia, ‘Ideologie, classi e costume’, in Castronovo, Valerio (ed.), L'Italia contemporanea. 1945–1975, Einaudi, Turin, 1976, pp. 379–134; Cafagna, Luciano, C'era una volta. Riflessioni sul comunismo Italiano, Marsilio, Venice, 1991, pp. 66ff; see also Luciano Cafagna, Una strana disfatta. La parabola dell'autonomismo socialista, Marsilio, Venice, 1996, and ‘Il fallimento della strategia autonomista di Pietro Nenni’, in Carbone, Giuseppe (ed.), La Virtù del Politico, Marsilio, Venice, 1996, pp. 37–62; Scoppola, Pietro, La Repubblica dei partiti. Profilo storico della democrazia in Italia, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1991, pp. 116 ff.Google Scholar

2. Sassoon, Donald, One Hundred Years of Socialism, I. B. Tauris, London, 1996, pp. 255–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Although the full conformity of the Italian capitalist system to neo-capitalist patterns is commonly dated from the mid-1960s, neo-capitalist features were recognized as emerging in Italy a decade before. Salsano, Alfredo, Il Neocapitalismo. Progetti ed ideologia , in Storia d'Italia, 5, part 1, Einaudi, Turin, 1972, pp. 898–903.Google Scholar

4. Hobsbawn, Eric, Age of Extremes, Michael Joseph, London, 1994, p. 270.Google Scholar

5. Przeworski, Adam, Capitalism and Social Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Sassoon, , One Hundred Years of Socialism, p. 285.Google Scholar

7. Giolitti, Antonio, Riforme e Rivoluzione, Einaudi, Turin, 1957, p. 21.Google Scholar

8. Giolitti, Antonio, ‘Politica ed economia nella lotta di classe. Un'intervista con Antonio Giolitti’, Mondo Operaio, X (9), September 1957, pp. 2–1, p. 3.Google Scholar

9. Spriano, Paolo, Le passioni di un decennio (1946–1956), ed. L'Unità, Rome, 1992, p. 55.Google Scholar

10. Ibid, p. 157 Google Scholar

11. Strinati, Valerio, Politica e cultura nel Partita Socialista Italiano, 1945–1978, Liguori, Naples, 1980, pp. 133–4.Google Scholar

12. Fortini, Franco, Died Invemi 1947–1957, DeDonato, Bari, 1973.Google Scholar

13. Strinati, , Politica e cultura, pp. 93–105.Google Scholar

14. Panzieri, Renato, Dopo Stalin. Una stagione della sinistra, ed. Merli, Stefano, Marsilio, Venice, 1986, p. xii.Google Scholar

15. Ibid, p. xxiii.Google Scholar

16. Pizzorno, Alessandro, ‘I tolemaici, ovvero i migliori anni della nostra vita’, Passato e Presente, 3, May–June 1958, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

17. Sassoon, , One Hundred Years of Socialism, p. 260.Google Scholar

18. For the constraints the Italian Communists faced in breaking with the past, see Sassoon, Donald, ‘Togliatti, Stalin, Hungary and the Tasks of Historians’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, I (1), May 1999, pp. 33–8. Only from 1962 would the PCI appear seriously engaged in the analysis of the new society. See Tenderize del capitalismo italiano. Atti del Convegno di Roma, Istituto Gramsci, Rome, 1962.Google Scholar

19. Guiducci, Roberto, Socialismo e verità, Einaudi, Turin, 1956; Giolitti, , Riforme e rivoluzione ; Panzieri, Renato and Libertini, Lucio, ‘Sette tesi sul controllo operaio’, Mondo Operaio, XI (2), February 1958, pp. 11–15.Google Scholar

20. Panzieri, , Dopo Stalin, p. xxxi.Google Scholar

21. Mafai, Miriam, Lombardi, Feltrinelli, Milan, 1976, p. 22.Google Scholar

22. Amato, P., Il PSI tra frontismo e autonomia (1948–1954), Cosenza, 1958, p. 92.Google Scholar

23. See for example, the PSI Executive Committee's report to the 32nd PSI National Congress (1957), in PSI, Resoconto stenografico 32° Congresso Nazionale PSI, Venezia 6–10 febbraio 1957, Edizioni Avanti!, Milan and Rome, 1957, p. 16.Google Scholar

24. Vasetti, Fernando, ‘Partito e tecnici’, Mondo Operaio, X (2–3) February–March 1957, pp. 72–7, p. 72.Google Scholar

25. Panzieri, Renato, ‘Capitalismo contemporaneo e controllo operaio’, in Panzieri, , Dopo Stalin, pp. 175–8, p. 175.Google Scholar

26. Strachey, John, Il capitalismo contemporaneo, Feltrinelli, Milan, 1957.Google Scholar

27. Dobb, Maurice, ‘Some Economic Revaluations’, Marxist Quarterly, 4 (1), January 1957, pp. 2–7. See also Bellamy, Richard, ‘Mr. Strachey's Guide to Contemporary Capitalism’, Marxist Quarterly, 4 (1), January 1957, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar

28. Foa, Vittorio, ‘Il neocapitalismo è una realtà’, Mondo Operaio, XI (5), May 1957, pp. 225–6, p. 225.Google Scholar

29. Ibid. See also, ‘Capitalismo contemporaneo e controllo operaio’, Mondo Operaio, X (12), December 1957, pp. 10–21.Google Scholar

30. Guiducci, , Socialismo e verità, pp. 130–1.Google Scholar

31. Ibid, pp. 138–9.Google Scholar

32. Giolitti, , Riforme e Rivoluzione, p. 20. The reliance on Paul Sweezy and Paul Baran's neo-Marxist analyses on monopoly capitalism here is clear.Google Scholar

33. Guiducci, , Socialismo e verità, pp 138–9.Google Scholar

34. Ibid, p. 142.Google Scholar

35. Amaduzzi, , in ‘Capitalismo contemporaneo e controllo operaio’, pp. 10–21.Google Scholar

36. Here Lombardi quotes Alfred Sauvy, a prominent French economic historian. Lombardi, , in ‘Capitalismo contemporaneo e controllo operaio’, pp. 10–21, p. 16.Google Scholar

37. Amaduzzi, , in ‘Capitalismo contemporaneo e controllo operaio’, pp. 10–21.Google Scholar

38. Lombardi, , in ‘Capitalismo contemporaneo e controllo operaio’, pp. 10–21.Google Scholar

39. Guiducci, , Socialismo e verità, p. 145.Google Scholar

40. Sassoon, , One Hundred Years of Socialism, pp. 265–6.Google Scholar

41. Guiducci, , Socialismo e verità, p. 136.Google Scholar

42. Barbadoro, Idomeneo, ‘Sviluppo economico e lotta rivoluzionaria’, Mondo Operaio, X (9), September 1957, pp. 13–15, p. 14.Google Scholar

43. Vallauri, Carlo, ‘La crisi del '56 e il PSI’, in Arfè, Gaetano et al. (eds.), Trent' anni di politica socialista (1946–1976), Atti del Convegno organizzato doll'Istituto Socialista di Studi Storici, Parma, Gennaio 1977, Mondo Operaio-Edizioni Avanti!, Rome, 1977, pp. 73–105, p. 85.Google Scholar

44. Nenni, Pietro, ‘Luci e ombre del congresso di Mosca’, Mondo Operaio, IX (3), March 1956, pp. 146–54.Google Scholar

45. Pietro Nenni's report to the 32nd PSI National Congress (1957), in PSI, Resoconto stenografico 32° Congresso Nazionale PSI, p. 26.Google Scholar

46. Ibid, p. 28.Google Scholar

47. Basso, Lelio, in Avanti!, 23 February 1957, cited in Vallauri, , ‘La crisi del ‘56 e il PSI’, p. 85.Google Scholar

48. De Martino, Francesco, ‘Ancora dello Stato’, Mondo Operaio, IX (7), July 1956, pp. 423–6, pp. 423–1.Google Scholar

49. Vallauri, , ‘La crisi del '56 e il PSI’, p. 85.Google Scholar

50. Gramsci, Antonio, ‘Noterelle sulla politica del Machiavelli’, copybook 13, in Gerratana, Valentino (ed.), Antonio Gramsci. Quaderni del Carcere, 3, Einaudi, Turin, 1977, pp. 1613–16. The reinterpretation of the notion of the dictatorship of the proletariat as the Gramscian notion of hegemony was very popular among Italian ‘revisionists’. See, Giolitti, , Riforme e Rivoluzione, pp. 29–41; Guiducci, , Socialismo e Verità, pp. 228ff; see also Onofri, Fabrizio, ‘La via sovietica (leninista) alla conquista del potere e la via italiana, aperta da Gramsci’, Nuovi Argomenti, November 1956–February 1957, pp. 48–85.Google Scholar

51. Giolitti, , Riforme e Rivoluzione, pp. 35–7.Google Scholar

52. Lombardi, Riccardo, ‘Le riforme di struttura come via democratica al socialismo’ (speech to the 35th PSI National Congress, Rome, 25–29 October 1963), in Colarizi, Simona (ed.), Riccardo Lombardi, Scritti politici 1945–1963. Dalla Resistenza al Centrosinistra, Marsilio, Venice, 1978, pp. 395–415, p. 396.Google Scholar

53. Giolitti, Antonio, ‘Alcune osservazioni sulle riforme di struttura’, Passato e Presente, 6, November–December 1958, pp. 677–91.Google Scholar

54. Archivio Centrale di Stato (Rome), Nenni Papers, ‘Party’ series, box no. 90, bundle no. 2215, Report to the PSI Central Committee, 9–10 April 1956.Google Scholar

55. Coen, Federico and Tamburrano, Giuseppe, ‘Sulla funzione e la struttura dello Stato nella moderna società capitalistica’, in Tendenze del capitalismo italiano. Atti del Convegno di Roma, pp. 171–90, p. 170. The question of the new forms and function of the state acquired an undisputed centrality in Mondo Operaio in the years from 1956 to 1957.Google Scholar

56. Lombardi, Riccardo, ‘La conquista democratica dello Stato’ (speech to the 34th PSI National Congress, Milan, 28–30 March 1961), in Colarizi, (ed.), Riccardo Lombardi, pp. 340–1. See also Lombardi, Riccardo, ‘La nuova politica delle alleanze’ (speech to the 33rd PSI National Congress, Naples, 15–19 January 1959), in Colarizi, (ed.), Riccardo Lombardi, pp. 293–6, p. 294.Google Scholar

57. Coen, and Tamburrano, , ‘Sulla funzione e la struttura dello Stato’, pp. 172–3.Google Scholar

58. See ‘Mozione della corrente autonomista’ (33rd PSI National Congress, 1961), in Franco Pedone, Novant'anni di pensiero socialista attraverso i congressi del PSI 1957–1966 , Marsilio, Venice, 1984, pp. 207–11.Google Scholar

59. Coen, and Tamburrano, , ‘Sulla funzione e la struttura dello Stato’, pp. 176–9.Google Scholar

60. Giolitti, , Riforme e Rivoluzione, p. 13.Google Scholar

61. Guiducci, , Socialismo e verità, p. 161.Google Scholar

62. Strinati, , Politica e cultura, p. 193.Google Scholar

63. The article by Renato Panzieri in Mondo Operaio (April 1957) signalled the acknowledgement of the substantial disagreements which existed with Nenni's revisionism; speaking of what was referred to as the autonomist faction, Panzieri argued: ‘The efforts to redefine the function and the policies of the party have been abruptly discarded. The search for a new revolutionary strategy has been dropped and, in its place, a banal social-democratic reformism has been adopted.’ Panzieri, Renato, column ‘Filo Rosso’, Mondo Operaio, X (4), April 1957, pp. 146–7.Google Scholar

64. See for example, Cafagna, , Una strana disfatta, pp. 20–1; Settembrini, Domenico, ‘The Divided Left: After Fascism, What?’, and Pellicani, Luciano, ‘Socialists and Communists’, both in Di Scala, Spencer, Italian Socialism, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, 1996, pp. 107–20 and pp. 152–60. In line with the emphasis placed by Italian historiography on the ‘anomaly’ of Italian socialism, the Centre-Left experience is regarded as a further example of the Italian left-wing parties' maximalism as opposed to the gradualism and sense of responsibility of their European counterparts. The limitations of the PSI's revisionism as the key factor of the Centre-Left governments' failure is at the centre of the analyses of those scholars cited in n. 1 above.Google Scholar

65. Crosland, Anthony, The Future of Socialism, Jonathan Cape, London, 1956, p. 19.Google Scholar

66. See for example Industry and Society: Labour's Policy on Future Public Ownership (NEC Policy document, 1957), widely regarded as the revisionist document par excellence. See also Crosland, , The Future of Socialism ; Crossman, Richard (ed.), The New Fabian Essays, Turnstile Press, London, 1952; or Gaitskell, Hugh, Socialism and Nationalisation, Fabian Tract, 300, 1956.Google Scholar

67. See here Pollock, Frederick, Automation. The Economic and Social Consequences of Automation, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1957, originally published in Germany in 1956 and later translated in several languages including Italian. Pollock's book represented a crucial point of reference for left-wing parties' debate on automation.Google Scholar

68. On this question see On this question see Favretto, Ilaria, ‘La svolta autonomista del PSI vista oltremanica: il partito laburista, il Foreign Office e il centro-sinistra’, Italia Contemporanea, 202, March 1996, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar

69. Interview with Antonio Giolitti, Rome, December 1995.Google Scholar

70. Wilson, Harold, ‘Speech opening the science debate at the Party's Annual Conference, Scarborough, 1963’, in Wilson, Harold, Purpose and Politics. Selected Speeches, London, 1964, pp. 14–27, p. 18.Google Scholar

71. Coen, Federico, ‘Scienza e politica al Congresso Laburista’, Mondo Operaio, XVI (10), October 1963, pp. 11–24, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

72. As Lombardi put it, Socialist economic policies were paradoxically aimed at the formation of a market economy in those areas, like the South, where feudal and precapitalist elements still persisted. Lombardi, Riccardo, ‘Schema di relazione introduttiva al Convegno delle Partecipazioni Statali’, in PSI-Sezione Economica, Convegno delle Partecipazioni Statali, Edizioni Avanti!, Milan, 1960, pp. 7–44, pp. 23–1.Google Scholar

73. See, for instance, D'Alema, Massimo, La sinistra che cambia, Feltrinelli, Milan, 1997, pp. xvii, 78.Google Scholar

74. Riccardo Lombardi's speech to the 33rd PSI National Congress (1959), in PSI, Resoconto stenografico 33° Congresso Nazionale PSI, Napoli 15–18 gennaio 1959, Edizioni Avanti!, Milan and Rome, 1959, pp. 178–208, p. 197.Google Scholar

75. Pietro Nenni's report to the 34th PSI National Congress (1961), in PSI, Resoconto stenografico 34° Congresso Nazionale PSI, Milano 15–20 marzo 1961, Edizioni Avanti!, Milan and Rome, 1961, pp. 10–41, p. 30.Google Scholar

76. Tamburrano, Giuseppe, ‘Per un programma socialista di governo’, Mondo Operaio, XII (4–5), April–May 1959, pp. 21–4, p. 21.Google Scholar

77. Archivio Centrale di Stato (Rome), Nenni Papers, ‘Correspondence’ series, section 1944–1979, Pietro Nenni–Gaetano Arfè correspondence, box no. 17, bundle no. 1057, Letter from Pietro Nenni to Gaetano Arfè, 28 November 1964 (Rome).Google Scholar

78. After a period (1949–53) in which the party membership substantially recovered from the crisis of 1948, it started declining again after 1956: members fell from 780,000 in 1953 to 480,000 in 1957 and started growing again only after 1966. Renewed growth might, however, partly be explained by the clientelistic character which the party began to acquire after a few years in government, an hypothesis which, in some respects, is proved by the fact that party membership grew almost exclusively in the South and steadily declined over the same period in the North: while in 1950 members from the North made up 67 per cent of the total, in 1967 they did not exceed 20 per cent. Cavazza, Fabio, ‘Elettori e Iscritti al PSI’, in Sivini, G., Partiti e partecipazione politica in Italia, Giuffrè, Milan, 1969, pp. 189–212, pp. 204–7.Google Scholar

79. Nenni's speech to the 35th National Congress, in ‘35° Congresso Nazionale PSI. Roma, 25–29 ottobre 1963’, in Pedone, , Novant'anni di pensiero socialista, pp. 238–320. See also Maurizio Degl'Innocenti, Storia del PSI dal Dopoguerra ad Oggi, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1993, p. 319.Google Scholar

80. Giolitti, , ‘Alcune osservazioni’, p. 683; and Giolitti, Antonio, Un socialismo possibile, Einaudi, Turin, 1968, p. 46.Google Scholar

81. See, for example, the numerous articles on electoral behaviour which appeared in journals close to the autonomist faction such as Tempi Moderni (for instance, Vallini, Edio, ‘Contributo per uno studio sulle tecniche elettorali’, Tempi Moderni, 1 (5), July 1958, pp. 266–9).Google Scholar

82. Degl'Innocenti, Storia del PSI, p. 116.Google Scholar

83. Guiducci, , Socialismo e verità, p. 73. See also Aldo Di Virgilio, , ‘Politica e scienze sociali in Italia nel secondo dopoguerra: l'esperienza di Tempi Moderni, Il Politico, 2, June 1985, pp. 275–97, p. 294.Google Scholar

84. See ‘35° Congresso Nazionale. Roma, 25–29 ottobre 1963’, in Pedone, , Novant'anni di pensiero socialista, pp. 238–320, p. 282. On the same question see also PSI, Resoconto stenografico 34° Congresso Nazionale PSI, Milano 15–20 marzo 1961, p. 307 and Roberto Guiducci's remarks in Archivio Centrale di Stato (Rome), Nenni Papers, ‘Correspondence series’, section 1944–1979, box no. 28, bundle no. 1445, Pietro Nenni–Roberto Guiducci correspondence.Google Scholar

85. Archivio Centrale di Stato (Rome), Nenni Papers, ‘Correspondence series’, section 1944–1979, Pietro Nenni–Gaetano Arfè correspondence, box no. 17, bundle no. 1057, Letter from Pietro Nenni to Gaetano Arfè, 28 November 1964 (Rome).Google Scholar

86. di Stato, Archivio Centrale (Rome), Nenni Papers, ‘Correspondence series’, section 1944–1979, box no. 28, bundle no. 1445, Pietro Nenni–Roberto Guiducci correspondence: Letter from Roberto Guiducci to Pietro Nenni, 23 July 1964 (Milan), pp. 1–2; Letter from Roberto Guiducci to Pietro Nenni, 26 October 1966 (Milan); Letter from Roberto Guiducci to Pietro Nenni, 19 November 1965 (Milan).Google Scholar

87. Lombardi, , ‘Schema di relazione’, p. 10. See also Carabba, Manin, Un ventennio di programmazione, Bari, 1977, p. 103.Google Scholar

88. di Studi Storici, Fondazione ‘Filippo Turati’ (Florence), PSI Archive, ‘Election Manifestos’ series, ‘Il programma 1963’, p. 38.Google Scholar

89. Riccardo Lombardi's speech to the 33rd PSI National Congress (1959), in PSI, Resoconto stenografico 33° Congresso Nazionale PSI, Napoli, 15–18 gennaio 1959. See also ‘Mozione autonomia, 34° Congresso Nazionale PSI 1961’, in Pedone, , Novant'anni di pensiero socialista, p. 210.Google Scholar

90. Giolitti, , ‘Alcune osservazioni’, p. 688.Google Scholar

91. Ibid.Google Scholar

92. See, for instance, Party, Labour, Industry and Society: Labour's Policy on Future Public Ownership, NEC policy document, 1957, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar

93. Lombardi, , ‘Schema di relazione’, p. 23.Google Scholar

94. Ibid.Google Scholar

95. Ibid, pp. 8–9. See also on the same issues, Giolitti, Antonio, ‘Iniziativa privata e impresa pubblica’, Mondo Operaio, XII (4–5), April–May 1959, pp. 17–21, p. 19; and Woolf, Stuart and Posner, Michael V., Italian Public Enteprise, Gerald Duckworth, London, 1967.Google Scholar

96. From the late 1950s onwards, Italian Socialists attached increasing importance to planning. This was reflected in the congresses in Naples (1959), Milan (1961) and Rome (1963). See, for instance, 33rd PSI Congress, Autonomists motion 1959, in Pedone, , Novant'anni di pensiero socialista, p. 122.Google Scholar

97. Unione Popolare (UP) and the Unione Socialista Indipendente (USI) both merged into the PSI in 1957. See Galli, Giorgio, I partiti politici italiani, Rizzoli, Milan, 1991, p. 113.Google Scholar

98. Ibid, p. 132.Google Scholar

99. Ibid, p. 143.Google Scholar

100. See D'Alema, Massimo, Un paese normale. La Sinistra e il futuro dell'Italia, Mondadori, Milan, 1995.Google Scholar

101. Degl'Innocenti, Storia del PSI, pp. 382–3. See also Carabba, , Un ventennio di programmazione, pp. 130–1.Google Scholar