Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:30:17.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WHAT'S IN A NAME? TWENTIETH-CENTURY REALISM IN KENNETH BURKE'S AESTHETICS*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2015

EVELYN BURG
EVELYN BURG*
Affiliation:
LaGuardia Community College, City University of New York E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Admired throughout the twentieth century by literary and sociological theorists but long neglected by philosophers, readers have overlooked Kenneth Burke's theoretical dependence on American philosophic realism, thus missing consistent patterns of his insight. By tracing Burke's own realism back to his year at Columbia University and his time at The Dial magazine, we see how Burke's earliest aesthetic theories conformed to aspects of the new realist movement. During the Depression, in his book Permanence and Change, he followed earlier new realists in arguing for a reconstructed modern teleology of “purpose” and incorporated realism within his pleas for a suppler Communist Party rhetoric than that sanctioned by the party leadership. Burke's apparently inconsistent positions can be understood as a continuous philosophical argument for realism within changing intellectual contexts, explaining his long-lived cross-disciplinary appeal and influence. Burke maintained central realistic tenets: (1) the independent existence and intelligibility of an external world and (2) the substantive meaning of universals, particularly a common human nature. Examining these connections informs our readings of Burke while illuminating one reverberation of the philosophical “new realists” in American intellectual culture. Burke expressed realist principles in his presentation of symbolic action and dramatism in The Philosophy of Literary Form and A Grammar of Motives, both published in the 1940s. His sophisticated aesthetic–linguistic realism appeared in his arguments against logical empiricists and New Critics, which displayed an arc of transformation in the philosophical and critical culture before World War II from a still-contested mixture to an emphatically nominalistic, antirealist one. It was from this philosophical position that Burke offered his lively, penetrating analyses of and challenges to many of the major movements in twentieth-century philosophy: realism, pragmatism, positivism, and post-structuralism.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 713 - 745
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank the readers of this article who greatly improved its accuracy and readability: historians Marcella Bencivenni, Martin Burke, Bob Huberty, Ernest Ialongo, Carol Quirke, Daniel Wishnoff, and philosophers Harvey Burstein and Lucia Lermond, as well as Modern Intellectual History's editors and reviewers. Many thanks also to the librarians of the Special Collections libraries at Pennsylvania State University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Chicago and NYPL's Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection of English and American Literature. I am most grateful to Michael Burke, Julie Whittaker, and the Burke family for their gracious aid and hospitality. The writing of this article was funded by two PSC CUNY grants.

References

1 Woodbridge, Frederick J. E., The Realm of Mind: An Essay in Metaphysics (New York, 1926), viii Google Scholar.

2 Ransom, John Crowe, Beating the Bushes: Selected Essays 1941–1970 (New York, 1972), 47–71, at 63 Google Scholar. Whenever possible, essay citations are from accessible collections and consecutive citations from a single text are listed in one note at the end of the paragraph.

3 William S. Knickerbocker, “Wam for Maw: Dogma versus Discursiveness in Criticism” (1941), reprinted in Rueckert, William H., ed., Critical Responses to Kenneth Burke, 1924–1966 (Minneapolis, 1969), 122–30, at 123.Google Scholar

4 Hawhee, Debra, Moving Bodies: Kenneth Burke at the Edges of Language (Columbia, SC, 2009), 55–74.Google Scholar

5 Weiser, M. Elizabeth, Burke War, Words: Rhetorizing Dramatism (Columbia, SC, 2008), 68–70, 81–2Google Scholar; George, Ann and Selzer, Jack, Kenneth Burke in the 1930s (Columbia, 2007), 111, 251 n. 21.Google Scholar

6 Aaron, Daniel, Writers on the Left (New York, 1992), 290–92Google Scholar; Foley, Barbara, Radical Representations: Politics and Form in U.S. Proletarian Fiction, 1929–1941 (Durham, NC, 1993), 157–8Google Scholar; Denning, Michael, The Cultural Front: The Laboring of American Culture in the Twentieth Century (London, 1997), 102–4, 445Google Scholar; Gilbert, James, Writers and Partisans (New York, 1992), 138 Google Scholar; Bloom, Alexander, Prodigal Sons: The New York Intellectuals and Their World (New York, 1986), 116 Google Scholar; Diggins, John Patrick, The Rise and Fall of the American Left (New York, 1992), 333.Google Scholar

7 Charles I. Glicksberg, “Kenneth Burke: The Critic’s Critic,” in Rueckert, Critical Responses to Kenneth Burke, 71–80, at 71.

8 Schneider, Isidor, “A New View of Rhetoric,” New York Herald Tribune Books, 13 Dec. 1931, 4.Google Scholar

9 White, Hayden, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore, 1973), 3 n. 4, 17.Google Scholar

10 Hawhee, Debra, “Burke and Nietzsche,” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 85/2 (1999), 129–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Crusius, , Kenneth Burke and the Conversation after Philosophy (Carbondale, IL, 1999), 23.Google Scholar

11 Burke, Kenneth, “The Constants of Social Relativity” (1937), in Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form (Berkeley, 1973), 404–7, at 404, original emphases.Google Scholar

12 Burke, Kenneth, Language as Symbolic Action (Berkeley, 1966), 6, 373.Google Scholar

13 Lentricchia, Frank, Criticism and Social Change (Chicago, 1985), 68–9Google Scholar; Carter, C. Allen, “Logology and Religion; Kenneth Burke on the Metalinguistic Dimension of Language,” Journal of Religion, 72 (Jan. 1992), 1–18, at 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Burke, Kenneth, Permanence and Change (Berkeley, 1984), 118, 193.Google Scholar

15 Kenneth Burke, Language as Symbolic Action, 3, 373.

16 Beth Eddy's The Rites of Identity: The Religious Naturalism and Cultural Criticism of Kenneth Burke and Ralph Ellison (Princeton, 2003); David Blakesley's “Kenneth Burke's Pragmatism: Old and New,” in Bernard L. Brock, ed., Kenneth Burke and the 21st Century (Albany, NY, 1999), 71–95; Paul Jay's Contingency Blues (Madison, 1997), 34, 120; David Hildebrand, “Was Kenneth Burke a Pragmatist?”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31 (Summer 1995), 632–58; and Giles Gunn's The Culture of Criticism and the Criticism of Culture (Oxford, 1987), 23, 75–80, all align Burke with pragmatism.

17 Hildebrand, “Was Kenneth Burke a Pragmatist?”, 643–9; Henderson, Greig E., Kenneth Burke: Literature and Language as Symbolic Action (Athens, GA, 1988), 122; Lentricchia, Criticism, 66.Google Scholar

18 Jameson, Fredric, “The Symbolic Inference; or Kenneth Burke and Ideological Analysis,” Critical Inquiry, 4 (Spring 1978), 507–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 521–2; Burke, Kenneth, “Methodological Repression and/or Strategies of Containment,” Critical Inquiry, 5 (Winter 1978), 401–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Christine E. Iwanicki, “The Revelations of Logology: Secular and Religious Tensions in Burke's Views on Language, Literature and Hermeneutics,” in Jack Selzer and Robert Wess, eds., Kenneth Burke and His Circles (West Lafayette, 2007), 174–200, at 185, 184.

19 Sidney Hook, “The Technique of Mystification,” repr. in Rueckert, Critical Responses to Kenneth Burke, 89–101, at 91.

20 Wess, Robert, Kenneth Burke: Rhetoric, Subjectivity, Post-modernism (Cambridge, 1996), 96, 135, 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Crable, Bryan, “Defending Dramatism as Ontological and Literal,” Communication Quarterly, 48 (2000), 323–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fisher, Walter R. and Brockriede, Wayne, “Kenneth Burke's Realism,” Central States Speech Journal, 35 (1984), 35–42, at 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brock, Bernard, “Introduction,” in Brock, ed., Kenneth Burke and the 21st Century (Albany, 1998), 2–9 Google Scholar; Kidd, Andrew, “Kenneth Burke and Contemporary Philosophy of Science,” K.B. Journal, 7/2 (Spring 2011)Google Scholar: n.p., available at www.kbjournal.org/kidd; Robert Heath, Realism and Relativism (Macon, GA, 1986), esp. 172–6. See also James L. Kastely, Rethinking the Rhetorical Tradition: From Plato to Postmodernism (New Haven, 1997), 235–6, 244–9.

21 Burke, Permanence and Change, 260.

22 Kuklick, Bruce, A History of Philosophy in America (Oxford, 2001), 48–9, 59–62Google Scholar; Schneider, Herbert, A History of American Philosophy (New York, 1963), 6–7 Google Scholar; McCosh, James, The Scottish Philosophy: Biographical, Expository, Critical, from Hutcheson to Hamilton (New York, 1874), 1–7, 288, 415–20.Google Scholar

23 Campbell, James, “One Hundred Years of Pragmatism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43 (Winter 2007), 1–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 6; and Campbell, A Thoughtful Profession: The Early Years of the American Philosophical Association (Chicago: Open Court, 2006), 101–116.

24 Albert Barnes, The Art of Painting (New York, 1937; first published 1925), 7.

25 Author's correspondence with Columbia University, 2011; Jack Selzer, Kenneth Burke in Greenwich Village: Conversing with the Moderns, 1915–1931 (Madison, 1996), 41, 60, 186; and “Richard Kostelanetz Interviews Kenneth Burke,” ed. J. Clarke Rountree III, Iowa Review, 17 (Fall 1987), 1–14.

26 Jones, William Frank, Nature and Natural Science: The Philosophy of F. J. E. Woodbridge (Amherst, 1983).Google Scholar For period descriptions see Woodbridge, F. J. E., “Confessions,” in Adams, G. P, ed., Contemporary American Philosophy (New York, 1962), 415–437 Google Scholar; Costello, Harry Todd, “The Naturalism of Frederick Woodbridge,” in Krikorian, Yervant H., ed., Naturalism and the Human Spirit (New York, 1944), 295–318 Google Scholar; Cohen, Morris R., American Thought: A Critical Sketch, ed. Cohen, Felix. S., (New York, 1962), 394–5Google Scholar.

27 Dewey, John, “The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy” (1910), in Dewey, The Philosophy of John Dewey, ed. McDermott, John J. (Chicago, 1981), 31–41, at 35 Google Scholar. Also see Harold A. Larrabee, “Naturalism in America,” in Krikorian, Naturalism and the Human Spirit, 319–53, at 351; Kuklick, A History of Philosophy in America, 190–91; John Shook, “Varieties of Twentieth Century American Naturalism,” The Pluralist, 6 (Summer, 2011), 1–17; and John Ryder, American Philosophic Naturalism in the Twentieth Century (Amherst, 1994), 9–25, at 13–15.

28 Sellars, Roy Wood, Evolutionary Naturalism (Chicago, 1922), vii.Google Scholar

29 Jewett, Andrew, “Canonizing Dewey,” Modern Intellectual History, 8/1 (April 2011), 91–125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cornelis de Waal, ed., American New Realism, 3 vols. (Bristol, 2001), 1: xiii–xxxv.

30 Holt, E. B., Marvin, W. T., Montague, W. P., Perry, R. B., Pitkin, W. B., and Spaulding, E. G., “The Program and First Platform of Six Realists,” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7 (1910), 393–401, reprCrossRefGoogle Scholar. in de Waal, American New Realism, 1: 51–9; for Dewey's critiques see ibid., 61–5, 73–6, 137–152.

31 Holt, Edwin B. et al., The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy (New York, 1912), 26–7, 53.Google Scholar

32 R. B. Perry, “The Ego-Centric Predicament,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 1: 9–18; Perry, “Realism as Polemic and Program of Reform,” in ibid., 19–49, at 21–3; Montague in “The Program and First Platform,” 54.

33 Jones, Nature and Natural Science, 60; Perry, R. B., “Prof. Royce's Refutation of Realism and Pluralism,” Monist, 12 (1902), 446–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pitkin, Walter B., “The Empirical Status of Geometrical Entities,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 2: 223–33Google Scholar.

34 Selzer, Kenneth Burke in Greenwich Greenwich Village, 41, 186.

35 For James's realistic and relational views see James, William, “The Function of Cognition,” in The Writings of William James, ed. McDermott, John J. (Chicago, 1978), 136–52Google Scholar; James, “Does ‘Consciousness’ Exist?”, in ibid., 169–83; and James, “The Notion of Consciousness,” in ibid., 184–94.

36 Bertrand Russell, “The Basis of Realism,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 1: 115–18; and Russell, Problems in Philosophy (Oxford, 1959), 97, 93–4.

37 Eldridge, Michael, “When Philosophy Became What It Is Today,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43 (Spring 2007), 375–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 William R. Dennes, “The Categories of Naturalism,” in Krikorian, Naturalism and the Human Spirit, 270–94, at 270.

39 Woodbridge, F. J. E., “Consciousness and Object,” Philosophical Review, 21 (1912), 633–640, at 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Perry in “The Program and First Platform,” 55; Edwin B. Holt, The Concept of Consciousness (New York, 1914), 193, 201, 246–7, 323; Cohen, American Thought, 383.

41 Holt, The Concept of Consciousness, 171. See also Eric P. Charles, ed., A New Look at the New Realism: The Psychology and Philosophy of E. B. Holt (New Brunswick, 2011), 38, 63, 77–8, 224; de Waal, American New Realism, 1: xxiv; John Passmore, A Hundred Years of Philosophy (New York, 1966), 263–4.

42 D. M. Armstrong, Universals and Scientific Realism, vol. 1, Nominalism and Realism, vol. 2, A Theory of Universals (Cambridge, 1978), 1: 138–9, 2: 1. Haack, Susan, “Realism,” Synthese, 73, (1987), 275–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tweedale, Martin, “Aristotle's Universals,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 65 (1987), 412–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hirst, R. J., “Realism,” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York, 1972), 77–83 Google Scholar; Spaulding, Edward G., “Realistic Aspects of Royce's Logic” (1916), in de Waal, American New Realism, 3: 171–80Google Scholar, at 172–4.

43 Perry in “The Program and First Platform,” 56; Burke, Language as Symbolic Action, 372–3.

44 For Ockham, nominalism, and science see Gillespie, Michael Allen, The Theological Origins of Modernity (Chicago, 2008), 22–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For Peirce see Forster, Paul D., “Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 28 (Fall 1992), 691–724, at 695Google Scholar. See also Pihlstrom, Sami, “Peircean Scholastic Realism and Transcendental Arguments,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34 (Spring 1998), 382–413 Google Scholar, at 386–7. For twentieth-century nominalism see Armstrong, Universals and Scientific Realism, 1: 12–30, Haack, Susan, “Platonism and Nominalism: Carnap and Goodman,” Monist, 61 (1978), 483–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Perry, “Realism as Polemic,” 28.

46 Harlow, Victor, Bibliography and Genetic Study of American Realism (New York, 1970), 56.Google Scholar

47 Cohen, American Thought, 381; Morris R. Cohen, “Review of The New Realism,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 1: 153–70, at 154–5s; and Hollinger, David, Morris R. Cohen and the Scientific Ideal (Cambridge, 1975), 102–9Google Scholar. Bannister's, Robert C. Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940 (Chapel Hill, 1987), describes sociology's nominalistic move.Google Scholar

48 Dewey, John, “Brief Studies in Realism,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 1: 142–4Google Scholar; and Dewey, “Rejoinder to Professor Spaulding,” in ibid., 113–14; Westbrook, Robert B., John Dewey and American Democracy (Ithaca, NY, 1991), 125–6.Google Scholar

49 Lovejoy, A. O., “Reflections of a Temporalist,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 1: 187–97, at 193Google Scholar; and Lovejoy, “Error and the New Realism” (1913), in ibid., 2: 209–21, at 210–12. For Holt's response see The Concept of Consciousness, 142–4, 220, 269; see also, Eric P. Charles, “Realism and Illusion: An Explication of Holt's Approach,” in A New Look at New Realism, 57–79.

50 Burke, Kenneth, A Grammar of Motives (Berkeley, 1969), 248–9, original emphasisGoogle Scholar.

51 Zappen, James, “Kenneth Burke on Dialectical–Rhetorical Transcendence,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 42 (2009), 279–301, at 280–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52 Kenneth Burke, “Fides Quaerens Intellectum” (1922), reprinted in Burke, Equipment for Living: The Literary Reviews of Kenneth Burke, ed. Nathaniel A. Rivers and Ryan P. Weber (West Lafayette, IN, 2010), 417–20, at 419–20.

53 Waldo Frank to Kenneth Burke, 3 May 1922, Kenneth Burke Papers, Eberly Family Special Collections Library, Pennsylvania State University.

54 Kenneth Burke to Waldo Frank, 4 Sept. 1922, Waldo Frank Papers, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvania.

55 Burke to Frank, 8 May 1922, Frank Papers.

56 Burke to Malcolm Cowley, 20 Nov. 1924, in Jay, Paul, ed., The Selected Correspondence of Kenneth Burke and Malcolm Cowley (Berkeley, 1988), 166 Google Scholar; Burke, Kenneth, Counter-statement (Berkeley, 1968), 48.Google Scholar

57 Heath, Realism and Relativism, 52.

58 Russell, Bertrand, “On the Nature of Acquaintance, II,” Monist, 24 (1914), 161–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 161–2; de Waal, American New Realism, xiv; Schneider, History, 501.

59 Richards, I. A., Principles of Literary Criticism (New York, 1963), 20–21, 160, 196, 262–3.Google Scholar

60 Burke, Counter-statement, 45–6, 138–41.

61 Ibid., 31,141, 138.

62 Ibid., 39, 124, 139, 140–1.

63 Burke, Kenneth, “Auscultation, Creation and Revision,” in Extensions of the Burkeian System, ed. Chesebro, James W. (Tuscaloosa, 1993), 120, 122, 130.Google Scholar

64 Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 234, 314; Burke, “My Approach to Communism,” The New Masses, 10 (March 1934), 16, 18–20, at 16; Burke, Philosophy, 322.

65 Undated letter to Robert Cantwell marked “1935?”, Burke Papers.

66 Kenneth Burke, “Revolutionary Symbolism in America,” reprinted in Legacy of Kenneth Burke, 267–73, at 269, 271, 272, original emphasis.

67 George, Ann and Selzer, Jack, “What Happened at the First American Writers’ Congress? Kenneth Burke's ‘Revolutionary Symbolism in America,’” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33 (Spring, 2003), 47–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and George and Selzer, Kenneth Burke in the 1930s, 16–29; Sheriff, Stacey, “Resituating Kenneth Burke's ‘My Approach to Communism’,” Rhetorica, 23, (Summer 2005), 281–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and n. 5.

68 Weiser, Burke, War, Words, 68–70. Burke's Attitudes toward History (New York, 1937) 153–54, contains a footnote, later excised, offering an “explanation” for the Moscow confessions.

69 Woodbridge, F. J. E., Nature and Mind: Selected Essays of Frederick J. E. Woodbridge (New York, 1937), 42–3.Google Scholar

70 Montague, W.P., “Unreal Subsistence and Consciousness,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 3: 82–3.Google Scholar

71 Burke, Counter-statement, 67, 71, 199–202.

72 Burke, Permanence and Change, 168, 184, 232.

73 Ibid., 5–6, 13, 18, 106, 197, 248. For nonreductionist behaviorism see Gary Hatfield, “Behaviorism and Psychology,” in Thomas Baldwin, ed., The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1870–1945 (Cambridge, 2003), 640–48.

74 Burke, Permanence and Change, 213, 214, 237.

75 George and Selzer, Kenneth Burke in the 1930s, 87.

76 Burke to McKeon, 17 Nov. 1934, Richard Peter McKeon Papers, Special Collections, University of Chicago Library, original emphasis.

77 Burke, Permanence and Change, 66.

78 Marvin, Walter T., “The Existential Proposition,” in de Waal, American New Realism, 1: 157–70, at 160, 170.Google Scholar

79 Burke, Permanence and Change, 90.

80 Richards, I. A., “Science and Poetry” (1926) in Mark Shorer, Josephine Miles, and Gordon McKenzie, eds., Criticism: The Foundations of Modern Literary Judgment (New York, 1958), 505–23Google Scholar; Burke, Permanence and Change, 250–5.

81 Burke, Permanence and Change, 260, my emphases.

82 Hawhee, Moving Bodies, 30.

83 Burke, Kenneth, “The Tactics of Motivation,” Chimera, 2/1 (Summer 1943), 37–53 Google Scholar, at 51–2; Burke, Permanence and Change, 261–2.

84 Burke, Permanence and Change, 253; Richards’ results became Practical Criticism (1930).

85 Perry, “Realism as Polemic,” 27; Montague in “The Program and First Platform,” 55; Holt et al., The New Realism, 48.

86 Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 397, 395–6.

87 Richard McKeon to Morris R. Cohen, 11 Feb. 1936, McKeon Papers.

88 Carnap, Rudolf, Philosophy and Logical Syntax (New York, 1979; first published 1935), 17, 29–31 Google Scholar; Carnap, “On the Character of Philosophic Problems,” Philosophy of Science 1 (Jan. 1934), 5–19, at 5, 6, 14–16; Stroll, Avrum, Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy (New York, 2000), 6–8, 55Google Scholar.

89 Carnap, Rudolf, “Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,” in Sahotra Sarkar, ed., Logical Empiricism at Its Peak: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath (New York, 1996), 10–31, at 11, original emphasis.Google Scholar

90 Carnap, “Elimination of Metaphysics,” 13; Carnap, Philosophy and Logical Syntax, 11–13, 15–18, 35.

91 Carnap, Rudolf, “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology” (1950), repr. in Carnap, Meaning and Necessity (Chicago, 1956), 205–21Google Scholar, at 207, 215; Carnap, “Elimination of Metaphysics,” 28–9; Carnap, Philosophy and Logical Syntax, 37–8; Carnap, “On the Character of Philosophic Problems,” 8.

92 Kenneth Burke, “Semantic and Poetic Meaning” (1938), in Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 138–67, at 141, 150, 159, original emphasis.

93 Ibid., 426, 159.

94 Richard McKeon to Kenneth Burke, 26 Nov. 1937, Kenneth Burke Papers.

95 Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 1, 2, 64, 109, 8–17, 24–5, 301.

96 Kenneth Burke to James Sibley Watson, 6 Jan. 1939, Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection, NYPL.

97 Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 20, 22, 30, 73.

98 Ibid., 25, 63–5, 71–9, 92–9, x.

99 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, xv.

100 Galison, Peter, “The Americanization of Unity,” Daedalus, 127/1 (Winter 1998), 45–71 Google Scholar, at 66–7; Jewett, Andrew, “Science and the Promise of Democracy in America,” Daedulus, 132/4 (Fall 2003), 64–70, at 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

101 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, xviii–xix, original emphasis.

102 Perry, “Realism as Polemic,” 36.

103 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, xv–xxi, xix, 3–4, 7–9, 5–20, 151, 262; Burke, Kenneth, “Dramatism,” in Sills, David L. and Merton, Robert K., eds., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 7 (New York, 1968), 445–52Google Scholar, at 446; Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 114.

104 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 262; Burke, “Ethan Brand: A Preparatory Investigation”, in Kenneth Burke: Essays towards a Symbolic of Motives: 1950–1955, ed. William H. Rueckert (West Lafayette, 2007), 98–9, original emphasis.

105 Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 144.

106 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 317, 319–20.

107 Carnap, “Elimination of Metaphysics,” 31; Carnap, “On the Character of Philosophic Problems,” 8–9; Carnap, “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology,” 221.

108 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 251; Peirce quoted in Bruce Kuklick, The Rise of American Philosophy (New Haven, 1977), 116, Peirce's emphasis.

109 Feuer quoted in Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 358; see also Reisch, George A., How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic (Cambridge, 2005), 124–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

110 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, xxii.

111 Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science, 2, 48, 148; Uebel, Thomas, “Calculation in Kind and Marketless Socialism: On Otto Neurath's Utopian Economics,” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15 (2008), 475–501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

112 For the diversity of positions held by the founders see Stadler, Friedrich, “What Is the Vienna Circle?” in Stadler, ed., The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism (New York, 2003), xi–xxiii CrossRefGoogle Scholar, xiv; Preston, Aaron, Analytic Philosophy: The History of an Illusion (London, 2007)Google Scholar; Glock, Hans-Johann, What Is Analytic Philosophy? (Cambridge, 2008), 90–93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 117–19; Glock, The Rise of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford, 1997), vii–xiv; McCumber, John, Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era (Evanston, IL, 2001)Google Scholar, 15, 26, 41, 77, and passim.

113 Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science, 271, 279–80; Howard, Don, “Better Red than Dead: Putting and End to the Social Irrelevance of Postwar Philosophy of Science,” Science & Education, 18 (2009), 199–220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for Jewett see n. 99; Kolakowski, Leszek, The Alienation of Reason: A History of Positivist Thought, trans. Guterman, Norbert (Garden City, NY, 1969), 197–8Google Scholar.

114 Carnap, “Elimination of Metaphysics,” 25.

115 Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 141 n.

116 Richardson, Alan, Carnap's Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism (Cambridge, 1998), 10–12 Google Scholar, 28–30, 139; Friedman, Michael, Reconsidering Logical Positivism (Cambridge, 1999), 95–100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Friedman, A Parting of the Ways (Chicago, 2000), 155–6. See also Friedman's and Richardson's chapters in Alan Richardson and Thomas Uebel, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism (Cambridge 2007), 91–116 and 346–70; Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter, Objectivity (Brooklyn, 2010), 253–6Google Scholar.

117 Carnap, “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology,” 206–7.

118 Conkin, Paul K., The Southern Agrarians (Knoxville, TN, 1988), 36, 38–40.Google Scholar

119 Young, Thomas Daniel, Gentleman in a Dustcoat: A Biography of John Crowe Ransom (Baton Rouge, 1976), 114, 117Google Scholar. Ransom quoted in Daniel Joseph Singal, The War Within: From Victorian to Modernist Thought in the South, 1919–1945 (Chapel Hill, 1982), 215.

120 Southerners, Twelve, I’ll Take My Stand: The South and the Agrarian Tradition (New York, 1977; first published 1930), 24–6Google Scholar.

121 Ransom, John Crowe, “Art and the Human Economy,” Kenyon Review, 7/4 (1945), 683–8Google Scholar, at 687. See also Murphy, Paul V., The Rebuke of History: The Southern Agrarians and American Conservative Thought (Chapel Hill, 2001), 16–19 Google Scholar; Young, Gentleman in a Dustcoat, 213–15; Malvasi, Mark, The Unregenerate South (Baton Rouge, 1997), 80, 125Google Scholar; Hobson, Fred, Tell about the South: The Southern Rage to Explain (Baton Rouge, 1983), 180 Google Scholar.

122 Singal, The War Within, 212, 217, 216; George and Selzer, Kenneth Burke in the 1930s, 239 n. 46. See also Shaheen, Aaron, Androgynous Democracy: Modern American Literature and the Dual-Sexed Body Politic (Knoxville, TN, 2010), 83–90 Google Scholar; Quinlan, Kieran, John Crowe Ransom's Secular Faith (Baton Rouge, 1999), xiv, 2–4 Google Scholar.

123 Kenneth Burke, “Property as an Absolute” New Republic, July 1936, 245–6.

124 John Crowe Ransom, World's Body (Baton Rouge, 1968), 330, 334.

125 Ibid., 342, 347–8.

126 Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, 75, 82, 99.

127 Genter, Robert, Late Modernism: Art, Culture, and Politics in Cold War America (Philadelphia, 2011)Google Scholar, Filreis, Alan, Counter-revolution of the Word: The Conservative Attack on Modern Poetry, 1945–1960 (Chapel Hill, 2008), 30–1Google Scholar; Morrison, Alastair, “Eliot, the Agrarians, and the Political Subtext of New Critical Formalism,” in Hickman, Miranda and McIntyre, John, eds., Rereading the New Criticism (Columbus, OH, 2012), 47–64 Google Scholar; Guillory, John, Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Foundation (Chicago, 1993), 134–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Graff, Gerald, Professing Literature (Chicago, 2008), 143–9Google Scholar; Schwartz, Lawrence H., Creating Faulkner's Reputation: The Politics of Modern Literary Criticism (Knoxville, TN, 1988), 77 Google Scholar, 119, 135, 149, 201–5; Schwartz, “Malcolm Cowley's Path to William Faulkner,” Journal of American Studies, 16/2 (1982), 229–42; Pickering, Edward D., “The Roots of New Criticism,” Southern Literary Journal, 41 (2008), 93–108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 101–5; Schryer, Stephen, “Fantasies of the New Class: The New Criticism, Harvard Sociology, and the Idea of the University,” PMLA, 122/3 (May 2007), 663–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 671–4; Jancovich, Mark, The Cultural Politics of the New Criticism (Cambridge, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Fekete, John, The Critical Twilight (London, 1977)Google Scholar.

128 Kuklick, A History of Philosophy in America, 246–7; Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science, 384–5.

129 Kenneth Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives (Berkeley, 1969), 252–6.

130 Tell, David, “Burke's Encounter with Ransom: Rhetoric and Epistemology in ‘Four Master Tropes’” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 34 (2004), 33–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 34.

131 Ransom, Beating the Bushes, 52, 64–5.

132 A. N. Whitehead, epigraph in Burke, Permanence and Change.

133 Ransom, Beating the Bushes, 67–8, 55, 67 n., original emphasis.

134 Pickering, “The Roots of New Criticism,” 104–5.

135 John Crowe Ransom to Kenneth Burke, 19 Aug. 1941, Burke Papers, original emphasis.

136 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 226, 447, 462–3.

137 John Crowe Ransom, “Mr. Burke's Dialectic,” New Republic, 18 Feb. 1946, 257–8.

138 Burke to Ransom, 10 March 1945 (two drafts), Burke Papers, original emphasis.

139 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 429, 454–5.

140 Gillespie, Theological Origins, 23–5.

141 Daniel Rogers, The Age of Fracture (Cambridge, MA, 2011), 10.

142 Popper, Karl, The Open Society and Its Enemies , vol. 1 (London, 1945); and Berlin, Isaiah, The Hedgehog and the Fox (London, 1953)Google Scholar, find Plato “totalitarian.”

143 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 248.

144 Kenneth Burke to Richard McKeon, 1 June 1944, McKeon Papers.

145 Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 512.

146 Burke, Kenneth, “The Anaesthetic Revelation of Herone Liddell,” Kenyon Review, 19 (1957), 505–59, at 521–2.Google Scholar

147 Burke, Language as Symbolic Action, 2, 96, 161, 222, 373, 476.

148 Kenneth Burke, “Approaches to Remy de Gourmont” (1921), revised as “Three Adepts of ‘Pure’ Literature,” and reprinted in Burke, Counter-statement, 1–28, at 19.