Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:14:47.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VAGARIES OF DISENCHANTMENT: GOD, MATTER, AND MAMMON IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY

Review products

JonathanSheehan and DrorWahrman, Invisible Hands: Self-Organization and the Eighteenth Century (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015)
Rebecca L.Spang, Stuff and Money in the Time of the French Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2016

CHARLY COLEMAN
CHARLY COLEMAN*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Columbia University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the lecture “Science as a Vocation,” Max Weber gave a reckoning not only of his own scholarly life, but also of our fate in a world bereft of wonder. Self-possessed intellectuals command knowledge with authority. Yet their technical prowess also points up intractable limits. Calculation falters in securing value, whether in its moral or economic guises. If “we live as did the ancients when their world was not yet disenchanted of its gods and demons,” Weber mused, we nonetheless do so “in a different sense.” Once-knowing entities have shed their skins, to assume the mien of “impersonal forces.” These remarks assemble elements of Weber's religious sociology within a single frame, from the “this-worldly asceticism” of the Protestant ethic to portrayals of rationality as an “iron cage,” where spirits—much less the Spirit—dare not tread.

Type
Review Essays
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 869 - 881
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Weber, Max, “Science as a Vocation” (1919), in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (Oxford, 1958), 137–9, 146–9, at 148, 149Google Scholar.

2 Weber, Max, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905), trans. Talcott Parsons (London, 1992), 115, 123Google Scholar.

3 Ibid., 68. See Gauchet, Marcel, The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion, trans. Oscar Burge (Princeton, 1997)Google Scholar; Baker, Keith Michael, “Enlightenment and the Institution of Society: Notes for a Conceptual History,” in Melching, Willem and Velema, Wyger, eds., Main Trends in Cultural History (Amsterdam, 1994), 95–120 Google Scholar; and Bell, David A., The Cult of the Nation in France: Inventing Nationalism, 1680–1800 (Cambridge, MA, 2001)Google Scholar.

4 Fleming, John V., The Dark Side of the Enlightenment: Wizards, Alchemists, and Spiritual Seekers in the Age of Reason (New York, 2013)Google Scholar; and Monod, Paul Kléber, Solomon's Secret Arts: The Occult in the Age of Enlightenment (New Haven, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Edelstein, Dan, “Introduction to the Super-Enlightenment,” in Edelstein, , ed., The Super-Enlightenment: Daring to Know Too Much (Oxford, 2010), 1–33, at 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Weber, “Science as a Vocation,” 139.

7 For a classic statement of this position see Skinner, Quentin, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” History and Theory, 8/1 (1969), 3–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 I have adopted the expression from Jameson, Fredric, “The Vanishing Mediator: Narrative Structure in Max Weber,” New German Critique, 1 (1973), 52–89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 It is worth noting here Dan Edelstein's argument that second-order observation typified the Enlightenment's conscious narrative of itself as a rational, progressive age; see The Enlightenment: A Genealogy (Chicago, 2010), 13–17, 69–74.

10 Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston, 1944), 141–217 Google Scholar.

11 Hirschman, Albert O., The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton, 1977), 130–31, at 131, original emphasisGoogle Scholar.

12 Connolly, William E., The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism (Durham, NC, 2013), 10–11, 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Connelly, William E., Capitalism and Christianity, American Style (Durham, NC, 2008), 39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Mandeville, Bernard, The Fable of the Bees and Other Writings, ed. Hundert, E. J. (Indianapolis, 1997), 19 Google Scholar.

15 Furet, François, Interpreting the French Revolution, trans. Elborg Forster (Cambridge, 1981), 81 Google Scholar. For an overview of this shift see Doyle, William, Origins of the French Revolution (Oxford, 1980), 5–41 Google Scholar.

16 Sewell, William H. Jr, Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation (Chicago, 2005), 150–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Kafka, Ben, The Demon of Writing: Powers and Failures of Paperwork (New York, 2012), 51–76 Google Scholar.

18 Spang has previously considered this episode in “The Ghost of Law: Speculating on Money, Memory and Mississippi in the French Constituent Assembly,” Historical Reflections/Réflexions historiques, 31/1 (2005), 3–26.

19 [Terrasson, Jean], Traité de la communion, in [Terrasson], Traité de l'infini créé, avec L'Explication de la possibilité de la Transsubstantiation (Amsterdam, 1769), 199, 211Google Scholar.

20 [Jean Terrasson], “III. Lettre, où l'on traite encore des constitutions, & du crédit; & où l'on explique l'usage des monnoyes en general, et les avantages de la monnoye de Banque en particulier,” in [Terrasson], Lettres sur le nouveau systême des finances (n.p., 1720), 19, 20, 25.

21 See Fabre, Pierre Jean, L'alchimiste chrétien: Traduction anonyme inédite du XVIIIe siècle, ed. Greiner, Frank (Paris, 2001), 62–8, 170–209Google Scholar.

22 Raunié, Emile, ed., Recueil Clairambault-Maurepas: Chansonnier historique du XVIIIe siècle, 10 vols. (Paris, 1880–84), 3: 113, 139–40Google Scholar.

23 See, among other works, Mignot, Etienne, Traité des prêts de commerce, ou De l'intérêt légitime et illégitime de l'argent, new edn, 4 vols. (Amsterdam, 1759)Google Scholar; and de La Porte, Barthélemy, Principes théologiques, canoniques et civils, sur l'usure, 3 vols. (Paris, 1769)Google Scholar.

24 Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. 1, trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, ed. Engels, Frederick (New York, 1967), 105–6 and 132–3Google Scholar.