Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:21:30.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE POSITIVIST UNIVERSALISM AND REPUBLICANISM OF THE YOUNG TURKS*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2017

BANU TURNAOĞLU
BANU TURNAOĞLU*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores positivist universalism, one of the central aspects of contemporary approaches in political theory, through the study of the Young Turks’ political thought. Current scholarship portrays the Young Turks as champions of a national cause, limited to overthrowing despotism and relaunching the Constitution of 1876 in the Ottoman Empire. This neglects their broader aim to guarantee peace, order, and progress, both at home and abroad, by adopting Comtean universal positivism, and it distorts their vision of society, politics, and history. From their base in Paris the Young Turks challenged the Eurocentric conception of universalism, suggesting a more egalitarian and comprehensive conception that has yet to be recognized. This article shows that, transcending the conventional boundaries between Western and non-Western political thought, the Young Turks’ political ideology presents an early example of the formation of a modern, pluralist worldview, and that their core conceptions had a deep impact on the founding of Turkish republicanism.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 777 - 805
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Professor John Dunn, Professor M. Şükrü Hanioğlu, Dr Şuhnaz Yılmaz, and Dr Isabel DiVanna for their invaluable comments on this article; Fabio Boni and Anouk Bottero for their help with translating French texts; Selahattin Öztürk for his help with procuring the archival material and transcribing Ottoman texts; and the Modern Intellectual History editors and anonymous reviewers for their feedback.

References

1 “Young Turks” (Les jeunes Turcs) refers to an Ottoman opposition movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, composed of various groups: Ottoman exiles, intellectuals, army officers, and students. In 1895, the Ottoman Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) branded its journal Mechveret supplément français as the “Organe de la Jeune Turquie.” From this, the expression became more widely used by both members of the CUP and the public. This article focuses on the political thinking of the Young Turk movement from 1895 until the Young Turk Revolution of 1908.

2 See, for example, Fındıkoğlu, Z. Fahri, Auguste Comte ve Ahmet Rıza (Istanbul, 1962)Google Scholar; Karpat, Kemal, Elites and Religion from Ottoman Empire to Turkish Republic (İstanbul, 2010)Google Scholar; Korlaelçi, Murtaza, Pozitivizmin Türkiye'ye Girişi ve İlk Etkileri (İstanbul, 2002)Google Scholar.

3 Since surviving texts do not exist in one cohesive collection, this study demanded a full survey of available literature—including unused original texts. The consulted archives were (in İstanbul) ISAM (Center for Islamic Studies), Atatürk Kütüphanesi, and Beyazıt Devlet Kütüphanesi, and in Paris La maison d'Auguste Comte and the Bibliothèque nationale de France.

4 Auguste Comte's Cours de Philosophie Positive was published between 1830 and 1842. Following this, in England, John Stuart Mill published A System of Logic (1843) and Auguste Comte and Positivism (1866). In Germany, Ernst Mach's Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung (Science of Mechanics) appeared in 1883. See Harré, Rom, “Positivist Thought in the Nineteenth Century,” in Baldwin, Thomas, ed., The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945 (Cambridge, 2003), 13–15 Google Scholar.

5 Nisbet, Robert, History of the Idea of Progress (New Brunswick, 1994), 255 Google Scholar.

6 Comte, Auguste, A General View of Positivism, trans. J. H. Bridges, 2nd edn (London, 1880), 77 Google Scholar.

7 Comte, Auguste, System of Positive Polity, trans. B. Franklin, vol. 4 (London, 1877), 10 Google Scholar.

8 Comte, Auguste, The Catechism of Positive Religion, trans. Richard Congreve (London, 1858), 360 Google Scholar.

9 Mill, John Stuart and Comte, Auguste, “Auguste Comte to John Stuart Mill, 23 January 1846,” in Haac, Oscar A., ed., The Correspondence of John Stuart Mill and Auguste Comte (London, 1995), 361 Google Scholar. On the articulation of cosmopolitanism and humanity in England see Varouxakis, Georgios, “‘Patriotism’, ‘Cosmopolitanism’, and ‘Humanity’ in Victorian Political Thought,” European Journal of Political Theory 5/1 (2006), 100–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Comte, The Catechism of Positive Religion, 30.

11 “Auguste Comte to John Stuart Mill, 23 January 1846,” 362.

12 Ibid.

13 Ibid., 361.

14 Comte, The Catechism of Positive Religion, 358.

15 See especially Comte, A General View of Positivism, chap. 6, “The Religion of Humanity.”

16 Comte, System of Positive Polity, vol. 4, 431.

17 Quoted in Pickering, Mary, Auguste Comte: An Intellectual Biography, vol. 3 (New York, 2009), 521 Google Scholar.

18 Ibid.

19 Comte, System of Positive Polity, vol. 4, 508.

20 With a brief interruption in 1848, Mustafa Reşid Paşa served as grand vizier from 1846 to 1852.

21 “Auguste Comte'dan Mustafa Reşit Paşa'ya Yazılan Mektup,” in Bora, Tanıl and Gültekin, Murat, eds., Cumhuriyet'e Devreden Düşünce Mirası Tanzimat ve Meşrutiyet'in Birikimi (İstanbul, 2006), 480 Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., 481.

23 Ibid.

24 Murtaza Korlaelçi, “Pozitivist Düşüncenin İthali,” in Bora and Gültekin, Cumhuriyet'e Devreden Düşünce Mirası Tanzimat ve Meşrutiyet'in Birikimi, 214–15.

25 Bayly, Christopher A., “European Political Thought and the Wider World,” in Jones, Gareth Stedman and Claeys, Gregory, eds., The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge, 2011), 851 Google Scholar; Simon, Walter Michael, European Positivism in the 19th Century: An Essay in Intellectual History (Ithaca, 1963)Google Scholar.

26 Arisaka, Yoko, “Beyond ‘East and West’: Nishida's Universalism and Postcolonial Critique,” Review of Politics 59/3 (1997), 542–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 For positivism in Latin America see Woodward, Ralph Lee, Positivism in Latin America, 1850–1900: Are Order and Progress Reconcilable? (Lexington, 1971)Google Scholar.

28 DiVanna, Isabel, “Reading Comte across the Atlantic: Intellectual Exchanges between France and Brazil and the Question of Slavery,” History of European Ideas 38/3 (2012), 452–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Zea, Leopoldo, Positivism in Mexico, trans. Josephine H. Schulte (Austin, 1974), 156–61Google Scholar.

30 Fortna, Benjamin C., “The Reign of Abdülhamid II,” in Kasaba, Reşat, ed., The Cambridge History of Turkey: Turkey in the Modern World (Cambridge, 2011), 47–8Google Scholar.

31 Some of these jurnals were the products of mere rumour. The surviving ones are compiled as a book. See Turgay, Asaf, İbret: Abdülhamid'e Verilen Jurnaller ve Jurnalciler (İstanbul, 1961)Google Scholar.

32 Kudret, Cevdet, Abdülhamit Devri'nde Sansür, vol. 1 (İstanbul, 2000), 5–6 Google Scholar, 48, 53.

33 “Catalogue, des livres et des brochures dont l'entree dans l'Empire Ottoman a éte interdite, İstanbul, 1318 [1910],” in Demir, Remzi, ed., Philosophia Ottomanica (İstanbul, 2005), 187–8Google Scholar.

34 Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü, “Notes on the Young Turks and the Freemasons, 1875–1908,” Middle Eastern Studies 25/2 (1989), 186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 For nineteenth-century radicalism see Claeys, Gregory and Lattek, Christine, “Radicalism, Republicanism and Revolutionism,” in Jones, and Claeys, , The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge, 2011), 203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü, Doktor Abdullah Cevdet ve Dönemi (İstanbul, 1981), 8–9 Google Scholar.

37 Cevdet, Abdullah, Fizyolociya-i Tefekkür: Mehazımın Esası Kraft und Stoff Ünvanlı Kitabın Tefekkür Bahsidir (İstanbul, 1892)Google Scholar.

38 Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü, “Blueprints for a Future Society: Late Ottoman Materialists on Science, Religion, and Art,” in Özdalga, Elisabeth, ed., Late Ottoman Society: The Intellectual Legacy (London, 2005), 28 Google Scholar.

39 Cevdet, Abdullah, “Muktesebât-ı Fenniye: Herkes İçün Kimya,” Musavver Cihan 4 (23 Sept. 1891), 30 Google Scholar.

40 Temo, İbrahim, “Tegaddi ve Devam-ı Hayat,” Musavver Cihan 16 (12 Dec. 1892), 123 Google Scholar.

41 Nur, Rıza, Tıbbiye Hayatından (İstanbul, 1911), 7 Google Scholar.

42 Ahmed Rıza initially suggested renaming the society Nizam ve Terakki (Order and Progress) to express his full commitment to positivism, but İttihâd-ı Osmani's members based in İstanbul preferred İttihat ve Terakki (Union and Progress). See Kuran, Ahmed Bedevî, İnkılap Tarihimiz ve Jön Türkler, 2nd edn (İstanbul, 2000), 46–7Google Scholar. Ahmed Rıza's major works included Tolérance musulmane (1897), La crise d'Orient (1907), and La faillite morale de la politique occidentale en Orient (1922). See M. Şükrü Hanioğlu, “Ahmed Rıza,” in Kate Fleet, Gudrun Krämer, Denis Matringe, John Nawas, and Everett Rowson, eds., Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE, at https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_23352, accessed 28 Nov. 2016. For an autobiography of Ahmed Rıza see Ahmed Rıza, Meclis-i Mebusan ve Ayan Reisi Ahmet Rıza Bey'in Anıları (The Memoirs of Ahmed Rıza, President of the Chamber of Deputies and of the Senate) (İstanbul: Arba Yayınları, 1988). For an intellectual biography of Ahmed Rıza see Erdal Kaynar, “Ahmed Rıza (1858–1930): Histoire d'un vieux Jeune Turc” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris, 2012).

43 Halil Ganem was an influential Lebanese leader of the Turkish–Syrian Committee, which merged with the Committee of Union and Progress in 1895. He published a journal, La jeune Turquie, in Şükrü Hanioğlu, Paris. M., “The Young Turks and the Arabs before the Revolution of 1908,” in Khalidi, Rashid, ed., The Origins of Arab Nationalism (New York, 1991), 36–7Google Scholar.

44 For Mizancı Murad Bey's life and works see Emil, Birol, Son Dönem Osmanlı Aydını Mizancı Murad Bey (İstanbul, 2009)Google Scholar.

45 Murad, Mizancı, Mücahede-i Milliye: Gurbet ve Avdet Devirleri (İstanbul, 1994), 246 Google Scholar.

46 (Yalçın), Hüseyin Cahit, Siyasal Anılar (İstanbul, 2000), 61 Google Scholar.

47 Mechveret appeared as the supplement of the Turkish Meşveret but not as its direct translation. It contained different articles with a more positivist tone. Meşveret was published only for two years. From 1897 until the Young Turk Revolution of 1908, Mechveret served as the major newspaper of the Young Turks in Paris. Because of Abdülhamid II's censorship, the newspapers were smuggled secretly into the Ottoman Empire to reach the Ottoman intellectual elite.

48 Ahmed Rıza, “Les positivistes et la politique internationale,” Mechveret 19 (15 Sept. 1898), 6.

49 “Banquet de la jeune Turquie,” Mechveret 26 (1 Jan. 1897), 3.

50 Ahmed Rıza, “İhtilal,” Meşveret 29 (15 Jan. 1898), 2.

51 Rıza, Ahmed, “Kadın,” in Gündüz, Mustafa and Bardak, Musa, eds., Ahmet Rıza Bey ve “Vazife ve Mesuliyet” Eserleri (Ankara, 2011 Google Scholar; first published 1908), 139.

52 Rıza, Ahmed, La crise de l'Orient: Ses causes et ses remedes (Paris, 1907), 55–7Google Scholar.

53 The Tanzimat (“reordering”) (1839–76) was the extensive reform and westernization movement of the nineteenth-century Ottoman Empire, which aimed at integrating with the “Concert of Europe.” Various reforms ranging from education to the military, finance, and administration were undertaken in this period.

54 Ahmed Rıza, “Kadın,” 113–52. He drew inspiration from Comte on women. For more on Comte's ideas on women's roles in the family see Pickering, Mary, “New Evidence of the Link between Comte and German Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Ideas 50/3, (1989), 441–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Ahmed Rıza, “Hükümetsizlik,” Meşveret 17 (21 Aug. 1896), 1.

56 Ahmed Rıza, “İcmal-i Ahval,” Meşveret 19 (20 Sept. 1896), 1–2.

57 Ahmed Rıza, “Mukaddime,” in Gündüz and Bardak, Ahmet Rıza Bey ve “Vazife ve Mesuliyet” Eserleri, 40.

58 Ahmed Rıza, “Ben mi Aldaniyorum Padişah mı Aldanıyor,” Meşveret 25 (8 Oct. 1897), 1.

59 Şerif Mardin, Jön Türklerin Siyasi Fikirleri, 1895–1908 (İstanbul, 2011), 193.

60 Cited in Şerif Mardin, Religion, Society, and Modernity in Turkey (New York, 2006), 171. See Ahmed Rıza, La revue occidentale, 2nd series 3 (1891), 116.

61 Fuad, “Indépendence et integrite de l'Empire Ottoman,” Mechveret 14 (1 July 1896), 3; Ahmed Rıza, “Confusion de pouvoirs en Turqui,” Mechveret 2 (15 Dec. 1895), 1.

62 Ahmed Rıza, “İhtilal,” 2.

63 Ahmed Rıza, “Le Sultan et les princes,” Mechveret, 1 Sept. 1905, 1.

64 Rıza, Ahmed, Vatanın Hâline ve Maarif-i Umûmiyenin Islahına Dair Sultan Abdülhâmid Han-ı Sânî Hazretlerine Takdim Kılınan Altı Lâyihadan Birinci Lâyiha (London: Imprimerie internationale, 1895), 17 Google Scholar. This text was an advice treatise, addressing the Sultan.

65 For the reference to Condorcet see “Asker,” in Gündüz and Bardak, Ahmet Rıza Bey ve “Vazife ve Mesuliyet” Eserleri, 91.

66 Halil Ganem, “La Constitution et le peuple Ottoman,” Mechveret, 15 Sept. 1889, 4.

67 “La politique du Sultan,” Mechveret 8 (1 April 1896), 1. This article appeared in Justice on 29 March 1896.

68 Fuad, “Indépendence et integrite,” 3; Ahmed Rıza, “Confusion de pouvoirs en Turqui,” Mechveret 2 (15 Dec. 1895), 1.

69 “Mukaddime,” Meşveret 1 (1 Jan. 1895), 1.

70 Ahmed Rıza, La crise de l'Orient, 3.

71 Ahmed Rıza, “L'Orient à l'exposition II,” Mechveret 100 (1 July 1900), 4.

72 Fuad, “Patience!”, Mechveret 9 (15 April 1896), 1–2.

73 See Bethell, Leslie, Ideas and Ideologies in Twentieth-Century Latin America (Cambridge, 1996), 150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, Terry N., Prophets and Patrons: The French University and the Emergence of the Social Sciences (Cambridge, 1973), 101–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jennings, Jeremy, Revolution and the Republic: A History of Political Thought in France since the Eighteenth Century (Oxford, 2013), 363 Google Scholar.

74 Simon, European Positivism in the 19th Century, 39.

75 Ahmed Rıza, “La construction d'une mosquee à Paris,” Mechveret 1 (1 Dec. 1895), 1.

76 Laffitte, Pierre, The Positive Science of Morals: Its Opportuneness, Its Outlines and Its Chief Applications, trans. J. Carey (London, 1908), 196–7Google Scholar.

77 Ibid.

78 Georges Clemenceau, “Pour faire plaisir au Sultan,” La dépèche, 14 April 1896, in Mechveret 9 (15 April 1896), 7.

79 Eduard Conte, “Le jeune Turquie,” Mechveret 9 (15 April 1896), 8.

80 “Banquet de la jeune Turquie,” Mechveret 26 (1 Jan. 1897), 4.

81 M. Şükrü Hanioğlu, Preparation for a Revolution: The Young Turks, 1902–1908 (Oxford, 2001), 39.

82 Lagarrigue, Juan Enrique, Religion de l'humanité . . . Lettre à M. Ahmed Riza, Par Juan Enrique Lagarrigue (Santiago Ercilla, 1901)Google Scholar.

83 Augustín Aragón to Ahmed Rıza, Mexico, César 10, 117/2 May 1905.

84 M. Şükrü Hanioğlu, “Ahmed Şuayb,” in Fleet et al., Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. at http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_23442, accessed 10 Dec. 2016.

85 Şuayb, Ahmed, Hayat ve Kitaplar (Ankara, 2005 Google Scholar; first published İstanbul, 1899, 2nd edn İstanbul, 1913), 70.

86 Okay, M. Orhan, Beşir Fuad: İlk Türk Pozitivist ve Natüralisti, 2nd edn (İstanbul, 2008)Google Scholar.

87 Beşir Fuad, “Mukaddime,” in Erdoğan Erbay and Ali Utku, eds., Voltaire (İstanbul, 2003; first published 1886), 103.

88 Ibid., 104–5.

89 Ibid., 139.

90 Ibid., 164.

91 Ahmed Şuayb, Hayat ve Kitaplar, 135.

92 Ibid.

93 Rıza, Ahmed, “L'Orient à l'exposition,” Mechveret 99 (1 June 1900), 2 Google Scholar.

94 Rıza, Ahmed, “L'Orient à l'exposition II,” Mechveret 100 (1 July 1900), 2–4 Google Scholar.

95 Rıza, Ahmed, “Devoir du Calife,” Mechveret 12 (1 June 1896), 3 Google Scholar; Rıza, Ahmed, “L'Orient à l'exposition III,” Mechveret 101 (15 July 1900), 2 Google Scholar.

96 Fuad, “Les armeniens et le self-government,” Mechveret 15 (15 July 1896), 4.

97 Ahmed Rıza, “L'Orient à l'exposition II,” 2.

98 Ahmed Rıza, La revue occidentale, 2nd series 3 (1895), 374–6.

99 Ibid.

100 Rıza, Ahmed, The Moral Bankruptcy of Western Policy towards the East, trans. Adair Mill (Ankara, 1988 Google Scholar; first published 1922), 147.

101 Rıza, Ahmed, “Pierre Laffitte,” Mechveret 137 (1 Feb. 1903), 4 Google Scholar.

102 Ahmed Rıza, “L'Orient à l'exposition III,” 2–3.

103 Ahmed Rıza, Moral Bankruptcy, 18, 111–37.

104 Ahmed Rıza, “Mukaddime,” 40.

105 Ahmed Rıza, “Padişah,” 12–13.

106 Ahmed Rıza, “Laicisation du protectorat,” Mechveret 138 (1 Dec. 1904), 1–2.

107 Ahmed Rıza, Moral Bankruptcy, 213.

108 Kansu, Aykut, “20. Yüzyıl Başı Türk Düşünce Hayatında Liberalizm,” in Bora, Tanıl and Gültekin, Murat, eds., Tanzimat ve Meşrutiyetin Birikimi (İstanbul, 2006), 291 Google Scholar.

109 Ahmed Rıza, “Devoir du Calife,” 3.

110 Ahmed Rıza, “Panislamisme,” in Ahmed Rıza, La crise de l'Orient, 39.

111 Rıza, Ahmed, “Une nouvelle tactique,” Mechveret 13 (15 June 1896), 3 Google Scholar.

112 Ahmed Rıza, Vatanın Haline ve Maarif-i Umumiyenin Islahına Dair Sultan Abdülhamid Han-ı Sani Hazretlerine Takdim Kılınan Layihalar Hakkında Makam-ı Sadarete Gönderilen Mektuptur (Geneva: Imprimerie et lithographie A. Friedrich, 1895), 21.

113 Ibid.

114 Fuad, Beşir, İlk Türk Materyalisti Beşir Fuad'ın Mektupları (İstanbul, 1988), 28–9Google Scholar.

115 Ahmed Rıza was preoccupied with the women's question and education. Upon his return to İstanbul he formed a committee, Sultanî İnas Cemiyeti, to launch the opening of schools for girls. In 1916 he initiated the opening of the school for girls, Adile Sultan İnas Mekteb-i Sultanisi (Adile Sultan Imperial Girls’ School), but this project was delayed due to the First World War. This school started functioning later and had its first graduates in 1920. See Ahmed Rıza, Anılar (İstanbul: Cumhuriyet Yayınları, 2001), 32.

116 Şuayb, Ahmed, Hayat ve Kitaplar, ed., Erbay, Erdoğan (Ankara, 2005 Google Scholar; first published 1899), 149.

117 Ibid.

118 Ahmed Rıza, “Mukaddime,” 1.

119 Ibid., 40.

120 Ahmed Rıza, “Şehzâdeler,” 54.

121 Ahmed Rıza, “Padişah,” 47–50.

122 Ahmed Rıza, “Mukaddime,” 1.

123 Ahmed Rıza, Moral Bankruptcy, 138.

124 Cited in M. Şükrü Hanioğlu, “Private Papers of Ahmet Rıza (2),” in Hanioğlu, The Young Turks in Opposition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 190.

125 Rıza, Ahmed, “Pourquoi l'Europe ne réclame pas le établissement de la Constitution en Turquie,” Mechveret 21 (15 Oct. 1896), 3 Google Scholar.

126 Ibid.

127 Ahmed Rıza, Moral Bankruptcy, 210.

128 Fuad, “La diplomatie et la question d'Orient 2,” Mechveret 17 (15 Aug. 1896), 2.

129 Ahmed Rıza, “Panislamisme,” 28.

130 Ahmed Rıza, Moral Bankruptcy, 14, 29.

131 Ibid., 14.

132 Ibid., 27.

133 Ibid., 207.

134 Ibid.

135 Ibid., 209.

136 Ibid., 6.

137 Ibid., 214.

138 Rıza, Ahmed, “Muharebe ve İhtilal,” Şura-yı Ümmet, 72 (6 April 1905), 1–2 Google Scholar; Rıza, “Port Arthtur'un Sükutu,” Şura-yı Ümmet, 69 (19 Feb. 1905), 1–2.

139 Ahmed Rıza, “Légions japonaises,” Mechveret, 1 March 1905, 1, cited in Worringer, Renée, “‘Sick Man of Europe’ or ‘Japan of the Near East’? Constructing Ottoman Modernity in the Hamidian and Young Turk Eras,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 36/2 (2004), 207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

140 Rıza, Ahmed, “Küstahlık,” Şura-yı Ümmet, 75 (20 May 1905), 1 Google Scholar.

141 Sabahaddin, “Merkeziyet ve Adem-i Merkeziyet,” Terakki 1 (1 April 1906), 10.

142 Ibid., 9–10.

143 Erkul, Ali, “Prens Sabahattin,” in Kongar, Emre, ed., Türk Toplumbilimcileri (İstanbul, 1982), 134 Google Scholar.

144 Sabaheddine, “The Sultan and the Pan-Islamic Movement,” The Times, 13 Aug. 1906, 6, also in Alkan, Mehmet Ö., ed., Prens Sabahaddin: Gönüllü Sürgünden Zorunlu Sürgüne (İstanbul, 2007), 155 Google Scholar.

145 Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü, “Der Jungtürkenkongress von Paris (1902) und seine Ergebnisse,” Die Welt des Islams 33 (1993), 61–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

146 On Ahmet Rıza's side were Hoca Kadri, Halil Ganem, Ahmed Ferid, Doctor Nazım, and Mustafa Hamdi. See Hanioğlu, Preparation for a Revolution, 3–4.

147 Among them were Niyazi Bey and Karabekir, both of whom later became key influential figures during the formation of the republic. Sohrabi, Nader, Revolution and Constitutionalism in the Ottoman Empire and Iran (New York, 2011), 90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

148 “Preface,” in Spiller, G., ed., Papers on Inter-Racial Problems Communicated to the First Universal Races Congress Held at the University of London July 26–29, 1911 (London, 1911)Google Scholar, v.