Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:56:10.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW: SOCIAL INVESTIGATION IN HISTORY AND THEORY*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

MARY O. FURNER
MARY O. FURNER*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Investigating investigations, inquiring into inquiries, surveying the results of earlier surveys: for well over a century historians have been digging into the mountains of data amassed by generations of social investigators, seeking evidence to use in reconstructing past economic relations and social conditions. Like Karl Marx hunched over parliamentary Blue Books in the British Museum, we have parsed the tables and decoded the responses, searching for the stuff of social and cultural life. All this intense scrutiny suggests something of the importance of the subject. For social historians seeking nonelite sources, for policy historians studying conditions to be addressed by state or communal action, for cultural historians recovering elusive past identities, for intellectual historians listening for points of contact between action and belief, the accumulated lore deposited in past social inquiries provides indispensable concrete evidence.

Type
Essays
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 147 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Frankel, Oz, States of Inquiry: Social Investigations and Print Culture in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the United States (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Igo, Sarah E., The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Page references are given in parentheses in the text.

2 Brock, William R., Investigation and Responsibility: Public Responsibility in the United States, 1865–1900 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 On the essentially contested nature of conceptual knowledge, see Gray, John, “On Liberty, Liberalism, and Essential Contestability,” British Journal of Political Science 8/4 (1978), 365–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L., eds., Political Innovation and Conceptual Change (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

4 Mannheim, Karl, Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, trans. Wirth, Louis and Shils, Edward (New York: Harcourt Brace and World, 1936; first published in German 1929)Google Scholar; Mullins, Willard A., “Truth and Ideology: Reflections on Mannheim's Paradox,” History and Theory 18/2 (1979), 141–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goldman, Harvey, “From Social Theory to the Sociology of Knowledge and back: Karl Mannheim and the Sociology of Intellectual Production,” Sociological Theory 12/3 (1994), 266–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Westbrook, Robert, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

6 Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books, 1973)Google Scholar; Shankman, Paul et al. ., “The Thick and the Thin: On the Interpretive Theoretical Program of Clifford Geertz,” Current Anthropology 25/3 (1984), 261–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 On these two thinkers see Kramer, Lloyd, “Habermas, Foucault, and the Legacy of Enlightenment Intellectuals,” in Fink, Leon et al. ., eds., Intellectuals and Public Life (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Flyvbjerg, Bent, “Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society?” British Journal of Sociology 49/2 (1998), 210–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Gerstle, Gary, American Crucible: Race and Nation in the Twentieth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

9 Donohue, Kathleen, Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Idea of the Consumer (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

10 Dewey, John, The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry (New York: Henry Holt, 1927)Google Scholar.

11 Smith, Mark C., Social Science in the Crucible: The American Debate over Objectivity and Purpose, 1918–1941 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; O'Connor, Alice, Social Science for What? Philanthropy and the Social Question in a World Turned Rightside Up (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2007)Google Scholar. In the latter, see particularly the illuminating sketch of Lynd's career and concerns, 59–65.