Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:33:34.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE GROWTH OF RACE AND CULTURE IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY GERMANY: GUSTAV KLEMM AND THE UNIVERSAL HISTORY OF HUMANITY*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2012

CHRIS MANIAS
CHRIS MANIAS*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Exeter E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The German ethnologist Gustav Klemm (1802–67) occupies a rather problematic position in the history of ideas, alternately hailed as a seminal figure in the development of concepts of race and culture, or belittled as a rather derivative marginal thinker. This article seeks to clarify Klemm's significance by rooting his theories in their contemporary intellectual and social context. It argues that his system, a linear model of human development driven by the interworkings of race and culture, grew from an attempt to synthesize Enlightenment notions of universal progress with major shifts of the mid-nineteenth century, including experiences of dramatic social, political and technological change, commitments to constitutional liberalism, and changes in contemporary ethnology and museology. His works therefore illustrate the complex manners in which ideas of heredity, environment, civilization, development and gender could be blended in this often neglected period, and how their meanings and implications altered as syntheses were built.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 2012 , pp. 1 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, Poliakov, Léon, Le mythe Aryen: Essai sur les sources du racisme et des nationalismes (Paris, 1971), 260–62Google Scholar; Harris, Marvin, The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture (New York, 1968), 101–2Google Scholar; Leopold, Joan, Culture in Comparative and Evolutionary Perspective: E. B. Tylor and the Making of Primitive Culture (Berlin, 1980), 87–9Google Scholar; Smith, Woodruff D., Politics and the Sciences of Culture in Germany, 1840–1920 (New York and Oxford, 1991), 60–61Google Scholar; Zimmerman, Andrew, Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany (Chicago and London, 2001), 184–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Penny, Hugh Glenn, Objects of Culture: Ethnology and Ethnographic Museums in Imperial Germany (Chapel Hill and London, 2002), 167–9Google Scholar; and Banton, Michael, Racial Theories: Second Edition (Cambridge, 1998), 36–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Many of these are based almost entirely on accounts several decades old, in particular Lowie, Robert H., The History of Ethnological Theory (New York, 1960), 11–16Google Scholar; and Voegelin, Eric, Rasse und Staat (Tübingen, 1933), 157–70Google Scholar.

2 Klemm, Gustav, Allgemeine Cultur-Geschichte der Menschheit, 10 vols. (Leipzig, 1843–52)Google Scholar, henceforth Klemm, ACGdM.

3 Bunzl, Matti and Penny, Hugh Glenn, “Introduction: Rethinking German Anthropology, Colonialism, and Race,” in Bunzl, M. and Penny, H. G., eds., Worldly Provincialism: German Anthropology in the Age of Empire (Ann Arbor, 2003), 1–30, 11Google Scholar.

4 Voegelin, Rasse und Staat, 158.

5 As well as own, Klemm'sFreundschaftliche Briefe (Dresden, 1850) and Vor fünfzig Jahren: Culturgeschichtliche Briefe, 2 vols. (Stuttgartt, 1865)Google Scholar, biographies appear in Heydrich, Martin, “Gustav Klemm und seine kulturhistorische Sammlung,” in Hesch, Michael and Spannaus, Günther, eds., Kultur und Rasse: Otto Reche zum 60. Geburtstag gewidmet von Schülern und Freunden (Munich and Berlin, 1939), 305–16Google Scholar; two articles in Jahrbuch des Museums für Völkerkunde zu Leipzig XXVI (1969): Ernst Germer's “Die Vorgeschichte der Gründung des Museums für Völkerkunde zu Leipzig, 1868–1869,” 5–40, and Dietrich Drost's “Gustav Klemms kulturhistorisches Museum,” 41–83; and Orlinska, Graẋyna, Catalogue of the “Germanic” Antiquities from the Klemm Collection in The British Museum (London, 2001), 19–29Google Scholar.

6 Green, Abigail, Fatherlands: State-Building and Nationhood in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Cambridge, 2001), 113–15Google Scholar.

7 See particularly the “classic” studies of Sheehan, James, German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1982), 5–6Google Scholar; and Langewiesche, Dieter, Liberalismus in Deutschland (Frankfurt-am-Main, 1988) for general characterizationsGoogle Scholar; and more recent closer investigations such as the essays in Jarausch, Konrad, Jones, Larry Eugene, and Hamerow, Theodore S., eds., In Search of a Liberal Germany: Studies in the History of German Liberalism from 1789 to the Present (New York, Oxford and Munich, 1990)Google Scholar; Fitzpatrick, Matthew P., Liberal Imperialism in Germany: Expansionism and Nationalism, 1848–1884 (New York, 2008), 14–16Google Scholar; and Leonhard, Jörn, Liberalismus: zur historischen Semantik eines Deutungsmusters (Oldenburg, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Klemm, Vor fünfzig Jahren, 1: 272.

9 Andreas Neemann, “Models of Political Participation in the Beust Era: The State, the Saxon Landtag, and the Public Sphere, 1849–1864,” in Retallack, James, ed., Saxony in German History: Culture, Society, and Politics, 1830–1933 (Detroit, 2000), 119–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Orlinska, Klemm Collection, 29; and Correspondenz-Blatt des Gesammtvereines der deutschen Geschichts- und Alterthums-Vereine I (1852).

11 Klemm, Vor fünfzig Jahren, 2: 179.

12 Ibid., 1: 24.

13 Klemm, Gustav, Allgemeine Culturwissenschaft: Die materiellen Grundlagen menschlicher Cultur (Leipzig, 1855), 31Google Scholar.

14 Saxony's distinctive place within Germany is discussed in Retallack, Saxony in German History.

15 Leopold, Culture in Comparative and Evolutionary Perspective, 74–8; and Carhart, Michael C., The Science of Culture in Enlightenment Germany (Cambridge, MA and London, 2007), 100–5Google Scholar.

16 Rudwick, Martin J. S., Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution (Chicago and London, 2005), 89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Carus has shared a similar fate to Klemm, being largely subordinated to earlier and later scholars: see Müller-Tamm, Jutta, Kunst als Gipfel der Wissenschaft: Ästhetische und wissenschaftliche Weltaneignung bei Carl Gustav Carus (Berlin and New York, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; he is mentioned in Banton, Racial Theories, 34–6.

18 Indeed, several of the more considered summaries of Klemm's thought relate his works and views to those of Semper, who has been more historiographically fortunate owing to his prominent place in the architectural history canon: Hildebrand, Sonja, “‘Nach einem Systeme zu ordnen, welches die inneren Verbindsfäden dieser bunten Welt am besten zusammenhält:’ Kulturgeschichtliche Modelle bei Gottfried Semper und Gustav Klemm,” in Karge, Henrik, ed., Gottfried Semper, Dresden und Europa: Die moderne Renaissance der Künste (Munich and Berlin), 237–49Google Scholar; and Hvattum, Mari, Gottfried Semper and the Problem of Historicism (Cambridge, 2004), 42–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Hvattum, Gottfried Semper, 43.

20 Klemm, Gustav, Attila, nach der Geschichte, Sage und Legende (Leipzig, 1827)Google Scholar.

21 Klemm, Gustav, Handbuch der germanischen Alterthumskunde (Dresden, 1836), xxvGoogle Scholar.

22 See especially Wiwjorra, Ingo, Der Germanenmythos: Konstruktion einer Weltanschauung in der Altertumsforschung des 19. Jahrhunderts (Berlin, 2006)Google Scholar; and Echternkamp, Jörg, Der Aufstieg des deutschen Nationalismus: 1770–1840 (Frankfurt am Main and New York, 1998), 316–35Google Scholar.

23 von, Klaus See, Deutsche Germanen-Ideologie: Vom Humanismus bis zur Gegenwart (Frankfurt-am-Main, 1970), 9–10Google Scholar.

24 Klemm, Allgemeine Culturwissenschaft, 34. Orlinska, Klemm Collection, notes that his excavations were conducted (at least by contemporary standards) very systematically, and seems to lament (at 29) that the rest of his life was spent on ethnographic theorizing: “Who knows what his achievements might have been had he not expanded his interests beyond the field of archaeology?”

25 Klemm, Handbuch, 161–90.

26 Klemm, Gustav, Die Königliche Sächsische Porzellan-Sammlung. Eine Uebersicht ihrer vorzüglichsten Schätze, nebst Nachweisungen über die Geschichte der Gefässbildnerei in Thon und Porzellan (Dresden, 1834)Google Scholar.

27 Heydrich, “Gustav Klemm,” 314.

28 Drost, “Gustav Klemms kulturhistorisches Museum,” 45.

29 “Die culturwissenschaftliche Sammlung des Hofrath Dr. Gustav Klemm in Dresden,” Das Ausland 37 (1864), 12–17, and 38 (1865), 345–9Google Scholar.

30 Ibid. 37 (1864), 17.

31 Klemm, Freundschaftliche Briefe, 79.

32 The study of antiquarianism owes much to Momigliano, Arnaldo, particularly The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography (Berkeley, CA and London, 1990), 54–79Google Scholar. Its track and links to archaeology is presented in Schnapp, Alain, La conquête du passé: Aux origines de l'archéologie (Paris, 1998)Google Scholar.

33 Marchand, Suzanne L., Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750–1970 (Princeton, NJ, 2003), 152–87Google Scholar; and Crane, Susan A., Collecting and Historical Consciousness in Early Nineteenth-Century Germany (Ithaca, NY, 2000), 60–104Google Scholar.

34 Klemm, ACGdM, 9: 21.

35 Ibid., 10: iii–iv.

36 Klemm, Gustav, Die Frauen: Culturgeschichtliche Schilderungen des Zustandes und Einflusses der Frauen in den verschiedenen Zonen und Zeitaltern, 6 vols. (Dresden, 1854–9)Google Scholar.

37 Klemm, Gustav, Allgemeine Culturwissenschaft and Die Werkzeuge und Waffen: Ihre Entstehung und Ausbildung (Sondershausen, 1858)Google Scholar.

38 Carhart, Science of Culture, particularly 1–26.

39 Marchand, Suzanne L., “The Quarrel of the Ancients and Moderns in the German Museums,” in Crane, Susan A., ed., Museums and Memory (Stanford, CA, 2000): 179–99, 181Google Scholar.

40 Klemm, Allgemeine Culturwissenschaft, 37. Originally in Adelung, Christoph, Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der Hochdeutschen Mundart, I: A–E (Leipzig, 1793), 1354–5Google Scholar.

41 Bunzl, Matti, “Franz Boas and the Humboldtian Tradition: From Volksgeist and Nationalcharakter to an Anthropological Concept of Culture,” in Stocking, George W., ed., Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition (Madison, WI, 1996), 17–78, 46Google Scholar.

42 Bauman, Zygmunt “Marx and the Contemporary Theory of Culture,” Social Science Information 7/19 (1968), 19–33, 22–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Klemm, Allgemeine Culturwissenschaft, 37.

44 Klemm, ACGdM, 1: 28.

45 Ibid., 1: 168–173.

46 Chickering, Roger, Karl Lamprecht: A German Academic Life (Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1993), 335–7Google Scholar.

47 Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte (Berlin, 1840), 136Google Scholar.

48 Klemm, ACGdM, 1: 233.

49 Ibid., 1: 20.

50 Ibid., 1: 20–1.

51 Ibid., 1: 18.

52 Ibid., 1: 19. See also Williams, Howard, Kant's Political Philosophy (Oxford, 1983), 1–26Google Scholar.

53 Ibid., 1: 19.

54 Cadot, Marie Th., “Positivisme politique et inégalité des races dans l'oeuvre narrative de G. Freytag,” Etudes germaniques 31/3 (1976), 281–96, 284–5Google Scholar.

55 Harris, The Rise of Anthropological Theory, 102.

56 Banton, Racial Theories, 36.

57 Klemm, ACGdM, 1: 196.

58 Stepan, Nancy Leys, “Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science,” Isis 77/2 (1986), 261–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Zantop, Susanne, Colonial Fantasies: Conquest, Family, and Nation in Precolonial Germany, 1770–1870 (Durham and London, 1997), 46–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Klemm, ACGdM, 1: 198–200.

61 Ibid., 1: 200.

62 Klemm, Vor fünfzig Jahren, 1: 9.

63 Klemm, ACGdM, 1: 202.

64 Ibid., 4: 114.

65 Ibid., 1: 197.

66 Bindman, David, Ape to Apollo: Aesthetics and the Idea of Race in the Eighteenth Century (Guildford, 2002)Google Scholar. He also notes (at 25) the wide contemporary esteem of the physical qualities of the Circassians.

67 Klemm, ACGdM, 1: 197.

68 Klemm, Frauen, 1: 2–3.

69 Ibid., 1: 195.

70 Klemm, ACGdM, 4: 22–3.

71 Ibid., 7: 161.

72 Marchand, Down from Olympus.

73 Klemm, ACGdM, 8: 331.

74 Ibid., 9: 4.

75 See Olender, Maurice, The Languages of Paradise: Race, Religion, and Philology in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, MA and London, 1992)Google Scholar; and Poliakov, Le mythe Aryen.

76 Klemm, ACGdM, 7: 481–3.

77 Arvidsson, Stefan, Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science (Chicago and London, 2006), 13–62Google Scholar; and Benes, Tuska, In Babel's Shadow: Language, Philology, and the Nation in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Detroit, 2008)Google Scholar.

78 Meiners is discussed extensively in Carhart, Science of Culture, and is linked with Klemm in Wiwjorra, Germanenmythos, 203–4.

79 The literature on Gobineau is vast. See particularly Biddiss, Michael D., Father of Racist Ideology: The Social and Political Thought of Count Gobineau (London, 1970)Google Scholar; Banton, Racial Theories, 62–8; Poliakov, Le mythe Aryen, 239–44; and Wiwjorra, Germanenmythos, 207–16.

80 de Gobineau, Arthur, Essai sur l'inégalité des races humaines, 4 vols. (Paris, 1853), 1: 142Google Scholar; Klemm meanwhile appears to have been totally unaware of Gobineau.

81 Biddiss, Father of Racist Ideology; and Kale, Steven, “Gobineau, Racism and Legitimism: A Royalist Heretic in Nineteenth-Century France,” in MIH 7 (2010), 33–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

82 See Voegelin, Rasse und Staat, particularly 167–81.

83 Benes, In Babel's Shadow, 197–201 and 210–11.

84 Klemm, ACGdM, 1: 204–5.

85 Ibid., 1: 174.

86 Ibid., 9: 298–9.

87 Zimmerman, Anthropology and Antihumanism, 66.

88 See Benoit Massin, “From Virchow to Fischer: Physical Anthropology and ‘Modern Race Theories’ in Wilhelmine Germany,” in Stocking, Volksgeist as Method and Ethic, 79–154; and Puschner, Uwe, Die völkische Bewegung in wilhelmischen Kaiserreich: Sprache—Rasse—Religion (Bonn, 2000)Google Scholar.

89 Orlinska, Klemm Collection, 13.

90 Leopold, Culture in Comparative and Evolutionary Perspective.

91 Hinsley, Curtis M. Jr, Savages and Scientists: The Smithsonian Institution and the Development of American Anthropology, 1846–1910 (Washington, DC, 1981), 87–91Google Scholar.

92 Germer, “Die Vorgeschichte der Gründung des Museums,” 36.

93 Penny, Objects of Culture, 175–9 and 199–202.

94 Chickering, Karl Lamprecht, and Smith, Sciences of Culture, 140–161, for Ratzel and the later “diffusionist revolt.”

95 Smith, Sciences of Culture, 60–61.

96 Waitz, Theodor, Anthropologie der Naturvölker, 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1859–1860), 1: 344Google Scholar.

97 Zimmerman, Anthropology and Antihumanism, 49–52.

98 Koepping, Klaus-Peter, Adolf Bastian and the Psychic Unity of Mankind: Foundations of Anthropology in Nineteenth Century Germany (London and New York, 1983), xivGoogle Scholar; and Hugh Glenn Penny, “Bastian's Museum: On the Limits of Empiricism and the Transformation of German Ethnology,” in Bunzl and Penny, Worldly Provincialism, 86–126.