Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:41:08.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the German Revolution to the New Left: Revolution and Dissent in Arendt and Marcuse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2021

Caroline Ashcroft Open the ORCID record for Caroline Ashcroft [Opens in a new window]
Caroline Ashcroft*
Affiliation:
School of History, Queen Mary University of London
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the German Revolution of 1918–19 was a formative event in the politicization of Hannah Arendt and Herbert Marcuse, significantly influencing their understanding of revolutionary action and their reflections on the 1960s New Left movement. The German Revolution draws these often polarized thinkers closer together as both characterize the unfulfilled political possibility of the revolution in substantially similar ways. In the work of Arendt, the staunch critic of Marx, this highlights a critical engagement with the socialist tradition; while for Marcuse, the self-proclaimed “orthodox” Marxist, the revolution reveals the importance of a revised idea of revolutionary action. By tracing the influence of the German Revolution on the work of these two theorists, this paper aims to recover the importance of this historical moment in their later political thought, particularly in their readings of the renewed political possibilities of the 1960s.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 835 - 858
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lederman, Shmuel, “Forgotten Uprisings and Silent Dialogues: Hannah Arendt and the German Revolution,” in Lederman, The German Revolution and Political Theory (Cham, 2019), 299–317, at 300Google Scholar.

2 Muldoon, James, “The Origins of Hannah Arendt's Council System,” History of Political Thought 37/4 (2016), 761–89, at 762, 764Google Scholar.

3 Holman, Christopher, Politics as Radical Creation: Herbert Marcuse and Hannah Arendt on Political Performativity (Toronto, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Gerwarth, Robert, November 1918: The German Revolution (Oxford, 2020), 91Google Scholar.

5 Mark Jones, Founding Weimar (Cambridge, 2016), explores the violence that took place in the revolution at the hands of the left-wing, centre, and right-wing parties.

6 Even then, strikes and wider unrest continued over the years that followed, driven by right and left.

7 Hoffrogge, Ralf, “Richard Müller, Ernst Däumig and the ‘Pure’ Council System,” in Hoffrogge, The German Revolution and Political Thought (Cham, 2019), 199–214, at 200Google Scholar.

8 Kets, Gaard and Muldoon, James, “The ‘Forgotten’ German Revolution: A Conceptual Map,” in Kets and Muldoon, The German Revolution and Political Thought (Cham, 2019), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gerwarth, November 1918, 86.

9 Katz, Barry, “Praxis and Poiesis: Toward an Intellectual Biography of Herbert Marcuse [1898–1979],” New German Critique 18 (1979), 12–18, at 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kellner, Douglas, Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism (London, 1984), 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Herbert Marcuse, Revolution or Reform: A Confrontation, ed. A.T. Ferguson (Chicago, 1976), 57; Kellner, Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism, 276.

11 Gerwarth, November 1918, 87.

12 Marcuse, Revolution or Reform, 57.

13 Ibid., 139.

14 Ibid.

15 Ibid., 91.

16 Ibid., 58.

17 Herbert Marcuse, “The German Communist Party,” in R. Laudani, ed, Secret Reports on Nazi Germany: The Frankfurt School Contribution to the War Effort (Princeton, 2013), 167–98, at 177–8.

18 Herbert Marcuse, “German Social Stratification,” in Laudani, Secret Reports on Nazi Germany, 106–17, at 115.

19 Adorno, Theodor W. and Horkheimer, Max, Dialectic of Enlightenment (London, 1997)Google Scholar.

20 Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth, Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World (New Haven, 1982), 124Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., 28.

22 Hannah Arendt, letter to Karl Jaspers, 29 Jan. 1946, in Hannah Arendt/Karl Jaspers: Correspondence, 1926–1969 (New York, 1992), 29, 507. Lederman and Muldoon also emphasize the importance of Blücher on Arendt's thought in their articles: Lederman, “Forgotten Uprisings”; Muldoon, “The Origins of Hannah Arendt's Council System.”

23 Heinrich Blücher, “Description of an Average Life,” Blücher Archive, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, at www.bard.edu/bluecher/rel_misc/BluecherAutobio.pdf (accessed 6 Aug. 2020).

24 Ibid.; Young-Bruehl, Hannah Arendt, 141, notes that the Moscow trials of 1936–8 were the point at which Blücher rejected communism.

25 Lederman, “Forgotten Uprisings,” 308.

26 Young-Bruehl, Hannah Arendt, 125.

27 Heinrich Blücher, letter to Hannah Arendt, 14 July 1958, in Within Four Walls: The Correspondence Between Hannah Arendt and Heinrich Blücher, 1936–1968 (Boston, 2000), 335.

28 Mayra Cotta, “Democracy and Dictatorship: Rosa Luxemburg's Path to Revolution,” in Cotta, The German Revolution and Political Theory (Cham, 2019), 183–97, at 184–5.

29 Hannah Arendt, “Rosa Luxemburg,” in Arendt, Men in Dark Times (Wilmington, MA, 1970), 35–6, at 36.

30 Ibid., 35. Klaus Theweleit, Male Fantasies, vol. 1, Women, Floods, Bodies, History (Minneapolis, 1987).

31 Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (Orlando, 1968), 308Google Scholar.

32 See Jones, Founding Weimar.

33 Ibid., 333, 165.

34 Ibid., 170.

35 Ibid., 194.

36 Heynen, Robert, “The German Revolution and the Radical Right,” in Heynen, The German Revolution and Political Theory (Cham, 2019), 45–68, at 64Google Scholar.

37 Gerwarth, November 1918, 221.

38 Heather, Gerard P. and Stolz, Matthew, “Hannah Arendt and the Problem of Critical Theory,” Journal of Politics, 41/1 (1979), 2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Wolin, Richard, Heidegger's Children (Princeton, 2015), 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Ibid., 147.

41 Holman, Politics as Radical Creation, 8.

42 Ibid.

43 Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (London, 1963), 126; Holman, Politics as Radical Creation, 168.

44 Holman, Politics as Radical Creation, 154.

45 Muldoon, “The Origins of Hannah Arendt's Council System.”

46 Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 328.

47 Arendt, On Revolution, 261–2.

48 Arendt, Hannah, “The Eggs Speak Up” (1951), in Arendt, Essays in Understanding (New York, 2005), 270–84Google Scholar, at 274.

49 Ibid.

50 Ibid., 275.

51 Arendt, “Rosa Luxemburg,” 38.

52 For a fuller critique of the problems in Arendt's interpretation of Luxemburg, see Muldoon, “The Origins of Hannah Arendt's Council System,” 15.

53 Arendt, “Rosa Luxemburg,” 39.

54 Ibid., 39–40.

55 Ibid., 40.

56 Ibid., 53.

57 Ibid.

58 Ibid., 51–2.

59 Ibid., 52.

60 Ibid., 53–4.

61 This epilogue was omitted from subsequent editions, and was later published separately. Arendt, Hannah, “Totalitarian Imperialism: Reflections on the Hungarian Revolution,” Journal of Politics 20/1 (1958), 5–43, at 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Ibid., 8, 26–7.

63 Ibid., 28.

64 Ibid., 29–30.

65 Ibid., 30.

66 Kets and Muldoon, “The ‘Forgotten’ German Revolution,” 5–6.

67 Gaard Kets, “Working-Class Politics in the Bremen Council Republic,” in Kets, The German Revolution and Political Theory (Cham, 2019), 91–111, at 94.

68 Hoffrogge, “Richard Müller, Ernst Däumig and the ‘Pure’ Council System,” 200.

69 Kets, “Working-Class Politics in the Bremen Council Republic,” 106, 96–7.

70 Donny Gluckstein, “Revolutionary Berlin: Fulcrum of the Twentieth Century,” in Gluckstein, The German Revolution and Political Theory (Cham, 2019), 69–90, at 81–2.

71 Arendt, “Totalitarian Imperialism,” 8.

72 Ibid., 27.

73 Hannah Arendt, “On Violence,” in Arendt, Crises of the Republic (New York, 1972), 103–98, at 113; Richard King, Arendt and America (Chicago, 2015), 277; Caroline Ashcroft, “From Resistance to Revolution: The Limits of Nonviolence in Arendt's ‘Civil Disobedience’,” History of European Ideas, 44/4 (2018), 461–76.

74 Arendt, “On Violence,” 116.

75 Hannah Arendt, “Thoughts on Politics and Revolution,” in Arendt, Crises of the Republic, 199–234, at 232.

76 Ibid.

77 King, Arendt and America, 274.

78 Arendt, “On Violence,” 125–6.

79 Arendt, “Thoughts on Politics and Revolution,” 206.

80 Arendt, On Violence, 37, 38.

81 Arendt, “Thoughts on Politics and Revolution,” 233.

82 King, Arendt and America, 275.

83 Arendt, “On Violence,” 185, 125.

84 Thomas Wheatland, The Frankfurt School in Exile (Minneapolis, 2009), 58.

85 Marcuse, Revolution or Reform, 60.

86 Herbert Marcuse, An Essay on Liberation (London, 1969), 61, added emphasis.

87 Ben Agger, “The Growing Relevance of Marcuse's Dialectic of Individual and Class,” Dialectical Anthropology 4/2 (1979), 135–45, at 143.

88 Kellner, Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism, 276.

89 Herbert Marcuse, Counter-revolution and Revolt (Boston, 1972), 39 n.

90 Marcuse, An Essay on Liberation, 56.

91 Douglas Kellner, “Introduction,” in Herbert Marcuse, The New Left and the 1960s: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse Volume III, ed. Douglas Kellner (London and New York, 2005), 1–37, at 18.

92 Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse, “Correspondence on the German Student Movement,” ed. Esther Leslie, New Left Review 233 (1999), 123–36, at 133.

93 Ibid.

94 Marcuse, Counter-revolution and Revolt, 44.

95 Ibid., 44–5.

96 Ibid., 45.

97 Herbert Marcuse, “On the New Left,” in Marcuse, The New Left and the 1960s, 122–7, at 126.

98 Hannah Arendt, “What Is Freedom?”, in Arendt, Between Past and Future (London, 2006), 142–69, at 166.

99 Rosa Luxemburg, The Russian Revolution (1918), trans. Bertram Wolfe (New York, 1940).

100 Hannah Arendt, “Civil Disobedience,” in Arendt, Crises of the Republic (San Diego, 1972), 49–102, at 88.

101 Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man (London, 1964), 1, added emphasis.

102 Arendt, On Revolution.

103 Rainer Winter, Resistance: Subjects, Representations, Contexts (Bielefeld, 2017), 74.

104 Stanley Aronowitz, “The Unknown Herbert Marcuse,” Social Text 58 (1999), 133–54, at 139.

105 Etienne Tassin “‘… sed victa Catoni’: The Defeated Cause of Revolutions,” Social Research 74/4 (2007), 1109–26, at 1118, original emphasis.

106 Marcuse, “On the New Left,” 126.

107 Marcuse, Herbert, Soviet Marxism (London, 1958), 43Google Scholar.

108 Ibid, 44.

109 Ibid., 44–5.

110 Herbert Marcuse, “Re-examination of the Concept of Revolution,” New Left Review 56 (1969), 27–34, at 31.

111 Marcuse, An Essay on Liberation, 56.

112 Ibid., 7, 39.

113 Ibid., 40.

114 Ibid., 41.

115 Ibid.

116 Marcuse, Soviet Marxism, 35.

117 Ibid.

118 Marcuse, An Essay on Liberation, 17.

119 Ibid.

120 Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 260–61.

121 Ibid., 313.

122 Ibid., 312.

123 Ibid., 314.

124 Ibid., 312.

125 Ibid., 327.

126 Ibid., 262, 308.

127 Herbert Marcuse, “Repressive Tolerance,” in Robert Paul Wolff, Barrington Moore Jr, and Marcuse, Herbert, A Critique of Pure Tolerance (Boston, 1969), 95–137, at 108–9Google Scholar.

128 Marcuse, Revolution or Reform, 58.

129 Heather and Stolz, “Hannah Arendt and the Problem of Critical Theory,” 15.

130 Kellner, “Introduction,” 6.

131 Wolin, Richard, “Preface,” in Wolin, Richard and Abromeit, John, eds., Heideggerian Marxism (Lincoln, NE, 2015), ix–x, at ixGoogle Scholar.