No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 July 2021
Around 1882, the photographer Albert Fernique photographed a group of Parisian workers gathered around trestles and benches inside a workshop. The floor is strewn with piles of wood and the ceiling beams tower above the workmen. Even so, the space is dwarfed by a massive, sculpted shoulder, draped in Roman robes, which dominates the background of the photograph; two workers watching the scene from a beam just below the roof appear to be perched on it like sparrows. The shoulder belonged to the statue, Liberty Enlightening the World—a gift to the United States from the France of the Third Republic. Work on the statue began here, in the workshop of the sculptor Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi, only a year after the suppression of the Paris Commune. More people were killed in that one Bloody Week (la semaine sanglante) in 1874 than were executed in the entire Reign of Terror following the French Revolution. If the statue was supposed to symbolize liberty, this was to be an orderly liberty far removed from the license of the armed Parisian workers and their short-lived utopian government. Unlike her ancestor Marianne, immortalized by Eugène Delacroix's Liberty Leading the People, the statue does not wear the red cap that, since ancient Rome, had symbolized freedom from slavery. In the wake of the Paris Commune, the Third Republic banned the cap and sought to banish the unruly freedom it represented.
1 Horne, Alistair, The Fall of Paris: The Siege and the Commune 1870–71 (London and New York, 1977), 418Google Scholar.
2 Guldi, Jo and Armitage, David, The History Manifesto (Cambridge, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 That “the very idea and valuation of freedom was generated by the existence and growth of slavery” is, of course, the central thesis of Orlando Patterson's historical sociology of freedom. Orlando Patterson, Freedom, vol. 1, Freedom in the Making of Western Culture (New York, 1991), xiv.
4 Skinner, Quentin, Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge and New York, 1998)Google Scholar.
5 Cited in Miles, Edwin A., “The Old South and the Classical World,” North Carolina Historical Review 48/3 (1971), 258–75, at 258Google Scholar. See also Harrington, J. Drew, “Classical Antiquity and the Proslavery Argument,” Slavery and Abolition 10/1 (1989), 60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Durden, Robert F., “J. D. B. De Bow: Convolutions of a Slavery Expansionist,” Journal of Southern History 17/4 (1951), 441–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Campbell, Mavis, “Aristotle and Black Slavery: A Study in Race Prejudice,” Race 15/3 (1974), 283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Kramnick, Isaac, Republicanism and Bourgeois Radicalism: Political Ideology in Late Eighteenth-Century England and America (Ithaca, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Appleby, Joyce, Liberalism and Republicanism in the Historical Imagination (Cambridge, MA, 1992)Google Scholar.
7 Kramnick portrays J. G. A. Pocock as the central figure in the attempt to displace claims for Locke's influence on the American founders. Kramnick, Republicanism and Bourgeois Radicalism, 36.
8 Macpherson, Crawford B., The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, 13th impr. (Oxford, 1990), 3Google Scholar. Though she is also at odds with Quentin Skinner, who argues that it was Hobbes who first developed a new conception of freedom according to which “where law ends, liberty begins.” Ibid.
9 De Dijn does not elaborate on these arguments but attributes the idea that natural rights were a feature of medieval debate to Brian Tierney and to Annabel Brett, and the argument that their later uptake was a response to the Reformation to Quentin Skinner and to Knud Haakonssen. The latter traces the attempt to wield natural rights against skepticism to Hugo Grotius, whose a priori argument for the existence of natural law detached this law from the Christian religion, portraying it as the necessary condition for the existence of any human society and moral life. Haakonssen, Knud, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (New York, 1996), 24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Grotius made an ancient skeptic, Carneades, the “spokesman” for the relativist position that “men have established iura according to their own interests [pro utilitate], which vary with different customs, and often at different times with the same people. So there is no natural ius.” Hugo Grotius, “Prolegomena to the First Edition of De Jure Belli ac Pacis”, in Grotius, The Rights of War and Peace, ed. Richard Tuck (Indianapolis, 2005), 1741–62, at 1746.
10 James Tully, “After the Macpherson Thesis,” in Tully, An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts (Cambridge, 1993), 71–95, at 71.
11 Ibid., 72.
12 Ferguson, Adam, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, ed. Oz-Salzberger, Fania (Cambridge, 2001), 150Google Scholar.
13 Ibid., 155.
14 Ibid.
15 Roediger, David R., The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class (London, 2007)Google Scholar; Ignatiev, Noel, How the Irish Became White (New York, 1995)Google Scholar.
16 Cooper, Frederick, Decolonization and African Society: The Labor Question in French and British Africa (Cambridge, 2010), 204Google Scholar.
17 Nkrumah, Kwame, Neo-colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (New York, 1966), xiiGoogle Scholar.
18 Ibid., 255.
19 See, for instance, Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, eds., The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective (Cambridge, MA, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Burgin, Angus, The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression (Cambridge, MA, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Slobodian, Quinn, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism (Cambridge, MA, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Whyte, Jessica, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and the Rise of Neoliberalism (London, 2019)Google Scholar; Cooper, Melinda, Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism (New York, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Hayek, Friedrich, “Individualism: True and False,” in Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago, 1958), 1–32, at 11Google Scholar.
21 Whyte, The Morals of the Market.
22 Burgin, The Great Persuasion, 139.
23 Slobodian, Globalists, 154.
24 Ronald Reagan, ‘“Address before a Joint Session of Congress on the State of the Union,” The American Presidency Project, 1986, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-before-joint-session-congress-the-state-the-union.
25 Hayek, Friedrich, Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 1 (London, 1998), 3Google Scholar.