Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:34:09.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ANXIETIES OF DISTANCE: CODIF ICATION IN EARLY COLONIAL BENGAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

JON E. WILSON
Affiliation:
King's College, University of London

Abstract

Historians of political thought tend to emphasize the continuous flow and transmission of concepts from one generation to the next, and from one place to another. Historians of Indian ideas suggest that India was governed with concepts imported from Europe. This article argues instead that the sense of rupture that British officials experienced, from both the intellectual history of Britain and Indian society, played a significant role in forming colonial political culture. It examines the practice of “Hindu” property law in late eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Bengal. It suggests that the attempt to textualize and codify law in the 1810s and 1820s emerged from British doubts about their ability to construct viable forms of rule on the basis of existing intellectual and institutional traditions. The abstract and seemingly “utilitarian” tone of colonial political discourse was a practical response to British anxieties about their distance from Indian society. It was not a result of the “influence” of a particular school of British thinkers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)