Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:17:01.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN AUSTRALIAN INTERNATIONALIST PARTS COMPANY WITH THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS: H. DUNCAN HALL AND THE FREUDIAN RESPONSE TO GLOBAL IRRATIONALISM*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2014

JAMES COTTON
JAMES COTTON*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, ADFA, Canberra E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most senior Australian in the League of Nations secretariat, H. Duncan Hall became an established advocate of institutional internationalism as a mitigator of conflict. From 1933, however, the advent of totalitarian movements and his exposure to Freudianism through his association with Dr Robert Waelder led him to the conviction that psychoanalysis provided the key to the irrationality of the times. He endeavoured to use his League position, including his influence in Australia, to convince opinion leaders of the profound dangers of national mass psychosis to the survival of the international order. Frustrated in the League, he then sought to convey the same message in the United States. Although largely unsuccessful in his efforts, and unable to establish an academic vehicle for the study of the issue in America, he was able to help bring to Australia the first practitioners of Freudian psychoanalysis trained in Europe.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 653 - 680
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was written while 2013 Harold White Fellow at the National Library of Australia. The author is indebted to the Library and its helpful staff for providing an ideal research environment, and also to Duncan Kelly and this journal's anonymous readers for constructive comments.

References

1 Cotton, James, The Australian School of International Relations (New York and London, 2013), 95–128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cotton, , “Early International Relations Teaching and Teachers in Australia: Institutional and Disciplinary Origins”, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 67/1 (2013), 71–97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 McAllister, William B., Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An International History (London, 2000)Google Scholar; Renborg, Bertil A., International Drug Control: A Study of International Administration by and through the League of Nations (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1947)Google Scholar.

3 Prime Minister Lyons to Avenol, 29 Oct. 1935: League of Nations [LoN] Archives, Geneva, Secretariat 50, 19973, Fold 1719.

4 Sydney Morning Herald 10 Jan. 1936, 10. On the Australian LNU see Brown, Nicholas, “Enacting the International: R. G. Watt and the League of Nations Union”, in Deacon, D. et al., eds., Transnational Ties (Canberra, 2006), 75–95 Google Scholar.

5 “Remarks on the Role of Mrs. Laura Puffer Morgan” (c. 1962), Papers of Sigmund Freud, Library of Congress, MSS39990, Box 113, “Interviews and Recollections”, Fold 33.

6 Hall to V. Stencek, 2 May 1939, LoN Archives, personnel file, Sec Box 787, 1594.

7 Parker, R. A. C., Chamberlain and Appeasement: British Policy and the Coming of the Second World War (Basingstoke, 1993), 55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Wireless address, Johannesburg, 22 Nov. 1935, LoN Archives, Sec 50, File 18709, Ser. 1719.

9 “Education for Peace”, March 1936, H. Duncan Hall Papers, National Library of Australia, MS 5547 Box 64.

10 “Education for Peace”, Hall Papers, Box 64.

11 Ceadel, Martin, Semi-detached Idealists: The British Peace Movement and International Relations, 1854–1945 (Oxford, 2000), 311–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McCarthy, Helen, The British People and the League of Nations (Manchester, 2011), 28–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Lloyd, Gwenda and Merlo, John, International Affairs in Schools (Australian League of Nations Union, Victorian Branch) (Melbourne, 1934), 10 Google Scholar.

13 Commonwealth Mission Diary 1935–6, Hall Papers, Box 61.

14 Ibid.

15 Ibid.

16 “War in Europe—War in Asia—War Still Unresolved in Africa. War in the Mediterranean”, Hall Papers, Box 40.

17 “Note on Conversation Regarding Broadcasts from Brussels to Australia via Radio Nations”, 1 Sept. 1936, LoN Archives, 9G/25222/218.

18 Hall to Avenol, 17 Nov. 1936, Hall Papers, Box 70.

19 “The Dominions and the Future of the Collective System”, Sept. 1936, Hall Papers, Box 70; see also “Report on Some Aspects of the Foreign Relations of the British Dominions”, 26 April 1937, Box70.

20 “Report on Mission in Canada, New Zealand and Australia 1938–9”, 9 April 1939, Hall Papers, Box 40, 1.

21 Ibid., 9.

22 Ibid, 11.

23 Walters to Avenol, 9 March 1939, LoN Archives, Sec Box 787, Fold 1594.

24 Zimmern, Alfred, The League of Nations and the Rule of Law 1918–1935 (London, 1936), 8 Google Scholar.

25 The tension between the League's ambitious internationalist agenda for economic and social improvement and its increasingly precarious control of global security issues is a major theme in much recent work on the League: e.g. Pedersen, Susan, “The Meaning of the Mandates System: An Argument,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 32/4 (2006), 560–82Google Scholar; Clavin, Patricia, Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations 1920–1946 (Oxford, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kott, Sandrine and Droux, Joëlle, eds., Globalizing Social Rights: The International Labour Organization and Beyond (New York and London, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Courtesy of the Hall family.

27 Laqua, Daniel, “Transnational Intellectual Cooperation, the League of Nations, and the Problem of Order,” Journal of Global History, 6/2 (2011), 223–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 United States Diary, Hall Papers, Box 40.

29 “Remarks on the Role of Mrs. Laura Puffer Morgan”, underlining in original; there is a similar passage in the autobiographical sketch, Hall Papers, Box 59.

30 Lynch, Cecelia, Beyond Appeasement: Interpreting Interwar Peace Movements in World Politics (Ithaca, NY, 1999)Google Scholar.

31 Roazen, Paul, Freud and His Followers (London, 1976), 308 Google Scholar; Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth, Anna Freud: A Biography, 2nd edn (New Haven, 2008), 201 Google Scholar; Guttman, Samuel A., ‘Obituary Robert Waelder 1900–1967’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50 (1969), 269–73Google Scholar.

32 Guttman, Samuel A., “Robert Waelder and the Application of Psychoanalytic Principles to Social and Political Phenomena”, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34/4 (1986), 835–62, 839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Rowe, David and Schulmann, Robert, eds., Einstein on Politics (Princeton, 2007), 215–16Google Scholar; Clark, Ronald W., Einstein: The Life and Times (New York, 1971), 363–5Google Scholar.

34 “World Organisation before and since the War”, Hall Papers, Box 42.

35 Murray, Gilbert, “Satanism and the World Order” (1919), in Murray, Humanist Essays (London, 1964), 188–204 Google Scholar; Peter Wilson, “Retrieving Cosmos: Gilbert Murray's Thought on International Relations”, in Christopher Stray, ed., Gilbert Murray Reassessed (Oxford, 2007), 239–60.

36 “Satanism and the Enigma of Gilbert Murray”, draft autobiography, chap. 9, Hall Papers, Box 59; “Satanism” (file), Box 65.

37 Waelder, Robert, “The Etiology and Course of Mass Psychoses” (1934), in Waelder, Psychoanalysis: Observation, Theory, Application. Selected Papers of Robert Waelder, ed. Guttman, S. A. (New York, 1976), 393–409 Google Scholar.

38 Hall letter, 30 June 1935, Hall Papers, Box 4, part 1.

39 Waelder, “The Etiology and Course of Mass Psychoses”, 396, 397.

40 Freud, Sigmund, “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego” (1921), in Freud, Civilization, Society and Religion (Penguin Freud Library vol. 12) (London, 1991), 91–178, 161Google Scholar.

41 Freud, Sigmund, Civilization and Its Discontents, trans. David McLintock, Leo Bersani and Adam Phillips (London, 2002 Google Scholar; first published 1931), 104; Gay, Peter, Freud: A Life for Our Time (London, 1988), 548 Google Scholar.

42 Hall letter, 30 June 1935, Hall Papers, Box 4, part 1; Toynbee to Hall, 12 Feb. 1935, Hall to David Loch, 15 April 1935, Hall Papers, Box 1.

43 Waelder to Hall, undated (Dec. 1935), Hall Papers, Box 1.

44 Waelder, “The Psychological Aspects of International Affairs”, Hall Papers, Box 1, 10–11; much of this text is reproduced in Waelder, Psychoanalysis: Observation, Theory, Application, 410–14.

45 Waelder, “The Psychological Aspects of International Affairs”, 11.

46 William Brown, The Times, 11 Dec. 1934.

47 Waelder, Robert, Psychological Aspects of War and Peace (League of Nations, Geneva Research Centre, Studies, X/2) (Geneva, 1939), 14 Google Scholar.

48 Waelder, “The Psychological Aspects of International Affairs”, 33.

49 Waelder, Psychological Aspects of War and Peace, 52–3.

50 Steinig to Duncan Hall, 17 June 1936, Hall Papers, Box 1.

51 Neumann, Franz, “The Decay of German Democracy”, Political Quarterly, 4/4 (1933), 525–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alpers, Benjamin L., Dictators, Democracy, & American Public Culture: Envisioning the Totalitarian Enemy, 1920s–1950s (Chapel Hill, 2003)Google Scholar.

52 Lasswell, Harold D., “The Psychology of Hitlerism”, Political Quarterly, 4/3 (1933), 373–84, 380Google Scholar.

53 Kecskemeti, Paul and Leites, Nathan, “Some Psychological Hypotheses on Nazi Germany: I–IV”, Journal of Social Psychology, 26/2 (1947), 141–83; 27/1 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 91–117; 27/2 (1948), 241–70; 28/1 (1948), 141–64.

54 Overy, Richard, The Morbid Age: Britain between the Wars (London, 2009), 136–74Google Scholar.

55 Sluga, Glenda, The Nation, Psychology, and International Politics, 1870–1919 (Basingstoke, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Glover, Edward and Ginsberg, Morris, “A Symposium on the Psychology of Peace and War”, British Journal of Medical Psychology, 14/3 (1934), 274–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Thomson, Mathew, The Psychological Subjects: Identity, Culture, and Health in Twentieth-Century Britain (Oxford, 2006), 217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Bowlby, John and Durbin, E., “Personal Aggressiveness and War”, in Durbin, E. and Bowlby, J., eds., War and Democracy: Essays on the Causes and Prevention of War (London, 1938), 3–150, 27Google Scholar.

59 William Brown, “The Psychology of International Relations”, The Lancet, 1 Feb. 1936, 290–93.

60 Brown, William, War and Peace: Essays in Psychological Analysis (London, 1939), 58 Google Scholar.

61 “Hitler and His Subjects”, The Spectator, 18 Sept. 1941, 8.

62 Adrian Stephen to Hall, 23 Aug. 1937; Hall to Stephen, 2 Nov. 1937, Hall Papers, Box 4, part 1; see also on the Belfast meeting, The Times, 21 July 1937.

63 “Note of Conversation with Menzies 1935”, H. Duncan Hall Papers, Box1; Martin, R. M., Robert Menzies A Life, vol. 1 (Melbourne, 1996), 161–2Google Scholar.

64 Smuts, J. C., Memorandum 1921, in Selections from the Smuts Papers, vol. 5, ed. van der Poel, Jean (Cambridge, 1973), Doc. 46, 71Google Scholar.

65 The Star (Johannesburg), 12 Nov. 1935.

66 Hancock, W. K., Smuts, vol. 2, The Fields of Force 1919–1950 (Cambridge, 1968), 271–4Google Scholar; Smuts, J. C., “The Present International Outlook”, International Affairs, 14/1 (1935), 3–19 Google Scholar.

67 “Notes on Talks with General Smuts at his farm” 12 Nov. 1935, Hall Papers, Box 1.

68 Ibid.; “Covenant or Chaos”, Cape Times, 31 Nov. 1935, 17.

69 Smuts to Amery, 2 Dec. 1935, in Selections from the Smuts Papers, vol. 6, ed. Jean van der Poel (Cambridge, 1973), 30.

70 Hall to Waelder, 5 Feb. 1936, Hall Papers, Box 4.

71 Hall to Smuts, 24 Feb. 1938, Hall Papers, Box 1.

72 Diary, Commonwealth mission 1936, Hall Papers, Box 61, underlining in original.

73 Autobiographical sketch, chap. 8, appendix, Hall Papers, Box 59.

74 Churchill, Winston, Arms and the Covenant (London, 1938), 361 Google Scholar.

75 “Some of the Deeper Causes of War”, Address to the Federation of the League of Nations Societies, 1938, Hall Papers, Box 40; de Madariaga, Salvador, Disarmament (London, 1929)Google Scholar. See also “The Place of Morality in Politics: National and International”, Society of Friends Geneva, Winter 1937–8, Hall Papers, Box 40.

76 H. Duncan Hall, “On the Edge”, 1939, Hall Papers, Box 70.

77 Cull, Nicholas, Selling War: The British Propaganda Campaign against American “Neutrality” (New York, 1995)Google Scholar.

78 H. Duncan Hall, “Study of the Psychological Bases of the War and Peace”; “Institute of Political Psychology”, Hall Papers, Box 40.

79 Hall, H. Duncan, “Pacific Settlement of International Disputes: Recent Trends”, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting, 34 (1940), 115–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Ibid., 124, 118.

81 Peter Kutter, ed., Psychoanalysis International: A Guide to Psychoanalysis Throughout the World, vol. 1, Europe (Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt, 1992); Guttman, “Robert Waelder and the Application of Psychoanalytic Principles”, 841.

82 Letter of H. Duncan Hall, 30 June 1935, Hall Papers, Box 4, part 1.

83 Steinig to Duncan Hall, 17 June 1936, Hall Papers, Box 1.

84 Jenny Waelder to Hall, 29 Sept. 1935, Hall Papers, Box 4, part 1.

85 Steinig to Hall, 6 June 1938, Hall Papers, Box 40.

86 Geroe, Clara Lazar, “A Reluctant Immigrant”, Meanjin, 41/3 (1982), 354–5Google Scholar.

87 Gold, Stanley, “The Early History”, Meanjin, 41/3 (1982), 347–8Google Scholar; also see Damousi, Joy, Freud in the Antipodes: A Cultural History of Psychoanalysis in Australia (Sydney, 2005), 179–204 Google Scholar.

88 “Report of Melbourne Institute for Psychoanalysis for 1941”; Hall to Lazar Geroe, 12 Nov. 1942, Hall Papers, Box 4.

89 Guttman, “Robert Waelder and the Application of Psychoanalytic Principles”, 852.

90 Hall, H. Duncan, Commonwealth: A History of the British Commonwealth of Nations (London, 1971), 419 Google Scholar.

91 Waelder himself did write later on international relations, to some acclaim: Kaplan, Morton A., “A Psychoanalyst Looks at Politics: A Retrospective Tribute to Robert Waelder”, World Politics, 20/4 (1968), 694–704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The emergence of modern realism owes a debt to the Freudian view of human nature: Schuett, Robert, Political Realism, Freud, and Human Nature in International Relations (New York and London, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.