Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:10:17.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FROM IMPERIAL TO INTERNATIONAL HORIZONS: A HERMENEUTIC STUDY OF BENGALI MODERNISM*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2011

KRIS MANJAPRA
KRIS MANJAPRA*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Tufts University Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay provides a close study of the international horizons of Kallol, a Bengali literary journal, published in post-World War I Calcutta. It uncovers a historical pattern of Bengali intellectual life that marked the period from the 1870s to the 1920s, whereby an imperial imagination was transformed into an international one, as a generation of intellectuals born between 1885 and 1905 reinvented the political category of “youth”. Hermeneutics, as a philosophically informed study of how meaning is created through conversation, and grounded in this essay in the thought of Hans Georg Gadamer, helps to reveal this pattern. While translocal vistas of intellectual life were always present in Bengali thought, the contours of those horizons changed drastically in the period under study. Bengali intellectual life, framed within a center–periphery imperial axis in the 1870s, was resolutely reframed within a multipolar international constellation by the 1920s. This change was reflected by the new conversations in which young Bengalis became entangled in the years after the war. At a linguistic level, the shift was registered by the increasing use of terms such as bideś (the foreign) and āntarjātik (international), as opposed to bilāt (England, or the West), to name the world abroad. The world outside empire increasingly became a resource and theme for artists and writers. Major changes in global geopolitical alignments and in the colonial politics of British India, and the relations between generations within Bengali bhadralok society, provide contexts for the rise of this international youth imagination.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 327 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sengupta, Acintyakumar, Kalloler Yug (Calcutta, 1950), 49, 57Google Scholar.

2 Basu, Buddhadeva, Green Grass (Calcutta: Papyrus, 1948), 81Google Scholar. See introduction in Dyson, Ketaki Kushari, ed. and trans., Selected Poems of Buddhadeva Bose (Calcutta: Oxford University Press), xxviiiGoogle Scholar.

3 This is the English translation that Kalidas Nag proposed to Rolland, Romain, 4 Feb. 1925, Kalidas Nag and Romain Rolland Correspondence, ed. Guha, Chinmoy (Calcutta, 1996), 123Google Scholar.

4 Basu, Debkumar, Kallolgosṭhīr Kathāsāhitya (Calcutta, 1960), 51Google Scholar.

5 Obituary of Gokulchandra Nag by Dineshranjan Das, Kallol, 1925, 620. Nag designed the set for and acted in the film “Soul of a Slave” (1923).

6 See letter by Kallol editor, 11 Kārthik 1924, reproduced in Sengupta, Kalloler Yug, 79.

7 Debkumar Basu, Kallolgosṭhīr Kathāsāhitya, 9.

8 See the excellent literary studies of Kallol by Basu, Debakumar, Kallolgosṭhīr Kathāsāhitya (Calcutta, 1960)Google Scholar; Ray, Jibendra Singha, Kalloler Kal (Calcutta, 1973)Google Scholar. Also see Das, S. N., “Post-Tagore Period of Bengali Literature”, in idem, Bengali Language and Literature (Delhi: Cosmos, 2002), 217–31Google Scholar.

9 Kaviraj, Sudipta, “The Two Histories of Literary Culture in Bengal”, in Pollock, Sheldon, ed., Literary Cultures in History (Berkeley, 2003), 559Google Scholar.

10 Jibendra Singha Ray, Kalloler Kal, 15.

11 The Nobel Prize for Literature was established in 1901. The International PEN was founded in 1921.

12 Dipesh Chakrabarty providing a valuable framing of Kallol in terms of “literary cosmopolitanism”. Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Adda”, in idem, Provincializing Europe (Princeton, 2000), 200.

13 Casanova, Pascale, The World Republic of Letters (Cambridge, 2004), 146–56Google Scholar.

14 Berman, Marshall, All that Is Solid Melts into Air (New York, 1982), 40Google Scholar.

15 Said, Edward, “The Voyage In and the Emergence Of Opposition”, in idem, Culture and Imperialism (London, 1994), 292–3Google Scholar.

16 See Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism, 260 ff.; On “the art of representing”, see idem, Representations of the Intellectual (New York, 1994), 12–14; Sudipta Kaviraj, “Two Literatures of Bengal”, 560.

17 This follows Ranajit Guha's felicitous translation of the word rasa. See “Experience, Wonder, and the Pathos of Historicality”, in idem, History at the Limit of World-History (New York, 2002). See Ghosh, Tapobrata, “Literature and Literary Life in Calcutta”, in Chaudhuri, Sukanta, ed., Calcutta: The Living City, 2 vols. (Calcutta, 1990), 2: 230Google Scholar.

18 I derive inspiration for this argument about social relevance from Peukert, Detlev, Die Weimarer Republik (Frankfurt, 1987), 14–18Google Scholar; and Marchand, Suzanne, German Orientalism (Cambridge, 2010)Google Scholar. Also see Ray, Rajat, Social Conflict and Political Unrest in Bengal, 1875–1927 (Delhi, 1984), 4Google Scholar.

19 Dallmayr, Fred, “Hermeneutics and Deconstruction: Gadamer and Derrida in Dialogue,” in Michelfelder, Diane and Palmer, Richard, eds., Dialogue and Deconstruction (Albany, 1989), 245–60Google Scholar; Kelly, Michael, “The Gadamer/Habermas Debate Revisited: The Question of Ethics,” Philosophical and Social Criticism 14/2 (1988), 369–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 See Foucault, Michel, Hermeneutics of the Subject, trans. Burchell, Graham (New York, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 211 ff. Gutting, Gary, “Introduction”, in idem, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (Cambridge, 1984), 2Google Scholar.

21 One major contribution of Gadamer's Truth and Method involved providing a phenomenology of conversation. See the 1993 English edition, translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall, 355–460.

22 See Cooper's, Frederick critique of binarism in “Conflict and Connection: Rethinking Colonial African History”, American Historical Review 99/5 (1994), 1516–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Frederick Cooper and Ann Stoler questioned the notion of ‘the globe’ as a unitary entity in Tensions of Empire (Berkeley, 1997), 33, 34; Cooper launched a more sustained critique of “totalizing” approaches in “Globalization”, in idem, Colonialism in Question (Berkeley, 2005), 94, 95.

24 Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism, 230–340; Mufti, Aamir, Enlightenment in the Colony (Princeton, 2007), 4Google Scholar.

25 Bhabha, Homi, Location of Culture (London, 1994), 28Google Scholar, emphasis in original.

26 Bhabha, “Signs Taken for Wonders”, in idem, Location of Culture, 171.

27 Bhabha, “Sly Civility”, in idem, Location of Culture, 93–101.

28 Bhabha, “Of Mimicry and Man”, in idem, Location of Culture, 121.

29 Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe, 18.

30 Guha, Ranajit, Dominance without Hegemony (Cambridge, 1997), 1Google Scholar. See Pandey, Gyan, “Subaltern Studies as Postcolonial Criticism”, American Historical Review 99/5 (1994), 1475–90Google Scholar.

31 Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe, 60, 64.

32 Ibid., 66.

33 Sartori, Andrew, Bengal in Global Concept History (Chicago, 2009), 62Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., 22.

35 Gandhi, Leela, Affective Communities (Durham, 2006), 29Google Scholar.

36 Trivedi, Harish, Colonial Transactions (Calcutta, 1993), 8Google Scholar.

37 Harper, Tim, “Empire, Diaspora and the Languages of Globalism 1850–1914”, in Hopkins, A. G., Globalization in World History (London, 2002), 154Google Scholar; Menon, Dilip, “Keshari Pillai and the Invention of Europe for a Modern Kerala”, in Bose, Sugata and Manjapra, Kris, Cosmopolitan Thought Zones (Basingstoke, 2010), 131–58Google Scholar; Benjamin Zachariah, “Rethinking (the Absence of) Fascism in India, c. 1922–45” in ibid., 178–212; Frost, Mark Ravinder, “Asia's Maritime Networks and the Colonial Public Sphere, 1840–1920”, New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 6/2 (2004), 63 ffGoogle Scholar.

38 Raina, Dhruv, “Reconfiguring the Centre”, in idem, Images and Contexts (Delhi, 2003), 159–75Google Scholar; Raj, Kapil, Relocating Modern Science (London, 2007), 23–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Sudipta Kaviraj, “Said and the History of Ideas”, in Bose and Manjapra, Cosmopolitan Thought Zones, 75; Cooper, “Globalization”, 95.

40 On the particular social location of the bhadralok, and their inability to become an enfranchised “bourgeoisie”, see Bhattacharya, Tithi, The Sentinels of Culture (Delhi, 2005), 64–7Google Scholar. On structural dominance see Lepsius, Rainer, “Zur Soziologie des Bürgertums under der Bürgerlichkeit”, in Kocka, Jürgen, ed, Bürger und Bürgerlichkeit im 19. Jahrhundert (Göttingen, 1987), 85Google Scholar.

41 Hugill, Peter, Global Communications since 1844 (Baltimore, 1999), 25 ff.Google Scholar; Jürgen Osterhammel, Verwandlung der Welt (Munich, 2009), 1010 ff.

42 See Ker, James C., Political Trouble in India, 1907–17 (Delhi, 1917), 193–316Google Scholar.

43 Bayly, Chris, Birth of the Modern World (Malden, 2004), 459–62Google Scholar.

44 On the “scramble” for Africa and Asia see Jürgen Osterhammel, Die Verwandlung der Welt, 577–80.

45 Schmoller, Gustav, Handels- und Machtpolitik (Stuttgart, 1900), 24Google Scholar.

46 Of the 414 members at the first official Congress of the Indian National Congress held in Calcutta in 1885, 230 were from Bengal. See Majumdar, Bimanbehari and Mazumdar, Bhakat Prasad, Congress and Congressmen in the Pre-Gandhian Era (Calcutta, 1967), 10Google Scholar.

47 For example, these figures founded nationalist intellectual institutions: the poet Rabindranath Tagore (b. 1861), spiritual leader Vivekananda (b. 1863), political theorist Bipinchandra Pal (b. 1858), archaeologist Pramathanath Bose (b. 1855), chemist Prafulla Chandra Ray (b. 1861), physicist J. C. Bose (b. 1858) and historian Jadunath Sarkar (b. 1870).

48 Tithi Bhattacharya, The Sentinels of Culture, 224.

49 Ghurye, G. S., “Cities of India”, Sociological Bulletin 2 (1953), 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Bagchi, Amiya, Private Investment in India, 1900–1939 (Cambridge, 1972), 70, 85 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rajat Kanta Ray, Social Conflict and Political Unrest, 106 ff.

51 Bagchi, Amiya, “European and Indian Entrepreneurship in India, 1900–1930”, in Ray, Rajat, ed., Entrepreneurship and Industry in India, 1800–1947 (Oxford, 1994), 177–82Google Scholar; Ker, Political Trouble in India, 141.

52 Amiya Bagchi, “Wealth and Work in Calcutta, 1860–1921”, in Chaudhuri, Calcutta: The Living City, 1: 215.

53 Basu, Aparna, The Growth of Education and Political Development in India (Delhi, 1974), 23Google Scholar.

54 Curzon declared he would give “the Mohammedans in Eastern Bengal . . . a unity which they have not enjoyed since the days of the old Mussalman Viceroys and Kings.” See Anon., The Partition Agitation Explained (Calcutta, 1906), 6.

55 Sarkar, Sumit, Swadeshi Movement (Delhi, 1973), 23Google Scholar.

56 The Defense of India Act of 1915 granted the government emergency powers of “preventative” detention of suspects. See Ker, Political Trouble in India, 317; Sedition Committee Report (Calcutta, 1918), 112, 113.

57 Out of a total of 186 persons charged for sedition between 1907 and 1917 in Bengal, 124 belong to the 16–24 age group, and 165 were upper-caste. See Sedition Committee Report (1918), 226; Ker, Political Trouble in India, 7.

58 Tegart, Charles, “Terrorism in India”, in Samanta, Amiya ed., Terrorism in Bengal, vol. 3 (Calcutta, 1995), xliiGoogle Scholar.

59 Pratt, Mary Louise, Imperial Eyes (New York, 1992), 9Google Scholar, spoke of “planetary consciousness”.

60 The term “Anglicist” refers to a debate in the early to mid-nineteenth century regarding educational institutions in the Indian colony. “Orientalists” argued for the cultivation of indigenous knowledge. Anglicists, such as Thomas Macaulay in his 1835 “Minute on Education”, insisted on English-medium education.

61 Forbes, Geraldine, Positivism in Bengal (Calcutta, 1975), 14Google Scholar; Raychaudhuri, Tapan, Reconsidering Europe (Oxford, 1988), 5Google Scholar.

62 Raychaudhuri, Europe Reconsidered, 122.

63 Chattopadhyay, Bangadarśan, 1872, introduction, 3.

64 Bangadarśan, 1872, introduction, 15. Throughout this essay I supply original Bengali terms in brackets in order to clarify the translations.

65 Dineshranjan Das, “Gokulchandra Nag”, Kallol, 1925, 689. All quotations from Kallol are my own translations from the original Bengali.

66 The Muslim intellectual Kazi Abdul Wadud wrote for Kallol. Suniti Debi was an editor of the magazine. A discussion of the writings of female authors appears below.

67 “Ami Kallol, sudhu kalrol, ghum hārā diśāhin”. Das, “Gokulchandra Nag”, Kallol, 1925, 620.

68 Basu, Buddhadeva, An Acre of Green Grass (Calcutta, 1997), 28Google Scholar.

69 Quoted in Chaudhuri, Pramatha, Ātmakathā (Calcutta: Book Emporium, 1946), 17Google Scholar.

70 Sengupta, Kalloler Yug, 35.

71 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1927, 164.

72 Buddhadeva Basu, “Kabi Sukumar Ray”, Kallol, 1925, 1108–25.

73 See the transcript of Vivekananda's speech: An Appeal to Young Bengal (Calcutta, 1910).

74 Sarkar, Sumit, Swadeshi Movement (Calcutta, 1973), 164Google Scholar; Bose, Pradip, “Sons of the Nation: Child Rearing in the New Family”, in Chatterjee, Partha, ed., Texts of Power (Minneapolis, 1995), 139Google Scholar.

75 Among the recent graduates who formed the circle around Hindu College instructor Henry Derozio were Krishna Mohan Banarjee, Ramgopal Ghosh and Dashina Ranjan. See Sengupta, Pallab, Derozio (Delhi, 2000), 6Google Scholar.

76 Raychaudhuri, Europe Reconsidered, 201.

77 As agents of “world forces”, Sarkar catalogues states, corporations and individual “geniuses” that have effect on a global stage. See B. K. Sarkar, The Science of History, v, vii; idem, Viśwāsakti (Calcutta, 1914). See the discussion in Giuseppe Flora, Benoy Kumar Sarkar and Italy (Delhi, 1994), 15, 16.

78 Bankimchandra Chattopadhyaya's journal Bangadarśan was explicitly concerned with how to negotiate the influences of bilāt. In Prabāsī (1901), and continuing with modernist journals such as Ārya, Sabuj Patra, and others, the deśi-bideśi (or domestic and foreign) and āntarjātik (international) dynamic is addressed.

79 See Bijoycandra Mazumdar's extended essay “Iuropīyo Mahāsamar” on Prussia's challenge to England and France from the time of Bismarck to Wilhelm II in Prabasi 15 (1915), 275–81.

80 “The Editor of the Modern Review Returns Home”, Prabasi, Dec. 1926, 699.

81 Rai, Lajpat, An Interpretation and a History of the Nationalist Movement (New York, 1916), 221Google Scholar.

82 Letter from Kalidas Nag to Gokulchandra Nag, 10 Feb. 1926, reprinted in Sengupta, Kalloler Yug, 214.

83 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1926, 657.

84 Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe, 199.

85 See Dipesh Chakrabarty's comments on Nripendrakrishna Chattopadhyay's Nana katha in Provincializing Europe, 200.

86 See Marchand, , German Orientalism (Cambridge, 2009)Google Scholar, chaps. 5 and 10.

87 For incomplete lists of foreign visitors to Shantiniketan and Calcutta University in the 1920s see Radhakrishnan, S., Rabindranath Tagore: A Centenary (Delhi 1961), 480 ff.Google Scholar; Dutt, Krishna and Robinson, Andrew, Rabindranath Tagore: The Myriad-Minded Man (London, 1995)Google Scholar. See “Shantiniketan” in Frankfurter Zeitung, 17 Oct. 1922.

88 Gadamer, Hans Georg, Truth and Method (New York, 1993), 102Google Scholar.

89 On the artistic vocabulary of the Swadeshi era see Prathama Banerjee, “The Work of Imagination: Temporality and Nationhood in Colonial Bengal” in Subaltern Studies (2005), 283 ff.

90 “Rushsahitya o tarun bangali” (Baishak 1926), “Rolland o tarun bangla” (Feb. 1925). Various usages of naba (new) are employed throughout, such as “nabayug” (new era), “nabajiban” (new life),“natunatwa” (novelty).

91 ChinmoyGuha, ed., Kalidas Nag and Romain Rolland Correspondence, 71–123.

92 See reprints of letters in Sengupta, Kalloler Yug, 251–3.

93 A note in the Ḍākghar section of Kallol (1926), 294, mentions that Noguchi sent a pictures of himself, as well as a poem, “I Followed the Twilight”, especially composed for Indians.

94 “Raa o tarun bāṁlā”, Kallol, 1923, 78.

95 Knut Hamsun (1924), Maxim Gorky (1924), Jacinto Benavente (1925), Leonid Andreyev (1926), Selma Lagerlöf (1927), Thomas Hardy (1927), André Maurois (1928), Percy Bysshe Shelly (1928), Omar Khayyám (1928), Yone Noguchi (1926), Romain Rolland (1924), H. G. Wells (1924), Leo Tolstoy (1928), Anatole France (1924), William Le Quex (1924), Gabriele d'Annunzio (1927), Emile Zola (1923), Fiona Macleod (1924), Guy de Maupassant (1925), Andre Godard (1925), Koloman Mikszath (1927), Masuccio of Salerno (1925), Louis Couperus (1925), Vladislav Reymont (1926), Marcel Prévost (1927), Anton Chekhov (1927), Karoly Ksifaludi (1929), Joseph Szebenyn (1929), François Coppée (1929), G. S. Viereck (1925), J. M. Barrie (1923), Walt Whitman (1924). See the list provided in Debkumar Basu, Kallolgosṭhīr Kathāsāhitya, 183–5.

96 “Publications of Professors at Presidency College from 1880–1950”, Presidency College Centenary Volume (Calcutta, 1956), 271, 272.

97 Catalogue of Books in the Presidency College Library (Calcutta, 1907).

98 Nripendrakrishna Chattopadhyay, “Jacinto Benavente”, Kallol, 1927, 937.

99 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1926, 160.

100 Nripendrakrishna Chattopadhyay, “Leonid Andreyev”, Kallol, 1925, 650.

101 Nripendrakrishna Chattopadhyay, “Russahitya o Tarun Bangali”, Kallol, 1926, 61.

102 Nripendrakrishna Chattopadhyay, “Russahitya o Tarun Bangali”, Kallol, 1926, 62.

103 Dineshranjan Das, “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1924, 791.

104 Excerpts from Noguchi's letters were reproduced in Nripendrakrishna Chattopadhyay, “Noguchi”, Kallol, 1926, 294.

105 Debkumar Basu, Kallolgosṭhīr Kathāsāhitya, 183.

106 “Phronesis [ist] die verantwortliche Vernünftigkeit.” Hans Georg Gadamer, “Probleme der praktischen Vernunft”, in Gesammelte Werke, vol. 2 (Tübingen, 2000), 325.

107 Gadamer, Truth and Method, 361.

108 “Ḍakghar”, Kallol, 1926, 777.

109 “Ḍakghar”, Kallol, 1927, 78.

110 Basu, “Kabi Sukumār Ray”, Kallol, 1925, 1108–25.

111 Nripendrakrishna Chattopadhyay, “Jacinto Benavente”, Kallol, 1925, 932.

112 “Ḍakghar”, Kallol, 1926, 560.

113 Harish Trivedi, Colonial Transactions, 81.

114 Meghnad Saha and S. N. Bose translated Einstein's 1917 paper on “general relativity” directly from German and published it in Calcutta in 1919. Benoykumar Sarkar translated Friedrich List's Das Nationale System between 1912 and 1916, and Booker T. Washington's Up from Slavery in 1913.

115 “Kabi Omar Khayyam”, Kallol, 1925, 155–60; “Gaibi” (Secret) from Kabir, translated by Radhacaran Chakrabarty, Kallol, 1926, 563. On Rolland's heroic Romanticism see Bresky, Dushan, Cathedral or Symphony: Essays on Jean-Christophe (Frankfurt, 1973), 71–3Google Scholar.

116 Both journals had the same editor, Ramananda Chatterjee. I tabulated the number of internationally themed articles for the years 1923–6 for both journals in order to make this estimate.

117 Mohitlal Mazumdar, “Pāntha,” Kallol, 1926, 394.

118 I thank Sugata Bose for providing me with this reference. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 24/3 (1960), 416–22.

119 The Rowlatt Act (1919), the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (1919) and the unprecedented number of conspiracy trials, counterinsurgency reports, emergency laws and executions in the 1920s indicate the level of oppression. See Laushey, David, Bengal Terrorism and the Marxist Left (Calcutta, 1975)Google Scholar.

120 Harish Trivedi, Colonial Transactions, 41.

121 Datta, Bhabatosh, “Mohitlāler Jiban o Kabitā”, in idem, ed., Mohitlāl Mazumdār Kābyasaṁgraha (Calcutta, 1997), 13Google Scholar.

122 Mazumdar, Mohitlal, Swapan-Pasāri (The Keeper of Dreams) (Calcutta, 1922)Google Scholar.

123 Nrisinghadasi Debi, “Byathār Tṛpti”, Kallol, 1927, 768–71.

124 Suniti Debi, “Pon-Bhāṅā”, Kallol, 1925, 415–18.

125 “Ḍakghar”, Kallol, 1926, 212, 213.

126 Jagatbandhu Mitra, “Saratchandra Sāhitye – Prem”, Kallol, 1927, 18.

127 Ibid., 19.

128 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1925, 100.

129 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1927, 780.

130 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1927, 79.

131 Hans Georg Gadamer, “Die Kontinuität der Geschichte und der Augenblick der Existenz,” Gesammelte Werke, vol. 2, 142.

132 Gadamer, Truth and Method, 397.

133 Kazi Abdul Wadud, “Sāhitya Samasyā”, Kallol, 1924, 438.

134 Ibid., 437.

135 Ibid., 439.

136 Dhirendranāth Biswas, “Ḳṣaṇika”, Kallol, 1926, 991.

137 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1925, 206.

138 Pramatha Chaudhuri, “Kathā-Sāhitye Rabindranāth”, Kallol, 1926, 293.

139 “Ḍākghar”, Kallol, 1927, 164.

140 Pramatha Chaudhuri, “Kathā-Sāhitye Rabindranāth”, 293.

141 Tapobrata Ghosh quotes Tagore in “Literature and Literary life in Calcutta”, 230.

142 “Barttamān Gadya Sāhitye”, Kallol, 1927, 266.

143 Chatterjee, Partha, Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World (London, 1986), 21Google Scholar.

144 Shiraishi, Takashi, An Age in Motion: Popular Radicalism in Java (Ithaca, NY, 1990)Google Scholar; Levine, Marilyn, The Found Generation: Chinese Communists in Europe during the Twenties (Seattle, 1993)Google Scholar; Epkenhans, Tim, Die iranische Moderne in Exil (Berlin, 2000)Google Scholar; Tai, Ho Tam, Radicalism and the Origins of the Vietnamese Revolution (Cambridge, MA, 1992)Google Scholar; Rabinbach, Anson, In the Shadow of Catastrophe (Berkeley, 1997)Google Scholar; Aydin, Cemil, The Politics of Anti-westernism in Asia (New York, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

145 Reproduced in Debkumar Basu, Kallolgosṭhīr Kathāsāhitya, 9.

146 This history is expertly discussed in Chatterji, Joya, Bengal Divided (Cambridge, 1994), 130–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.