Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:33:00.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building, Dwelling, Dying: Architecture and History in Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2020

Chris Moffat
Chris Moffat*
Affiliation:
School of History, Queen Mary University of London
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a long history of scholars finding in architecture tools for thinking, whether this is the relationship between nature and culture in Simmel's ruins, industrial capitalism in Benjamin's Parisian arcades, or the rhythms of the primordial in Heidegger's Black Forest farmhouse. But what does it mean to take seriously the concepts and dispositions articulated by architects themselves? How might processes of designing and making constitute particular forms of thinking? This article considers the words and buildings of Lahore-based architect Kamil Khan Mumtaz (b. 1939) as an entry point into such questions. It outlines how professional architecture in Pakistan has grappled with the unsettled status of the past in a country forged out of two partitions (1947 and 1971). Mumtaz's work and thought—engaging questions of tradition, authority, craft and the sacred—demonstrates how these predicaments have been productive for conceptualizing time, labor and the nature of dwelling in a postcolonial world.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 520 - 546
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Devji, Faisal, Muslim Zion (London, 2013), esp. chap. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the history of qaum in South Asia see Qasmi, Ali Usman and Robb, Megan, “Introduction,” in Qasmi and Robb, eds., Muslims against the Muslim League (Delhi, 2017), 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Devji, Muslim Zion; Khan, Naveeda, Muslim Becoming (Durham, NC, 2012)Google Scholar.

3 See Moffat, Chris, “History in Pakistan and the Will to Architecture,” CSSAAME 39/1 (2019), 171–83Google Scholar; and Javed Majeed, “Everything Built on Moonshine” (forthcoming).

4 Kostof, Spiro, ed., The Architect (Berkeley, 2000)Google Scholar; Cuff, Dana, Architecture: The Story of Practice (Cambridge, MA, 1992)Google Scholar.

5 Corbusier, Le, Towards a New Architecture (New York, 1986; first published 1931), 7Google Scholar.

6 For an evocative assessment of this moment see Banham, Reyner, Theory and Design in the First Machine Age (London, 1960)Google Scholar.

7 Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture, 173.

8 See the Ordinance for Pakistan Council Architects and Town Planners, with associated documents, in Cabinet Division File No. 138/Prog/81, National Documentation Wing, Islamabad.

9 Akhtar, Aasim Sajjad, Politics of Common Sense (Delhi, 2018), 152Google Scholar.

10 Buchli, Victor, An Anthropology of Architecture (London, 2013), 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Simmel, Georg, “Two Essays,” Hudson Review 11/3 (1958), 371–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Benjamin, Walter, The Arcades Project (Cambridge, MA, 1999)Google Scholar; Heidegger, Martin, “Building Dwelling Thinking,” in Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought (New York, 2001), 141–60Google Scholar; see also Sharr, Adam, Heidegger's Hut (Cambridge, MA, 2017)Google Scholar.

12 Extant histories of architecture in Pakistan are piecemeal, compiled by enthusiasts or architects themselves and reflecting on individual cities or careers, rather than forging a sustained, disciplinary conversation about context, concepts, styles and approaches. An example of the constrained, if eminently readable, nature of this literature is Khwaja's, Zahir-ud Deen Memoirs of an Architect (Lahore, 1998)Google Scholar.

13 I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for encouraging this reflection.

14 Two recent books informing my approach do, however, take the monumental and iconic as central: Rajagopalan, Mrinalini, Building Histories: The Archival and Affective Lives of Five Monuments in Modern Delhi (Chicago, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Murawski, Michal, The Palace Complex: A Stalinist Skyscraper, Capitalist Warsaw, and a City Transfixed (Bloomington, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Heidegger, “Building Dwelling Thinking.” Based on a 1951 lecture given in Darmstadt, Germany, the essay became an important reference for architects seeking to ground their work in context, against the alleged tabula rasa reductivism of the Modern Movement. I return to the reception of Heidegger later in this essay.

16 I borrow this contrast between “recursive” and “generative” temporalities from Gordon, Uri, “Prefigurative Politics between Ethical Practice and Absent Promise,” Political Studies 66/2 (2017), 521–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Mumtaz's 1966 CV, in National College of Art (hereafter NCA) Archives, 279 F (P/File H-35).

18 Patrick Wakely, “Otto Koenigsberger Obituary,” The Guardian, 26 Jan. 1999. Koenigsberger's papers are stored at the Architectural Association Archives in London. An article in the AA Journal (April 1963) notes that Mumtaz was joined in his cohort by architects from India, Indonesia, Iraq, Kenya, Singapore, Trinidad and elsewhere.

19 Solano-Meza, Natalia, “Against a Pedagogical Colonization,” Charrette 4/2 (2017), 47Google Scholar; Roux, Hannah le, “The Networks of Tropical Architecture,” Journal of Architecture 8 (2003), 340–58, at 337–54Google Scholar.

20 Department of Tropical Architecture 1957 lecture program and 1965 program handbook (72:37 [42] ARC), AA Archives.

21 1965 program handbook, 29 (72:37 [42] ARC), AA Archives.

22 Lloyd, Michael, “Design Education in the Third World,” Habitat International 7/5–6 (1983), 367–75, at 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Ibid., 368; Solano-Meza, “Against a Pedagogical Colonization.”

24 Lloyd, “Intentions,” Arena: The Architectural Association Journal 82/94 (1966) (special number on Kumasi), 40; Christians, Lutz, “Teaching History,” Arena: The Architectural Association Journal 82/94 (1966), 56Google Scholar.

25 Mumtaz reflects on this moment in his Modernity and Tradition: Contemporary Architecture in Pakistan (Karachi, 1999), 41Google Scholar.

26 NCA Archives 259 E: Scheme for the Development of Architectural Department, 1960–61.

27 NCA Archives 279 F (P/File H-35). On Mumtaz's family entanglements with early Pakistani communism see Ali, Kamran Asdar, Surkh Salam (Karachi, 2015), 70–76Google Scholar.

28 This is evident in Lloyd's reference for Mumtaz, dated 9 Sept. 1966, in NCA Archives 279 F (P/File H-35).

29 Daechsel, Markus, Islamabad and the Politics of International Development (Cambridge, 2015), 167, 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Arches and vaulted roofs were familiar locally, but associated with wealthier or ceremonial buildings rather than simple farm dwellings. Zarminae Ansari, “A Contemporary Architectural Quest and Synthesis: Kamil Khan Mumtaz in Pakistan” (unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997), 48–9, 57. A parallel case may be seen in local critiques of Hassan Fathy's famous New Gourna project in Egypt. See Pyla, Panayiota, “The Many Lives of New Gourna,” Journal of Architecture 14/6 (2009), 715–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Akhtar, Politics of Common Sense; and Toor, Sadia, The State of Islam (London, 2011)Google Scholar.

32 Daechsel, Islamabad and the Politics of International Development, 46–7.

33 I deploy “craftsman” with full awareness of its gendered occlusions. In maintaining Mumtaz's usage of the term, I mean to underline a certain imaginary of traditional building practice and its proper subject in contemporary Pakistan.

34 Mathur, Saloni, India by Design (Berkeley, 2007), esp. chap. 1Google Scholar. See also McGowan, Abigail, Crafting the Nation in Colonial India (New York, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Mathur, India by Design, 32, with a nod to James Clifford, describes this as the British Empire's “salvage paradigm.”

36 Interview with Kamil Khan Mumtaz, Lahore, 12 Feb. 2018.

37 Mumtaz, Modernity and Tradition, 42, 30.

38 This, indeed, was the project of Ardalan and Bakhtiar's mentor, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, who provided a Foreword to Ardalan, Nader and Bakhtiar, Laleh, The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture (Chicago, 1973), xi–xviGoogle Scholar. See also Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, Traditional Islam in the Modern World (London, 1987)Google Scholar.

39 Grigor, Talinn, Building Iran (New York, 2009), 164–5Google Scholar; and John-Alder, Kathleen, “Paradise Reconsidered,” in Gharipour, Mohammad, ed., Contemporary Urban Landscapes of the Middle East (Abingdon, 2016), 120–48, 137Google Scholar.

40 Frampton, Kenneth, Modern Architecture, 3rd edn (London, 1992), 280Google Scholar.

41 Mumtaz, Modernity and Tradition, 34.

42 Ibid., 80–81.

43 Scott, David, Refashioning Futures (Princeton, 1999), 14, original emphasisCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 See also Chatterjee, Partha, The Nation and Its Fragments (Princeton, 1993)Google Scholar.

45 The “perennialist” or “traditionalist” school of thought, founded by the French philosopher René Guénon (1886–1951), articulated a critique of the modern world based on an idea of primordial, “inner” truths shared by world religions and captured vividly in traditional forms of knowledge. Along with Guénon, the work of Ananda Coomaraswamy (1877–1947)—whom Mumtaz cites as an important influence—and Frithjof Schuon (1907–98) helped consolidate a philosophy that challenged scientific and secular knowledge with notions of eternal wisdom.

46 Askari, M. H., Jadidiyat (Rawalpindi, 1979)Google Scholar. For context see Zaman, Muhammad Qasim, Islam in Pakistan (Princeton, 2019), 80–82Google Scholar; and Ali, Surkh Salam, 147–9.

47 Interview with Mumtaz, Lahore, 12 Feb. 2018; NCA Archives 279 F: Personal File of Kamil Khan Mumtaz, 1966–80 (P/File H-35 [250]). His specific reason for leaving is not given but there is repeated mention of Mumtaz's involvement in “disturbances.”

48 See, for instance, Yasmeen Lari's “Preface” to Lari, Traditional Architecture of Thatta (Karachi, 1989). As one reviewer of this essay observed, the transformation of religious ornament into mass-produced market commodity ironically fulfills Mumtaz's call for a “lack of originality” in design—albeit without the ethic of building and dwelling he is prescribing.

49 Mumtaz, Modernity and Tradition, 48.

50 Mumtaz, Kamil Khan, Architecture in Pakistan (Singapore, 1985)Google Scholar.

51 The digitized Mimar catalogue is available via ArchNet at https://archnet.org/collections/56.

52 See correspondence between UNESCO's W. Tochtermann and Mumtaz, June 1975, in NCA Archives 279 F (P/File H-35). Tochtermann introduced the project as part of an endeavour to “collect information on Asian ‘architecture without architects’.”

53 When, in a 2018 interview, I asked Mumtaz about the absence of Bangladesh, he countered that there was indeed a long-standing conversation in terms of methods and approaches, particularly with Muzharul Islam, a leading voice in “regional modernism” debates who also trained at the AA in the 1950s.

54 Mumtaz, Architecture in Pakistan, 4.

55 Jalal, Ayesha, “Conjuring Pakistan: History as Official Imagining,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 27 (1995), 73–89, at 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Interview with Mumtaz, Lahore, 12 Feb. 2018; Mumtaz, Architecture in Pakistan, 2. The choice of English as language of communication privileges the latter but also reflects the lingua franca of professional architectural practice in Pakistan.

57 Mumtaz, Modernity and Tradition, 57.

58 Ibid., 38. For variations on this theme in the history of Muslim societies see Christensen, Peter, ed., Expertise and Architecture in the Modern Islamic World (Bristol, 2018)Google Scholar.

59 On this genre of thinking see Yarrow, Thomas and Jones, Siân, “‘Stone Is Stone’: Engagement and Detachment in the Craft of Conservation Masonry,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20 (2014), 256–75, at 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sennett, Richard, The Craftsman (New Haven, 2008)Google Scholar.

60 Coomaraswamy, Ananda, Art and Swadeshi (Madras, n.d. [c. 1912]), 22Google Scholar; Mathur, India by Design, 44–6, 49.

61 Mumtaz, Modernity and Tradition, 17.

62 Ibid., caption to Plate 8.

63 Ibid., 63.

64 Ardalan and Bakhtiar, Sense of Unity, 10.

65 Ibid., 5.

66 Mumtaz, Modernity & Tradition, 66–7.

67 Ardalan and Bakhtiar, Sense of Unity, 5.

68 On the institution of the workshop across a diversity of contexts see Sennett, The Craftsman.

69 Sennett, The Craftsman, 54; see also the emphasis on “unity and equality” among Scottish masons, alongside a clear hierarchy in terms of experience, temperament and character in Yarrow and Jones, “Stone Is Stone,” 261.

70 Daechsel, Islamabad and the Politics of International Development, esp. chap. 2.

71 For a questioning of this primacy see Yarrow and Jones, “Stone Is Stone.”

72 On the portability of craft ethics see Bellini, Frederico, “Cormac McCarthy's The Stonemason and the Ethic of Craftsmanship,” European Journal of American Studies 12/3 (2017), 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 Indeed, Fathy was the first winner of the Aga Khan Chairman's Award in 1980. See his influential Architecture for the Poor (Chicago, 1973)Google Scholar. For insights into the function of tradition more generally in Pakistan see Iqtidar, Humeira, “Redefining ‘tradition’ in political thought,” European Journal of Political Theory 15/4 (2016), 424–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Cited in Mumtaz, , “The Architecture of Sufi Shrines,” in Quraeshi, Samina, ed., Sacred Spaces (Cambridge, MA, 2009), 41–68, at 42Google Scholar.

75 Mumtaz, “Architecture of Sufi Shrines,” 43.

76 A jibe I heard on fieldwork suggested that, if one commissions Mumtaz to build a house, they shouldn't expect to move in for ten to twenty years.

77 Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Foreword, in Ardalan and Bakhtiar, Sense of Unity, xi. Bakhtiar was Nasr's student at Tehran University in the 1960s.

78 Mumtaz, Modernity and Tradition, Plate 8.

79 Mumtaz, “Architecture of Sufi Shrines,” 54.

80 Interview with Mumtaz, Lahore, 12 Feb. 2018. Lings was a student of Frithjof Schuon.

81 Ardalan and Bhaktiar, Sense of Unity, 10.

82 Mumtaz, “Architecture of Sufi Shrines,” 43.

83 Heidegger, “Building Dwelling Thinking.”

84 I am grateful to Vazira Zamindar for encouraging me to think about this aspect of Mumtaz's biography. On Lahore as palimpsest see Glover, William, Making Lahore Modern (Minneapolis, 2008)Google Scholar.

85 For an account of this terrain, see Maqsood, Ammara, The New Pakistani Middle Class (Cambridge, MA, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

86 Mumtaz, Modernity and Tradition, 42–5.

87 Mumtaz, “Architecture of Sufi Shrines,” 54.

88 Spiro Kostof, “Preface,” in Kostof, The Architect, xvii–xx, at xvii, describes architects as “conceivers of buildings,” who mediate between clients and builders.

89 Amen Jaffer, “Inhabiting the Power of the Sacred: Legitimacy and Affect in Punjabi Shrines” (Ph.D. dissertation, New School for Social Research, 2016).

90 Mumtaz, “Architecture of Sufi Shrines,” 60.

91 Ibid., 55.

92 Ibid., 58.

93 Declan Walsh, “Of Saints and Sinners,” The Economist, 18 Dec. 2008.

94 I am grateful to Umber bin Ibad for conversation on this point. See also his Sufi Shrines and the Pakistani State (London, 2018)Google Scholar.

95 Zaman, Islam in Pakistan, 223–4.

96 Mumtaz, Modernity, 35; and see Heidegger, Martin, Bremen and Freiburg Lectures, trans. Mitchell, Andrew J. (Bloomington, 2012), 34–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 Sharr, Adam, Heidegger for Architects (London, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98 Samina Quraeshi, “Introduction,” in Quraeshi, Sacred Spaces, xi–xii.

99 Mumtaz, “Architecture of Sufi Shrines,” 60.

100 “Our Mission,” www.lcs.org.pk. The LCS was initiated in 1984 by the architect Zahir-ud Deen Khawaja, supported by others including the architect Nayyar Ali Dada and human rights advocate I. A. Rehman.

101 Kamil Khan Mumtaz, “Sustainable Cultural Tourism,” Friday Times, 25 July 2004.

102 “UN urges Pakistan to halt construction of Orange Metro Train,” Daily Times, 25 Jan. 2016.

103 Bhatti, Shaila, Translating Museums (Walnut Creek, 2012)Google Scholar.

104 “Construction on Lahore's Orange Line Metro Train to Be Suspended: LHC,” Dawn, 19 Aug. 2016.

105 Interview with Mumtaz, Lahore, 12 Feb. 2018. The joke derives from a spoof news site. See “Shahbaz Vows to Construct New Heritage Sites along OMLT Route,” Daily Khabaristan, 20 Aug. 2016, at https://dailytimes.com.pk/62454/satire-shahbaz-vows-to-construct-new-heritage-sites-along-olmt-route. I am grateful to Timothy Cooper for this reference.