No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
BRIDGING THE ABYSS: VICTOR BASCH'S POLITICAL AND AESTHETIC MINDSET*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2013
Abstract
This essay cross-examines both the correlation and the disjunction between art philosophy and political reason in the thinking of the French Jewish art philosopher, Kant specialist and socialist politician Victor Basch (1863–1944). Two interwoven lines of questioning will be in play. One considers the extent to which Basch's theory of beauty, which was primarily grounded in a psychological theory of Einfühlung, was a corollary to his political ideas and practices. The other line of inquiry raises questions about how Basch's political position, namely his anti-facist defending of republican values, became influenced by his work on aesthetics. By answering both questions, this article challenges the traditional historiography of interwar aesthetics. The esaay shows how conceptual debates of aesthetics were not just sterile theoretical products, but to a large extent offered an apparatus to diagnose and orientate a rapidly changing world. Therefore this essay develops a reflection about the gaze needed to take in the complex historical situations from which aesthetic reflections grew, and which in turn they addressed.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
Footnotes
*
I want to thank Stéphane Symons, Samuel Moyn and the two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable suggestions and comments on earlier versions of this article.
References
1 “Séance du samedi 17 juin 1939,” Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie 40 (1946), 41–92. The English-language version of the address can be found in Mahoney, D. J. and Anderson, B. C., Thinking Politically: A Liberal in the Age of Ideology (New Brunswick, NJ, 1997), 325–32Google Scholar.
2 Furet, F., The Passing of an Illusion: The Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century, trans. Furet, Deborah (Chicago, 2000), 313Google Scholar.
3 For a detailed account see Basch, F., Victor Basch, de l'affaire Dreyfus au crime de la milice (Paris, 1994)Google Scholar.
4 “Séance du samedi 17 juin 1939,” 67.
5 Vogt, W. P., “Identifying Scholarly and Intellectual Communities: A Note on French Philosophy, 1900–1939,” History and Theory 21/2 (1982), 267–78, 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Aron, R., Mémoires: 50 ans de réflexion politique (Paris, 1983), 154–7Google Scholar. This process has been described in Lindenberg, D., Les années souterraines, 1937–1947 (Paris, 1990)Google Scholar.
7 Mahoney, D. J., “Raymond Aron's Model of Democratic Conservatism,” Society 46/1 (2008), 12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Sirinelli, J.-F., “Raymond Aron avant Raymond Aron (1923–1933),” Vingtième siècle 2/2 (1984), 15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Zeldin, T., France, 1848–1945: Intellect, Taste and Anxiety (Oxford, 1977), 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Classic examples of this are two influential studies which were published in the 1960s: Morpurgo-Tagliabue, Guido, L'esthétique contemporaine: Une enquête, trans. M. Bourette Serre (Milan, 1960)Google Scholar and the Earl of Listowel, Modern Aesthetics: A Historical Introduction (London, 1967)Google Scholar. A more recent example is Nachtsheim, S., Kunstphilosophie und empirische Kunstforschung, 1870–1920 (Berlin, 1984)Google Scholar. An interesting commentary on this compelling tendency in the historiography of aesthetics can be found in P. Guyer, “Aesthetics between the Wars: Art and Liberation”, in Baldwin, T., ed., Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1870–1945 (Cambridge, 2003), 721–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 For details of his academic career see Gruson, P., “A propos de la carrière universitaire de Victor Basch”, in Basch, F.et al., eds., Victor Basch (1863–1944): Un intellectuel cosmopolite (Paris, 2000), 41–54Google Scholar.
11 For a critical analysis of this image of Basch see Choulet, P., “Grandeur et illusions de Victor Basch”, Visages de la Résistance La Liberté de l'Esprit 16 (1987), 19–28Google Scholar.
12 Basch, F., “Victor Basch et l'affaire Dreyfus”, Le Mouvement Social 166 (1994), 9–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Arendt, H., “From the Dreyfus Affair to France Today”, Jewish Social Studies 4 (1942), 195–240, 223 n. 101Google Scholar. See also Basch's own account: Basch, Victor, Le procès de Rennes dix ans après: Discours prononcé le 29 mai 1909 au congrès international de la Ligue des droits de l'homme à Rennes (Paris, 1928)Google Scholar.
14 Rodrigue, A., “Rearticulations of French Jewish Identities after the Dreyfus Affair”, Jewish Social Studies 3 (1996), 1–24Google Scholar.
15 Basch, Victor, Les doctrines politiques des philosophes classiques de l'Allemagne: Leibniz, Kant, Fichte, Hegel (Paris, 1927)Google Scholar.
16 This was the case in a manifesto written by professors of the Institut Catholique in Paris: “Un manifeste des universités françaises”, Journal des débats 21 (13 Nov. 1914), 623–4.
17 Hanna, M., The Mobilization of Intellect: French Scholars and Writers during the Great War (Cambridge, 1996), 109Google Scholar.
18 Ringer, F., Fields of Knowledge: French Academic Culture in Comparative Perspective, 1890–1920 (Cambridge, 1992), 219–25Google Scholar.
19 In the period between 1886 and the First World War, ten doctoral theses in philosophy which had Kant as their subject were defended at French universities. The thesis by Basch was the only one on aesthetics. See the list of theses in Gabel, G. U., “Thèses de doctorat sur Kant soutenus devant les universités françaises, 1886–1976”, Kant-Studien 76/2 (1985), 235–8Google Scholar.
20 Harding, F. J. W., “Notes on Aesthetic Theory in France in the Nineteenth Century”, British Journal of Aesthetics 13/3 (1973), 251–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar. An exhaustive inventory of studies on aesthetics can be found in Mustoxidi, T. M., Histoire de l'esthétique française, 1700–1900: Suivi d'une bibliographie générale de l'esthétique française des origines à 1914 (New York, 1920)Google Scholar.
21 Pinotti, A., “Empathy”, in Sepp, H. R. and Embree, L., eds., Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics (Dordrecht, 2010), 93–8Google Scholar.
22 Lipps, T., Grundlegung der Ästhetik (Hamburg, 1903), 107, 348–55Google Scholar.
23 Lipps, T., “Ästhetik”, in Hinneberg, P., ed., Systematische Philosophie (Berlin, 1907), 343Google Scholar. For a complete history of the doctrine of Einfühlung see Jahoda, G., “Theodor Lipps and the Shift from ‘Sympathy’ to ‘Empathy’”, Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences 41/2 (2005), 151–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 See the reviews by Sautreaux, L. in Revue philosophique de France et de l’étranger 23/45 (1898), 92Google Scholar; and by Bernard Bosanquet in Mind 7 (1898), 101–8.
25 Galland-Szymkowiak, M., “Le ‘symbolisme sympathique’ dans l'esthétique de Victor Basch”, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 34/2 (2002), 211–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 Basch, V., Essai critique sur l'esthétique de Kant (Paris, 1896), xivGoogle Scholar.
27 Basch, V., “Le maître problème de l'esthétique”, Revue philosophique 92 (1921), 1–26, 4Google Scholar.
28 Souriau, E., “Die Hauptrichtungen der gegenwärtigen französischen Ästhetik”, Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 28 (1934), 54–84, 63Google Scholar. In a comparable way, Denis Huisman described Basch as a “sharp psychologist who was more fascinated by literary and artistic criticism than by an aesthetic system.” Huisman, D., L'esthétique (Paris, 1954), 56Google Scholar.
29 This misreading is briefly mentioned in Wenzel, C. H., Subjektive Allgemeingültigkeit des Gesmackurteils bei Kant (Berlin, 2000), 11–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Basch, Essai critique sur l'esthétique de Kant, 106.
31 Feldman, V., Esthétique française contemporaine (Paris, 1936), 112Google Scholar.
32 Dessoir, M., Buch der Erinnerung (Stuttgart, 1946), 96–7Google Scholar.
33 Dufrenne, M., “L'esthétique en 1913”, in Brion-Guerry, L., ed., L'année 1913: Les formes esthétiques de l'oeuvre d'art à la veille de la première guerre mondiale (Paris, 1971), 25–30Google Scholar.
34 Basch, Victor, “Begrüssungsabend”, in Ortsausschuss, , ed., Kongress für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft. Berlin 7–9. Oktober 1913: Bericht (Stuttgart, 1914), 32Google Scholar.
35 V. Basch, “Die Objektivität des Schönen: Diskussion”, in Ortsausschuss, Kongress für Ästhetik, 90.
36 Basch, “Die Objektivität des Schönen: Diskussion”, 90.
37 Weber, E., The Hollow Years: France in the 1930s (New York, 1994)Google Scholar.
38 “Séance du 27 décembre 1906”, Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, 17 (1907), 74.
39 Ibid., 69.
40 Ibid., 70.
41 Ibid., 101.
42 Ibid., 92.
43 Ibid., 101.
44 Cf. Stolnitz, J., “On the Origins of ‘Aesthetic Disinterestedness’”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 22/2 (1961), 131–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
45 Basch himself openly spoke about this evolution of his thinking. Basch, Victor, “Le maître-problème de l'esthétique” (1921) in Basch, Essais d'Esthétique, de philosophie et de literature (Paris, 1934), 36–7Google Scholar. This evolution is also discussed in Filloux, J. C., “Victor Basch: Vers une esthétique de la reception”, Revue internationale de psychosociologie 8/18 (2002), 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46 Victor Basch, “Diskussion”, in Ortsausschuss, Kongress für Ästhetik, 162.
47 The italics are already present in the source. Basch, Victor, “Discours liminaire”, Deuxième Congrès Internationale de l'esthétique et de science de l'art (Paris, 1937), lvGoogle Scholar.
48 See, for example, the speech Basch gave in Berlin in 1924 for the German League for the Rights of Man. Basch, Victor, “Die europäische Lage und die deutsch-französische Verständigung”, in von Puttkamer, F., ed., Victor Basch in Potsdam (Berlin, 1929), 6–13Google Scholar.
49 Basch, “Discours liminaire”, lxi–lxii.
50 Basch, V., “Art et démocratie”, in Actes du huitième Congrès internationale de philosophie à Prague 2–7 septembre 1934 (Prague, 1936), 531–4Google Scholar.
51 Victor Basch, “Discussion, september 6 1934”, in ibid., 515.
52 de Ternay, H., “Relation du sensus communis du jugements esthétique avec le contrat originaire de l'humanité”, in Parret, H., ed., Kants Asthetik. Kant's Aesthetics. L'esthétique de Kant (Berlin, 1998), 557–63Google Scholar.
53 Basch, “Discussion, september 6 1934”, 515–17, 531–4.
54 Bujic, B., Music in European Thought, 1851–1912 (Cambridge, 1988), 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
55 van Middelaar, L., Politicide: De moord op de politiek in de Franse filosofie (Amsterdam, 2002), 27–8Google Scholar, 158–60.
56 Cited in Wilson, S., Ideology and Experience: Anti-Semitism in France at the Time of the Dreyfus Affair (Rutherford, NJ, 1982), 1Google Scholar.
57 Strong, T. B., “History and Choices: The Foundations of the Political Thought of Raymond Aron”, History and Theory 11/2 (1972), 179–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
58 Koss, J., “On the Limits of Empathy”, Art Bulletin 88/1 (2006), 144–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
59 In 1920 the theorist of revolutionary syndicalism Georges Sorel called Basch “an absurd character”. Gianinazzi, W., “Georges Sorel–Vilfredo Pareto. Bribes d'une correspondance”, Mil neuf cent 8/8 (1990), 155–68, 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The same type of criticism was developed by the political commentator Fernand Baldensperger in 1943: La littérature française entre les deux guerres (1919–1939) (Marseille, 1943), 18.
60 Reschke, R., “Klio, Chronos und Ästhetik: Zur historischen Dimension ästhetischen Denkens”, in Hirdina, K. and Reschke, R., eds., Ästhetik: Aufgabe(n) einer Wissenschaftsdisziplin (Freiburg im Breisgau, 2004), 13–30Google Scholar.
61 Ludwig, B., “Victor Basch et l'Allemagne: Esquisse d'une relation particulière”, Revue d'Allemagne et des Pays de langue allemande 36/3–4 (2004), 341–58Google Scholar.; F. Basch, “Gender and Survival: A Jewish Family in Occupied France, 1940–1944. The Basch Family”, Feminist Studies, June 2006, online publication, available at http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5969719/Gender-and-survival-a-Jewish.html.
62 Basch, V., Essai critique sur l'esthétique de Kant (Paris, 1925), h.Google Scholar
63 Calinescu, M., Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism (Durham, 1987), 45Google Scholar.
64 Feldman, V., Journal de guerre, 1940–1941 (Tours, 2006), 50–51Google Scholar.
65 Berenson, B., Aesthetics and History (London, 1950), 25Google Scholar.
66 Illustrative of this kind of portrayal is a description made by the Egyptian freedom fighter Doria Shafik, a former student of Basch at the Sorbonne. Her recollections are cited in Nelson, C., Doria Shafik, Egyptian Feminist: A Woman Apart (Cairo, 1996), 73Google Scholar. Also the politician Louise Weiss had bitter memories of Basch's expressive way of debating. She remembered how during a 1930s discussion on the right of women to vote Basch had formulated his stubborn reluctance by speaking louder and constantly shaking his head: a way of behaving identical with what Aron saw happening during the 1939 debate. Weiss, L., Mémoires d'une européenne (1934–1939) (Paris, 1970), 119–20Google Scholar.
67 Inspiring insights about this aspect of political culture can be found in Harriman, R., Political Style: The Artistry of Power (Chicago, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and te Velde, H., Stijlen van leiderschap: Persoon en politiek van Thorbecke tot Den Uyl (Amsterdam, 2002)Google Scholar.
68 A story told in Lévine, M., Affaires non classeés (Paris, 1973), 57Google Scholar.
69 Kösser, U., Ästhetik und Moderne: Konzepte und Kategorien im Wandel (Erlangen, 2006), 20–21Google Scholar.
70 This idea is defended in Rosenblatt, N., “Empathy and Anaesthesia: On the Origins of the French Machine Aesthetic”, Grey Room 2 (2001), 78–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Beale, M. A., The Modernist Enterprise: French Elites and the Threat of Modernity, 1900–1940 (Stanford, 1999), 11–47Google Scholar.
71 Signature of Lalo, Charles in his L'expression de la vie dans l'art (Paris, 1933)Google Scholar. This book was offered to Basch and is now held in the Human and Social Sciences Library Paris Descartes-CNRS.
72 Illustrative of this are the statements made by a pupil of Lalo, Liviu Rusu, who defended her master's sociological work. Rusu, Liviu, Essai sur la création artistique: Contribution à une esthétique dynamique (Paris, 1935), 11–15Google Scholar.
73 As was stressed in an analysis of the scientific field of aesthetics made in 1929 by another leading French art philosopher, Etienne Souriau, it was already at the end of the 1920s that Basch's theory of Einfühlung got pushed aside by Lalo's sociological aesthetics: Souriau, Etienne, L'avenir de l'esthétique: Essai sur l'objet d'une science naissante (Paris, 1929), 25–6Google Scholar.
74 Illustrative for Basch's anti-facism is a 1933 brochure which outraged the right wing in France: Basch, Victor, “Le drame Allemand”, in Vogel, Lucien, ed., Témoignages de Notre Temps: Les juifs (Paris, 1933), 6–7Google Scholar.
75 Baumgarten, A. G., Aesthetica (Hildesheim, 1961; first published Frankfurt, 1750)Google Scholar,§1.
76 Kuhn, H., “Ästhetik”, in Friedrich, W. H. and Killy, W., eds., Das Fischer-Lexicon: Literatur (Frankfurt, 1965), 52Google Scholar.
77 This phenomenon is analysed in Forsey, J., “The Disenfranchisement of Philosophical Aesthetics”, Journal of the History of Ideas 64/4 (2003), 581–97, 581CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A similar reflection is made in Speer, A., “Beyond Art and Beauty: In Search of the Object of Philosophical Aesthetics”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8/1 (2000), 73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.