¹ See Polanyi, Karl, Arensberg, Conrad M., and Pearson, Harry W. (eds), Trade and Market in Early Empires (Glencoe, Ill.:Free Press, 1957)Google Scholar and Polanyi, Karl, Dahomey and the Slave Trade: An Analysis of an Archaic Economy (Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1966).Google Scholar

² For an account of the controversy see Smelser, Neil J., ‘A Comparative View of Exchange Systems,’ Economic Development and Cultural Change 7 (1959): 173–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cook, Scott, ‘The Obsolete “Anti-Market” Mentality: A Critique of the Substantive Approach to Economic Anthropology,’ American Anthropologist 68 (1966): 323–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Cook, Scott, ‘Structural Substantivism: A Critical Review of Marshall Sahlins' Stone Age Economics,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 16 (1974): 355–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ Cook, Scott, ‘Production, Ecology, and Economic Anthropology: Notes Toward an Integrated Frame of Reference,’ Social Science Information 12 (1973): 25–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cook, Scott, ‘Economic Anthropology: Problems in Theory, Method, and Analysis,’ in Honigman, John J. (ed.), Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973) pp. 795–860Google Scholar; Godelier, Maurice, Racionaldid e irracionalidid en la economia (Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 1967).Google Scholar

⁴ For a recent airing of the controversy and an argument for reconciliation see ‘Peasant Strategies in Asian Societies: Moral and Rational Economic Approaches: A Symposium,’ Journal of Asian Studies 42 (1983): 753–868.Google Scholar

⁵ The closest he has come is ‘Potentialities of Capitalistic Development in the Economy of Mughal India,’ The Journal of Economic History 29 (1969): 32–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The first volume of the new Cambridge Economic History of India, edited by Habib and Raychaudhuri, should have produced a general statement but it does not. Although the articles are informative the book is not unified or coherent. Individual authors do not seem to have read one another's contributions and there is no common theoretical underpinning. See also the recent discussion ‘Review of The Cambridge Economic History of India and Beyond,’ Modern Asian Studies 19, pt 3 (07 1985).Google Scholar

⁶ North, Douglas C. and Thomas, Robert Paul, The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), p. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷ Digby, Simon, ‘Economic Conditions Before 1200,’ in Raychaudhuri, Tapan and Habib, Irfan (eds), Cambridge Economic History of India [CEHI] vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1982)), pp. 45–7.Google Scholar

⁸ Irfan Habib, ‘Non-agricultural Production and Urban Economy’, in ibid., 1: 82; Simon Digby, ‘Currency System,’ ibid., 1: 94.

⁹ Moosvi, Shireen, ‘Production, Consumption, and Population in Akbar's Time,’ Indian Economic and Social History Review [IESHR] 10 (1973): 181–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moosvi, Shireen, ‘Note on Professor Alan Heston's “Standard of Living in Akbar's Time—A Comment,”’ IESHR 14 (1977): 397–401.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Habib, Irfan, ‘Population,’ in CEHI 1: 163–7.Google Scholar

¹¹ The most recent estimate, that of Irfan Habib, puts the rate of urbanization in 1600 at about 15 percent, ibid., 1: 169. Given what is known about urbanization in premodern societies this seems too high. It appears that, like so many other writers on premodern societies, Habib overestimates the rate of urbanization. See Skinner, William (ed.), The City in Late Imperial China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1977), p. 227Google Scholar. The reason in most cases (and this seems to apply here as well) is a confusion between the number and size of cities and the rate of urbanization. The one does not determine the other. It is quite possible to have a large number of rich and populous cities and a low rate of urbanization. For example, an assumption of 7 percent as the rate of urbanization and 150 million as the size of Mughal India in 1600 produces an urban population of 10.5 million persons. Thus, it is possible to accept all of the evidence about the size and wealth of Mughal cities and still posit a low rate of urbanization.

¹² Tapan Raychaudhuri, ‘Non-Agricultural Production: Mughal India,’ ibid., 1: 261–2.

¹³ See Hocart, A. M., Kings and Councillors: An Essay in the Comparative Anatomy of Human Society (Cairo: Government Printing Office, 1936), pp. 112–15Google Scholar; and Cohn, Bernard S., ‘Political Systems in Eighteenth Century India: The Banaras Region,’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 82 (1962): 312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ See Blake, Stephen P., ‘The Hierarchy of Central Places in North India During the Mughal Period of Indian History,’ South Asia 6/1 (1983): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁵ Morris, Morris D., ‘Growth of Large-Scale Industry to 1947,’ in Kumar, Dharma (ed.), Cambridge Economic History of India [CEHI], vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 554.Google Scholar

¹⁶ A. G. Chandavarkar, ‘Money and Credit (1858–1947),’ ibid., 2: 764.

¹⁷ Tom Kessinger, ‘Regional Economy (1757–1857): North India,’ ibid., 2: 250–62.

¹⁸ Gupta, Ashin Das, Indian Merchants and the Decline of Surat: 1700–1750 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlage, 1979), p. 22.Google Scholar

¹⁹ North, and Thomas, , Rise of the Western World, pp. 120–32.Google Scholar

²⁰ See Pearson, M. N., Merchants and Rulers in Gujarat (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Gupta, Das, Indian MerchantsGoogle Scholar; Gokhale, Balkrishna Govind, Surat in the Seventeenth Century: A Study in the Urban History of Premodem India, Scandinavian Institute of Asian Monograph Series, no. 29 (London: Curzon Press, 1979).Google Scholar

²¹ al-Fazl, Abu, A'in-i Akbari, ed. Blochmann, H., 2 vols. (Calcutta, India: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1867–1877), 2: 240.Google Scholar

²² Habib, , ‘Potentialities of Capitalistic Development,’ p. 66Google Scholar; Prakash, Ishwar, ‘Organization of Industrial Production in Urban Centres in India During the 17th Century with Special Reference to Textiles,’ in Readings in Economic History, ed. Ganguli, B. N. (New Delhi: Asia Publishing House, 1964), p. 48.Google Scholar

²³ For Iran see Chardin, John, Travels in Persia (London: Argonaut Press, 1927), p. 30Google Scholar; for Fatimid Egypt see Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2d. edn, s.v. ‘Egypt,’ pp. 17–18Google Scholar; and for Delhi in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries see Afif, Shams Siraj, Ta'rikh-i Firuz Shahi, ed. Husain, Maulavi Vilayat (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1891), pp. 337–43.Google Scholar

²⁴ Raychaudhuri, Tapan, ‘The State and The Economy: Mughal Empire,’ CEHI, 1: 178.Google Scholar

²⁵ al-Fazl, Abu, A'in, 1: 9.Google Scholar

²⁶ For a listing of the thirty-six Karkhanahs see ‘Dastur al-'Amal-i 'Alamgiri,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Add. 25020, British Museum, London, fol. 53b.

²⁷ Abu al-Fazl, A'in, 1: 43–5, 48–58, 67–72, 101–11, 127–53, 167–74; ‘Dastur al-'Amal-i 'Alamgiri,’ foll. 54a-55b ‘Zawabit-i 'Alamgiri,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Or. 1641, British Museum, London, foll. 133b-34a; Jagat Rai, ‘Farhang-i Kardani,’ Abdus Salam Collection, no. 315, Maulana Azad Library, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, U.P., fol. 25b; Bernier, Francois, Travels in the Mogul Empire: 1656–68, trans. Irving Brock, ed. Archibald Constable (London: Constable's Oriental Miscellany, 1891; reprint edn, Delhi, India: S. Chand and Co. 1968), p. 259Google Scholar; ‘Khillaq al-Siyaz,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, no. 314, National Archives of India, p. 96.Google Scholar

²⁸ Abu al-Fazl, A'in, 1: 12–39, 118–27; Rai, ‘Farhang-i Kardani,’fol. 25b 'Zawabit-i ‘Alamgiri,’ fol. 134a; 'Dastur al-'Amal-i 'Alamgiri,’ foll. 54a-55a.

²⁹ Rubruck, William, The Journey of William of Rubruck to the Eastern Parts of the World: 1253–55, trans. Rockhill, William Woodville (London: Hakluyt Society, 1900), p. 207.Google Scholar

³⁰ al-Fazl, Abu, Akbar Namah, ed. by Ahmad, Agha 'Ali and Maulavi 'Abd al-Rahim, 3 vols (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1868–1894), 3: 192.Google Scholar

³¹ Anand Ram, ‘Mir'at al-Istilah,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Or. 1813, British Museum, London, fol. 124a; 'Zawabit-i ‘Alamgiri,’ fol. 134a.

³² Anand Ram, ‘Mir'at al-Istilah,’ fol. 124a; ‘Zawabit-i 'Alamgiri,’ fol. 134a; ‘Dastur al-'Amal-i 'Alamgiri,’ fol. 54a.

³³ Anand Ram, ‘Mir' at al-Istilah,’ fol. 124a.

³⁴ Ibid., fol. 124b; Manucci, Niccolao, Storia do Mogor, trans. Irvine, William, 4 vols (London: John Murray, 1907–1908; reprint ed, Calcutta: Editions Indian, 1965), 2: 436.Google Scholar

³⁵ For karkhanahs in the households of Abu al-Fazl, Khwaja Abu al-Hasan, Muqarrab Khan, Amir al-Umara Samsam al-Daulah, and Raushan al-Daulah see Khan, Nawab Samsam al-Daulah Shah Nawaz, Ma'asir al-Umara, ed. 'Ali, Maulavi Mirza Ashraf, 3 vols (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1891), 2: 620, 3: 381Google Scholar; Lahauri, Muhammad Salih Kanbo, Amal-i Salih, ed. Yazdani, G., 3 vols. (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1912–1946), 1: 455Google Scholar; 'Ahwal-i Khan Dauran, Persian Manuscript Collection, Or. 180, British Museum, London, foll. 156a-87b; and Muhammad Baksh Ashob, ‘Tarikh-i Shahadat-i Farrukhsiyar-u Julus-i Muhammad Shah,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Or. 1832, British Museum, London, foll. 48a-b. For a description of the establishment of one of Shahjahan's amirs see Singh, Surat, ‘Tazkirah-i Pir Hassy Taili’ in Athar Ali, M., The Mughal Nobility Under Aurangzeb (reprint edn Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1970), p. 162Google Scholar. See also Ram, Anand, ‘Mir'at al-Istilah,’ fol. 117bGoogle Scholar; and Pelsaert, Francisco, Jahangir's India: The Remonstrantie of Francisco Pelsaert, trans. Moreland, W. H. and Geyl, P. (Cambridge: W. H. Heffer and Sons, 1925), p. 55.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ashob, , ‘Tarikh-i Muhammad Shah’, fol. 48bGoogle Scholar; ‘Ahwal-i Khan Dauran,’ foll. 161a–86b; ‘Bayaz-i Khushbui,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Ethe 2784, India Office Library, London, foll. 5b–103b, 126b–39b.

³⁷ Shaikh Farid gave khil'ats to members of his household each year. Shah Nawaz Khan, Ma'asir al-Umara, 2: 639. Samsam al-Daulah Khan Dauran maintained a karkhanah for gift khil'ats (dad-khilats). ‘Ahwal-i Khan Dauran,’ fol. 164b. The Rajah of Jaipur also gave khil'ats to his clients. ‘Delhi Newsletters—1779–82,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Add. 25021, British Museum, London, fol. 206b.

³⁸ Nawab Dargah Kuli Khan, ‘Risalah-i Salar Jang,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Add. 26,237, British Museum, London, fol.-89b.

³⁹ Qaisar, A. Jan, ‘Distribution of the Revenue Resources of the Mughal Empire Among the Nobility,’ India History Congress, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Session (Aligarh, U.P.: n.p., 1967), 237–43.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ See Prakash, , ‘Organization of Industrial Production,’ pp. 48–9Google Scholar; Naqvi, Hameed Katoon, Urban Centres and Industries in Upper India: 1556–1803 (London: Asia Publishing House, 1968), p. 155Google Scholar; Foster, William, The English Factories in India: 1618–21 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906), p. 198.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Heber, Reginald, Narrative of a Journey Through the Upper Provinces of India from Calcutta to Bombay, 1824–23, 2 vols (London: John Murray, 1828), 1: 555.Google Scholar

⁴² See Naqvi, H. K., Urbanisation and Urban Centers Under the Great Mughals: 1556–1707 (Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Studies, 1972) p. 6Google Scholar; Prakash, , ‘Organization of Industrial Production,’ p. 51Google Scholar; and Chicherov, A. I., India: Economic Development in the 16th-18th Centuries, trans. Danemanis, Don (Moscow: ‘nauka’ Publishing House, 1971), pp.84–5Google Scholar. For Gujarat See Bendrey, V. S., A Study of Muslim Inscriptions (Bombay: Karnatak Publishing House, 1944), pp. 124–5.Google Scholar

⁴³ al-Fazl, Abu, A'in, 2: 44.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Ibid., 1: 284.

⁴⁵ Richards, J. F., Mughal Administration in Golconda (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), pp. 185–7.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Pearson, , Merchants and Rulers, pp. 123–4Google Scholar. For similar arguments about artisan organizations in West Asia see Baer, G., ‘The Administrative, Economic, and Social Functions of the Turkish Guilds,’ International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 1 (1970): 28–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Baer, G., ‘Guilds in Middle Eastern History,’ in Studies in the Economic History of the Middle East, ed. Cook, M. A. (London: Oxford University Press, 1970), pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Bernier, , Travels, p. 229.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Ibid., p. 254.

⁴⁹ Foster, , English Factories 1618–21, p. 168Google Scholar; Director Joust Diericky to the Governor-General, 19 September 1648, Transcripts and Translations of Dutch Records at the Hague: Letters from India: 1600–1699, India Office Library, London, vol. 16, no. 507, p. 1.

⁵⁰ Foster, , English Factories: 1618–21, pp. 46–7.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Foster, William, The English Factories in India: 1630–33 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1910), p. 129.Google Scholar

⁵² Bernier, , Travels, p. 254Google Scholar; Manucci, , Storia do Mogor, 2: 396.Google Scholar

⁵³ Naqvi, , Urban Centres, p. 226.Google Scholar Her figure of 4.5 percent is wrong; the correct percentage is 7.

⁵⁴ Ibid., p. 222.

⁵⁵ For a full discussion see Stephen P. Blake, ‘Shahjahanabad: The Sovereign City in Mughal India, 1639–1739’ (unpublished manuscript), ch. 4.

⁵⁶ Cook, , ‘Economic Anthropology,’ pp. 829–30.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Nash, Manning, Primitive and Peasant Economic Systems (San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co., 1966), pp. 87–8.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Sharma, Ramesh Chandra, ‘The Ardha-Kathanak, A Neglected Source of Mughal History,’ Indica 7 (1970): pp. 49–73, 105–20Google Scholar. See also Gupta, Das, Indian Merchants and the Decline of Surat, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Habib, Irfan, ‘Banking in Mughal India,’ in Contributions to Indian Economic History (Calcutta: F. K. L. Mukhopadhyay and Company, 1960), 1: 18–19Google Scholar; Habib, Irfan, ‘Usury in Medieval India,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 6 (1963–1964): 406.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Pearson, , Merchants and Rulers, pp. 123–4Google Scholar; Gupta, Das, Indian Merchants and the Decline of Surat, p. 14Google Scholar; Gupta, Ashin Das, ‘Indian Merchants and the Trade in the Indian Ocean, 1500–1700,’ in CEHI 1: 407–33Google Scholar; Timberg, , Marwaris, p. 5Google Scholar; Bayly, C. A., ‘Indian Merchants in a “Traditional” Setting: Benares, 1780–1830,’ in Dewey, Clive and Hopkins, A. G. (eds), The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India (University of London: Institute of Commonwealth Studies—Commonwealth Papers, no. 21, 1978), pp. 171–93.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Manrique, Sebastien, The Travels of Fray Sebastien Manrique, trans. Luard, C. E., 2 vols (London: Hakluyt Society, 1927), 2: 156Google Scholar; Pelsaert, , Jahangir's India, p. 30.Google Scholar

⁶² Bayly, C. A., ‘Patrons and Politics in Northern India,’ in Locality, Province, and Nation: Essays on Indian Politics, 1870–1940, ed. Gallagher, John, Johnson, Gordon, and Seal, Anil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp. 35, 42Google Scholar; Bayly, C. A., Rulers, Townsmen, and Bazaars: North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion, 1780–1870, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 155, 387–8.Google Scholar

⁶³ Lahauri, , 'Amal-i Salih, 3: 58–9, 108.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Khan, Khafi, Muntakhab al-Lubab, ed. Ahmed, Maulavi Kabir al-Din and SirHair, Wolseley, 3 vols (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1869–1925), 2: 255.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ For the twelve temples see Archeological Survey of India, List of Muhammadan and Hindu Monuments of Shahjahanabad, 4 vols (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1915–1922), 1: 65, 101, 107, 109, 116, 132, 139, 140, 141, 152, 161, and 165Google Scholar. For a similar argument about the role of merchants in Mughal India see Richards, John F., ‘Mughal State Finance and the Premodern World Economy,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 23 (1981): 285–308.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Sarkar, Jadunath, Studies in Aurangzeb's Reign (Calcutta: M. C. Sarkar and Sons, 1933). p. 273.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Pearson, , Merchants and Rulers, pp. 23–4, 88–91.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Carol, Hans, ‘Hierarchy of Central Place Functions Within the City,’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 50 (1960): 419–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dutt, A. K., ‘Intra-City Hierarchy of Central Places: Calcutta as a Case Study,’ Professional Geographer 2 (1969): 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁹ Fortescue, T., ‘Report on the Revenue System of the Delhi Territory, 1820,’ in Records of the Delhi Residency and Agency, 1807–57 (Lahore: Punjab Government Press, 1911), pp. 131–76.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Ibid.; al-Badaoni, Abd al-Qadir bin Maluk Shah urf, Muntakhab-ut-Tawarikh, 3 vols, trans. Ranking, G. S. A. and Lowe, W. H. (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1884–1898), 2: 404.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Selected Waqai of the Deccan, ed. DrHusain, Yusuf (Hyderabad: Central Records Office, 1953), p. 23Google Scholar; ‘Revenue Tables of Subahs and Parganahs in Reigns of Shahjahan and Auragnzeb,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Or. 1779, British Museum, foll. 224b–226aGoogle Scholar; Sarkar, Jadunath, Fall of the Mughal Empire, 4 vols (Calcutta: M. C. Sarkar and Sons, 1932–1950; reprint edn; Poona, India: Orient Longman's Ltd, 1971), 2: 175–6.Google Scholar

⁷² Chaturman Rai, ‘Chahar Gulshan,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Or. 1791, British Museum, London, foll. 41b. For a list of mahals in the city in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries see James Grant, ‘Firhist-i Subajat-i Hindustan,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Ethe 433, India Office Library, foll. 20a-21a.

⁷³ Bernier, , Travels, pp. 228–30.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Sharma, , ‘The Ardha-Kathanak,’ pp. 52, 108.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ For the merchants in Samsam al-Daulah's household see ‘Ahwal-i Khan Dauran,’ foll. 169a, 181b—82a. Manucci describes a merchant who had the responsibility for providing a great amir's household with vegetables during a trip to Kashmir. Storia do Mogor, 3: 416.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Habib, , ‘Usury,’ pp. 6–16.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Calendar of Persian Correspondence, vol. 9, 1790–1791 (New Delhi: National Archives of India, 1949), p. 48.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Gentile, M., Mémoires sur 'Indoustan ou Empire Mogol (Paris: Chez Petit Librarie de S.A.R. Monsieur et de S.A.S. le Duc de Bourbon, 1822) p. 188.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ ‘Tarikh-i Ahmad Shahi,’ foll. 17a–b.

⁸⁰ For a discussion see Blake, , ‘Hierarchy of Central Places,’ South Asia 6/1 (1983): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸¹ Rai, Sujan, ‘Khulasat al-Tawarikh,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, Or. 1625, British Museum, London, fol. 18a.Google Scholar

⁸² Foster, William, The English Factories in India: 1637–41 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912), p. 288Google Scholar; Foster, William, The English Factories in India: 1646–50, p. 305Google Scholar; William Jesson to Surat, 7 May 1656, English Factory Records: 1655–60, India Office Library, London, 103: 120–1

⁸³ Rai, Sujan, ‘Khulasat al-Tawarikh,’ fol. 18a.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Husain, Murtaza, Hadiqat-ul-Aqalim, (Lucknow: n.p., 1879–1881), p. 41Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Dargah Kuli Khan, ‘Risalah,’ fol. 89b. For other descriptions see Chandar Bhan Baraham, ‘Chahar Chaman,’ Persian Manuscript Collection, British Museum, London, Or. 1892, foll. 142–43; Khan, Shah Nawaz, Ma'asir al-Umara, 3: 473Google Scholar; and Bernier, , Travels, pp. 248–51.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Cook, , ‘Economic Anthropology,’ pp. 838–9.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ See Blake, , Shahjahanabad, ch. 4.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Qaisar, , ‘Distribution of Revenue Resources,’ pp. 237–43.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Ibid.