Article contents
Urban Development and Death: Bombay City, 1870–1914
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Extract
Historians, statesmen, administrators, nationalists and others have disagreed sharply about the impact of modernization in the era of Western domination. Did Western rule provide the tools for Indian progress but did economically medieval, ‘other-worldly’ Indians fail to maximize the benefits of modernization and even thwart advances? Conversely, did Western imperialism systematically impoverish India by making it a ‘satellite,’ freezing the subcontinent into a neo-feudal social pattern while sucking up its wealth? Finally, is a ‘new revisionist’ interpretation correct that India experienced real if undramatic economic growth during the Western era and that notions of exploitation or Indian suffering induced by development were myths? Interpretations expressing either the great success and benign innovations of Western rule, or its exploitiveness both appear flawed, according to Bombay's modernizing experience. Bombay underwent a great expansion of wealth and became the source of India's new factory textile production, the hub of a great newwork of trasport and trade, and the cosmopolitan abode of wealth Indian merchants, industrialist and professionals, whose affluence, modernity, industrializing activies and eventual nationalist orientation distinguished them from a supine or neo-feudal comprador class, cooperating with Western masters in exploiting ‘natives’ for a myrmidon's share of the profits. Alternatively, Bombay's prosperity did not flow down to the masses; its modernization was complex, dynamically helping to produce progress and wealth, but for some decades impoverishing and destroying many lives. In the half-century of rapid development preceding the first world war, the great majority of Bombay's populace, its ordinary working classes, experienced significant declines in living standards, worsening environmental conditions and escalating death-rates. Diminished real income and increased mortality among Bombay's ordinary inhabitants warn against extrapolating from rising indices of material production an optimistic conclusion about the general human condition in the city or in British India.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986
References
The author appreciates fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Ford-Rockefeller Program on Population and Development Policy, which facilitated work on this essay.
1 See, for example, Knowles, L. C. A., Economic Development of the British Overseas Empire (3 vols, London, 1924–1936), I, 351–2Google Scholar and passim; Coupland, Reginald, India: A Restatement (London, 1945), 52, 62 and passim.Google Scholar
2 For a synthesizing or ‘world’ view of the deleterious effects of ‘development,’ see particularly Frank, André Gunder, ‘The Development of Underdevelopment,’ Monthly Review, XVIII, 4 (09 1966), 17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weisskopf, Thomas E., ‘Imperialism and the Economic Development of The Third World,’ The Capitalist System (Englewood Cliffs, 1978), 500–14.Google Scholar For a moderate, sophisticated version of the idea that Western domination thwarted Indian development, see Chandra, Bipin, ‘Reinterpretation of Nineteenth Century Indian Economic History,’ Indian Economic and Social History Review, V (1968), 35–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 See, for example, McAlpin, Michelle, Subject to Famine (Princeton, 1983), 211–18 and passim.Google Scholar
4 Edwards, S. M., Gazetteer of Bombay City and Presidency (2 vols, Bombay, 1909) (hereafter Gazetteer), I, 120–1, 126–7.Google Scholar
5 Gazetteer, I, 514–20; II, 10–11, 161–2.Google Scholar
6 Census of India (hereafter CI), 1901, X, P 4, 135Google Scholar; Gazetteer, I, 126–7.Google Scholar
7 CI, X, P 4, 130, 135; Gazetteer, II, 173.Google Scholar
8 CI, 1901, X, P 4, 135.Google Scholar
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid.
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid., 32, 134.
13 Ibid., 133.
14 Ibid., 133–5.
15 Ibid., 133.
16 Ibid.
17 Dobbin, Christine, Urban Leadership and Western India (Oxford, 1972), 9–13, 44–7, 57–69, 98–150Google Scholar; Karaka, D. F., History of the Parsees, 2 vols (London, 1881), 215–37, passimGoogle Scholar; Gazetteer, I, 238;Google ScholarCI, 1881, VI, 40.Google Scholar
18 CI, 1881, VI, 40.Google Scholar
19 Gazetteer, I, 213–14.Google Scholar
20 CI, 1901, X, P 4, 134.Google Scholar
21 Bombay Municipal Reports (Bombay) (hereafter BMR), 1885, 245.Google Scholar
22 CI, 1901, X. P 4, 134.Google Scholar
23 BMR, 1875, 148–9.Google Scholar
24 CI, 1901, X. P 4, 133.Google Scholar
25 BMR, 1874, 120Google Scholar; CI, 1901, X, P 4, 133.Google Scholar
26 BMR, 1874, 60, 121.Google Scholar
27 BMR, 1875, 143.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., 145.
29 Ibid.
30 India Office Library and Records, ‘The Water Supply of Bombay,’ 19Google Scholar; BMR, 1879, 255.Google Scholar
31 BMR, 1879, 256.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., 276.
33 Gazetteer, II, 183.Google Scholar
34 Ibid.
35 BMR, 1892, 383.Google Scholar
36 BMR, 1874, 126.Google Scholar
37 BMR, 1877, 175Google Scholar; BMR, 1879, 278.Google Scholar
38 BMR, 1877, 176Google Scholar; India Office Library and Records, ‘Report on the Drainage and Sewerage of Bombay,’ 12–16 and passim.
39 BMR, 1874, 129.Google Scholar
40 Report of the Special Committee on The Drainage of Bombay (Bombay, 1878), 8.Google Scholar
41 BMR, 1882, 275.Google Scholar
42 BMR, 1892, 383.Google Scholar
43 BMR, 1888, 340–1.Google Scholar
44 BMR, 1888, 340.Google Scholar
45 Ibid., 355.
46 BMR, 1894, 525.Google Scholar
47 BMR, 1895, 579–80.Google Scholar
48 BMR, 1896, 629.Google Scholar
49 Hirst, L. F., The Conquest of Plague (London, 1953), 300.Google Scholar
50 Ibid., 352; Calcutta Municipal Reports, 1896–1910, passim.
51 Balthazard, M. and Bahmanyar, M., ‘Recherches Sur La Peste en Inde,’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization, XXIII (1960), 214 and passim.Google Scholar
52 Gazetteer, I, 323Google Scholar; Prices and Wages in India, (Calcutta), 1901, 277, 279, 281.Google Scholar
53 CI, 1911, VIII, 12.Google Scholar
54 Prices and Wages, 1922, 7, 211 and passim.Google Scholar
55 BMR, 1897, 651–2Google Scholar; BMR, 1899, 407.Google Scholar
- 26
- Cited by