Article contents
Unmaking the Chinese Nationalist State: Administrative Reform among Fiscal Collapse, 1937–1945*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2011
Abstract
The defeat of the Chinese Nationalist Party (Guomindang) in the Chinese Civil War in 1949 is often explained as a consequence of Nationalist fiscal incompetence during the Second Sino-Japanese War, which led to the collapse of the Nationalist state. In this paper, I argue that from 1937 until 1940, GMD fiscal policy managed to preserve a degree of relative stability even though, by early 1939, the Nationalists had already lost control over ports yielding 80 per cent of Customs revenue which, during the Nanjing decade (1928–1937), had accounted for more than 40 per cent of annual central government revenue. The loss of this revenue forced the Nationalists to introduce wartime fiscal instruments, taxation in kind, and transit taxes, both previously condemned as outdated and inequitable by the Nationalists. Further territorial losses led to the introduction of deficit financing, which in turn became a cause of hyperinflation. The introduction of war-time fiscal instruments led to administrative changes in the revenue-collecting agencies of the Nationalist state, and to the demise of the Maritime Customs Service as the pre-eminent revenue-collecting and anti-smuggling organization. The administrative upheavals of the war facilitated the rise of other central government organizations nominally charged with smuggling suppression, which in fact frequently engaged in trade with the Japanese-occupied areas of China. Hence, administrative reforms at a time of fiscal collapse, far from strengthening the war-time state, created one of the preconditions for the disintegration of the Nationalist state, which facilitated the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) victory in 1949.
- Type
- Part I: Experiencing China's War with Japan: World War II, 1937–1945
- Information
- Modern Asian Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 2: China in World War II, 1937–1945: Experience, Memory, and Legacy , March 2011 , pp. 277 - 301
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
1 Brewer, J. (1989), The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783, Unwin Hyman, London, p. xviGoogle Scholar.
2 Eastman, L. (1974). The Abortive Revolution: China under Nationalist Rule, 1927–1937, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 van de Ven, H. (2003). War and Nationalism in China, 1925–1945, Routledge Curzon, London, pp. 1–63Google Scholar.
4 Stilwell, J. (ed.) and White, T. (1991, 1948), The Stilwell Papers, Da Capo, New York, p. 317Google Scholar.
5 White, T. and Jacoby, A. (1980, 1946). Thunder out of China, Da Capo, New York, p. 312Google Scholar.
6 Tuchman, B. (1970). Sand against the Wind: Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–1945, Macmillan, New York, pp. 115 and 531Google Scholar.
7 van de Ven, War and Nationalism in China, p. 295.
8 Second Historical Archives of China (hereafter SHAC) 679/9/3560, Hooper to Kung (31 March, 1937).
9 SHAC 679/9/3560, Hooper to Kung, (31 March, 1937).
10 ‘Annual Report on China for 1937’, in Sir A. Clark Kerr to Viscount Halifax, (29 April, 1938) [F6312/6312/10], in Bourne, K., Cameron Watt, D. and Trotter, A. (eds), (1992). British Documents on Foreign Affairs (hereafter BDFA), Part II, Series E, Asia, 1914–1939, University Publications of America, Fredericksburg, Maryland, Vol. 21, China, 1932–1939, pp. 372–373Google Scholar.
11 Lee, B. (1973), Britain and the Sino–Japanese War, 1937–1939: A Study in the Dilemmas of British Decline, Stanford University Press, Stanford, p. 119Google Scholar.
12 SHAC 679/1/32745 K. K. Chen, ‘Customs Revenue in Occupied Areas’ (23 March, 1944), in L. K. Little to Dr H. H. Kung (28 March, 1944).
13 Bickers, R. (2008). The Chinese Maritime Customs at War, 1941–1945, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 36:2, 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Brewer, Sinews of Power, p. xx.
15 SHAC 679/32750 F. W. Maze to P. T. Chen, Private and Confidential (21 October, 1939).
16 SHAC 679/1/32745 K. K. Chen, ‘Customs Revenue in Occupied Areas’ (23 March, 1944), in L. K. Little to Dr H. H. Kung (28 March, 1944).
17 Ibid.
18 Bickers, The Chinese Maritime Customs at War, pp. 299–301.
19 Barrett, D. (2001). ‘The Wang Jingwei Regime, 1940–1945: Continuities and Disjunctures with Nationalist China’, in Barrett, D. and Shyu, L., eds, Chinese Collaboration with Japan, 1932–1945: The Limits of Accommodation, Stanford University Press, Stanford, p. 115Google Scholar.
20 Bickers, The Chinese Maritime Customs at War, p. 299.
21 SHAC 679/1/32745 K. K. Chen, ‘Customs Revenue in Occupied Areas’ (23 March, 1944) in L. K. Little to Dr H. H. Kung (28 March, 1944).
22 SHAC 679/9/481 ‘Outline of History of the Chinese Maritime Customs’ (undated, ca. 1942–1945), in Bickers, The Chinese Maritime Customs at War, p. 300.
23 SHAC 679/1/32745 K. K. Chen, ‘Customs Revenue in Occupied Areas’ (23 March, 1944) in L. K. Little to Dr H. H. Kung (28 March, 1944).
24 SHAC 679/1/32747 Maze to Kung, Confidential (11 June, 1938).
25 Young, A. (1965). China's Wartime Finance and Inflation 1937–1945, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 Xingzhong Gongsi, Kabushiki kaisha Xing Zhong Gongsi jigyō gaiyō (1938); Xingzhong Gongsi, Xing Zhong Gongsi kankei kaisha gaiyō (1939); South Manchuria Railway, Research Division, Kitō denki tōsei hōsaku narabi chōsa shiryō (1937); all quoted in Nakamura, T., transl. Angel, R. (1980). ‘Japan's Economic Thrust into North China, 1933–1938: Formation of the North China Development Corporation’, in Iriye, A., ed. (1980). The Chinese and the Japanese: Essays in Political and Cultural Interactions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, p. 235Google Scholar.
27 SHAC 679/1/26910 IG Circular No. 4158 (31 December, 1930); Chen, S. (1997). Jindai Zhongguo Haiguan Shi, Renmin Chubanshe, Beijing, p. 838Google Scholar.
28 SHAC 679/1/26910 IG Circular No. 4158 (31 December, 1930).
29 SHAC 679/1/26919 Ministry of Finance, Guanwushu Daidian No. 143, ‘General Rules for Improving the Collection of Interport Duty’, Enclosure No. 2, IG Circular No 5585 2nd Series (21 September, 1937).
30 SHAC 679/1/26919 ‘General Rules for Improving the Collection of Interport Duty’, Enclosure No. 2, IG Circulars 2nd Series No 5585 (21 September, 1937).
31 SHAC 679/1/26919 IG Circulars 2nd Series No 5585 (21 September, 1937).
32 SHAC 679/8/143 IG Circular CIS No. 131 (8 May, 1942).
33 SHAC 679/1/26910 IG Circular No. 4158 (31 December. 1930); Young, A. (1971). China's Nation-Building Effort: the Financial and Economic Record, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, p. 66Google Scholar; SHAC 679/1/26097 IG Circular, 2nd Series No. 3310 (1 June. 1922).
34 Zheng, B. (2004). Zhongguo Jindai Lijin Zhidu Yanjiu, Zhongguo Caizheng Jingji Chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 54–57Google Scholar.
35 Mr E. M. B. Ingram to Mr A. Henderson, Despatch (20 January, 1931) [F984/2/10], BDFA, Vol. 39, China (October, 1930 to December, 1931), p. 52.
36 SHAC 679/8/143 IG Circular CIS No. 131 (8 May, 1942).
37 SHAC 679/8/158 IG Circular CIS No. 883 (27 February, 1945).
38 Young, China's Wartime Finance and Inflation, p. 36.
39 Bickers, The Chinese Maritime Customs at War, p. 303.
40 SHAC 679/26090 E. T. Williams, Commissioner, Wuchow, Wuchow No. 4230/CIS No. 74 (25 September, 1942).
41 SHAC 679/8/143 IG Circular CIS No. 131, (8 May, 1942).
42 Eastman, L. (1980). ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship: Smuggling, Puppets and Atrocities during the War, 1937–1945’, in Iriye, The Chinese and the Japanese, pp. 276–277.
43 Eastman, ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship’, p. 277.
44 SHAC 679/1/4145 IG Circular CIS No. 82 (26 March, 1942).
45 SHAC 679/1/4145 IG Circular CIS No. 22 (3 February, 1942).
46 SHAC 679/1/4145 IG Circular CIS No. 52 (7 March, 1942).
47 Chargé in China (Atcheson) to Secretary of State, Chungking (2 August, 1943) [893.5151/953: Telegram], in Department of State (ed.) (1957). Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers(hereafter FRUS), 1943, China, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 440.
48 Freyn, H. (1943). Free China's New Deal, Macmillan, New York, p. 73Google Scholar; OSS, doc. C: China 2.3-c, ‘Trade between Occupied China and Free China’ (16 June, 1942), p. 2 (Office of War Information (OWI), Box 397); both in Eastman, ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship’, p. 278.
49 OSS, ‘Trade between Occupied China and Free China’, p. 1, in Eastman, ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship’, p. 279.
50 Eastman, ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship’, p. 283.
51 Epstein, I. (1947). The Unfinished Revolution in China, Little, Brown, Boston, p. 311Google Scholar, in Eastman, ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship’, p. 283.
52 Eastman, ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship’, p. 283.
53 Urban, M. (2007). Fusiliers: Eight Years with the Redcoats in America, Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar; Latimer, J. (2007), 1812: War with America, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar; both in Porter, B. (2008). ‘Friendly Fire’, London Review of Books, 30:4, 9Google Scholar.
54 Freyn, Free China's New Deal, p. 73, in Eastman, ‘Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship’, p. 283.
55 Wakeman, F. (2003). Spymaster: Dai Li and the Chinese Secret Service, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 320–329Google Scholar.
56 SHAC 679/1/4145 IG Circular CIS No. 66 (14 March, 1942).
57 Harvard University, Houghton Library, Ms. Am 1999.2, L. K. Little Personal (spine), Letters, Memoranda etc. relating to Customs Affairs 1945 (title page), L. K. Little to B. E. F. Hall, IGS No. 52 (9 February, 1945), in Bickers, ‘The American IG’, pp. 25–26.
58 Young, China's Nation-Building Effort, pp. 433–435.
59 Bickers, The Chinese Maritime Customs at War, p. 301.
- 4
- Cited by