Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:07:59.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade and Society in the Banda Islands in the Sixteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Villiers
Affiliation:
British Institute in Southeast Asia, Singapore

Extract

Both Moluccan cloves and Bandanese nutmeg and mace played an important, even crucial, part in the elaborate network of exchanges of commodities which for many centuries before the intervention of the Europeans had been the characteristic feature of inter-island trade in the Indonesian archipelago. From the early sixteenth century the Portuguese, and to a lesser extent the Spanish, added a new strand to this network, but even in the spice islands, the commercial domination of which was their chief goal, they did not seriously disrupt its traditional pattern. This was particularly so in the Banda Islands, which they soon discovered were markedly different from the Moluccas, not only by virtue of the different spices which they produced and in which they traded, but in the economic and political organization of their societies, in the manner in which they reacted to the European intervention and in the effect which that intervention had upon their commercial activities. Both acted as magnets to the Portuguese and Spanish, and later on the Dutch and English, drawn by the lure of great profits, as they had to Asian traders for many centuries before the arrival of the Europeans. But both presented rather different problems to those traders, Asian and European alike, once commercial relations had been established

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Thomaz, L. F. F. R., ‘Les Portugais dans les mers de l'Archipel au XVIe siècle’, Archipel, 18 (1979), pp. 105–25;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Thomaz, L. F. F. R., ‘Malucoe Malaca’, in A viagem de Fernão de Magalhães e a questão das Molucas, Actas do II Colóquio Luso-Espanhol de Historia Ultramarina (Lisbon, 1975), pp. 2948.Google Scholar See also van Leur, J. C., Indonesian Trade and Society (The Hague, 1955), passim;Google Scholar and Meilink-Roelofsz, M. A. P., Asian Trade and European Influence in the Indonesian Archipelago between 1500 and about 1630 (The Hague, 1962), passim.Google Scholar

2 Pires, Tomé, Suma Oriental, trans. and ed. Armando, Cortesao, 2 vols, Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, LXXXIX (1944), I, p. 204.Google Scholar

3 Most sixteenth-century sources say that Halmahera also produced cloves but these probably grew wild and were of little commercial importance. By the beginning of the seventeenth century clove production had extended to Ambon and its surrounding islands and to western Seram. See Richard, Z. Leirissa, ‘Local Potentates and the Competition for Cloves in Early Seventeenth-century Ternate (North Moluccos)’, in Proceeding of the VIIth IAHA Conference, 2 vols(Bangkok,1975), I, pp. 310–12.Google Scholar The História das Ilhas de Maluco (1561) says: ‘It is also not true that only in these five islands are there cloves because on Gomoconora and Jeilolo and on the islet of Yres and on Mitara and in Pulau Cavalle they are to be found; though not enough to be of any account; also on another island of Amboyno called Lacide, where the Javanese go to collect them in exchange for artillery and munitions’Google Scholar (de Sá, A. B., Documentação para a história das missōes do Padroado Portugués do Oriente. Ser. 2, Insulindia, 5 vols (Lisbon, 1954–58, III, p. 362).Google Scholar

4 de Barros, João, Da Asia, dos feitos que os Portugues fizeram no descubrimento das terras e mares do Oriente, ed. Pagliarini, N., 5 vols (Lisbon, 17771778), III, 5, p. 6.Google Scholar

5 Pigafetta, Antonio, Magellan's Voyage: A Narrative Account of the First Navigation, trans. and ed. Skelton, R. A. (London, 1975), p. 145.Google Scholar

6 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 206.Google Scholar

7 Lopes de Castanheda, Fernão, Historia do descobrimento e conquista da India pelos Portuguezes, 3rd edn (Pedro de Azevedo: Coimbra, 1929), 6, v, pp. 155–6.Google Scholar

8 Manrique, Frei Sebastien, Itinerario de las Missiones Orientales, trans. and ed. Luard, C. E. and Fr. H., Hosten, 2 vols, Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, LIX (1926), 1, VI, pp. 5960.Google Scholar

9 Garcia, da Orta, Colóquios dos simples e drogas e cousas medicinais da India, ed. Conde, de Ficalho, 2 vols (Lisbon, 1891), II, pp. 81 and 365.Google Scholar See also Conde, de Ficaiho, Garcia da Orta e o seu tempo (Lisbon, 1886). Orta was private doctor to Martim Affonso de Sousa, Governor of India from 1542 to 1545, and accompanied him to India in 1534.Google Scholar

10 Relação dos feitos eroicos em armas que Sancho de Vasconcelosfe fez nas partes de Amboyno e Maluco, in Sá, Documentação, IV, p. 193.Google Scholar

11 O Estado da India e aonde tem o seu principio, Add. MSS. Brit. Mus. Papeis tocantes a Portugal, Documentação Ultramarina Portuguesa (Lisbon, 1960), I, p. 234.Google Scholar

12 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 206.Google ScholarVan, Leur, Indonesian Trade and Society, p. 122, citing Dutch sources, says there were three crops a year.Google Scholar

13 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 206;Google ScholarMeilink-Roelofsz, , Asian Trade and European Influence, p. 96.Google Scholar

14 Leur, Van, Indonesian Trade and Society, p. 128.Google Scholar

15 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 206. It may be noted here that the Bandanese language (all sixteenth-century sources agree that the Bandanese spoke a single language) belongs to a different group (Ambon-Timor) to those spoken in the Moluccas (North and South Halmahera and Sula-Bacan). Of these groups of languages all are Malayo-Polynesian, save North Halmahera, which is Papuan.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., I, p. 207.

17 Schrieke, B., Indonesian Sociological Studies (The Hague, 1955), pt 1, p. 24.Google Scholar

18 Castenheda, , Historia do descobrimento…, 6, V, pp. 155–6.Google Scholar

19 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 212.Google Scholar

20 de Navarrete, M. F., Colección de los viages y descubrimientos que hicieron por mar los Españoles, de Loaisa, V Docs., Num. XXII (Madrid, 1837), pp. 401–39.Google Scholar

21 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, pp. 211 and 220.Google Scholar

22 Apostolado de Francisco Xavier nas Molucas, 1614, Bk III, ch. 2,Google Scholar in , , Documentação, II, p. 477.Google Scholar

23 Phelan, J. L., The Hispanization of the Philippines: Spanish Aims and Filipino Responses (University of Wisconsin Press, 1959), pp. 9, 15–18 and 22.Google Scholar See also Cushner, N. P., Landed Estates in the Colonial Philippines, Yale University Monograph Series no. 20 (1976), pp. 79;Google Scholar and Reid, Anthony, ‘Trade and state power in 16th and 17th century Southeast Asia’ in Proceedings of the VIIth IAHA Conference(Bangkok,1979), I, p. 400.Google Scholar

24 Jacobs S.J., H. Th. Th. M. (ed. and trans.), A Treatise on the Moluccas (c. 1544) probably the Preliminary Version of Antonio Galvão's Lost Historia das Molucas (Rome, 1971), ch. XIII.Google Scholar

25 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 217.Google Scholar

26 Tristão de Ataide to the King, Moluccas, 20 02 1534, in Sá, Documentaçāo, I, pp. 321–2.Google Scholar

27 Padre Pedro Mascarenhas to the Padre Provincial, Moluccas, 1562, in ibid., II, p. 437.

28 Schrieke, , Indonesian Sociological Studies, p. 228.Google Scholar

29 See below notes 93 and 94.

30 The islanders of Waigeo paid an annual tribute of birds of paradise, tortoiseshell or sago to the Sultan of Tidore as late as the mid-nineteenth century. Wallace, A. R., The Malay Archipelago, 7th edn (London, 1880), pp. 529–30.Google Scholar

31 Barbosa, Duarte, An Account of the Countries Bordering on the Indian Ocean and Their Inhabitants, trans and ed. Dames, M. L., 2 vols, Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, XLIV (1918), II, 118, pp. 196–8.Google Scholar

32 Downton, Nicholas, The Voyage of Nicholas Downton to the East Indies 1614–1615, ed. SirWilliam, Foster, Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, LXXXII (1939), pp. 43–4 and 211.Google Scholar

33 Jourdain, John, The Journal of John Jourdain 1608–1617, ed. SirWilliam, Foster, Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, XVI (1905), pp. 328–9. Richard Hunt had accompanied David Middleton's expedition and presumably gone with him to Banda, where he remained as factor. My italics.Google Scholar

34 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 206;Google ScholarTrindade, Frei Paulo Padre da, Conquista espiritual do Oriente…, ed. Lopes, Fr.Felix OFM, 3 vols (Lisbon, 19621967), I, p. 45.Google Scholar

35 Perhaps the Javanese whom Barros says was the wife of the first Moslem ruler of Ternate (Barros, , Da Asia, III, I, p. 580).Google Scholar

36 Barbosa, , An Account of the Countries…, II, 120, p. 203.Google Scholar

37 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 213.Google Scholar

38 Hence the Dutch hongitochten, the naval patrols sent round the islands to destroy and burn unlicensed trees after the Treaty of Batavia in 1652.

39 Up to 100, according to Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 214.Google Scholar See also Castanheda, , Historia do descobrimento…, 6, XI, p. 168.Google Scholar

40 Rebello, Gabriel, Informação das cousas de Maluco, 1559, III, pp. 381–6.Google Scholar See also Horridge, G. Adrian, The Design of Planked Boats of the Moluccas, Maritime Monographs and Reports, National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, 38 (1978).Google Scholar

41 Barbosa, , An Account of the Countries…, II, 119, p. 199.Google Scholar

42 Castenheda, , Historia do descobrimento …, 6, XI, p. 26.Google Scholar

43 Descrição sumaria das Molucas e de Banda, December, 1529, in Sá, Documentação, IV, p. 17.Google Scholar

44 Pires, , Suma Oriental, II, p. 207.Google Scholar

45 Castenheda, , Historia de descobrimento …, 6, XI, pp. 26 and 169.Google Scholar

46 Pires, , Suma Oriental, II, p. 265.Google Scholar

47 António de Brito to the King, Ternate, , 11 02 1523, in Sá, Documentação, I, p. 155.Google Scholar

48 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 212.Google Scholar

49 Descrição sumaria…, in Sá, Documentação, IV, p. 17.Google Scholar

50 Begin ende voortgangh van de Vereenigde Nederlandsche Geoctroyeerde Oost-Indische Compagnie…, ed. Isaac, Commelin, 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1646), II, p. 82.Google Scholar

51 Jourdain, , Journal, pp. 294–5.Google Scholar

52 de Paiva, AntÓnio to Joao de Albuquerque OFM, Bishop of Goa, Goa, 11 1545.Google Scholar In SJ, H. Jacobs, ‘The First Locally Demonstrable Christianity in Celebes 1544’, Studia, 17 04, 1966.Google Scholar

53 Barbosa, , An Account of the Countries…, II, 121, pp. 204–5.Google Scholar

54 In English these coins were known as class or cash. The word derives from Tamil Kasu (Sanskrit: karsha) and was used especially to denote the Chinese coins le and Zien, made of an alloy of copper and lead with a square hole in the centre. 1000 of these coins made 120 reis or 1 tael and 140 weighed 1 arratel of 160z. See John, Saris, The voyage of Captain John Saris to Japan 1613, ed. SirSatow, Ernest M., Hakluyt, Society, 2nd series, V (1900), p. 213.Google Scholar

55 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 202.Google Scholar

56 Ibid., p. 203.

57 Afonso Lopes da Costa to the King, Malacca, 20 08 1518, in , , Documentação, I, pp. 103–4.Google Scholar

58 Barbosa, , An Account of the Countries…, II, 118, pp. 196–8.Google Scholar

59 From ‘Kalinga’. The Malay Keling was used to designate Indian merchants from the Coromandel coast settled in Malacca (Portuguese: Quelim).

60 Pires, , Suma Oriental, II, p. 447.Google Scholar

61 Thomaz, , ‘Maluco e Malaca’, p. 40.Google Scholar

62 Meilink-Roelofsz, , Asian Trade and European Influence, pp. 95–6.Google Scholar

63 Wagner, F. A., Indonesia: The Art of an Island Group (London, 1959), pp. 175–82.Google Scholar

64 Barbosa, , An Account of the Countries…, II, 118, pp. 196–8 and 120, 202–3.Google Scholar

65 Wolters, O. W., Early Indonesian Commerce (Cornell University Press, 1967), p. 26.Google Scholar See also Meilink-Roelofsz, , Asian Trade and European Influence, p. 99;Google Scholar and Barros, , Da Asia, III, 5, p. 135.Google Scholar In 1545 Pero de Faria reckoned the annual consumption ofcloves in China was only 20 bahars (Thomaz, , ‘Maluco e Malaca’, p. 46).Google Scholar

66 Grace, Wong, A Comment on the Tributary Trade between China and Southeast Asia… Southeast Asian Ceramic Society, Transaction no. 7.Google Scholar

67 Meilink-Roelofz, , Asian Trade and European Influence, p. 158.Google Scholar

68 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 205.Google Scholar

69 Barros, , Da Asia, III, 5, p. 6.Google Scholar

70 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 206. The weight of the bahar in Banda was 550 lbs, in the Moluccas 600 lbs and in Malacca 530–540 lbs. The Portuguese generally reckoned 32 new arratels or pounds of 16 ounces to the arroba, 4 arrobas to the quintal and 4 quintals to the bahar.Google Scholar

71 António de Brito to the King, Ternate, 28 02, 1525, in , , Documentação, I, pp. 194–5.Google Scholar

72 Descriçāo sumaria…,Google Scholar in ibid., IV, p. 16. The same figures are given in Informação a El-Rei sobre o comercio da pimenta e do cravo, s.d., in ibid., I, pp. 338–9.

73 Barbosa, , An Account of the Countries…, II, 118, pp. 196–8.Google Scholar

74 Mundy, Peter, The Travels of Peter Mundy in Europe and Asia, 1608–1667, ed. SirRichard, Temple Bt, vol. II, Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, XXXV (1914), p. 153.Google Scholar

75 de Urdaneta, Andres, Narrative of the Voyage to Malucos or Spice Islands by the Fleet under the Orders of the Comendador Garcia Jofre de Loaysa, in Early Spanish voyages to the Straits of Magellan, trans and ed. SirClements, Markham, Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, XXVIII (1911), pp. 85 and 88–9.Google Scholar

76 Thomaz, , ‘Maluco e Malaca’, p. 44Google Scholar See also Pigafetta, , Magellan's Voyage, p. 121. Pigafetta describes how he and his companions traded with the King of Ternate and obtained a bahar of cloves each for two cubits of fairly good red cloth, 35 glasses, 15 axes, 25 pieces of linen, 150 knives, 50 pairs of scissors, 40 caps, ten ells of Gujerat cloth etc.Google Scholar

77 Descrição sumaria…,Google Scholar In , , Documentação, IV, p. 16.Google Scholar

78 Pires, , Suma Oriental, I, p. 268.Google Scholar

79 See Boxer, C. R. and Manguin, P. Y., ‘Miguel Roxo de Brito's Narrative of his Voyage to the Raja Empat, May 1581-November 1582’, Archipel, 18 (1979), p. 178 n. 13.Google Scholar For a detailed description of the making of sago in Seram, see Wallace, , The Malay Archipelago, pp. 377–81.Google Scholar

80 Urdaneta, , Narrative of the Voyage to Malucos, p. 85.Google Scholar

81 Rebello, , Informação…,Google Scholar in , , Documentação, III, p. 395.Google Scholar

82 Trindade, , Con quista espiritual do Oriente, I, p. 45.Google Scholar

83 , , Documentaçāo, III, p. 326.Google Scholar

84 Rebello, , Informaçāo,Google Scholar in ibid., III, p. 356.

85 I.e. manuko dewata (divine bird). The modern Indonesian is burung dewata or cenderawasih.

86 Transylvanus, Maximilianus, De Moluccis insulis, ed. Carlos, Quirino (Manila, 1969), pp. 126–7.Google Scholar

87 Wallace, , The Malay Archipelago, pp. 549–53.Google Scholar

88 ibid., pp. 371–2. See also Boxer, and Manguin, , ‘Miguel Roxo de Brito's Narrative’, p. 180 n. 14.Google Scholar

89 Spate, O. H. K., The Spanish Lake (London, 1979), p. 34.Google Scholar

90 Galvão, Antonio, The Discoveries of the World from their First Original unto the year of Our Lord, 1555, ed. Adm, V.. Bethune, , Hakluyt Society, Old series, XXX (1872), p. 117.Google Scholar

91 Rui de Brito to the King, Malacca, 6 01 1514, in , , Documentação, I, pp. 73–4.Google Scholar

92 Depoimento de Diogo Brandão em o processo das Molucas, Tomar, , 25 08 1533,Google Scholaribid., I, p. 176.

93 Antonio de Brito to the King, Ternate, 11 02 1523, ibid., I, p. 153.

94 Rui Gago to the King, Moluccas, 15 02 1523, ibid., I, p. 162.

95 See Thomaz, , ‘Maluco e Malaca’, p. 43.Google Scholar

96 Orta, , Colóquios dos Simples…, p. 82.Google Scholar

97 The Borneo route was believed to be more ancient than the Banda route. Jorge de Albuquerque writes of discovering ‘the ancient navigation… to go and return in the same time as it takes to go to Banda and back’. He adds that there were pilots who knew the route and ‘from the information I have from the Maquaceres, which is an island near the port of Ambon, it seems to me an easy matter to find the route’. Jorge, de Albuquerque to the King, Malacca, 8 01 1515, in Documentação, Sá, I, pp. 7680.Google Scholar

98 de Brito, Antonio to the King, Ternate, 11 02 1523,Google Scholaribid., I, p. 153.

99 de Ataide, Tristao to the King, Moluccas, 20 02 1534,Google Scholaribid., IV, pp. 435–6.

100 Irmao Fernao do Souro to his brethren of the Colegio de Santo Antao, Lisbon, Moluccas, 15 02 1563, ibid., III, pp. 24–5. Some scholars have asserted that the Portuguese set up feitorias in the Banda Islands comparable to those established on Ambon (see, for example, Diffie, B. W. and Winius, G. D., Foundations of the Portuguese Empire 1415–1580 (University of Minnesota Press and Oxford University Press, 1977), p. 370). Winius describes the Portuguese settlements on Lontor and Neira as feitorias. But there is insufficient evidence from Portuguese sources to sustain this view. The establishment of a right to trade by agreement with local rulers and the erection of a padrao did not invariably lead to the setting up of a feitoria or the appointment of a feitor. This of course is not to deny that some Portuguese settled in the islands and traded there.Google ScholarAbdurachman, R. Paramita in her excellent essay ‘Moluccan Responses to the First Intrusions of the West’ (in Haryati, Soebadio and Carine, A. du Marchie Sarvaas (eds.), Dynamics of Indonesian history (Amsterdam, 1978), p. 173)Google Scholar cites the donation (doacao) of D.Joao III in 1531 to Kaichili Daroes, a Ternatan agent or Rimelaha, of tenure of all the land in Banda as an indication that the Portuguese Crown exercised some kind of suzerainty over the Banda Islands which made it possible to bestow them in this way on a faithful ally as a reward for his services. But there is no evidence that the orang kaya ever recognized any authority of the Portuguese Crown over them or their land and it seems unlikely therefore that the doacao was ever more than a symbolic offering by the King of Portugal of something which was not in any real sense his to donate.

101 Relação dos feitos eroicos…, ch. 91,Google Scholar in , , Documentação, IV, pp. 435–6 and 451.Google Scholar

102 Padre Baltasar Dias to his brethren in Portugal, Malacca, , 19 11 1556,Google Scholaribid., II, p. 270. A decree of the First Provincial Council of Goa in 1567 ordains that no priest should be received in Bengal, Peru, China, Moluccas, Banda, Sunda or other places where there is no Portuguese fortress, even if he has dismissory letters from the bishop of that place, unless they expressly mention how he is to govern it. (Da reformação das cousas da Igreja (Goa, 1567),Google Scholaribid., III, p. 190.)

103 Urdaneta, , Narrative of the Voyage to Malucos, pp. 78–9.Google Scholar

104 King of Geilolo to the Emperor, Geilolo, , 1 03 1532, inGoogle Scholar, , Documentação, I, p. 257.Google Scholar

105 Thomaz, , ‘Maluco e Malaca’, p. 43.Google Scholar

106 Albuquerque, L.de and Feijo, R. Graca, ‘Os pontos de vista de D. Joao III na Junta de Badajoz-Elvas’, in A viagem de Fernão Magãthaes, p. 538.Google Scholar

107 Palha, Francisco to the King, Goa, 26 12 1553,Google Scholar in , , Documenlação, II, pp. 104–5.Google Scholar

108 Nilio, Gaspar to the King, Malacca, 10 08 1545, inGoogle Scholaribid., I, p. 458.

109 Floris, Peter, Voyage to the East Indies in the Globe. 1611–1615, ed. Moreland, W. H., Hakluyt Society, 2nd series, LXXIV (1934), p. 88.Google Scholar

110 An excellent account of the subjugation of the Banda Islands is in Hall, D. G. E., A Histoiy of South East Asia, 3rd edn (London, 1968), pp. 307–9.Google Scholar See also Reid, , ‘Trade and State Power’, pp. 400–1;Google ScholarVlekke, B. H. M., Nusantara. A history of Indonesia (Brussels, 1943), pp. 124–41;Google Scholarvan, Leur, Indonesian Trade and Society, pp. 182–4;Google Scholar and Arasaratnam, S., ‘Monopoly and Free Trade in Dutch-Asian Commercial Policy: Debate and Controversy within the VOC’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, IV, No. 1 (03, 1973), pp. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

111 Schrieke, , Indonesian Sociological Studies, p. 35.Google Scholar