Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:07:41.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade and Darbar Politics in the Bengal Subah, 1733–1757

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Kumkum Chatterjee
Kumkum Chatterjee
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of India's trade has attracted the attention of researchers for several decades now. But in the seventies and eighties our knowledge of the history of India's trading world has been especially enriched by a spate of literature on the subject. Among the issues that have received special attention from historians, the relationship between merchants and politics must be singled out as a theme that has recurred in the investigations and analyses of scholars. This issue of the connection between merchants and politics has yielded different conclusions depending on the regional and chronological dimensions of each study, as well as on the specific circumstances that molded the history of the regions that have figured in studies of Indian trade history.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , May 1992 , pp. 233 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Older works on Indian trade history include: Furber, H., John Company at Work (Cambridge, Mass. 1951);Google ScholarRaychaudhuri, T., Jan Company in Coromandel 1605–1690 (S. Gravenhage, 1962);Google ScholarDasgupta, A., Malabar in Asian Trade 1740–1800 (Cambridge, 1967), etc.Google Scholar

2 The literature is so large that it is impossible to mention all of them. Some of the noteworthy contributions include, Pearson, M. N., Merchants and Rulers in Gujarat (New Delhi, 1976);Google ScholarMarshall, P. J., East Indian Fortunes. The British in Bengal in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford, 1976);Google ScholarChaudhuri, K. N., The Trading World of Asia and the English East India Company 1660–1760 (Cambridge, 1978);CrossRefGoogle ScholarDasgupta, A., Indian Merchants and the Decline of Surat 1700–1750 (Wiesbaden,1979);Google ScholarBayly, C. A., Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars: A Study of North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion 1770–1870 (Cambridge, 1982);Google ScholarArasaratnam, S., Merchants, Companies and Commerce on the Coromandel Coast 1650–1740 (Delhi, 1986), etc.Google Scholar There is also a growing body of journal articles on this subject. e.g. Subramaian, Lakshmi, ‘Bombay and the West Coast in the 1740s’, Indian Economic and Social History Review (hereafter referred to as IESHR) 8, 2 (1981), pp. 189–216,CrossRefGoogle Scholar‘Capital and Crowd in a Declining Asian Port City’, Modern Asian Studies (hereafter referred to as MAS) 19, 2 (1985), pp. 213–15,Google Scholar‘Banias and the British: The Role of Indigenous Credit in the Process of Imperial Expansion in Western India in the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century’, MAS 21, 3 (1987), pp. 473–510,Google ScholarSubrahmanyam, Sanjay, ‘The Portuguese, the Port of Basrur and the Rice Trade 1600–50’, IESHR 21, 4 (1984), pp. 433–62,Google Scholar‘Staying on: The Portugese of Southern Coromandel in the late Seventeenth Century’, IESHR 22, 4 (1985), pp. 444–63,Google Scholar‘Persians, Pilgrims and Portugese. The Travails of Masulipatnam Shipping in the Western Indian Ocean 1590–1665’, MAS 22, 3 (1988), pp. 503–30, etc.Google Scholar

3 For example, the case of Gujarat in the sixteenth century and the eighteenth century shows that the world of business and the world of politics usually did not impinge on one another. A study of the Coromandel by S. Subrahmanyam yields different conclusions etc. See Pearson, Merchants and Rulers in Gujarat; Dasgupta, , Indian Merchants and the Decline of Surat;Google ScholarSubrahmanyam, S., ‘Persians, Pilgrims and Portugese’.Google Scholar

4 Tripathi, A., Trade and Finance in the Bengal Presidency 1793–1833 (Bombay, 1956);Google ScholarSinha, N. K., The Economic History of Bengal, 3 vols (Calcutta, 1956, 1962 and 1970);Google ScholarBhattacharya, S., The English East India Company and the Economy of Bengal (Calcutta, 1969),Google ScholarMarshall, P. J., East Indian Fortunes (Oxford, 1976);Google ScholarChaudhuri, Sushil, Trade and Commercial Organization in Bengal 1650–1720 (Calcutta, 1975);Google ScholarPrakash, Om, The Dutch East India Company and the Economy of Bengal (Princeton University Press, 1985), etc.Google Scholar

5 Chaudhuri, Sushil, ‘Merchants, Companies and Rulers: Bengal in the Eighteenth Century’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 31, I (02. 1988), pp. 97–103.Google Scholar

6 Banerjee, Kumkum, ‘Grain Traders and the East India Company: Patna and its Hinterland in the Late Eighteenth Century and the Early Nineteenth Century’, IESHR 23, 4 (1986).Google Scholar

7 Naqvi, H. K., Urban Centers and Industries in Upper India 1556–1806 (Bombay, 1968), p. 100.Google Scholar

8 SirFoster, W. (ed.), The English Factories in India (hereafter referred to as EFI), 10 vols (Oxford, 1906–1927). This reference is to vol. 1, p. 213.Google Scholar

9 These processes are discussed in, Gladwin, F., A Narrative of Transactions in Bengal. A Translation of Salimullah Munshi's Tarikh-i-Bangla (Calcutta, 1906);Google ScholarSirSarkar, J. N., History of Bengal, vol. 2 (Dacca, 1948);Google ScholarKarim, Abdul, Murshid Quli Khan and his Times (Dacca, 1963);Google ScholarCalkins, P. B., ‘Formation of a Regionally Oriented Ruling Group in Bengal’, Journal of Asian Studies 29, 4 (08. 1970), pp. 799–806.Google Scholar

10 Salim, Ghulam Hussain Khan, Riyaz-us-salatin. Translated by Salam, Maulavi Abdus (Calcutta, 1904), p. 295.Google Scholar

11 Gladwin, , Narrative of Transactions, pp. 47, 98.Google Scholar

12 Khan, Yusuf Ali, Tarikh-i-Bangla-i-Mahabat Jangi. Translated by Subhan, Abdus (Calcutta, 1982), pp. 19, 27–38, 42–50, 55–60, 63–7, 86–109;Google ScholarTabatabai, Ghulam Hussain Khan, Seir Mutaqherin (hereafter referred to as Seir), 4 vols, translated by Manus, Nota (Calcutta, 1902). This reference is to vol. 1, pp. 280–1, 344–6 and vol. 2, p. 429Google Scholar and Gladwin, , Narrative of Transactions, p. 25.Google Scholar

13 Seir, vol. 1, p. 283Google Scholar, Datta, K. K., Ali Vardi Khan and His Times 1740–1770 (Calcutta, 1973), pp. 10–13.Google Scholar

14 Fazal, Abul, Ain-i-Akbari, translated by Gladwin, F. (Calcutta, 1784), vol. I, part 3, p. 371.Google Scholar

15 Ibid..

16 Seir, vol. 1, pp. 281, 344–5, vol. 3, p. 180.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., vol. 3, p. 178.

18 Gladwin, , Narrative of Transactions, pp. 40–1.Google Scholar

19 For the configuration of political power at the level of the jagirdars, aimmadars and zamindars and for an analysis of their interaction with rural trade, see Banerjee, Kumkum ‘Indigenous Trade, Finance and Politics: A Study of Patna and its Hinterland 1757 to 1813’ (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Calcutta, 1987).Google Scholar

20 Bolts, William, Considerations on Indian Affairs (London, 1772), p. 200;Google ScholarEFI, vol. 1, p. 195 and vol. 2, p. 400.Google Scholar

21 EFI, vol. 1, p. 195.Google Scholar

22 Proceedings of the Board of Revenue Opium (hereafter referred to as BR Opium), The West Bengal State Archives (hereafter referred to as WBSA), proceedings of 18 June 1789. ‘Translation of Ramchund Pundit's Answers to and Observations on the Cultivation of Opium’ (Enclosure to letter from Duncan, J. to Cornwallis, 16 July 1788).Google Scholar

23 Sarkar, Jagadish Narayan, Studies in Economic Life in Mughal India (Delhi, 1975), pp. 177–85.Google Scholar

24 Chaudhuri, , The Trading World of Asia, pp. 336–9;Google ScholarSarkar, Jagadish Narayan, Glimpses of Medieval Bihar Economy (Calcutta, 1978), p. 71.Google Scholar

25 Chaudhuri, The Trading World of Asia, p. 336.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., p. 337.

27 Ibid..

28 BR Opium, 18 June 1789 (see fn. 22); Naqvi, , Urban Centers and Industries in Upper India, pp. 105–6.Google Scholar

29 Marshall, , East Indian Fortunes, pp. 81–2, 91.Google Scholar

30 The best example of this is furnished by Hovhannes, a lone Armenian who came to India in 1683 to trade on behalf of a few Armenian merchants of Isfahan. See, Khachikian, Levon, ‘Ledger of the Merchant Hovhannes Joughayetsi’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 8, 3 (1966), pp. 153–86.Google Scholar

31 Sarkar, , History of Bengal, p. 418.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., pp. 431–51 and Bhattacharya, , The East India Company, pp. 22–3.Google Scholar

33 Wilson, C. R. (ed.), The Early Annals of the English in Bengal 1708–1722 (hereafter referred to as Early Annals), 3 vols (Calcutta, 1895–1917). This reference is to vol. 1, p. 190.Google Scholar Also Bhattacharya, , The East India Company, p. 26.Google Scholar

34 Wilson, , Early Annals, vol. 1, p. 147 and vol. 3, pp. 44–5,Google Scholar and Hill, S. C. (ed.) Bengal in 1756–57 (hereafter referred to as Hill), 3 vols (London 1905). This reference is to vol. 1, p. 21.Google Scholar

35 Hill, vol. 1, pp. 33–7, 39.Google Scholar

36 Wilson, , Early Annals, vol. 1, p. 210, vol. 2, p. 35,Google Scholar and Hill, vol. 1, pp. 19, 36–7.Google Scholar

37 For example, in December 1712, August 1713, December 1721, the soldiers escorting the Patna fleet committed acts of violence on the officials manning toll posts.Google ScholarWilson, , Early Annals, vol. 2, p. 97 and vol. 3, p. 383.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., vol. I, p. 58.

39 These figures are based on data regarding the quantity of saltpetre purchased by the English East India Company from India between 1664 to 1715 as given in Chaudhuri, , The Trading World of Asia, p. 531.Google Scholar

40 Chaudhuri, Sushil, ‘Merchants, Companies, and Rulers’ (see fn. 5), pp. 97–103, provides more or less the same information about Khwaja Wajeed and Amirchand. The other merchants mentioned in my narrative, e.g. Meer Afzal, Meer Ashraf and other Patna merchants do not figure in Chaudhuri's discussion.Google Scholar

41 Hill, vol. 1, p. 41.Google Scholar

42 Sinha, , Economic History of Bengal, vol. 1, p. 68.Google Scholar

43 Hill, vol. 1, p. 41 and vol. 3, p. 190.Google Scholar

44 Seir, vol. 2, p. 400, fn. 214.Google Scholar

45 Proceedings of the Home Department, Public Branch (hereafter referred to as Home Public), National Archives of India (hereafter referred to as NAI). This reference is to proceedings of 2 May 1755: Letter from Coja Wazeed to W. Watts, undated and Bengal Public Consultations (hereafter referred to as BPC) India Office Records, London (hereafter referred to as IOR). This reference is to BPC Range 1, vol. 17, consultations (hereafter referred to as cons) of 24 Dec. 1744 (Special Consultations).Google Scholar

46 Sinha, , Economic History of Bengal, vol. 1, p. 246.Google Scholar

47 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, Translation of a contract made by Omichand–Deepchand with H. Cole etc., undated in Special Consultations of 1744, ‘Papers and Accounts Relating to Affairs Between Hon'ble Co at Patna and Deepchand’ (hereafter referred to as ‘Special Consultations’ only).

48 Ibid.. Special Consultations: Answer of H. Cole to Complaint by Deepchand etc., undated.

49 Sinha, , Economic History of Bengal, vol. 1, pp. 240–3.Google Scholar

50 This was because of their involvement in the opium and saltpetre trades: BPC Range 1, vol. 19, cons of May 12, 1747 and Hill, vol. 2, p. 63.Google Scholar

51 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, cons of 5, April 1744. Also special consultations.Google Scholar

52 Secret and Military Consultations (hereafter referred to as Secret and Mil. Cons), IOR, Range A, vol. 1, cons of 25 February 1757.Google Scholar

53 BPC Range 1, vol. 19, cons of 12 May 1747 and Hill, vol. 2, p. 63.Google Scholar

54 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, cons of 15 June 1745.Google Scholar

55 Coast and Bay Abstracts, IOR, vol. 4, f. 376, 11 December 1741.Google Scholar

56 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, special consultations.

57 Ibid., and Hill, vol. 1, p. 73,Google ScholarSinha, , Economic History of Bengal, vol. 1, p. 243.Google Scholar

58 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, special consultations.

59 Hill, vol. 2, p. 63.Google Scholar

60 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, cons of 24 December 1744.Google Scholar

61 Ibid., vol. 11, cons of 13 November 1735.

62 Seir, vol. 2, p. 349 and Mohammed, Syed, ‘Old Muslim Inscriptions at Patna’, Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society 16 (1930), pp. 355–77.Google Scholar

63 BPC Range 1, vol. 10, cons of 23 December 1734 and vol. 11, cons of 13 November 1735.Google Scholar

64 Home Public: 20 May 1765. Original consultation, no. 3.Google Scholar

65 BPC Range 1, vol. 19, cons of 13 January 1747 and vol. 12, cons of 24 December 1737.Google Scholar

66 Ibid., vol. 18, cons of 15 August, 1746.

67 Ibid., vol. 10, cons of 3 June 1734 and vol. 17, cons of 5 October 1744, also Patna Factory Records, IOR, vol. 2, cons of 4 September 1744.

68 BPC Range 1, vol. 19, cons of 28 February 1747.Google Scholar

69 Home Public, 11 August 1757, Reproduction of a letter from Coja Ashruph to Omichund from Patna, undated.Google Scholar

70 Home Miscellaneous, MSS No. 192–5, NAI Microfilm Reel No. 82, Accession no. 2855.

71 BPC Range 1, vol. 10, cons of 3 June 1734.Google Scholar

72 Judicial Criminal Proceedings, WBSA, 24 March 1820, ‘Abstracts from the Records of the Office of the Superintendent of Police Regarding Supplies for Troops, etc.’Google Scholar and Buchanan-Hamilton, F., An Account of the District of Behar and Patna in 1811–12, vol. 2, pp. 636–7,Google Scholar also, Banerjee, Kumkum, ‘Indigenous Trade, Finance and Politics–A Study of Patna and its Hinterland 1757 to 1813’ (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Calcutta, 1987).Google Scholar

73 BPC Range 1, vol. 21, cons of 7 July 1748.Google Scholar

74 Ibid., vol. 30, cons of 7 September 1758.

75 Ibid., vol. 14, cons of 24 April 1740.

76 Ibid., vol. 17, special consultations.

77 Bayly, C. A., ‘Indian Merchants in a Traditional Setting: Benaras 1780–1830’, in Dewey, C. and Hopkins, A. G. (eds), The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India (London, 1978), pp. 81–182,Google Scholar and Gillion, K., Ahmedabad: A Study in Indian Urban History (California, 1968), pp. 19–24.Google Scholar

78 For instance, the action of the Panta merchants against Humphreys Cole. BPC Range 1, vol. 17, special consultations.

79 Ibid., cons of 24 December 1744, Translation of Coja Momed Avazed's letter to T. Braddyl, undated.

80 Ibid., vol. 19, cons of 26 March 1747.

81 Ibid., vol. 17, cons of 11 August 1744.

82 Ibid., vol. 19, cons of 28 February 1747.

83 Ibid..

84 Ibid., vol. 17, cons of 24 December 1744, Translation of Coja Momed Avazed's letter to T. Braddyl, undated.

85 Ibid., cons of 30 November 1744.

86 Ibid., cons of 24 December 1744, Translation of Coja Momed Avazed's letter to T. Braddyl, undated.

87 Ibid., vol. 19, cons of 12 May 1747.

88 Ibid..

89 Patna Factory Records, vol II, cons of 31 March 1747.Google Scholar

90 Ibid., cons of 28 March 1747.

91 Ibid., cons of 26 December 1744 and 8 January 1745.

92 Ibid., cons of 7 January 1745.

93 BPC Range 1, vol. 15, cons of 9 July 1742.Google Scholar

94 Ibid., vol. 17, cons of 27 June 1743 and 25 July 1743.

95 Patna Factory Records, vol. 2, cons of 18 January 1745.Google Scholar

96 Ibid., cons of 4 March 1745.

97 BPC Range 1, vol. 19, cons of 12 May 1747.Google Scholar

98 Ibid..

99 Ibid..

100 Ibid., vol. 30, cons of 7 September 1758.

101 This feature has been discussed, but not in depth in Datta, K. K., Studies in the History of the Bengal Subah 1740–1770 (Calcutta, 1936), pp. 377–8Google Scholar and has been mentioned in passing in Chaudhuri, , The Trading World of Asia etc., p. 341.Google Scholar

102 EFI, vol. 1, p. 259.Google Scholar

103 Ibid., vol. 11, p. 69.

104 Ibid., vol. 11, pp. 395–6.

105 BPC Range I, vol. 10: cons of 27 September 1734.Google Scholar

106 Ibid., vol. 11, cons of 17 April 1735.

107 Ibid., vol. 17, cons of 6 August 1745.

108 Patna Factory Records, vol. 2, cons of 28 October 1745.Google Scholar

109 Ibid., cons of 3 April 1747.

110 Ibid., cons of 16 May 1747.

111 Ibid., cons of 24 June 1747.

112 Ibid..

113 BPC Range 1, vol. 14, cons of 24 April 1740.Google Scholar

114 Ibid..

115 Ibid..

116 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 20 January 1744.

117 Ibid., vol. 17, special consultations.

118 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 20 January 1744.

119 Ibid., vol. 17, special consultations.

120 Ibid., cons of 24 December 1744, Translation of Coja Momed Avazed's letter to T. Braddyl, undated.

121 Ibid., vol. 17, cons of 20 May 1745.

122 Ibid., cons of 8 January 1745.

123 Ibid., cons of 12 July 1745.

124 Patna Factory Records, vol. 2: cons of 23 September 1745.Google Scholar

125 BPC Range 1, vol. 15, cons of 29 July 1742.Google Scholar

126 Ibid..

127 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 11 April 1743.

128 Ibid., vol. 23, cons of 25 January 1750.

129 Ibid., vol. 14, cons of 24 April 1740.

130 Patna Factory Records, vol. 2, cons of 15 November 1744.Google Scholar

131 Ibid..

132 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, special consultations.

133 Ibid., vol. 17, cons of 20 May, 1745.

134 Ibid., cons of 25 July 1745.

135 Ibid., cons of 20 May 1745.

136 Hill, vol. I, p. 41.Google Scholar

137 Sarkar, , History of Bengal, p. 432.Google Scholar

138 Bhattacharya, , The East India Company, pp. 33, 39, 49.Google Scholar

139 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, special consultations.

140 Ibid., vol. 17: cons of 24 December 1744, Translation of Coja Momed Avazed's letter to T. Braddyl, undated.

141 Ibid., cons of 20 May 1745.

142 Ibid., cons of 6 August 1745 also Patna Factory Records, vol. 2, cons of 28 October 1745.

143 Marshall, East Indian Fortunes, p. 109.Google Scholar

144 Gupta, B. K., Siraj and the East India Company (Leiden, 1962), pp. 52–3.Google Scholar

145 Hill, vol. 1, p. 3 and p. 7.Google Scholar

146 Secret and Mil. Cons, vol. 1, 17 May 1757.Google Scholar

147 BPC Range 1, vol. 15, cons of 24 July 1742.Google Scholar

148 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 6 March 1743.

149 Seir, vol. 1, p. 47,Google Scholar also Lakhnavi, Shivdas, Shahnama Munawwar Kalam, translated by Askari, S. H. (Patna, 1980). p. 12.Google Scholar

150 Patna Factory Records, vol. 2, cons of 13 March 1745 and 19 March 1745.Google Scholar

151 Sarkar, , History of Bengal, pp. 449, 452.Google Scholar

152 Ibid., pp. 431–2.

153 BPC Range 1, vol. 11, cons of 17 July 1736.Google Scholar

154 Ibid., vol. 17, cons of 18 October 1744.

155 Patna Factory Records, vol. 2, cons of 4 October 1744.Google Scholar

156 Ibid., cons of 11 November 1744.

157 BPC Range 1, vol. 16, cons of 22 September 1743.Google Scholar

158 EFI, vol. I, p. 69 and pp. 395–6.Google Scholar

159 Interestingly enough, Om Prakash also finds that the participation of mansabdars and jagirdars in Bengal's seaborne trade which had been fairly strong at an earlier period, began to decline from the late seventeenth century. For details, see Prakash, Om, The Dutch East India Company, pp. 29, 32, 224–30 and 234, fn. 29.Google Scholar

160 BPC Range 1, vol. 10, cons of 25 June 1734.Google Scholar

161 Ibid., vol. 11, cons of 17 July 1736.

162 Ibid..

163 Ibid., vol. 12, cons 8 August 1737.

164 Ibid., cons of 29 August 1737.

165 Ibid., cons of 11 October 1737.

166 Ibid., cons of 21 December 1737.

167 Ibid., vol. 18, cons of 22 September 1746.

168 Sinha, N. K., Economic History of Bengal, vol. 1, p. 68.Google Scholar

169 Seir, vol. 2, p. 349. Also BPC Range 1, vol. 18, cons of 15 August 1746.Google Scholar

170 Hill, vol. 2, p. 22.Google Scholar

171 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, cons of 23 December 1734.Google Scholar

172 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 20 January 1744.

173 Ibid..

174 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 20 January 1744.

175 However, there were exceptions. In 1740, the saltpetre merchants with the encouragement of the Dutch company used armed men to seize saltpetre kept in store for joint sharing between the English and Dutch companies. Ibid., vol. 14, cons of 24 April 1740.

176 Ibid., vol. 17, special consultations.

177 Ibid..

178 Sarkar, , History of Bengal, p. 451.Google Scholar

179 Hill, vol. 3, p. 160.Google Scholar

180 Sarkar, , History of Bengal, pp. 431, 451–2.Google Scholar

181 Ibid., p. 450.

182 BPC Range 1, vol. 14, cons of 24 April 1740.Google Scholar

183 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 20 January 1744.

184 Ibid., vol. 10, cons of 23 December 1734.

185 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 20 January 1744.

186 Patna Factory Records, vol. 2, cons of 25 March 1747.Google Scholar

187 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, special consultations.

188 Kasimbazar Factory Records, vol. 5, cons of 21 January 1736.Google Scholar

189 BPC Range 1, vol. 17, special consultations.

190 Seir: vol. 1, pp. 283–4, 370–2.Google Scholar

191 Ibid., vol. 2, p. 400, footnote 214.

192 BPC Range 1, vol. 15, cons of 19 April 1752.Google Scholar

193 Ibid., vol. 16, cons of 26 February 1743.

194 For the situation of some of Patna's merchants—especially big merchants of the type discussed in this paper—following the crisis of 1757, see Kumkum Banerjee, ‘Indigenous Trade, Finance and Politics’ (see fn. 72).