Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Most contemporary scholars involved in economic development research think that the government should be playing an important role in the technology transfer being carried out in developing countries. However, during the end of the Ch'ing Dynasty no plan for large-scale technology transfer was made owing to financial difficulties, and railways were the only enterprise which proceeded at a constant rate. At the end of the Ch'ing Dynasty railways, in the eyes of government officials and the gentry, would widely promote the development of various sectors as well as benefit the national defense to help reach the objective of making China strong and wealthy. After more than half a century of development railway construction made considerable progress in China, and according to statistics in 1933 a total mileage of more than 10,000 kilometers covering 19 provinces had been constructed. Assets reached $860 million yuan and liabilities were more than 1.2 billion. Although still a very minor operation compared to other industrialized countries, this was the largest enterprise in modern China, transporting 45 million passengers and 27 kilotons of cargo annually, employing 120,000 people. Operating income reached $148 million yuan and output, $160 million yuan.
1 Chien-chung, Ma, Shih-k'o chai chi-yen (Ma Chien-chung's Essays), 1896, chuan 1, p. 5b.Google Scholar
2 Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspectives: A Book of Essays (Cambridge, Mass., 1962), p. 105.Google Scholar
3 On the system of bookkeeping and accounting traditionally used by the Chinese government, see Otte, Friedrich W. K., ‘The Evolution of Bookkeeping and Accounting in China,’ Annalen der Betriebswirtschaft 2:1 (1928), pp. 160–80.Google Scholar
4 Cheng-chih, Yu (ed.), Hisa-an hui-kao (Yeh Kung-cho's Essays) (n.p., 1930), pp. 277–8;Google ScholarArnold, Julean, China: A Commercial and Industrial Handbook (Washington, D.C., 1926), p. 327.Google Scholar
5 wei-yuan-hui, Chiao-t's t'sieh-tao pu chiao-t'ung shih pien-chuan (ed.), Chiaot'ung shih lu-cheng p'ien (A History of Communication) (Nanking, 1935), ch. 1, pp. 777–88.5.Google Scholar
6 Ling, H. H., ‘A Decade of Chinese Railroad Construction (1926–1936)’ in Shih, Paul K. T.(ed.), The Strenuous Decade: China's Nation-Building Efforts, 1927–1937 (N.Y., 1970), p. 282.Google Scholar
7 Ju-cheng, MiTi-kuo chu-i yu Chung-kuo t'ieh-lu (1847–1949) (Imperialism and the Chinese Railroads) (Shanghai, 1980), p. 365.Google Scholar
8 Britain, Great, Naval Intelligence Division, China Proper, Vol. III, Economic Geography, Ports and Communications (London, 1945), pp. 465–6.Google Scholar
9 Ling, , ‘A Decade of Chinese Railroad Construction,’ p. 283.Google Scholar
10 Rosenbaum, Arthur, ‘Railway Enterprise and Economic Development: The Case of the Imperial Railways of North China, 1900–1911,’ Modern China 2:2 (04 1976), p. 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Wong, C. C., ‘Some Dangers of Railway Development in China and How to Prepare Against Them,’ in Remer, C. F. (ed.), Reading in Economics for China (Shanghai, 1933), p. 624.Google Scholar
12 For examples see Jui-t'ao, Hung, ‘T'ieh-tao cheng-li yu t'ieh-tao t'ung-ch'ih’ (Railroad Reorganization and Railroad Control), Chiao-t'ung Tsa-chih 1:6 (04 1933), pp. 51–2.Google Scholar
13 Shih-hsuan, Chin, T'ieh-lu yun-shu hsueh (Railroad Transportation) (Chengtu, 1945), pp. 407–8.Google Scholar
14 Morris, Ray, Railroad Administration (N.Y., 1930), ch. 6.Google Scholar
15 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, ‘The United States: Seedbed of Managerial Capitalism,’ in Chandler, Alfred D. Jr and Daems, Herman (eds), Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1980), p. 16.Google Scholar
16 Some examples can be found in Hung, ‘T'ieh-tao cheng-li yu t'ieh-tao t'ung-chih,’ p. 51.Google Scholar
17 Yu, (ed.), Hsia-an hui-kao, p. 199.Google Scholar
18 Ling, H. H. and Kao, Tsung-lu (eds), Chan T'ien-yu yu Chung-kuo t'ieh-lu (Chan T'ien-yow and the Chinese Railroad) (Taipei, 1977), pp. 89–92, 259–60.Google Scholar
19 Fargue, Thomas E. La, China's First Hundred (Pullman, 1942), p. 60.Google Scholar
20 Hsuan-huai, Sheng, Sheng shang-shu yu-chai ts'un-kao (Collected Papers of Ministry President Sheng Hsuan-huai), chuan 2, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
21 Ling, H. H., Chung-kuo t'ieh-lu chih (A History of Chinese Railroads) (Taipei, 1954), pp. 137–8.Google Scholar
22 Min-li Pao (The People's Automony) (Shanghai), 4 02 1911.Google Scholar
23 En-han, Lee, China's Quest for Railway Autonomy, 1904–1911 (Singapore, 1977), p. 135.Google Scholar
24 Ling, H. H. (ed.), Chan T'ien-yu hsien-sheng nien-p'u (A Chronological Biography of Chan T'ien-yow) (Taipei, 1961), p. 52.Google Scholar
25 Shu-huai, Wang, ‘Ch'ieng-mo t'ieh-lu jen-ts'ai wen-t'i’ (The supply of Railroad Talents in Late Ch'ing China) in Kou-li t'ai-wan shih-fan ta-hsueh li-shih hsueh-pao (Bulletin of Historical Research), 9 05 1981), p. 22.Google Scholar
26 Chiao-t'ung shih lu-cheng p'ien, ch. 2, pp. 177–8.Google Scholar
27 Fu-chun, Sa, ‘San-shih nien lai Chung-kuo chih t'ieh-lu kung-cheng’ (Railroad Engineering in the Late Thirty Years) in shih hsueh-hui kuing-cheng, Chung-kuo (ed.), San-shih nien lai chih Chung-kuo kung-cheng (Chinese Engineering in the Late Thirty Years) (Nanking, 1946), p. 2.Google Scholar For more information on railway schools in modern China, see Jui-te, Chang, Chung-kuo chin-tai t'ieh-lu shih-yeh kuan-li te yen-chiu: cheng-chih cheng-mien te fen-hsi, 1876–1937 (Railroads in Modern China: Political Aspects of Railroad Administration, 1876–1937) (Taipei, 1991), ch. IV.Google Scholar
28 Yu, (ed.), Hsia-an hui-kao, p. 200.Google Scholar
29 Sa, , ‘San shih nien lai Chung-kuo chih t'ieh-lu kung-cheng,’ pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
30 pu, T'ieh-tao, comp. T'ieh-tao nien-chien (The Railroad Yearbook), Chuan 1 (Nanking, 1934), pp. 544–5.Google Scholar
31 Ling, H. H., ‘T'ang hsiao yu hsin Chung-kuo chien-she’ (Tangshan School and New China's Construction) in Kuo-li Chiao-t'ung-ta-hsueh pa-shih nien (Eighty Years of Communication University) (Taipei, 1976), p. 111.Google Scholar
32 Sa, , ‘San shih nien lai Chung-kuo chih t'ieh-lu kung-cheng,’ p. 2.Google Scholar
33 Chang, , Chung-kuo chin-tai t'ieh-lu shih yeh kuan-li te yen-chiu, ch. V.Google Scholar
34 Sa, , ‘San-shih nien lai Chung-kuo chih t'ieh-lu kung cheng,’ p. 2.Google Scholar
35 Ling, , Chung-kuo t'ieh-lu chih, p. 138.Google Scholar
36 Japan. Tedsudosho. benjisho, Shanhai (ed.), Tetsudobu Seiritsugo no Shina tetsduo (China's Railroads Following the Establishment of the Ministry of Railroads) (Shanghai, 1935), p. 9.Google Scholar
37 wei-yuan-hui, Chiao-t'ung t'ieh-tao pu chiao-t'ung shih pien-chuan (ed.), Chiaot'ung shih ts'ung-wu p'ien (A History of Communication, General Affairs Section) (Nanking, 1935), ch. 1, pp. 631–4.Google Scholar
38 Cheng-chih kuan-pao (Political Gazetteer), 458 (18 01 1908), p. 8.Google Scholar
39 Chang, Chung-li, The Income of the Chinese Gentry (Seattle, 1962), pp. 35 and 41.Google Scholar
40 Ling, , Chung-kuo t'ieh-lu chih, p. 140.Google Scholar
41 Yu, (ed.), Hsia-an hui-kao, p. 30.Google Scholar
42 Te-hsuan, Yuan, ‘Chiao-t'ung yao cheng ken pen chieh chueh ch'u i’ (A Draft Solution to the Problems of Communication Affairs), in Chiao-t'ung kung-pao (Communication Gazetteer), 925 (5 06 1925), Appendix, p. 16.Google Scholar
43 Ling, , Chan T'ien-yu hsien-sheng nien-p'u, p. 52.Google Scholar
44 Ling, H. H., Lung-hai Yu-han Hsiang-kuei Chu lu hui-i (Reminiscences on the Building of the Lung-hai, Yueh-han and Hsiang-kuei Railroads) (Taipei: Chang-liu pan-yueh-kan she, 1953), p. 27.Google Scholar
45 Huenemann, Ralph William, The Dragon and the Iron Horse: The Economics of Railroads in China, 1876–1937 (Cambridge, Mass., 1984), p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Rozman, Gilbert (ed.), The Modernization of China (N.Y.: Free Press, 1981), p. 205.Google Scholar
47 Metzger, Thomas A., The Internal Organization of Ch'ing Bureaucracy: Legal, Normative, and Communication Aspects (Cambridge, Mass., 1973), pp. 151–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Benjamin Elman pointed out that stron tendencies towards professionalization among Chinese intelectuals existed already in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. See , Elman, From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China (Cambridge, Mass., 1984), pp. 96–100.Google Scholar