Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:47:18.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Corner of a Chinese Field: The politics of remembering foreign veterans of the Taiping civil war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2018

JONATHAN CHAPPELL
JONATHAN CHAPPELL*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The memory of the foreign involvement in the Taiping war lasted long after the fall of the Taiping capital at Nanjing in 1864. The events were commemorated by various actors, Chinese and foreign, from the end of the war until the end of the treaty-port century in 1943 when the right to extraterritoriality was abrogated. This article explores the commemorations of the foreign role through three media: the issuing of medals to foreign fighters, the building of memorials to the foreign dead, and the writing of histories of the events. Across these media, different interest groups used the foreign interventions as a proxy for continuing debates about the role of foreigners in China and about China's place in the world. More broadly, the commemorations of the role of foreign fighters in the Taiping war is a case study in the transnational politics of memory. The memories of the war were contested or commemorated not just by states, but also by individuals and groups whose views often diverged from those of their government. By tracing how memories of the war were remembered and forgotten, we can trace the insecurities of different interest groups over time and their perceived power relative to each other.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 1134 - 1171
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 North-China Herald, 10 June 1904, p. 1218.

2 For accounts of the Taiping civil war and foreign involvement in it, see Platt, S. R., Autumn in the Heavenly Kingdom: China, the West, and the Epic Story of the Taiping Civil War, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2012Google Scholar; Yu-wen, Jen, The Taiping Revolutionary Movement, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1973Google Scholar; and Ssū-yü, Têng, The Taiping Rebellion and the Western Powers: A Comprehensive Survey, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971Google Scholar.

3 Spence, J., God's Chinese Son: The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom of Hong Xiuquan, Harper Collins, London, 1996, pp. 237–8Google Scholar.

4 Chappell, J., ‘The limits of the Shanghai bridgehead: understanding British intervention in the Taiping rebellion 1860–62’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, vol. 44, no. 4, 2016, pp. 533–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See, for example, Meyer-Fong, T., ‘Where the war ended: violence, community, and commemoration in China's nineteenth-century civil war’, American Historical Review, vol. 120, no. 5, 2015, p. 1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Platt, S. R., ‘Introduction: war and reconstruction in 1860s Jiangnan’, Late Imperial China, vol. 30, no. 2, 2009, pp. 8–9Google Scholar.

6 See, for example, Winter, J. and Sivan, E., ‘Setting the framework’, in War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century, Winter, J. and Sivan, E. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, p. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Anderson, B. R., Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London, 2006.Google Scholar

7 See, for example, Assmann, J., ‘Communicative and cultural memory’, in Cultural Memories: The Geographical Point of View, Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M., and Wunder, E. (eds), Springer, London, 2011, p. 55Google Scholar; and Assmann, A., ‘Transformations between history and memory’, Social Research, vol. 75, no. 1, 2008, p. 50Google Scholar.

8 Assmann, A., ‘Memory, individual and collective’, in Oxford Handbooks Online, Goodin, R. E. and Tilly, C. (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, p. 215Google Scholar.

9 Assmann, ‘Transformations between history and memory’, p. 55.

10 Assmann, ‘Memory, individual and collective’, p. 220.

11 See, for example, McLellan, J., Antifascism and Memory in East Germany: Remembering the International Brigades, 1945–1989, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004Google Scholar; and Huhle, T., ‘“I see the flag in all of that”: discussions on Americanism and internationalism in the making of the San Francisco Monument to the Abraham Lincoln Brigade’, American Communist History, vol. 10, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Arielli, N. and Rodogno, D., ‘Transnational encounters: hosting and remembering twentieth-century foreign war volunteers: introduction’, Journal of Modern European History, vol. 14, no. 3, 2016, p. 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Meyer-Fong, ‘Where the war ended’, pp. 1737–8.

14 This approach to the study of historical memory has been suggested by Michael Rothberg. See Rothberg, M., Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2009, p. 11Google Scholar.

15 See, for example, Bickers, R., ‘History, legend and treaty port ideology, 1925–1931’, in Ritual and Diplomacy: The Macartney Mission to China 1792–1794, Bickers, R. (ed.), Wellsweep, London, 1993, pp. 81–92Google Scholar; Bickers, R., ‘Shanghailanders: the formation and identity of the British settler community in Shanghai 1843–1937’, Past & Present, vol. 159, 1998, pp. 161–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bickers, R., ‘Moving stories: memorialisation and its legacies in treaty port China’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, vol. 42, no. 5, 2014, pp. 826–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 For the negotiations on the abrogation of extraterritoriality, see Bickers, R., ‘Settlers and diplomats: the end of British hegemony in the international settlement, 1937–1945’, in In the Shadow of the Rising Sun: Shanghai under Japanese Occupation, Henriot, C. and Yeh, Wen-Hsin (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, pp. 229–32Google Scholar; and Chan, K. C., ‘The abrogation of British extraterritoriality in China 1942–43: a study of Anglo-American-Chinese relations’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, 1977, pp. 257–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 HC Deb, 31 May, 1864, Hansard vol. 175, cc. 967–8.

18 Russell to Wade, 18 May 1855, The National Archives of the UK, Foreign Office Records, FO228 Series (hereafter TNA, FO228), FO228/379.

19 For Qing emperors’ patronage of the forms of other cultures within their empire, see Crossley, P. K., The Manchus, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA, 1996, p. 117Google Scholar.

20 Xuehuan's memorial to the emperor and imperial response, 21st day of the first month of the first year of the Tongzhi reign (hereafter TZ1, M1, D21, and so on) (19 February 1862), in [The Complete Management of Foreign Affairs: Tongzhi Reign], Zhonghua shuju, Beijing, 2008, hereafter CYTZ, juan 4, memorials 111–112, p. 139.

21 Gordon to Elizabeth Gordon, 2 June 1864, Gordon Papers, Bell Collection (hereafter GPBC), British Library Manuscripts Collection, London, Add MS 52389.

22 For Li's proposal, see Li Hongzhang's memorial to the emperor, 7 January 1863, enc. 3 in Medhurst to Bruce, 31 January 1863, TNA, FO228/347. See also Prince Gong's memorial to the regents, TZ2, M3, D19 (6 May 1863), in CYTZ, juan 15, memorial 564, pp. 658–9.

23 Medhurst to Bruce, 31 January 1863, TNA, FO228/347.

24 Enc.1 in Medhurst to Bruc3, 31 January, 1863, TNA, FO228/347. Reproduced with permission from the National Archives of the UK.

25 For the Nian, see Perry, E. J., Rebels and Revolutionaries in North China, 1845–1945, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1980, pp. 96–151Google Scholar.

26 Gibson to Bruce, 30 April 1863, TNA, FO228/355.

27 Prince Gong's memorial to the emperor, TZ2, M3, D19 (6 May 1863), in CYTZ, juan 15, memorial 564, pp. 658–9.

28 Harry A. Mohler Collection (HMC), Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Stanford University, California, M13.

29 Prince Gong's memorial to the emperor, TZ2, M3, D19 (6 May 1863), in CYTZ, juan 15, memorial 564, pp. 658–9. Gibson's role is suggested by the fact that consuls were the first point of contact for Qing officials and the most senior British diplomatic authority in the treaty port away from Beijing.

30 Goh, G., The Order of the Double Dragon. Imperial China's Highest Western Style Honour, 1882–1912, New South Wales, Brookvale, 2012, p. 5Google Scholar. The transliteration was apparently ba-si and was converted to baoxing once Qing officials noted that foreign officials valued them and referred to them as stars.

31 HMC, M40.

32 See, for example, H. A. Clery to Alcock, 22 May 1866, TNA, FO228/443.

33 De-la-Noy, M., The Honours System, Allison & Busby, London, 1985, p. 21Google Scholar.

34 Matikkala, A., The Orders of Knighthood and The Formation of the British Honours System, 1660–1760, Boydell & Brewer, Woodbridge, 2008, pp. 62–3Google Scholar.

35 Thompson, A., ‘Honours uneven: decorations, the state and bourgeois society in imperial Germany’, Past & Present, vol. 144, 1994, pp. 198–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 McLeod, J., ‘The English honours system in princely India, 1925–1947’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (Third Series), vol. 4, no. 2, 1994, p. 238Google Scholar.

37 Knox, B., ‘Democracy, aristocracy and empire: the provision of colonial honours, 1818–1870’, Australian Historical Studies, vol. 25, no. 99, 1992, p. 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Cannadine, D., Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire, Penguin, London, 2002, pp. 9–10Google Scholar. Cannadine's wider claim that class was more significant than race in the structuring of the British empire has, however, been vigorously critiqued. See, for example, Fletcher, I. C., ‘Ornamentalism: how the British saw their empire (review)’, Victorian Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, 2003, pp. 532–4Google Scholar.

39 Stanley to Alcock, 30 October 1868, TNA, FO228/447.

40 Regulations Respecting Foreign Orders and Medals, 10 May 1855, enc. 1, in Stanley to Alcock, 30 October 1868, TNA, FO228/447.

41 Ibid.

42 Dundee Courier, Wednesday, 6 February 1856.

43 Alcock to Guy, 13 March 1866, TNA, FO228/422, emphasis added.

44 Charles Gordon to Henry Gordon, 19 June 1864, GPBC, Add MS 52389.

45 Bruce to Gibson, 23 June 1863, TNA, FO228/355. Gibson's receipt of a higher class of medal is, perhaps, further evidence that he was the instigator of the scheme Chonghou put forward to the emperor.

46 Wade to Russell, 1 December 1864, TNA, FO228/358.

47 Waters to Gordon, 29 January 1871, GPBC, Add MS 52394.

48 Hart to Gordon, 13 July 1868, GPBC, Add MS 52394.

49 Ferns to the Secretary of the Admiralty, enc. 2 in Clarendon to Alcock, 28 May 1869, TNA, FO228/467.

50 Zuo Zongtang's memorial to the emperor, TZ3, M2, D20 (27 March 1864), in CYTZ, juan 23, memorial 871, pp. 1039–40.

51 Imperial Response to Zuo Zongtang, TZ2, M11, D15 (25 December 1863), in CYTZ, juan 22, memorial 830, pp. 988–9.

52 This should not be over emphasized. Although Frederick Wakeman saw in mid-nineteenth-century Qing decentralization a precursor to the warlord era of the 1920s, as Richard Horowitz points out, the Qing were able to build strong central institutions in this period, notably the customs service. See Wakeman, F., ‘Introduction’, in Li Hung-chang and the Huai Army: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Chinese Regionalism, Spector, S. (ed.), University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1964, p. xliiGoogle Scholar; and R. Horowitz, ‘Central power and state making: Zongli Yamen and self-strengthening in China’, PhD thesis, Harvard University, 1998, p. 243. For the failure to centralize a system of medals for foreigners in the 1860s, see also E. Kaske, ‘Die Chinesischen Orden der Qing-Dynastie (1644–1911) (The Chinese Orders of the Qing Dynasty, 1644–1911)’, BDOS-Jahrbuch, 2002, pp. 93–4.

53 Zuo Zongtang's memorial to the emperor, TZ3, M2, D20 (27 March 1864), in CYTZ, juan 23, memorial 871, pp. 1039–40.

54 Weaver, B. C., ‘The development of foreign style medals during the late Qing dynasty’, The Medal Collector, vol. 48, no. 4, 1997, p. 28Google Scholar.

55 Parkes to Wade, 2 November 1864, TNA, FO228/368.

56 Zuo Zongtang's memorial to the emperor, TZ2, M11, D15 (25 December 1863), in CYTZ, juan 22, memorial 829, pp. 987–8.

57 Bruce to Gibson, 23 June 1863, TNA, FO228/355; and Jules Berthemy to Édouard Drouyn de Lhuys, 10 August 1864, French Archives Diplomatiques, Centre de La Courneuve, Paris, 25CP/40.

58 Prince Gong's memorial to the Emperor, TZ2, M3, D19 (6 May 1863), in CYTZ, juan 15, memorial 564, pp. 658–9.

59 For this general feature of honours systems, see Frey, B. S., ‘Giving and receiving awards’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 1, no. 4, 2006, p. 382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Napoleon conferred the Legion d'Honneur in person, as did Victoria the Victoria Cross. See Lynn, J. A., ‘Toward an army of honor: the moral evolution of the French army, 1789–1815’, French Historical Studies, vol. 16, no. 1, 1989, p. 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and De-la-Noy, The Honours System, p. 76.

60 Tseng-Tsai, Wang, ‘The audience question: foreign representatives and the emperor of China, 1858–1873’, The Historical Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, 1971, p. 620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61 North-China Herald, 8 August 1863.

62 Allen, C. H., The Life of ‘Chinese’ Gordon, William Briggs, Toronto, 1884, p. 10Google Scholar.

63 Forest, B. and Johnson, J., ‘Unraveling the threads of history: Soviet-era monuments and post-Soviet national identity in Moscow’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 92, no. 3, 2002, p. 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Waley-Cohen, J., The Culture of War in China: Empire and the Military under the Qing Dynasty, I.B. Tauris, London, 2006, pp. 34–5Google Scholar.

65 Flath, J., ‘“This is how the Chinese people began their struggle”: Humen and the opium war as a site of memory’, in Places of Memory in Modern China: History, Politics, and Identity, Matten, M. A. (ed.), Brill, Leiden, 2012, pp. 174–5Google Scholar.

66 Meyer-Fong, T., What Remains: Coming to Terms with Civil War in Nineteenth-Century China, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2013, p. 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Deyuan, F., ‘ ’ [‘Li Hongzhang and the loyalty memorial temples of the Huai Army’], [Anhui Historical Research], vol. 3, 2006, p. 73Google Scholar.

68 Bickers, ‘Moving stories’, pp. 830–1.

69 S. Wells Williams to W. F. Williams, 16 November 1862, in Wells Williams, F. and Wells Williams, S., The Life and Letters of Samuel Wells Williams, LL.D., Missionary, Diplomatist, Sinologue, Scholarly Resources, Wilmington, Del., 1972, p. 341Google Scholar; and Rantoul, R. S., ‘Frederick Townsend Ward’, The Essex Institute Historical Collections, no. XLIV, 1908, p. 48Google Scholar.

70 See, for example, Tianyue, J., ‘“ - ” ’ [‘A historical examination of Admiral Protet's death: a discussion of relations between the Qing and French governments during the Sino-Foreign suppression of the Taiping’], [Qing History Research], vol. 2, 2016, pp. 120–33Google Scholar.

71 Henriot, C., ‘The colonial space of death: Shanghai cemeteries, 1844–1949’, in Twentieth-Century Colonialism and China: Localities, the Everyday and the World, Goodman, B. and Goodman, D. S. G. (eds), Routledge, Abingdon, 2012, pp. 113–14Google Scholar.

72 Visualising China: China 1850-1950, an Interactive Resource, University of Bristol, http://visualisingchina.net/#hpc-oh01-022 (accessed online: 12.12.15). Image courtesy of Charles Poolton and Historical Photographs of China, University of Bristol.

73 North-China Herald, 25 February 1885, p. 220; and North-China Herald, 11 March 1885, p. 275.

74 North-China Herald, 8 January 1880, p. 3. The reporter suggested that Gordon had fought the Nian rather than the Taiping.

75 Epitaph on General Charles Gordon's Tomb, St Pauls Cathedral, London.

76 Bickers, ‘Moving stories’, pp. 832–4.

77 Ibid., pp. 835–6.

78 Ibid., p. 832.

79 Hung-Ting, Ku, ‘Urban mass movement: the may thirtieth movement in Shanghai’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 1979, pp. 200–2Google Scholar.

80 Ibid., p. 203. For more accounts of the 30 May movement, see Rigby, R. W., The May 30 Movement: Events and Themes, Australian National University Press, Canberra, 1980Google Scholar; and Bickers, R., Empire Made Me: An Englishman Adrift in Shanghai, Allen Lane, London, 2003, pp. 163–7Google Scholar.

81 Bickers, ‘Settlers and diplomats’, p. 232.

82 China Weekly Review, 1 November 1924, cited in Clifford, N. R., ‘A revolution is not a tea party: the “Shanghai Mind(s)” reconsidered’, Pacific Historical Review, vol. 59, no. 4, 1990, pp. 513–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 From 3,470 residents to 8,817 residents compared with 10,256 residents to 14,701 residents. See Volz, Y. Z. and Lee, Chin-Chuan, ‘Semi-colonialism and journalistic sphere of influence’, Journalism Studies, vol. 12, no. 5, 2011, p. 564CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 W. R. Kahler, Chinese Chips (Shanghai, reprinted from The Union, 1914), cited in Western Adventurer Buried in Ignominy, Shanghai Star, 3 June 2004, https://web.archive.org/web/20050214014202/http://app1.chinadaily.com.cn/star/2004/0603/cu18-2.html, [accessed 3 March 2018].

85 See Borg, A., War Memorials: From Antiquity to the Present, Leo Cooper, London, 1991, p. ixGoogle Scholar; and Tarlow, S., ‘An archaeology of remembering: death, bereavement and the First World War’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 1997, p. 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

86 For the establishment of the Ward Post, see J. C. Bond, ‘Pictorial history of China Post 1: Part 1—1919–1959’, in http://www.cp1.info/2007/h/cp1HISTORY.pdf, [accessed 3 March 2018], The American Legion Generals Ward & Chennault & Lt. Helseth Post No. 1 (ed.), China, 1988, pp. 1–3.

87 American Legion Generals Ward and Chennault Post No. 1, Poop Sheet 63, 17 November 1959, from the archives of the American Legion Generals Ward and Chennault Post. This document was generously shared by the post's current historian, Scott Riebel.

88 Millard's Review of the Far East, 5 June 1920, p. 41. For reference to the Post's ‘Americanization programme’, see John Hervey Ross to Rev. Clinton J. Bushey, 20 May 1921, Ward's Tomb 1921 to 1939, Archives of the Frederick Townsend Ward Post of the American Legion, Texas, United States of America.

89 Lobingier, C. S., ‘An early American hero in China (Frederick Townsend Ward, 1831–1862)’, Bulletin of the American Legion Frederick Ward Post No. 1, Shanghai, China, vol. 1, 1921, p. 1Google Scholar.

90 The Weekly Review, 26 May 1923, p. 452.

91 The China Weekly Review, 15 March 1924, p. 83.

92 North-China Herald, 30 May 1925, p. 376.

93 The China Press, 7 June 1937, p. 5.

94 ‘Memorial day on Monday: Spanish war vets to gather at cemetery’, The China Press, 26 May 1938, p. 2.

95 Mortimer to Frederick Townsend Ward Post, 30 September 1947, cited in Bond, ‘Pictoral history of China Post 1’, p. 4.

96 See http://www.chinapost1.org/, [accessed 22 February 2018].

97 Carr, C., The Devil Soldier: The American Soldier of Fortune who Became a God in China, Random House, New York, 1995, p. 5Google Scholar. For local recollections of Ward's tomb, see Stevens, K., ‘The American soldier of fortune Frederick Townsend Ward honoured and revered by the Chinese with a memorial temple’, Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. 38, 1998, p. 288Google Scholar.

98 North-China Herald, 10 June 1887, pp. 638–9.

99 Henriot, ‘The colonial space of death’, pp. 122–4.

100 North-China Herald, 21 December 1938, p. 499. Cost was also a factor. It was cheaper to move the bodies than restore the original graveyard in its current condition. See Minutes of the Shanghai Municipal Council, 6 April 1938 in Zhang, Qian, Shi, Meiding, and Ma, Changlin, The Minutes of Shanghai Municipal Council, Shanghai Classics Publishing House, Shanghai, 2001, p. 29Google Scholar.

101 North-China Herald, 8 March 1938, p. 60.

102 Ibid., 11 October 1939, p. 60.

103 Ibid., 21 December 1938, p. 499. For the change in the philosophy of burial following the First World War, see Winter, C., ‘First World War cemeteries: insights from visitor books’, Tourism Geographies, vol. 13, no. 3, 2011, p. 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

104 These and all subsequent references to the rededication ceremony are taken from the North-China Herald, 10 May 1933, p. 214.

105 Rantoul, ‘Frederick Townsend Ward’, p. 48.

106 For an account of the removal of some of these memorials as well as the defacing of gravestones deemed ‘imperialistic’ by the communists, see Bickers, ‘Moving stories’, pp. 24–5.

107 Zheng, Xiaowei, ‘Loyalty, anxiety, and opportunism: local elite activism during the Taiping rebellion in eastern Zhejiang, 1851–1864’, Late Imperial China, vol. 30, no. 2, 2009, pp. 40–1Google Scholar.

108 Wilson's work was preceded by that of Augustus Lindley, a British Taiping partisan, but this work was written in the belief that the Taiping were still a viable force, in order to persuade his compatriots to support the cause. See Lindley, A. F., Ti-ping Tien-kwoh: The History of the Ti-ping Revolution, Including a Narrative of the Author's Personal Adventures, Day, London, 1866, p. xiiGoogle Scholar.

109 Wilson, A., England's Policy in China, A. Shortrede & Co., Hong Kong, 1860Google Scholar.

110 Wilson, A., The ‘Ever-Victorious Army’: A History of the Chinese Campaign under Lt Col C. G. Gordon, CB RE and of the Suppression of the Tai-Ping Rebellion, Blackwood, London, 1868, p. xviGoogle Scholar.

111 Ibid., pp. 256–8.

112 See Butler, W. F., Charles George Gordon, Macmillan & Co., London, 1889, p. 70Google Scholar; Hake, A. E., ‘Introduction’, in Events in the Taeping Rebellion, Hake, A. E. (ed.), W.H. Allen & Co., London, 1891, pp. 6–7Google Scholar; and Mossman, S., The Great Taiping Rebellion: A Story of General Gordon in China, Griffith Farran Browne & Co., London, 1893, p. 347Google Scholar.

113 Strachey, G. L., Eminent Victorians, Garden City Publishing, Garden City, NY, 1920, p. viGoogle Scholar, although this is not representative of all Victorian biography. See Atkinson, J., Victorian Biography Reconsidered: A Study of Nineteenth-Century ‘Hidden’ Lives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010, pp. 8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

114 See, for example, Mercier, R. P., Campagne du Cassini dans les Mers de Chine, 1851–1854, Retaun-Bray, Paris, 1889Google Scholar; Lyster, T. and Lyster, E. A., With Gordon in China: Letters from Thomas Lyster, Lieutenant Royal Engineers, T.F. Unwin, London, 1891Google Scholar; Forrester, E., ‘Personal recollections of the Tai-Ping rebellion’, Cosmopolitan, vol. 22, no. 6, 1896, pp. 625–9Google Scholar; and Moule, A. E., Personal Recollections of the Tai'ping Rebellion, Shanghai Mercury, Shanghai, 1898Google Scholar.

115 See, for example, Rantoul, ‘Frederick Townsend Ward’; and Powell, E. A., Gentlemen Rovers, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1913Google Scholar.

116 Powell, Gentlemen Rovers, pp. vii–viii; and Cahill, H., A Yankee Adventurer: The Story of Ward and the Taiping Rebellion, The Macaulay Company, New York, 1930, p. 271Google Scholar.

117 Hail, W. J., Tsêng Kuo-fan and the Taiping Rebellion: With a Short Sketch of his Later Career, Paragon Book Reprint Corp., New York, 1964, p. xivGoogle Scholar; and The China Weekly Review, 16 May 1925, p. 310.

118 Chun-Chieh, Huang, ‘The defining character of Chinese historical thinking’, History and Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, 2007, pp. 180–1Google Scholar.

119 The title of a historical work by Northern Song dynasty (ad 960–1127) historian Sima Guang. See Kwong, L. S. K., ‘The rise of the linear perspective on history and time in late Qing China c. 1860–1911’, Past & Present, vol. 173, 2001, p. 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also On Ng, Cho and Wang, Q. E., Mirroring the Past: The Writing and Use of History in Imperial China, University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu, 2005Google Scholar.

120 Schneider, A. and Tanaka, S., ‘The transformation of history in China and Japan’, in The Oxford History of Historical Writing Volume 4: 1800–1945, Maiguashca, J., Macintyre, S., and Pók, A. (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, p. 492Google Scholar.

121 Probably while Dong was serving as vice president of the Records Office—a post he was appointed to on 26 August 1864. See Dong Xun, [Autobiographical Record of the Old Man of the Study for Returning to Read My Books’, ‘’ [‘Collected materials on modern Chinese history’], no. 29, Guangwen Shuju, Taipei, 1971, p. 96.

122 Xun, Dong, ‘’ [‘Record of the foreign armies’], in [A Collection of Documents on the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom], Jialuo, Yang (ed.), Dingwen shuju, Taipei, 1973, p. 564Google Scholar.

123 Dong, Autobiographical Record, pp. 92–3.

124 Dong, ‘Record of the foreign armies’, pp. 536–8, 540–1. For the foreign withdrawal in the summer of 1862, see Staveley to Hope, 13 June 1862, TNA, FO17/384.

125 Modern editions of the work are all based on the same draft copy, found in Beijing University Library. See Dong, ‘Record of the foreign armies’, p. 527.

126 For Li Hongzhang commissioning the work, see Hail, Tsêng Kuo-fan and the Taiping Rebellion, p. 384.

127 See Wenlan, Du, [Record of the Suppression of the Southern Rebels], Ju Zhen Zhai, Beijing, 1871, pp. 734–68Google Scholar.

128 See ‘’ [‘Songjiang Prefecture Gazetteer of Achievements’], Fu Sinian Library, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 19 (1883 (Guangxu 9)), juan 19, p. 1788.

129 Medhurst to Bruce, 8 January 1863, TNA, FO 228/347.

130 A phrase borrowed from Tobie Meyer-Fong. See Meyer-Fong, What Remains, p. 15.

131 (Dianshizhai huabao - Dianshizhai Pictorial), (Guangdong: Guangdong Renmin Chubanshe, 1983), juan , p. 50.

132 Shenbao, 21 August 1880, p. 19287.

133 Although Shenbao was owned by the British newspaper proprietor, Ernest Major, it had an entirely Chinese staff and was intended to address an entirely Chinese audience. See Mittler, B., ‘Domesticating an alien medium: incorporating the Western-style newspaper into the Chinese public sphere’, in Joining the Global Public: Word, Image, and City in Early Chinese Newspapers, 1870–1910, Wagner, R. G. (ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 2007, p. 16Google Scholar.

134 [Dianshizhai Pictorial], Guangdong Renmin Chubanshe, Guangdong, 1983, juan Zhong (), p. 50.

135 Xiaoqing, Ye, The Dianshizhai Pictorial: Shanghai Urban Life, 1884–1898, Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2003, p. 14Google Scholar.

136 Ibid., p. 14.

137 Wooldridge, C., ‘What literati talked about when they talked about memory: commemorating resistance to the Taiping in Nanjing's Yu Garden, 1900–1911’, Twentieth-Century China, vol. 40, no. 1, 2015, p. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

138 Jen, Taiping Revolutionary Movement, p. 9.

139 Shanqing, Ling, [An Unofficial History of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom], Wenming Shuju, Shanghai, 1923, p. 1.Google Scholar

140 Xiao Yishan noted that Ling's work had influenced his decision to collect Taiping documents held in libraries as far afield as London, Paris, Berlin, and Washington. See Yishan, Xiao, [Collected Documents on the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom], Guoli bianyi guan, Beijing, 1936, pp. 1–2Google Scholar. For an example of such work, see Zhongqi, Wang and Bingsong, He, [The History of the Revolution of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom], Shangwu Yinshu Guan, Shanghai, 1931Google Scholar.

141 See, for example, Yitang, Yang, [Research on the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom], Xin Zhongguo Shudian, Shanghai, 1930, p. 4Google Scholar; and Youwen, Jian, [A Trip to Jintian and Other Essays], cited in Ssū-yü, Têng, New Light on the History of the Taiping Rebellion, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1950, p. 5.Google Scholar

142 Yingjie, Guo and Baogang, He, ‘Reimagining the Chinese nation: the “Zeng Guofan phenomenon”’, Modern China, vol. 25, no. 2, 1999, p. 144Google Scholar.

143 See, for example, Xingyao, Xie, [A Collection of Thirteen Taiping Documents], Wenhai Chubanshe, Beijing, 1938, p. 82Google Scholar.

144 Erh-kang, Lo, [A Draft History of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom], Shangwu Yinshu Guan, Shanghai, 1936, p. 1Google Scholar. Lo took up a directorship in the People's Republic of China (PRC)'s Institute of Modern History in 1949.

145 Assmann, ‘Transformations between history and memory’, p. 52.

146 For an account of the British community's departure from treaty-port China, see Bickers, R., Britain in China: Community, Culture and Colonialism, 1900–49, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1999, pp. 236–40Google Scholar.

147 See Spence, God's Chinese Son; Reilly, T. H., The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom: Rebellion and the Blasphemy of Empire, University of Washington Press, Seattle, 2004Google Scholar; Platt, Autumn in the Heavenly Kingdom; and Meyer-Fong, What Remains. In addition to this, there have been a couple of biographies of key figures, including Carr, The Devil Soldier; and Pollock, J., Gordon: The Man Behind the Legend, Constable, London, 1993Google Scholar.

148 Tingyi, Guo, [A Day by Day History of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom], Taiwan Shangwu Yinshuguan, Taipei, 1957, p. 1Google Scholar. The foreword to the original 1946 edition was dated 1940.

149 See, for example, Feuerwerker, A., ‘China's modern economic history in communist Chinese historiography’, in History in Communist China, Feuerwerker, A. (ed.), M.I.T. Press, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1968, pp. 219–20Google Scholar.

150 Meyer-Fong, T., ‘Civil war, revolutionary heritage and the Chinese garden’, Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review, vol. 13, 2014, pp. 90–1Google Scholar.

151 Yongzhi, Xu, ‘ (1949–1990)’ [‘A brief discussion of historical research on the Taiping heavenly kingdom in Taiwan and Hong Kong (1949–1990)]’, [Anhui Historical Research], vol. 4, 1991Google Scholar.

152 Yang Yitang, Research on the Taiping, p. 4.

153 Aleida Assmann has noted this function of political memory. Assmann, ‘Transformations between history and memory’, p. 52.