Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:03:28.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan's Contribution to the Development of Muslim Nationalism in India*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Hafeez Malik
Hafeez Malik
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Villanova University, Pennsylvania 19085.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By a general consensus among historians, the modern age is characterized as the age of nationalism. Despite this general agreement, however, the phenomenon of Muslim nationalism in India, which finally fulfilled itself in establishing the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, has remained misunderstood. In the first decade after the partition of India, the creation of Pakistan was explained away in terms of the divide and rule policy of the British and/or the religious fanaticism of the Muslims. This was so because Indian nationalists of all descriptions had assumed that Indian nationalism was a single and unified movement working for the unity or homogeneity of Indian civilization.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , March 1970 , pp. 129 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Heimsath, Charles H., Indian Nationalism and Hindu Social Reform, Princeton, 1964, pp. 132–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Cf. Also Kennedy, J., Asian Nationalism in the Twentieth Century, New York, 1968, pp. 84, 179 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Government of India, The Report of the States Reorganization Commission, p. 43.

3 Kohn, Hans, The Idea of Nationalism, New York, 1944.Google Scholar

4 For the impact of Sir Sayyid's European tour on his religious ideas, Cf. also Malik, Hafeez, ‘The Religious Liberalism of Sir Sayyid Ahmad khan’, The Muslim World, 07 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, ‘Insan Wa Haywan’, Tahdhib al-Akhlāq, Jamadi al-Thani, 1297 A. H./1979;Google Scholar also Maqalāt-i Sir Sayyid, Isma'il, Muhammad (ed.). Majlis Traqqi-i Adab, Lahore, 1962, pp. 144–6.Google Scholar

6 The Holy Qur'ān, Tr. Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Lahore, Shaikh Muhammad Ashraf, 1938, p. 1405.

7 SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, ‘Qawmi ta'līm, qawmi hamdardi awr bahami itifaq’, Tahdhīb al-Akhlāq, 23 01 1884.Google Scholar

8 Ali, Sayyid Iqbal, Sayyid Ahmad Khan Kā Safar-i Punjab, Aligarh, n.d., p. 88.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., p. 51.

10 Ibid., pp. 176–7.

11 SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, ‘Apni madad Ap: Khuda unki madad karta hai jo ap apni madad Kartay hai’, Tahdhīb al-Akhlāq, Aligarh, Vol. VI, Sha'ban I, 1292 A.H./1875; pp. 113–26.Google Scholar Cf. also, Maqalāt-i Sir Sayyid, Vol. V, p. 79.Google Scholar

12 SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, ‘Hindustan Kay Mu'azez Khāndān’, Akhbār Scientific Society, 7 04 1876.Google Scholar

13 A great Urdu poet and satirist, Insha Allah Khan, was born in Murshidabad between 1756 and 1758. His father, Mir Masha Allah Khan, was a courtier of Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah. When sixteen, Insha left Murshidabad for Lucknow, where for some time he was connected with the court of Shuja-ud-Daulah. On the latter's death he came to Delhi, where he was received kindly by Emperor Shah Alam. Cf. Sadiq, Muhammad. A History of Urdu Literature, Oxford, 1964, p. 125Google Scholar; for a critique of his poetry see Hayi, Sayyid Abdul, Gul-i Ra'nā, Azamgarh, Vol. II, p. 257Google Scholar; Azad, Muhammad Husain, Aab-i Hayat, Lahore, 1957, pp. 254 ff.Google Scholar

14 SirSayyid, , ‘Hindustan Kay Mu'azez Khāndān’, op. cit., p. 95.Google Scholar

15 SirSayyid, , ‘Ayk tadbir: Musalmanun kay Khandan ko Tabahiy awr Barbadi Say bachanay key’, Tahdhīb al-Akhlāk, Aligarh: Zil Qa'dah, 1296/1878,Google ScholarMaqalāt-i SirSayyid, , Vol. V, pp. 97–138.Google Scholar

16 This referred to the efforts of some Bengali landlords who had petitioned the British Government to open an agricultural school. Cf. SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, ‘Hamary Raū'sā Awr Qawmi Bhala'īy’, Akhbār Scientfic Society, 13 07 1866.Google Scholar

17 Ibid.

18 The members of the Select Committee were: (1) Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan (First Secretary) (2) Mawlavi Muhammad Arif (3) Mawlavi Sayyid Abdullah (4) Muhammad Yar Khan (5) Sayyid Zain al-Abidin (6) Mirza Rahmat Allah Beg (7) Mawlavi Ashraf Husain Khan (8) Mawlavi Muhammad Samy 'i Allah Khan (9) Munshi Muhammad Akra Husain (10) Sayyid Amdad Ali (11) Mawlavi Qutb-ud-Din Hasan (12) Mawlavi Hamid-ud-Din (13) Munshi Muhammad Subhan (14) Mawlavi Muhammad Isma'il (15) Mawlavi Abd al-Rahman (16) Mawlavi Hafiz-ud-Din (17) Mir Badshah (18) Mawlavi Sayyid Farid-ud-Din (19) Munshi Muhammad Akbar Husain. SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, ‘Tariyqah Ta'lim Musalmanan’, Tahdhīb al-Akhlāq, Aligarh, 10, Rabi I, 1289 A.H./1872.Google Scholar

19 Sir Sayyid included the following under (I) Islamic Studies—law, jurisprudence, Apostolic Traditions, principles of Traditions, Commentary on the Qur'an, biography and dogmas; under (II) Literature—grammar and syntax of Urdu, Persian, Arabic, English and Latin, history, geography, ethics, psychology, logic, philosophy, political science, and public administration; under (III) Mathematics—arithmetic, geometry, statistics and advanced mathematics; under (IV) Natural sciences— thermo-dynamics, electricity, meteorology, geology and natural philosophy. SirSayyid, , Maqalāt-i Sir Sayyid: Ta'līmi, Tarbīyati Awr Ma'shrīty Mudamin, Lahore, Majlis Traqqi-i Adab, 1962, Vol. VI. pp. 79–80.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., pp. 82–9.

21 SirSayyid, , ‘Ta'lim Awr Atfiq’, Maqalāt-i Sir Sayyid: Taqrīri Maqalāt, Lahore, Majlis Traqqi-i Adab, 1963, p. 160.Google Scholar

22 , Ali, op. cit., pp. 140, 167.Google Scholar

23 Ibid., p. 161.

24 SirSayyid, , ‘Madresseh al-Ulum Key Darūrat’, Taqrīri Maqalāt, p. 120.Google Scholar

25 To counteract the territorial and secular nationalism of the All-India National Congress, Sir Sayyid established the Patriotic Association in August 1888. Under its influence regional Islamic associations protested against the political policy of the Congress throughout India. The Patriotic Association made it clear to the British that more than one nationality existed in India and that the yoking of Hindus and Muslims under a parliamentary system would work only to the detriment of the minority.

26 Khan, Sayyid Ahmad to al-Mulk, Mahd Ali Khan Muhsin, 29 04 1870 in Maktūbāt-i Sir Sayyid, Panipati, Shaikh Muhammad Isma'il (Ed.), Lahore, Majlis Traqqi-i Adab, 1959, p. 103.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., p. 104.

28 Musalmanuñ Key Qismat Kā Faysalā, Agra, 1894, p. 72; contains speeches of Sir Sayyid and other leaders of the Aligarh Movement, which were delivered at the VIth Session of Muhammadan Educational Conference at Aligarh.Google Scholar

29 In order to gain a view of the Muslims' share in the administration of the British-Indian Government, see appendices A and B, attached at the end of this paper.

30 Cf. Ali, , op. cit., pp. 144–6.Google Scholar

31 Cf. SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, Majmū'ah Resolution-hay Dēh Salah: Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental Educational Conference, Agra, Matba' a Mufid-i Aam, 1896, pp. 9, 35.Google Scholar

32 This obviously refers to the Westernized educated Bengali élite, which collaborated with Allen Octavian Hume in establishing the All-India National Congress in 1885.

33 Manglori, Sayyid Tufayī Ahmad, Musalamanuñ Ka Roshan Mustaqbil, Delhi, 1945, p. 279. In the later years of Sir Sayyid's life Mawlavi Sami'y Allah was his major opponent.Google Scholar

34 Husain, Mir Waliyat ‘Madmun’, Conference Gazette, Aligarh, 8 11 1935Google Scholar, as cited in Manglori, , op. cit., p. 280.Google Scholar

35 The Muhammadan Defence Association was founded by Sir Sayyid to create a political platform for the Muslims' views and it opposed the politics of the Congress. Cf. Hali, Altaf Husain, Hayāt-i Javid, Lahore, Akademi Punjab Trust, 1957, pp. 318–20Google Scholar

36 Husain, S. Abid, The Destiny of Indian Muslims, New York, 1965, p. 39. During his visit in May 1967 to Hafeez Malik (at Villanova University, Pennsylvania) Dr Husain admitted that no authentic evidence was available supporting the contention that Sir Sayyid was thoroughly dominated by Beck, and that he formulated his policies on Beck's suggestion. Dr Husain also regretted the fact that instead of doing his independent research on this issue, he relied excessively upon Manglori's assertions.Google Scholar

37 Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan Kay Lekcharūn Kā Majmū'ah Ma'a Mukhtaser Sawaneh 'Umri, Sirāj-ud-Din, Munshi Muhammad, Ed., Lahore, Fadl-ud-Din, 1890, p. 367.Google Scholar

38 Gandhi, Mohandas K., An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments with Truth, Boston, 1957, p. 214.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., p. 449.

40 SirKhan, Sayyid Ahmad, Mukammal Majmū'ah Lekchers Wā Spiches, Lahore, 1891, p. 367.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., pp. 348–9.

42 Ibid., p. 357.

43 Ibid., pp. 351–2.

44 Ibid., p. 353.

45 Ibid., p. 354; Cf. also, Hali, , op. cit., pp. 316–17.Google Scholar

46 For Sir Sayyid's view of democracy, concept of Muslim nationalism and national progress see also, Malik, Hafeez, ‘Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan's Role in the Development of Muslim Nationalism in the Indo-Pakistan Sub-Continent’, Islamic Studies, Rawalpindi, 12 1966, Vol. V, No. 4Google Scholar; and ‘Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan's Theories of Muslim Nationalism and National Progress’, Modern Asian Studies, July 1968.