Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:57:44.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Silk Road, Cotton Road or . . . . Indo-Chinese Trade in Pre-European Times”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

STEPHEN F. DALE
STEPHEN F. DALE*
Affiliation:
OSU Department of History, 367 Dulles Hall, 230 West 17th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

India and China were the most important producers of textiles in the world prior to the industrial revolution. However, whereas the Western historiography usually discusses Indian cotton and Chinese silk in connection with European imports, or with their sales in the Indian Ocean and the Middle East, cotton and silk were also exchanged between India and China. Indeed, Indian cotton and Chinese silk were probably the principal manufactured goods exchanged between these civilizations. Although Indian records are fragmentary, especially when compared with the voluminous Chinese sources, Indian cotton goods are known to have reached the Indianized states in Xinjiang in the early Common Era (CE), and may have been produced there, in Khotan and the neighbouring states, by the time that indigenous silk production was known to exist in India in the fourth and fifth centuries CE. Yet, while in later centuries large amounts of cotton cloth were produced in China while indigenous centres of silk production developed in India, exchanges of the finest types of cotton and silk cloth continued, usually driven by cultural and social factors in each civilization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 79 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reid, Anthony, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988), 90Google Scholar. For Southeast Asian trade, see also Tibbetts, G.R., A Study of the Arabic Texts Containing Material on South-East Asia (Leiden and London: E.J. Brill, 1979)Google Scholar. Bielstein, Hans, Diplomacy and Trade in the Chinese World 589–1276 (Leiden: Brill, 2005), 72–77Google Scholar, summarizes Indo-Chinese diplomatic/trade missions between the seventh and tenth centuries CE.

2 Sen, Tansen, Buddhism, Diplomacy and Trade (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2003), 176.Google Scholar

3 Basham, A.L., The Wonder that Was India (New York: Grove Press, repr. 1959), 197.Google Scholar

4 Liu, Xinru, Silk and Religion: An exploration of material life and the thought of people, AD 600–1200 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996), 50.Google Scholar

5 Sen, Buddhism, Diplomacy and Trade, 185 and Bielenstein, Diplomacy and Trade in The Chinese World, 72.

6 Xinru Liu, Silk and Religion, 52. For the varieties of Chinese silk see Vainker, Shelagh, Chinese Silk, A Cultural History (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

7 Huan, Ma, Ying-yai Sheng-lan The Overall Survey of the Ocean's Shores [1433] translated and edited by J.V.G. Mills (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Hakluyt Society, 1970), 143, 163.Google Scholar

8 Pai-tie from the Sanskrit, patta. Cotton cloth may have been produced in South Asia as early as 2300 BCE, in the Indus Valley cities of Harappa and Mohenjo Daro. Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China Vol. 5 “Chemistry and Chemical Technology,” Part IX “Textile Technology: Spinning and Reeling,” Dieter Kuhn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968), 58.

9 Hanyu, Gau, Chinese Textile Designs translated by Scott, Rosemary and Whitfield, Susan (Hong Kong: Viking, 1992), 26 and plate 25.Google Scholar

10 Schaefer, Edward, The Golden Peaches of Samarkand (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), 106.Google Scholar

11 Quoted by Chao, Kang, The Development of Cotton Textile Production in China (Cambridge, Ma.: East Asian Center, 1977), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Sen, Buddhism, Diplomacy and Trade, 10.

13 Xiaozhai Lu and Robert C. Clarke, “The cultivation and use of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in ancient China,” www.hempfood.com/IHA/iha02111.html, pp. 1–7, and Needham, Science and Civilization in China, 5, Part IX, 18–22.

14 Chao, The Development of Cotton Textile Production in China, 7.

15 Chao, The Development of Cotton Textile Production in China, 18 and Needham, Science and Civilization in China, 5, Part IX, 58–59.

16 Chao, The Development of Cotton Textile Production in China, 19.

17 Liu, Silk and Religion, 51–2.

18 Schaeffer, The Golden Peaches of Samarkand, 206.

19 Ibid., 207.

20 Note by J.V.G. Mills in Ma Huan, Ying-yai Sheng-lan, 162, n. 1.

21 Schaeffer, The Golden Peaches of Samarkand, 265–6.

22 Ibid., 122.

23 Liu, Ancient India and Ancient China, 53–63.

24 Schaefer, The Golden Peaches of Samarkand, 182.

25 Ibid., 275.

26 Sen, Buddhism, Diplomacy and Trade, 161 and Frantz Grenet, “Les marchands sogdiens dans le mers du Sud à l'époque préislamique,” in Pierre Chuvin ed., Inde-Asie Centrale, Routes du commerce et des idées (Tashkent and Aix –en-Provence, 1996), 65–84.

27 Ibid., 140–63.

28 Ma Huan, Ying-yai Sheng-lan, 137.

29 Chinese porcelain fragments have been found in the ruins of buildings at Vijayanagar. I am indebted to Sanjay Subramanyam and Cathy Asher for suggesting that ‘Hindu’ rulers in times of Muslim dominance may also have valued the Chinese export porcelain. For a reference to porcelain fragments, see Fritz, John M. and Michell, George, City of Victory, Vijayanagara (New York, N.Y.: Aperture, 1991), 100.Google Scholar

30 Ma Huan, Ying-yai Sheng-lan, 141.