Article contents
Salt and Warlordism in Szechwan 1914–1922
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Extract
In recent studies of warlordism, one source has not, to my knowledge, been used. This is the collection of reports of the Sino-foreign salt inspectorate held in the Toyo Bunko. Of all the institutions of the China coast, the salt inspectorate, its offices deep in the interior, its revenues a magnet for predatory armies, was perhaps in closest touch with warlordism. This paper studies the relationship of salt and warlordism in Szechwan between 1914 and 1922. Szechwan in this period has been selected for 3 reasons. First, the reports from the inspectorates of Ch'uan-nan and Ch'uan-pei, which together covered not only Szechwan but also Yunnan, Kweichow and Hupei as supplied by its salt, are unusually informative on politics. Second, between 1914 and 1922, Szechwan, a border province both northern and southern or neither, ran a full gamut of warlordism: regional, provincial, subprovincial and stabilized. It also attracted the attention of ‘guest armies’ from outside. Third, 1914–1922 has coherence; 1914 saw Yüan Shih-k'ai ascendant and the inspectorate established in Szechwan; 1922 saw Yüan's legatee Hsü Shih-ch'ang descendant, and Liu Hsiang, the embodiment of stabilized warlordism in Szechwan, ascendant.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990
References
1 The Chief Inspectorate of the Central Salt Administration, Peking, Reports by the District Inspectors, Auditors and Collectors on the Reorganization of the Salt Revenue Administration in China 1913–1917, 1918, 1919–1921, 1922, cited hereafter as District Reports; Report by Sir Richard Dane on the Reorganization of the Salt Revenue Administration in China 1913–1917, cited hereafter as Dane Report.
2 Sutton, Donald S., Provincial Militarism and the Chinese Republic (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1980).Google Scholar
3 Merchant, Livingston Tallmadge, ‘The Mandarin President Xu Shichang and the Militarization of Chinese Politics’, Dissertation Brown University 1983, UMI 1988;Google ScholarKapp, Robert A., Szechwan and the Chinese Republic (Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1973).Google Scholar
4 Dane Report, p. 149. The words are not those of Dane but of Von Strauch, the foreign deputy chief inspector who made a survey of conditions in Szechwan.
5 District Reports 1913–1917, pp. 186–7.Google Scholar
6 Ibid., p. 187.
7 Ibid., p. 188.
8 Dane Report, pp. 245–8.Google Scholar
9 Ibid., p. 249.
10 District Reports 1918, p. 70.Google Scholar
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid., p. 85.
13 Ibid., p. 87.
14 Ibid., p. 89.
15 District Reports 1919–1921, p. 56.Google Scholar
16 Ibid., p. 60.
17 Ibid.
18 Ibid.
19 Ibid., p. 134.
20 Ibid., p. 137.
21 Ibid.
22 Ibid., pp. 220–1.
23 District Reports 1922, p. 63.Google Scholar
24 Ibid., p. 57.
25 Ibid., p. 71.
26 District Reports 1913–1917, p. 258.Google Scholar
27 District Reports 1919–1921, p. 138.Google Scholar
28 Dane Report, pp. 255–6.Google Scholar
29 Ibid., p. 256.
30 District Reports 1918, pp. 88–9.Google Scholar
31 Adshead, S. A. M., ‘Un cycle bureaucratique: I'administration du Sel en Orient et en Occident,’ Annales, economies, sociétés civilisations 38:2 (03–04 1983), pp. 221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Kapp, , Szechwan, pp. 41–3.Google Scholar
33 Adshead, S. A. M., Province and Politics in Late Imperial China: Viceregal Government in Szechwan, 1898–1922 (Curzon Press, London, 1984), p. 122.Google Scholar
34 Ch'en, Jerome, The Military-Gentry Coalition: China under the Warlords (Toronto U.P., Toronto, 1979), p. 140.Google Scholar
35 Sutton, , Provincial Militarism, p. 260.Google Scholar
36 Fairbank, John K. (ed.), The Cambridge History of China, vol. 12, Republican China 1912–1949, pt I (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983), p. 291.Google Scholar
37 District Reports 1919–1921, p. 224.Google Scholar
38 Ibid., p. 225.
39 Ibid.
40 District Reports 1922, p. 69.Google Scholar
41 Ibid., p. 70.
42 Ibid.
43 Ibid., p.71.
44 Lèbvre, Lucien, Philippe II et la Franche-Comté; (Flammarian, Paris, 1970), p. 204.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by