¹ Edward Said, ‘Orientalism reconsidered’ in Barker, Francis et al. , Literature, Politics and Theory: Papers from the Essex Conference. (Methuen, London 1986), p. 223.Google Scholar The most useful recent statement of the difficulties of representing non-European ‘others’, which draws on the themes of post-structuralism, is Clifford, James and Marcus, George (eds), Writing Culture: The Politics and Poetics of Ethnography (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1986).Google ScholarGood critical introductions to these themes are Harland, RichardSuperstructuralism: The Philosophy of Structuralism and Post-Structuralism (Methuen, London, 1987)Google Scholar and Fekete, John (ed.), The Structural Allegory: Reconstructive Encounters with the New French Thought (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1984).Google Scholar

² For a recent exploration of these arguments, see Medick, Hans, ‘“Missionaries in the Row Boat”? Ethnological Ways of Knowing as a Challenge to Social History’ in Comparative Studies in Society and History, 29, 1, 1987.Google Scholar A provocative argument in favour of the value of ethnographic work for social history within the South Asian context is Dirks, Nicholas B., The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom (Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

³ Guha, Ranajit, ‘On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India’, SS I, 1982, p. 2.Google Scholar

⁴ Amin, Shahid, ‘Gandhi as Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern U.P., 1921–2’, SS III, 1984.Google Scholar

⁵ Pandey, Gyan, ‘Peasant Revolt and Indian Nationalism: The Peasant Movement in Awadh, 1919–22’, SS I, 1982, p. 187.Google Scholar

⁶ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Peasants, Politics and Historiography: A Response’, Social Scientist, no. 120, 05 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar This brief note, written in response to a critical review article, written from a Marxist perspective by Alam, Javeed, in Social Scientist, no. 117, 02 1983, is useful for clarifying a number of issues.Google Scholar

⁷ See, for example, the review article byGupta, Dipankar: ‘On Altering the Ego in Peasant History: Paradoxes of the Ethnic Option’, Peasant Studies, vol. 13, no. 1 (Fall 1985), p. 15. I thank Majid Siddiqi for bringing this article to my attention.Google Scholar

⁸ Most notably, of course, in the debates surrounding the work of E. P. Thompson, since his publication of The Making of the English Working Class in 1963, and in his exchanges with British Marxist historians who had drawn on the work of Louis Althusser. See especially Thompson, E. P., The Poverty of Theory, and Other Essays, Merlin (London, 1978);Google Scholar and the riposte by Anderson, Perry: Arguments within English Marxism, New Left Books (London, 1979).Google Scholar

⁹ Guha, Ranajit, Preface, SS II, 1983.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Bhattacharaya, Sabyasachi, ‘History from Below’, Social Scientist, no. 119, 04 1983, p. 6.Google Scholar

¹¹ Baudrillard, Jean, In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities…or the End of the Social and Other Essays, Translated by Foss, Paul, Patton, Paul and Johnston, John, Foreign Agents Series (New York, 1983), pp. 48–9.Google Scholar

¹² Ibid., p. 29.

¹³ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Peasants, Politics and Historiography’, p. 62.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, ‘Discussion: Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiography’, SS IV, 1985, p. 342.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Amin, Shahid, ‘Small Peasant Commodity Production and Rural Indebtedness: The Culture of Sugarcane in Eastern U.P., c. 1880–1920’, SS I, 1982.Google Scholar

¹⁶ For references to parts of this debate, see footnote 8.

¹⁷ Moi, Toril, Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory (Methuen, London 1985). See especially Part I, ‘Anglo-American Feminist Criticism’.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Peasants, Politics and Historiography’, p. 58.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Ibid., p. 61.

²⁰ See the collective review of Subaltern Studies II, in Social Scientist, no. 137, 10 1984, p. 12.Google Scholar

²¹ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Peasants, Politics and Historiography’, p. 59.Google Scholar

²² Henningham, Stephen, ‘Quit India in Bihar and the Eastern U.P.: The Dual Revolt’, SS II, 1983, p. 137. The emphasis is the author's.Google Scholar

²³ Ibid., p. 149.

²⁴ Ibid., p. 153. See the criticism of this essay in Social Scientist, no. 137, 10 1984, pp. 23–9.Google Scholar

²⁵ Guha, Ramachandra, ‘Forestry and Social Protest in British Kumaun, c. 1893–1921’, SS IV, 1985, pp. 92–4.Google Scholar

²⁶ Ibid., pp. 99–100.

²⁷ Dasgupta, Swapan, ‘Adivasi Politics in Midnapur, c. 1760–1924’, SS IV, 1985, p. 102.Google Scholar

²⁸ Ibid., pp. 134–5.

²⁹ Sarkar, Tanika, ‘Jitu Santal's Movement in Malda, 1924–32: A Study in Tribal Protest’, SS IV, 1985, p. 154.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ibid., p. 10.

³¹ Gupta, Dipankar, ‘On Altering the Ego in Peasant History’, p. 9.Google Scholar

³² Ibid., p. 10.

³³ Ibid., p. 13

³⁴ Guha, Ranajit, ‘The Prose of Counter-Insurgency’, SS II, 1983, p. 3.Google Scholar

³⁵ See the review inJournal of Asian Studies, vol. XLV, no. I, 11. 1985, p. 178.Google Scholar

³⁶ See the review in Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 22, no. 1, 1985, p. 94.Google Scholar

³⁷ Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India (Oxford University Press, Delhi, 1983), p. 13.Google Scholar

³⁸ Guha, Ranajit, ‘On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India’, p. 8. The emphasis is the author's.Google Scholar

³⁹ Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency, p. 3.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Ibid., p. 334.

⁴¹ Ibid., p. 18.

⁴² Especially in Fanon's, Black Skin, White Masks, translated by Markman, C. L. (Grove Press, New York 1967)Google Scholar, and, of course, in Said's, Orientalism (Pantheon Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar

⁴³ See his foreword to the new edition of Fanon's, Black Skin, White Masks: Pluto Press, London 1986, pp. xv–xvi.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency, esp. pp. 18–76.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Sarkar, Tanika, ‘Jitu Santal's Movement in Malda’, pp. 152–3.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency, pp. 20–8.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Ibid., p. 28.

⁴⁸ Arnold, David, ‘Rebellious Hillmen: The Guden-Rampa Risings, 1839–1924’, SS I, 1982, p. 131.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Ibid., pp. 131–2, footnote 106.

⁵⁰ Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency, p. 8.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Ibid., p. 225.

⁵² Sarkar, Sumit, ‘The Conditions and Nature of Subaltern Militancy: Bengal from Swadeshi to Non-co-operation, c. 1905–22’, SS III, 1984, p. 273;Google ScholarChatterjee, Partha, ‘Agrarian Relations and Communalism in Bengal, 1926–1935’, SS, I, 1982, p. 36++.Google Scholar

⁵³ Gupta, Dipankar, ‘On Altering the Ego in Peasant History’, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Das, Arvind, ‘Agrarian Change from Above and Below: Bihar 1947–78’, SS II, pp. 225–6.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Ibid., p. 226.

⁵⁶ Chandra, N. K., ‘Agricultural Workers in Burdwan’, SS II, 1983, p. 237.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Althusser, Louis, ‘Is it Simple to be a Marxist in Philosophy?’ in Essays in Self Criticism (New Left Books, London 1976), p. 205. The emphasis is the author's.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Foucault, Michel, ‘The Subject and Power’, in Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (Harvester Press, 1982), p. 212.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Foucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy and History’, in Rabinow, Paul (ed.), The Foucault Reader (Penguin, 1984), p. 78.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Bhatnagar, Rashmi, ‘Uses and Limits of Foucault: A Study of the Theme of Origins in Edward Said's “Orientalism”’, Social Scientist, no. 158, 07 1986, p. 5.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Baudrillard, Jean, In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities p. 9.Google Scholar

⁶² Ibid., pp. 23–4.

⁶³ Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘Conditions of Knowledge for Working-Class Conditions: Employers, Government and the Jute Workers of Calcutta, 1890–1940’, SS II, 1983, p. 308.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Gupta, Dipankar, ‘On Altering the Ego in Peasant History’, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Agrarian Relations and Communalism in Bengal, 1926–35’, SS I, pp. 12–13 and p. 18.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Ibid., p. 35.

⁶⁷ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘More on Modes of Power and the Peasantry’, SS II, 1983, p. 343.Google Scholar See the exchange between Chatterjee and Sanjay Prasad on these points, in Social Scientist, no. 141, February 1985, and no. 151, December 1985.

⁶⁸ Moi, Toril, Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory, p. 86.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ See, for example, Sarkar, Sumit, ‘The Conditions and Nature of Subaltern Militancy’, pp. 273–4.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Pandey, Gyan, ‘ “Encounters and calamities”: The History of a North Indian Qasba in the Nineteenth Century’, SS III, 1984, p. 269.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Hardiman, David: ‘Adivasi Assertion in South Gujarat: the Devi Movement of 1922–3’, SS III, 1984, p. 217.Google Scholar

⁷² Sarkar, Tanika, ‘Jitu Santal's Movement in Malda’, p. 153.Google Scholar

⁷³ Chandra, N. K., ‘Agricultural Workers in Burdwan’, SS II, 1983, p. 250.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Comaroff, Jean, Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance: The Culture and History of a South frican People (University of Chicago Press, 1985), p. 261.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ See their reviews in Social Scientist, no. III, 08 1982, and no. 117, February 1983.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Modes of power: Some Clarifications’, Social Scientist, no. 141, 02 1985, pp. 56–7.Google Scholar See also his tribute to Althusser, in the Preface to his Bengal 1920–1947: The Land Question, CSSSH Monograph (Calcutta, 1985), pp. xviii–xxxv.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ See, for example, Poster, Mark, Foucault, Marxism and History: Mode of Production versus Mode of Information (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984), pp. 111–15;Google ScholarPhilp, Mark, ‘Michel Foucault’, in Skinner, Q., (ed.) The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences (Cambridge University Press 1985), p. 79.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Cohn, Bernard S., ‘The Command of Language and the Language of Command’, SS IV, 1985, p. 283.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Ibid., p. 329.

⁸⁰ Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘Conditions for Knowledge of Working-Class conditions’, p. 262.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Ibid., pp. 289–91.

⁸² Ibid., pp. 294–310.

⁸³ Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, ‘Discussion: Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiography’, SS IV, 1985, p. 345.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency, pp. 336–7.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.), 1971.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Bhattacharaya, Sabyasachi, ‘History from Below’, p. 7.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Peasants, Politics and Historiography’, p. 59.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Baudrillard, Jean, In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, p. 39.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Williams, Raymond, Marxism and Literature (Oxford University Press, 1977), p. 125.Google Scholar