Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2013
In 1914, the Indian Army was deployed against the enemies of the British Empire. This paper analyses the administrative mechanism as well as the imperial assumptions and attitudes which shaped the recruitment policy of the Indian Army during the First World War. From the late nineteenth century, the Martial Race theory (a bundle of contradictory ideas) shaped the recruitment policy. With certain modifications, this theory remained operational to the first decade of the twentieth century. The construction of the ‘martial races’ enabled the British to play-off different communities against each other to prevent the emergence of a unified anti-British sentiment among the colonized. During the Great War, faced with the rising demands of manpower, the army was forced to modify the Martial Race theory. However, a conscript army did not emerge in British-India. This was due to imperial policies, the inherent social divisions of Indian society, and because the demands for military manpower remained relatively low in comparison to India's demographic resources. Due to innovations in the theory and praxis of recruitment, the volume of recruitment showed a linear increase from 1914 to 1918, with maximum intensification of recruitment occurring during 1917 and 1918. But as the war ended in November 1918, despite the entry of several new communities, the bulk of the Indian Army still came from the traditional martial races.
My thanks to the three unknown referees, the editor, and Suhrita for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. I am grateful to Moumita and Priyadarshini for providing some of the data mentioned in the sources.
1 Roy, Kaushik, ‘Recruiting for the Leviathan: Regimental Recruitment in the British-Indian Army, 1859–1913’, Calcutta Historical Journal, nos. 23–24 (Combined Special Number) (2001–4), pp. 59–60Google Scholar.
2 Robson, Brian (ed.), Roberts in India: The Military Papers of Field-Marshal Lord Roberts, 1876–1893 (Stroud: Sutton, 1993), p. 256.Google Scholar
3 Roberts to the Secretary of State, 12 September 1897, Roberts to Kitchener, 1904, 11/36, Reel no. 2, Kitchener Papers, Microfilm (henceforth M/F), Accession no. 2094, National Archives of India (hereafter NAI), New Delhi.
4 Field-Marshal Lord Roberts of Kandahar, Forty-One Years in India: From Subaltern to Commander-in-Chief (1897, reprint, New Delhi: Asian Educational Services, 2005), p. 532.
5 Quoted from Maguire, T. Miller, Outlines of Military Geography (Cambridge: University Press, 1900), p. 324.Google Scholar
6 Harrison, Mark, Public Health in British-India: Anglo-Indian Preventive Medicine 1859–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 38–46.Google Scholar
7 Maguire, Outlines of Military Geography, pp. 325–331.
8 Barstow, A. E., The Sikhs: An Ethnology (1928, reprint, Delhi: Low Price Publications, 1993), pp. 153–154.Google Scholar
9 Talbot, Ian, ‘British Rule in the Punjab, 1849–1947: Characteristics and Consequences’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1991), pp. 204–206Google Scholar.
10 Northey, W. Brook and Morris, C. J., The Gurkhas (1927, reprint, New Delhi: Cosmo Publications, 1987), Foreword, pp. xxvii.Google Scholar
11 Roy, ‘Recruiting for the Leviathan’, pp. 62–73.
12 Vansittart, Eden, Gurkhas (1906, reprint, New Delhi: Asian Educational Services, 1991), pp. 10–11Google Scholar; Captain Bingley, A. H., Handbook on Rajputs (1899, reprint, Delhi: Low Price Publications, 1999), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
13 Veer, Peter Van Der, Imperial Encounters: Religion and Modernity in India and Britain (2001, reprint, Delhi: Permanent Black, 2006), pp. 135–142.Google Scholar For a summary of the Aryan Invasion debate see Trautmann, Thomas R. (ed.), The Aryan Debate (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
14 Martin, Gregory, ‘The Influence of Racial Attitudes on British Policy towards India during the First World War’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, Vol. 14, No. 2 (1986), p. 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Sir Griffiths, Percival, To Guard my People: The History of the Indian Police (London: Ernest Benn Limited, 1971)Google Scholar, is an account of the organizational evolution of the structure of the police in colonial India by an ex-imperialist. There is yet no modern monograph on the Indian police. David Arnold's article entitled ‘Bureaucratic Recruitment and Subordination in Colonial India: The Madras Constabulary, 1859–1947’, in Guha, Ranajit (ed.), Subaltern Studies, vol. 4, Writings on South Asian History and Society (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 1–25Google Scholar, and his monograph Police Power and Colonial Rule: Madras, 1859–1947 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1986) both focus on the Madras Police. However, there are some scattered data about police in other parts of India.
16 From official secretary. to the chief commissioner, British Burma, Foreign Department, to Quarter Master General in India, 26 February 1886, no. 374, Proceedings of the Government of India, Burma 1885–6, Serial No. 1, Series 2, NAI.
17 Memorandum on the Different Systems adopted on the North-Western Frontier for the Employment of Local Levies, Intelligence Branch, Quartermaster General's Department in India (Simla: Government Central Press, 1888), Part I, pp. 5–6, MSS.EUR.F 163/7, India Office Records (hereafter IOR), British Library (henceforth BL), London.
18 Streets, Heather, Martial Races: The Military, Race and Masculinity in British Imperial Culture, 1857–1914 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), p. 7.Google Scholar
19 Chene, Mary Des, ‘Military Ethnology in British India’, South Asia Research, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1999), pp. 121–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Anderson, Clare, Legible Bodies: Race, Criminality and Colonialism in South Asia (Oxford/New York: Berg, 2004), p. 57.Google Scholar
21 Shakespear, Colonel L. W., History of the 2nd King Edward's Own Goorkha Rifles (The Sirmoor Rifles) (Aldershot: Gale and Polden, 1912), p. 29.Google Scholar
22 Candler, Edmund, The Sepoy (London: John Murray, 1919), p. 22.Google Scholar
23 Metcalf, Thomas R., The New Cambridge History of India, III:4, Ideologies of the Raj (1998, reprint, New Delhi: Foundation Books, 2005), p. 119.Google Scholar
24 Northey and Morris, Gurkhas, pp. viii, 272.
25 Wikeley, J. M., Punjabi Musalmans (1915, reprint, New Delhi: Manohar, 1991), List of Authorities Consulted.Google Scholar
26 Metcalf, Ideologies of the Raj, pp. 113–114, 116.
27 Omissi, David, “‘Martial Races”: Ethnicity and Security in Colonial India, 1858–1939’, War & Society, Vol. 9, No. 1 (1991), pp. 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Bates, Crispin, ‘Race, Caste, and Tribe in Central India: The Early Origins of Indian Anthropometry’, in Robb, Peter (ed.), The Concept of Race in South Asia (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 224.Google Scholar
29 Anderson, Legible Bodies, pp. 60–61, 183–186.
30 Robb, Peter, ‘South Asia and the Concept of Race’, in Robb, (ed.), The Concept of Race in South Asia, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
31 Bayly, Susan, ‘Caste and “Race” in the Colonial Ethnography of India’, in Robb, (ed.), The Concept of Race in South Asia, pp. 167–168Google Scholar.
32 Caplan, Lionel, “‘Bravest of the Brave”: Representations of “The Gurkha” in British Military Writings’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3 (1991), p. 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Streets, Martial Races, p. 8.
34 Chene, ‘Military Ethnology’, pp. 132–133.
35 The Gurkhas, Note by Lieut-Col. R. Sale Hill, with Addenda by C. Reid, Records of Chief Commands, 1865–76, Notes and Minutes by Lord Napier of Magdala, MSS.EUR.F.114, IOR, BL.
36 Veer, Imperial Encounters, pp. 150–153.
37 Caplan, Lionel, ‘Martial Gurkhas: The Persistence of a British Military Discourse on “Race”’, in Robb, (ed.), The Concept of Race in South Asia, pp. 267–268Google Scholar.
38 Rand, Gavin, “‘Martial Races” and “Imperial Subjects”: Violence and Governance in Colonial India, 1857–1914’, European Review of History, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2006), p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Caplan, “‘Bravest of the Brave”’, p. 573.
40 Caplan, Lionel, Warrior Gentleman: ‘Gurkhas’ in the Western Imagination (Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1995), p. 25.Google Scholar
41 Candler, Sepoy, p. 8.
42 Ibid., p. 9.
43 Barstow, Sikhs, p. 153.
44 MacMunn, G. F.The Martial Races of India (London: Sampson, Low, Marston & Co. Ltd., 1933), p. v.Google Scholar
45 Enloe, Cynthia H., Ethnic Soldiers: State Security in Divided Societies (Middlesex: Penguin, 1980), p. 25.Google Scholar
46 Enloe, Ethnic Soldiers, p. 26.
47 Shakespear, Sirmoor Rifles, p. 23. My translation is ‘Kill the enemies; victory goes to the Gurkhas’.
48 Hobsbawm, Eric, ‘Introduction: Inventing Traditions’, in Hobsbawm, and Ranger, Terence (eds), The Invention of Tradition (1983, reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar For details of how the British constructed martial traditions of the Rajputs, Gurkhas and Sikhs, see Roy, Kaushik, Brown Warriors of the Raj: Recruitment and the Mechanics of Command in the Sepoy Army, 1859–1913 (New Delhi: Manohar, 2008), pp. 190–222.Google Scholar
49 Shakespear, Sirmoor Rifles, p. 29.
50 Ibid., p. 37.
51 Streets, Martial Races, p. 10.
52 Enloe, Ethnic Soldiers, p. 26.
53 Enloe, Cynthia H., ‘Ethnicity in the Evolution of Asia's Armed Bureaucracies’, in Ellinwood, DeWitt C. and Enloe, (eds), Ethnicity and the Military in Asia (London: Transaction Books, 1981), pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
54 Hack, Karl and Rettig, Tobias, ‘Imperial Systems of Power, Colonial Forces and the makings of Modern Southeast Asia’, in Hack, and Rettig, (eds), Colonial Armies in Southeast Asia (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Taylor, Robert H., ‘Colonial Forces in British Burma: A National Army Postponed’, in Hack, and Rettig, (eds), Colonial Armies in Southeast Asia, p. 198Google Scholar.
56 Enloe, Ethnic Soldiers, p. 134.
57 Womack, Sarah, ‘Ethnicity and Martial Races: The Garde indigene of Cambodia in the 1880s and 1890s’, in Hack, and Rettig, (eds), Colonial Armies in Southeast Asia, pp. 107, 110–111.Google Scholar
58 Trevor-Roper, Hugh, ‘The Invention of Tradition: The Highland Tradition of Scotland’, in Hobsbawm, and Ranger, (eds), The Invention of Tradition, pp. 25–27Google Scholar; Streets, Martial Races, p. 1; Candler, Sepoy, p. 18.
59 Streets, Martial Races, pp. 2, 12.
60 George Hamilton to Elgin, 16 September 1897, no. 139, Reel no. 2, Hamilton Papers, Accession no. 1572, M/F, NAI.
61 Hamilton to Elgin, 16 November 1898, no. 228, Hamilton to Curzon, 5 January 1900, C126/2, Reel no. 1, Hamilton Papers.
62 Ellinwood, DeWitt C., ‘Ethnicity in a Colonial Asian Army: British Policy, War, and the Indian Army, 1914–18’, in Ellinwood, and Enloe, (eds), Ethnicity and the Military in Asia, pp. 91–92.Google Scholar
63 Constable, Philip, ‘The Marginalization of a Dalit Martial Race in Late Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Western India’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 60, No. 2 (2001), p. 443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64 Omissi “‘Martial Races”: Ethnicity and Security in Colonial India’, p. 8.
65 Caplan, Warrior Gentleman, p. 33; Northey and Morris, Gurkhas, Foreword, p. xxix.
66 Metcalf, Ideologies of the Raj, p. 113.
67 Gaylor, John, Sons of John Company: The Indian and Pakistan Armies, 1903–91 (1992, reprint, New Delhi: Lancer, 1993), p. 9.Google Scholar
68 Proceedings of the Army in India Committee, 1912 (Simla: Government Central Branch Press, 1913), vol. 1-A, Minority Report, pp. 1, 157.
69 Wikeley, Punjabi Musalmans, p. 1.
70 Ibid., pp. 2–3.
71 Gaylor, Sons of John Company, p. 188.
72 Northey and Morris, Gurkhas, Foreword, pp. xv–xvi.
73 Shakespear, Sirmoor Rifle, pp. 67, 73.
74 Caplan, Warrior Gentleman, p. 52.
75 Rosen, Stephen Peter, Societies and Military Power: India and Its Armies (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Roy, Kaushik, Hinduism and the Ethics of Warfare in South Asia: From Antiquity to the Present (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76 Ellinwood, ‘Ethnicity in a Colonial Asian Army: British Policy, War, and the Indian Army, 1914–18’, in Ellinwood and Enloe (eds), Ethnicity and the Military in Asia, p. 89.
77 Pradhan, S. D., ‘Indian Army and the First World War’, in Ellinwood, DeWitt C. and Pradhan, S. D. (eds), India and World War I (New Delhi: Manohar, 1978), pp. 51–53Google Scholar; The Army in India and its Evolution including an Account of the Establishment of the Royal Air Force in India (1924, reprint, New Delhi: Anmol Publications, 1985), p. 156.
78 India's Contribution to the Great War (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1923), p. 79.
79 Statistical Abstract of Information regarding the Armies at Home and Abroad, 1914–20, p. 785, L/MIL/17/5/2382, IOR, BL; Minority Report, pp. 120–121, 123–124, 130, 215; Proceedings of the Army in India Committee, 1912 (Simla: Government Central Branch Press, 1913), vol. 3, Minutes of Evidence, p. 538.
80 Kitchener to Brodrick, 3 December 1901, Y/5, Brodrick to Kitchener, 9 June 1904, Y/51, Reel no. 1, Kitchener Papers.
81 Kitchener to Brodrick, 25 April 1904, Y/166, Reel no. 2, Kitchener Papers.
82 Roberts to Kitchener, 14 July 1904, EI 27/2, Reel no. 2, Kitchener Papers.
83 Hamilton to Curzon, 15 August 1900, Reel no. 1, Hamilton Papers.
84 Army Committee, vol. 3, p. 552.
85 Minority Report, p. 18.
86 Robson (ed.), Roberts in India, p. 266.
87 Ellinwood, DeWitt C., ‘The Indian Soldier, the Indian Army, and Change, 1914–18’, in Ellinwood, and Pradhan, (eds), India and World War I, pp. 202–207.Google Scholar
88 Army Committee, vol. 3, p. 652.
89 Northey and Morris, Gurkhas, Foreword, pp. xxvii, xxix.
90 Caplan, Warrior Gentleman, pp. 32–34.
91 Mason, Philip, A Matter of Honour: An Account of the Indian Army, its Officers and Men (1974, reprint, Dehra Dun: EBD Publishers, 1988), pp. 405–453.Google Scholar
92 Yong, Tan Tai, The Garrison State: The Military, Government and Society in Colonial Punjab, 1849–1947 (New Delhi: Sage, 2005), p. 102.Google Scholar
93 Sir Rumbold, Algernon, Watershed in India: 1914–22 (London: Athlone Press, University of London, 1979), p. 20.Google Scholar
94 Indian Voices of the Great War, Soldiers’ Letters, 1914–18, Selected and Introduced by David Omissi (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 27–28.
95 McLain, Robert, ‘The Indian Corps on the Western Front: A Reconsideration’, in Jensen, Geoffrey and Wiest, Andrew (eds), War in the Age of Technology: Myriad Faces of Modern Armed Conflict (New York and London: New York University Press, 2001), pp. 167–193.Google Scholar
96 Recruiting in India before and during the War of 1914–18, p. 19, L/MIL/17/5/2152, IOR, BL.
97 Recruiting in India, pp. 19–20, 22, 73.
98 Wikeley, Punjabi Musalmans, p. 3.
99 Recruiting in India, pp. 22, 73.
100 Ibid., pp. 25, 73, 87.
101 O'Dwyer, Michael, India as I Knew it: 1885–1925 (1926, reprint, Delhi: Mittal Publications, 2004), p. 216.Google Scholar
102 Chaudhuri, Nirad C., ‘The Martial Races of India, Part III’, Modern Review, Vol. XLIX, No. 289 (1931), p. 69.Google Scholar
103 Mazumder, Rajit K., The Indian Army and the Making of Punjab (New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2003), p. 25.Google Scholar
104 Minority Report, 137
105 Recruiting in India, pp. 133, 144–145.
106 MacMunn, G. F., The Armies of India (1911, reprint, New Delhi: Heritage Publishers, 1991), p. 169.Google Scholar
107 Recruiting in India, p. 19.
108 Tai-Yong, Tan, ‘An Imperial Home-Front: Punjab and the First World War’, Journal of Military History, Vol. 64, No. 2 (2000), p. 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
109 Recruiting in India, pp. 21–24, 26, 74; Tai-Yong, ‘An Imperial Home-Front: Punjab’, pp. 398–401. According to Michael O'Dwyer the central recruiting board was set up in May 1917. Michael O'Dwyer, India as I Knew It, p. 220.
110 Banskota, Purushottam, The Gurkha Connection: A History of the Gurkha Recruitment in the British Indian Army (New Delhi: Nirala, 1994), pp. 122–125.Google Scholar
111 War Speeches of His Honour Sir Michael O'Dwyer, Lieutenant-Governor of Punjab (Lahore: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1918), pp. 17–18.
112 Morris, Major C. J., The Gurkhas: An Ethnology (1936, reprint, New Delhi: Low Price Publications, 1993), pp. 1, 5–6.Google Scholar
113 India's Contribution, p. 277.
114 Morris, Gurkhas, p. 3.
115 Captain Spaight, W. J. M., ‘The History of Gurkha Recruiting’, Journal of the United Service Institution of India, Vol. LXX, No. 299 (1940), p. 186.Google Scholar
116 Army Committee, vol. 3, p. 640.
117 Spaight, ‘Gurkha Recuiting’, p. 187.
118 Roy, Kaushik, ‘The Construction of Martial Race Culture in British-India and its Legacies in Post-Colonial South Asia’, in Bandopadhyay, Kaushik (ed.), Asia Annual 2008: Understanding Popular Culture (New Delhi: Manohar, 2010), p. 250.Google Scholar
119 Barstow, Sikhs, p. 93.
120 Minority Report, pp. 156–157.
121 Bonarjee, P. D., A Handbook of the Fighting Races of India (Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co., 1899), p. 13.Google Scholar
122 Barstow, Sikhs, p. 5.
123 Recruiting in India, p. 26.
124 Minority Report, 32–33.
125 Perry, F. W., The Commonwealth Armies: Manpower and Organisation in two World Wars (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
126 Army Committee, vol. 3, p. 536.
127 Recruiting in India, pp. 23–26.
128 India's Services in the War, 2 vols (1922, reprint, Delhi: Low Price Publications, 1993),
vol. 1, p. 32.
129 Recruiting in India, p. 25.
130 Pati, Budheswar, India and the First World War (New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, 1996), pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
131 Gaylor, Sons of John Company, p. 50.
132 India's Services, vol. 2, pp. 227–229, 232, 236–237.
133 India's Contribution, pp. 200, 277.
134 Cohen, Stephen P., ‘The Untouchable Soldier: Caste, Politics, and the Indian Army’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3 (1969), p. 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
135 Barstow, Sikhs, p. 78.
136 Omissi, David, The Sepoy and the Raj: The Indian Army, 1860–1940 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994), p. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
137 MacMunn, Martial Races, p. 9.
138 O'Moore Creagh, General, Indian Studies (London: Hutchinson & Co., n.d.), p. 233.Google Scholar
139 Recruitment in India, Appendix 19, L/WS/1/136, IOR, BL.
140 India's Services, vol. 1, pp. 23, 43; Total Contribution in Men and Casualties suffered by India during the War, 21 November. 1918, CAB/24/70, TNA, Kew, UK.
141 Nirad C. Chaudhuri, ‘The Martial Races of India, Part II’, Modern Review Vol. XLVIII, No. 285 (1930), p. 295.
142 Army in India, p. 219.
143 Hew Strachan, ‘The First World War as a Global War’, First World War Studies Vol. 1, No. 1 (2010), p. 8.
144 Statistical Abstract, p. 715.
145 Ellinwood, ‘The Indian Soldier, the Indian Army, and Change, 1914–1918’, in Ellinwood and Pradhan (eds), India and World War I, p. 177; Army Committee, vol. 3, p. 548.
146 Lieutenant-Colonel Sharma, Gautam, Nationalisation of the Indian Army: 1885–1947 (New Delhi: Allied Publishers, 1996), pp. 37, 105Google Scholar.