This paper was presented at the Fourth International Seminar on Indo-Portuguese History, Lisbon, 11–16 November 1985.

¹ With an introduction and notes by Guerreiro, A. Machado. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional—Casa da Moeda, 1974.Google Scholar

² Ibid., xxxi.

³ Lisbon: Sociedade Propagadora dos Conhecimentos Úteis, 1842.Google Scholar

⁴ With an introduction by Machado, Augusto Reis. Lisbon: Agência Geral das Colonias, 1944.Google Scholar

⁵ Op. cit., xvi.Google Scholar

⁶ Maria, LuisGraça, Pedrosa dos Santos, ‘Um documento inédito para a biografia do Padre Manuel Godinho’, Portugaliae Historica 2 (Lisbon, 1974), 325–30. The transcription of the MS is not quite satisfactory.Google Scholar

⁷ Correia-Afonso, John, ‘Some Portuguese Records on the Cession of Bombay’, The Indian Archives, 27 (New Delhi, 1978), 1–11.Google Scholar

⁸ Ibid., 6–10.

⁹ Regarding the actual territory ceded by the King of Portugal to the King of England and the dispute in the matter, cf. David, M. D., History of Bombay, 1661–1708 (Bombay, 1973), 49–51.Google ScholarHacke's, WilliamA Description of…;India &c (1700), which we consulted in the British Library, contains an interesting hand-drawn coloured chart of Goa, with the legend ‘The City of Goa all its dependencies doth justly belong to the crown of England by the marriage of King Charles the Second with Queen Catherine’. One cannot blame the Portuguese Governor for being wary of English claims!Google Scholar

¹⁰ Antonio de Mello de Castro fought a delaying action. In order to gain time to represent to the King of Portugal his case for the retention of Bombay, he challenged the credentials of Sir Abraham Shipman who had been commissioned by Charles II to take possession of Bombay. Cf. David, , History of Bombay, 39–64.Google Scholar

¹¹ This was not just a hypothetical situation. Goa at this time was more than once blockaded by the Dutch. Cf. Boxer, C. R., Portuguese India in the Mid-Seventeenth Century (Delhi, 1980), 34, 40–1 and passim.Google Scholar

¹² It was a sign of the decline of Portuguese power that the newly-appointed Governor of Goa, Antonio de Mello de Castro (later given the title of Viceroy), should have to make the voyage to India in 1662 with the English fleet under the command of James Ley, third Earl of Marlborough. He sailed in the Leopard, Captain Richard Minors commanding, and unfortunately their relations were less than cordial (cf. David, , History of Bombay, 37–8).Google Scholar

¹³ Correia-Afonso, ‘Some Portuguese Records’, 10. The Governor finally complied with his king's clear and firm orders, and Bombay was handed over to Humphrey Cooke on 8 February 1665. The Governor (now Viceroy) returned to Portugal in 1667 and died in 1689.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Vol. I, Estado da India, Tomo I (Lisbon, 1978).Google Scholar

¹⁵ A part of the document appears in translation in Correia-Afonso, John, ‘Manuel Godinho's alternatives to the Carreira da India’, in de Souza, Teotonio R. (ed.), Indo-Portuguese History, Old Issues, New Questions (New Delhi, 1985), 84–9.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Op. cit., xiii.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Archivum Romanum Societatis Iesu (ARSI) Lus. 75, f. 75 v.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Fr. Nuno da Cunha had been Assistant to the Jesuit Superior General in Rome, 1646–1649, and was much respected in Portugal. Fr. John Paul Oliva had been selected Vicar-General in the Society of Jesus on 7 June 1661 to assist the ailing Superior General, Fr. Goswin Nickel and succeed him on his death, 31 July 1664.Google Scholar

¹⁹ ARSI Lus 37, F. 34iv.Google Scholar