Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:15:02.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of the Forest in Colonial Malaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

T. N. Harper
T. N. Harper
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The notion that tribal peoples are destructive of the forest environment is not a new one. The political struggles that fostered it are only just beginning to engage the attention of historians. This essay is a preliminary exploration of the experience of the indigenous minorities—the Orang Asli—of peninsular Malaysia during the period of colonial rule. It examines their relationship to the society outside the forest. The politics of the forest it addresses are not narrowly environmental. Indeed, what follows is based on the assumption that the relationship of the aborigines to their environment was transformed, not so much by the changing ecological conditions of the forest as the colonial economy expanded, but by the changing political circumstances of the frontier as the Orang Asli were drawn into a widening orbit of relations with external powers. ‘Orang Asli’ means literally ‘original people’. It is a polite term that took on a legal status from the 1950s. Before then, in common parlance, the aborigines were ‘Sakai‘—a derogatory term synonymous with ‘slave’. The term Orang Asli encompasses three basic types of communities: the Negritos, nomadic hunters and gatherers of the northern forests; the Senoi —whose two main subdivisions, the Temiar and the Semai, together make up the larger part of the Orang Asli population of the central highlands, following more settled forms of swidden agriculture; and the proto-Malays of the south, fishermen and cultivators with a more similar economy to neighbouring Malays.1 Their shared history has become an issue of great sensitivity in modern Malaysia, and Malaysian politicians have in recent years bitterly questioned the legitimacy of western criticism of the present circumstances of the Orang Asli. To explain why this is so, I want to examine the preoccupations of British administration during the period when it was trustee of the forests of the peninsula and directly responsible for the welfare of their inhabitants. Three themes dominate the discussion that follows.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 1 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For an introduction to the Orang Asli see Williams-Hunt, P. D. R., An Introduction to the Malayan Aborigines (Kuala Lumpur 1952)Google Scholar and Carey, Iskander, The Orang Asli: The Aboriginal Tribes of Peninsular Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur, 1976).Google Scholar

2 Noone, R. O. D., ‘Notes on the trade in blowpipes and blowpipe bamboo in north Malaya’, Federation Museums Journal, n.s. I (1954–1955), pp. 1–18;Google ScholarEndicott, K. M., ‘Brief report on the Semaq Beri of Pahang’, FMJ, n.s. XX (1975), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

3 Discussed in Dunn, F. L., Rain-forest Collectors and Traders: A Study of Resource Utilization in Modern and Ancient Malaya (Monographs of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, No. 5, Kuala Lumpur, 1975), pp. 114–16;Google ScholarLeary, John D., ‘Orang Asli contacts with the Malays, Portuguese and Dutch in peninsular Malaya from 1400–1700’, Asian Studies Review, 18, 2 (1994), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar

4 Andaya, B. W. and Andaya, L. Y., A History of Malaysia (London, 1982), pp. 80–113.Google Scholar

5 Logan, L. R., ‘Five days in Naning, with a walk to the foot of Gunong Datu in Rambau’, Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia, III (1849), p. 24.Google Scholar

6 For example, Maxwell, W. E., ‘The aboriginal tribes of Perak’, Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, IV (1879), pp. 46–50.Google Scholar

7 Couillard, M.-A., ‘The Malays and the “Sakai”: some comments on their social relations in the Malay peninsula’, Kajian Malaysia, II (1984), pp. 81–108;Google ScholarDodge, N., ‘The Malay-aborigine nexus under Malay rule’, Bijdragen Tot de Taal- land- en Volkenkunde, 137, 1 (1981), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

8 Endicott, Kirk M., ‘The effects of the slave raiding on the aborigines of the Malay peninsula’, in Reid, Anthony (ed.), Slavery, Bondage and Dependency in Southeast Asia (Brisbane, 1983), pp. 216–45.Google Scholar

9 For a discussion of Temiar country see, Benjamin, G., ‘Headmanship and leadership in Temiar society’, Federation Museums Journal, n.s. XIII (1969), pp. 1–43.Google Scholar

10 Favre, P., ‘An account of the wild tribes inhabiting the Malayan peninsula, Sumatra and a few neighbouring islands’, JIA & EA, II (1848), pp. 254–5.Google Scholar

11 Von Mikhulo-Maclay, N., ‘Ethnographical excursions in the Malay peninsula— November 1874 to October 1875’, JSBRAS, II (1878), p. 215—emphasis in original.Google Scholar

12 Swettenham, Sir Frank, cited in B. W. Andaya and L. Y. Andaya, A History of Malaysia, p. 207.Google Scholar

13 Cant, R. G., An Historical Geography of Pahang (Kuala Lumpur, 1972), p. 100, 29.Google Scholar

14 Hwa, Cheng Siok, ‘The rice industry in Malaya: an historical survey’, Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, XLII, 2 (1969), pp. 130–44.Google Scholar

15 Enclosures on Sel/Sec/6443/1900; file series from Arkib Negara Malaysia.Google Scholar

16 Minutes on Sel.Sec/2852/1895.Google Scholar

17 D. O. Kuala Lumpur, minute 27.11.1901, Sel.Sec/6580/01.Google Scholar

18 State Forest Officer to Director of Forests, 8.7.1931, DF/500/31; A.D.O. Gopeng to D.O. Kinta, Perak FO/171/22.Google Scholar

19 State Forest Officer Selangor to Directory of Forestry, 16.3.1936, DF/200/36.Google Scholar

20 High Commissioner, minute, 5.7.1941, Ibid.

21 Windsor, C. J. to Commissioner for the Wild Animal Protection Committee, 26.2.1931, DO Pekan/250/31.Google Scholar

22 Minutes on Perak FO/256/27.Google Scholar

23 ‘Shifting cultivation in Tapah Hills Reserve’, 1.5.1939, DF/259/39.Google Scholar

24 Carson, G. L., ‘A brief investigation into the ladang workings of the Sakai in Sungei Kinta Catchment area, Kinta Hills Forest Reserve’, 1.5.1939, DF/259/39.Google Scholar

25 Discussed in Benjamin, , ‘Headmanship and leadership’, pp. 25–7.Google Scholar

26 State Forest Officer Perak, 15.7.1946, DF/259/39.Google Scholar

27 For an account of the Methodists see, Nathalie, and Means, Paul B., And the Seed Grew (Singapore, 1981).Google Scholar

28 C. L. R., ‘Propaganda amongst aboriginals’, 21.5.1938, DF/328/37.Google Scholar

29 H. D. Noone, minute, 31.8.1938, Ibid.

30 ‘Report upon application for agricultural land—Kassim binLompat’; ‘Minutes of the 160th meeting of the State Council Pahang, 15.9.1937’; Pekan, D. O. to British Resident Pahang, 26.4.1939, British Resident Pahang/829/39.Google Scholar

31 ‘Forest Department Weekly Situation Report for week ending 20.10.1945’, BMA/DEPT/11/3.Google Scholar

32 Loch, A. J., minute, 4.6.1938, Malayan Union/4949/47.Google Scholar

33 For example in Cheraka, Bukit reserve in Selangor, ‘Forest Department— Weekly Situation Report’ week ending 13.10.1945, BMA/DEPT/11/3.Google Scholar

34 Kangsar, D. O. Kuala, minute, 3.2.1948, PK.SEC/2777/47.Google Scholar

35 A. Kangsar, D. O. Kuala, ‘Census of Sakai’, 29.11.1947, KKLO/77/47.Google Scholar

36 Enclosure in RC.SEL/677/46.Google Scholar

37 Frazer and Neave, soft drinks company, experimented with orang asli bottle protectors, Maby, D. A., ‘Rehabilitation of Sakai’, 3.5.1946, DO Larut/239/46.Google Scholar

38 Protector of Aborigines to Kajang, D. O., 5.4.1946, RC.SEL/677/46.Google Scholar

39 ‘The population census problem’, Utusan Melayu, 5.12.1946.Google Scholar

40 Protector of Aborigines to Kajang, D. O., 5.4.1946, RC.SEL/677/46.Google Scholar

41 Diary of Speldewinde, D., 5.7.1948, DF/375/46.Google Scholar

42 Dodwell, G. C., ‘Aboriginal tribes in Tanjong Malim Sub-district’, 20.12.1948, Dodwell papers, RHO.Google Scholar

43 State Forest Officer, Perak, 28.10.1941, DF/57/40.Google Scholar

44 Minute, 7.6.1946; Kangsar, D. O. Kuala, minute, 13.10.1947, in KKLO/112/47.Google Scholar

45 Noone, Richard, Rape of the Dream People, (London, 1972), p p. 150–5.Google Scholar

46 Dodwell, G. C., ‘Aboriginal tribes in Tanjong Malim Sub-district’, 20.12.1948, Dodwell papers, Rhodes House, Oxford.Google Scholar

47 Diary of D. Speldewinde, 24.11.1947, DF/375/46.Google Scholar

48 Zainal Adibin bin Haji Abas to Deputy Chief Secretary, 6.4.1948; A.D.O. Selama, minute, May, 1948, DOL/789/48.Google Scholar

49 Described in Holman, Denis, Noone of the Ulu, RichardNoone, Rape of the Dream People.Google Scholar

50 Gouldsbury, Pamela, Jungle Nurse (London, 1960), pp. 138–9.Google Scholar

51 Malay Mail, 22.8.1949.Google Scholar

52 ‘Massacre at Ulu Kenyor’, Pemloi Gah: Orang Asli news, I (12 1990).Google Scholar

53 Leary, John, The Importance of the Orang Asli in the Malayan Emergency, 1948–1960 (Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash, Working Paper No. 56, 1989), pp. 17–20;Google ScholarJones, Alun, ‘The orang asli: an outline of their progress in modern Malaya’, Journal of Southeast Asian History, IX (1968), p. 301.Google Scholar

54 Daily Worker, 28.4.1952.Google Scholar

55 For the ambiguities of this situation, see Gouldsbury, , Jungle Nurse, pp. 51–4.Google Scholar

56 Leary, , The Importance of the Orang Asli, p. 8.Google Scholar

57 Straits Times, 1.8.1954.Google Scholar

58 ‘Statement taken by MajorWilliams-Hunt, P. D. R. at Paya Senayan, Lipat Kajang Mukim, Temerloh District, Pahang from Batin MAT headman of a Semaq Semang community and from TAN, another of the same group at the same place’, DO Temerloh/92/50.Google Scholar

59 Noone, , Rape of the Dream People, pp. 150–5.Google Scholar

60 MRSA, July 1954, CO 1030/7, Public Record Office, London.Google Scholar

61 Williams-Hunt, to del Tufo, n.d., FS./12072/50.Google Scholar

62 Ayoub, Raja, ‘Note’, 28.4.1950, FS/12665/50.Google Scholar

63 Segar, Karim bin Alang and Rahman, Zainal bin Abdul, ‘Report of a survey of aborigines groups in Trengganu—June 1956’, DO Kuantan/458/52; R. O. D. Noone to State Secretary Trengganu, 25.7.1956.Google Scholar For an account of a similar survey in Kelantan see Slimming, John, Temiar Jungle: A Malayan Journey (London, 1958).Google Scholar

64 Muda, Alias bin to Advisor on Aborigines, 9.1.1956;Google ScholarBiles, H. F. to State Secretary Pahang, 24.1.1956, DO Kuantan/458/52;Google ScholarSingapore Standard, 16.10.1956.Google Scholar

65 Straits Times, 30.3.1954.Google Scholar

66 The development of these administrative practices is well-described in Walker, Anthony R., ‘In mountain and ulu: a comparative history of development strategies for ethnic minority peoples in Thailand and Malaysia’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, IV 4(1983), 451–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

67 ‘Duties of Capt. E. G. Edney Hayter—Protector of Aborigines’, copy in DO Temerloh/365/49.Google Scholar

68 Williams-Hunt, P. D. R., ‘Anthropology from the air’, Man, LXIII, (1949), pp. 49–51;Google ScholarStraits Times, 22.4.1953.Google Scholar

69 See Williams-Hunt, P. D.R., An Introduction to the Malayan Aborigines.Google Scholar

70 Straits Times, 9.4.1953.Google Scholar

71 Jones, , ‘The orang asli’, pp. 297–301;Google ScholarMeans, Gordon P., ‘The orang asli: aboriginal policies in Malaya’, Pacific Affairs, XXXVIII, 4 (1985), pp. 644–5;Google ScholarPolunin, Dr Ivan, reported in Straits Times, 13.10.1950.Google Scholar

72 Straits Times, 11.1.1957.Google Scholar

73 Miller, , Jungle War in Malaya, pp. 151–3.Google Scholar

74 Straits Times, 15.9.1954; 13.11.1953; Noone, Rape of the Dream People, p. 181; Department of the Adviser of Aborigines, Circular Memorandum No. 14, ‘Clothing and the aborigines’, Sel Sec/1411/50.Google Scholar

75 Malay Mail, 12.3.1954.Google Scholar

76 ‘Suggested policy for aboriginal advancement: 1. Arts and crafts', FS/123542/50.Google Scholar

77 Malay Mail, 15.2.1950.Google Scholar

78 Williams-Hunt to Deputy Chief Secretary, 1.3.1950, FS/12354/50.Google Scholar

79 ‘Suggested policies for aboriginal advancement: 1. Arts and crafts’, Ibid.

80 Department of the Adviser of Aborigines, Circular Memorandum No. 15, ‘Some notes on a suggested policy for aboriginal advancement’, September 1950, Sel Sec/ 1411/50.Google Scholar

81 ‘Confidential memo from Advisor on Aborigines, Federation of Malaya: Aboriginal policy’, FS/12663/50.Google Scholar

82 Williams-Hunt to Deputy Chief Secretary, 13.10.1950, FS/12354/50.Google Scholar

83 Straits Times, 2.11.1953;Google ScholarMalay Mail, 6.11.1953;Google ScholarBlacking, John, ‘Aborigines must be set free from Reds’, Malay Mail, 2.11.1953.Google Scholar

84 ‘Department of Aborigines—Suggested long term policy towards the aborigines’, 29.10.1955, DF/787/54.Google Scholar

85 Malay Mail, 27.1.1954.Google Scholar

86 Straits Times, 28.1.1954.Google Scholar

87 P.A.S.(B) to Williams-Hunt, 6.6.1950, FS/12865/50.Google Scholar

88 Shrubshall, E. J. to State Forest Officer, Pahang, 18.1.1955, DF/787/54.Google Scholar

89 ‘Precis (Executive Council, 12.1.1955): Aboriginal Reserve at Langkap’, Ibid.

90 R. O. D. Noone, ‘A note on the conflict of interest between the Forestry Department and the Department of Aborigines as exemplified by the Forest Enactment Cap. 153 and the Aboriginal Peoples Ordinance Cap. 3/1954’, 24.3.1956, Ibid.

91 Colin Marshall to State Secretary, Perak, 23.10.1956, Ibid..

92 ‘Rights in the Forest Reserves of Sakais’; State Forest Officer, Perak to Protector of Aborigines, Perak, 28.1.1956; 21.2.1956, Ibid.

93 Colin Marshall, ‘Perak State Aborigines Advisory Board—Comments on memorandum by the Protector of Aborigines’, 1.4.1957, Ibid.

94 Hiley, A., minute, 24.4.1956;Google ScholarPadang, D. O. Batang, minute, 25.7.1956;Google ScholarCorfield, R. C., ‘Aborigine cultivation in forest reserves’, 28.3.1957;Google ScholarMarshall, Colin, ‘Uncontrolled aboriginal cultivation in forests reserve’, 20.4.1957;Google Scholar Colin Marshall, minute, 17.6.1956, Ibid.

95 F. S. Walker to Director of Forestry, 29.6.1956, Ibid.

96 Carson, G. L., ‘A brief investigation into the ladang workings of the sakai in Sungei Kinta Catchment Area, Kinta Hills F.R.’, 24.7.1938, DF/351/38, ANM.Google Scholar

97 ‘Comments by the Acting Director of Forestry of paper ref. G/54/3B by the Department of Aborigines on the conflict of interests between the two Departments’, 7.7.1956, DF/787/54.Google Scholar

98 D. S. P. Noakes, Director of Forestry, ‘Memorandum’, 14.5.1957, Ibid.

99 State Forest Officer, Negri Sembilan and Malacca to Director of Forests, 5.8.1955;Google Scholar E. J. Shrubshall to State Forest Officer, Negri Sembilan and Malacca, 26.11.1954, Ibid.

100 ‘White Squatter’ by ‘Amynedd’, Malay Mail, 12.3.1949.Google Scholar

101 State Secretary, Selangor, ‘Appointment of Sakai headmen’, 1.6.1950;Google ScholarMubin Sheppard to State Secretary, 14.12.1949 and Williams-Hunt's reply, 16.1.1950;Google Scholar‘A note on the recognition and appointment of headmen for aboriginal ethnic groups and communities’, July 1950, Sel Sec/2907/49.Google Scholar

102 Singapore Standard, 18.9.1954.Google Scholar

103 Malay Mail, 21.7.1953; 21.7.1956.Google Scholar

104 Singapore Standard, 13.12.1957.Google Scholar

105 Straits Times, 14.7.1957.Google Scholar

106 Straits Times, 22.8.1956;Google ScholarMalay Mail, 11.12.1956.Google Scholar

107 Redwood, J. to State Secretary, Selangor, 19.7.1952, Sel Sec/2597/51.Google Scholar

108 ‘Notes of the nineteenth meeting of the Chief Secretary'sCoordinating Committee of representatives of churches, missionary bodies, and voluntary organizations held on 6.8.1954’;Google Scholar‘Twentieth meeting of the Chief Secretary's Co-ordinating Committee …. 8.10.1954’, BA Pahang/29/52/Part I.Google Scholar

109 Asli, Jabatan Hal Ehwal Orang, Statement of Policy regarding the administration of the Orang Asli of Peninsular Malaysia, (Kuala Lumpur, 1961).Google Scholar For the ambiguities of these policy pronouncements, which still stand today, see Jones, Alun, ‘The Orang Asli: an outline of their progress in modern Malaya’, Journal of Southeast Asian History, IX (1968), pp. 301–5;Google ScholarMeans, Gordon P., ‘The Orang Asli: aboriginal policies in Malaysia’, Pacific Affairs, XXXVIII, 4 (1985), pp. 637–52;Google ScholarMcKellan, Susan, ‘Orang Asli: an analysis of state penetration and development plans on aboriginal peoples of West Malaysia’, Review of Indonesian and Malayan Studies, XIX, 2 (1985), pp. 80–112;Google Scholarand from a legal aspect, Hooker, M. B., ‘The Orang Asli and the laws of Malaysia: with special reference to land’, unpublished paper, Simposium Ketiga, Mengenai Kehidupan Sosial dan Pembangunan Masyarakat Orang Asli di Semenanjung Malaysia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 1990.Google Scholar