Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:11:16.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy and Reality in Riparian South Asia: British Famine Policy and Migration in Colonial North India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Christopher V. Hill
Christopher V. Hill
Affiliation:
Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The assumption of the passive peasant in Indian history has been existent at least since the time of Max Weber, and continues to return, phoenix-like in its appearance, every few decades. Its importance, however, lies in the responses the generality spawns. Morris D. Morris refuted Max Weber's thesis, detailed in The Religions of India, in 1967, while Barrington Moore, Jr.'s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy was aptly rebutted by Kathleen Gough in 1974. Since then, the concept of the rational peasant, particularly during colonial times, has undergone a metamorphosis. Various modes of peasant dynamics have been amply demonstrated in recent works, stepping into the realms of peasant rebellion, desertion, banditry, and the like. Of particular import, in terms of peasant consciousness, has been the rise of the ‘Subaltern School’ of study. Beginning with Ranajit Guha's seminal work, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India, and continuing with volumes of articles by a variety of authors, the Subaltern Studies group has attempted, in their own words, to offer an alternative to historical writing ‘that fails to acknowledge, far less interpret, the contributions made by the people on their own, that is independently of the elite.…’ These scholars thus use the term subaltern for those social groups which they believe have been ignored through the course of history.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , May 1991 , pp. 263 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 The two most important works of this genre are Weber, Max, The Religions of India (Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1958)Google Scholar; and Moore, Barrington Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966).Google Scholar

3 Morris, Morris D., ‘Values as an Obstacle to Economic Growth in South Asia: An Historical Survey,’ The Journal of Economic History XXVII, 4 (12 1967), pp. 588–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarGough, Kathleen, ‘Indian Peasant Uprisings,’ Economic and Political Weekly IX, 32–34 (08 1974), pp. 1391–412.Google Scholar

4 Guha, Ranajit, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google ScholarGuha, Ranajit (ed.), Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society, vols I-V (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1982–1987).Google Scholar

5 Guha, Ranajit, ‘On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India,’ Subaltern Studies 1, p. 3. Emphasis in the original.Google Scholar

6 Yang, Anand A., The Limited Raj: Agrarian Relations in Colonial India, Saran District 1793–1920 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), pp. 181–224.Google ScholarHirschman's, original argument may be found in his Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

7 Arnold, David, ‘Famine in Peasant Consciousness and Peasant Action: Madras, 1876–8,’ in Guha, Ranajit (ed.), Subaltern Studies III, 1984, pp. 62–115.Google Scholar

8 Hunter, W. W., A Statistical Account of Bengal: Vol. XV, Districts of Monghyr and Purneah (London: Trubner and Co., 1877), p. 33.Google Scholar

9 For more on this environmental phenomenon, see Hill, Christopher V., ‘Santhal Bataidars in Purnia District: The Evolution of the Sharecropping System,’ Economic and Political Weekly XXII, 34 (08 22, 1987), pp. 1450–4.Google Scholar

10 ‘Report on the Condition of the Lower Classes of Population in Bengal,’ vol. L/E/7/185, India Office Library and Records, 1888. This document is commonly known as the Dufferin Report.Google Scholar

11 Miller, Kerby A., Emigrants and Exiles: Ireland and the Irish Exodus to North America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985). p. 18.Google Scholar

12 Miller, , Emigrants and Exiles, Part One. The quotation is from pp. 50–1.Google Scholar

13 Trevelyan, Charles, quoted in Miller, Emigrants and Exiles, p. 283.Google Scholar

14 Bennett, John W., The Ecological Transition: Cultural Anthropology and Human Adaptation (New York: Pergamon Press, 1976), p. 198.Google Scholar

15 Miller, , Emigrants and Exiles, pp. 280–97Google Scholar; Black, R. D. Collison, Economic Thought and the Irish Question, 1817–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960), pp. 226–35.Google Scholar

16 ‘Report on the Condition of the Lower Classes of Population in Bengal’.

17 Beames, John, Memoirs of a Bengal Civilian (London: Chatto and Windus, 1961), p. 232.Google Scholar

18 Richard Temple, ‘Reclamation of Culturable Waste Lands in the Durbhanga Estate, the Julpigoree District, and the Palimow Pergunnah.’ Minute of the Lieutenant Governor of Bengal, 18 May 1875. Government of Bengal Revenue Department, Land Revenue Branch, File No. 7 of 1875, Bihar State Archives.Google Scholar

19 Yang, Anand A., ‘Peasants on the Move: A Study of Internal Migration in India,’ Journal of Interdisciplinary History, X, 1 (Summer 1979), p. 39.Google Scholar

20 Bengal Revenue Proceedings, Vol. 309, 1876–1878, India Office Library and Records.Google Scholar

21 Ibid.

22 Ibid.

23 Bengal Revenue Proceedings, vol. 2801,March-April 1886.Google Scholar

24 Bengal Revenue Proceedings, vol. 4734,January–March 1895.Google Scholar

25 Yang, Anand A., ‘An Institutional Shelter: The Court of Wards in Late Nineteenth-Century Bihar,’ Modern Asian Studies 13, 2 (1979), pp. 247–64. The direct quote is from p. 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Temple, ‘Reclamation of Culturable Waste Lands in Durbhanga Estate.’

27 ‘Report on the Condition of the Lower Classes of Population in Bengal.’

28 Yang, , ‘Peasants on the Move,’ p. 37.Google Scholar

29 Byrne, J., Survey and Settlement Operations in the District of Purnea (1901–1908) (Calcutta: The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, 1910), p. 3.Google Scholar

30 Somers, George E., The Dynamics of Santal Tradition in a Peasant Society (New Delhi: Abhinav Publications, 1977), p. 42.Google Scholar

31 Somers, , Dynamics of Santal Tradition, p. 43.Google Scholar

32 Guha's, RanajitElementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency is the definitive study of peasant consciousness in the Santhal Rebellion.Google Scholar

33 Bengal Revenue Proceedings, vol. 7575,Oct.-Dec. 1907.Google Scholar

34 Bose, N. L., Final Report on the Survey and Settlement Operations of the Kosi Diara Area in the District of Purnea, 1923–26, p. 7. Printed Report of the Bihar State Board of Revenue Library and Records.Google Scholar

35 Government of Bihar Law Department, Special Laws Applicable to the Santal Parganas (Patna: Superintendent of the Secretariat Press, Bihar, 1965), p. 87.Google Scholar

36 Bengal Revenue Proceedings, vol. 8413, 1910.Google Scholar

37 Bengal Revenue Proceedings, vol. 7575,Oct.-Dec. 1907.Google Scholar

38 N. P. Thadani, ‘Report on the Agrarian Trouble in Dhamdaha and Dharahara Police Stations in Purnea District,’ in ‘Confidential Correspondence Concerning Santhal Agitation in Purnea, 1940,’ unlisted Political Special File of the Bihar State Archives. Hereafter referred to as Santhal Agitation File.

39 Bihar and Orissa Revenue Proceedings, vol. 11831, 1930, India Office Library and Records.Google Scholar

40 Bengal Revenue Proceedings, vol. 8413, 1910.Google Scholar

41 ‘Proceedings of a Meeting of Maliks and Bataidars of the Dhamdaha, Dharahara and Rupauli Area where there are Agrarian Troubles,’ Santhal Agitation File.Google Scholar

42 Confidential D. O. no. 190C, 12 May 1940, Santhal Agitation File.Google Scholar

43 Confidential D. O. no. 524/1. G., 18 May 1940, Santhal Agitation File.Google Scholar

44 Chakrabortty, S. K., Final Report on the Revisional Survey and Settlement Operations in the District of Purnea (1952–1960) (Printed Record of the Bihar State Board of Revenue Library and Records).Google Scholar

45 The Village Notes, Dhamdaha Thana, 1955, Village no. 136, Rupaspur Khaga; no. 138, Dhamdaha; no. 185, Bhawanipur Rajdhan. Purnia District Record Room.Google Scholar

46 Chakrabortty, S. K., Report on the 1952–60 Survey and Settlement, p. 189.Google Scholar

47 Searchlight, Patna, November 29, 1971.Google Scholar

48 Beames, , Memoirs, p. 232.Google Scholar

49 Arnold, , ‘Famine in Peasant Consciousness,’ pp. 104–5.Google Scholar

50 Ibid, pp. 112–13.