Article contents
A Partition of Contingency? Public Discourse in Bengal, 1946–1947
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2009
Abstract
The historiography on the Partition of Bengal has tended to see it as a culmination of long-term trends of Hindu and Muslim communalism within the province. This essay offers a counter-narrative to the ‘inevitability’ of the Partition by focusing on Bengali public discourse in the months leading up to the Partition. The possibility of a division generated a large-scale debate amongst the educated in Bengal and they articulated their views by sending numerous letters to leading newspapers, district political and civic organizations and sometimes published pamphlets for local consumption. A critical examination of these public debates for and against Partition reveals the countdown to August 1947 as a period of multiple possibilities. Rather than being pre-determined, the stands for a separate or a United Bengal were contingent in nature. Understanding the genesis provides the starting point and the necessary corrective to evaluate India's path to post-colonial nationhood.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
Bibliography
Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi
All India Congress Committee Papers
All India Hindu Mahasabha Papers
Shyama Prasad Mookerjee Papers
L/Public and Judicial (P&J)/7
L/P& J/8
Amrita Bazar Patrika (Calcutta)
Ananda Bazar Patrika (Calcutta)
Hindustan Standard (Calcutta)
The Statesman (Calcutta)
- 4
- Cited by