Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:28:42.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maintaining the Military Districts: Civil—Military Integration and District Soldiers' Boards in the Punjab, 1919–1939

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Tai Yong Tan
Tai Yong Tan
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The vital importance of the Indian Army as the guardian of the imperial order in India was never more evident than during the interwar years. The period from 1919 to the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939 was a testing time for the Raj; state authority was being challenged by a mounting nationalist movement, and public order was frequently disrupted by civil disobedience campaigns, as well as recurrent outbreaks of communal violence. In maintaining public order the colonial state had always been prepared to rely on that ultimate guarantee of its authority and power–the Indian Army. However, in frequent discussions of the deployment of the military in 'aid of civil power', the continued loyalty of the bulk of the army the Indian soldiers and officers, was never questioned, and seemed to be taken for granted.2 Yet, both the Government of India and the to be taken for granted.2 Yet, both the Government of India and the Army Headquarters were well awar that the 'loyalty' of the Army could never be guaranteed, and that it was conditional upon a stable and pacified recruiting base; if that base were to be 'subverted', then the Indian Army, or portions of it, would not only cease to be of use as an instrument of state power, but could ultimately pose a threat to the Raj itself

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , October 1994 , pp. 833 - 874
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For discussions on official thinking concerning the role of the Indian Army in defending and holding the Indian empire, see Clayton, Anthony, The British Empire as Superpower (London, 1986), pp. 32–8;Google Scholar and Major-General Gwynn, C., Imperial Policing (London, 1939).Google Scholar

2 See for example discussions by chatfield's Committee in its Report, 1939, OIOR: L/MIL/5/886.

3 See for example note by SirMarris, William S., Sec. Gol, Home Dept, 19 Dec. 1919, Gol, Home (Pol), ‘B’, pro. 76, Jan. 1920, NAI. In a sense, this was indicative of the continued influence of the 1857 Rebellion in official thinking in colonial India.Google Scholar

4 The Punjab had long been the critical area where the battle for the loyalty of the Indian Army was to be waged and home to about two-thrids of the combatants of the Army during the inter-war years, and a substantial number of ex-servicemen. By 1927, if Gurkhas were excluded from the Indian Army, Punjabis accounted for 60 per cent of the total strength of the Indian Army. British officials recognized that the Punjab was a province of key military importance, and as long as it, and especially the military districts, remained loyal and pacified, the British could rely on the Indian Army, and ‘could face with confidence any situation that might arise in the other provinces’. See Sir Henry Craik to M. H. Brabourne, 10 Sept. 1938 in Linlithgow's Papers, OIOR: MSS EUR F.125/87; and Sir Malcolm Hailey to sir Frederick Hirtzel, 13 Nov. 1924, in Hailey's Papers, OIOR: MSS EUR E.220/6c.

5 Report of Committee Appointed to Investigate the Disturbances in the Punjab, 1920 (Hunter's Commission: Disorders Enquiry Committee, Report and Evidence). pp, 1920, Cmd 681, vol. XLV.Google Scholar

6 Ibid.

7 The General Officer Commanding Lahore Divisional Area reported claims of bad treatment by soldiers on demobilization; some even reported that they were deprived of their kits and clothes and ordered to clear the cantonments or they would be handed over to the police. GoI, Home (Pol), ‘B’ File 373, Feb. 1920. List of grievances of demobilized soldiers submitted by Umar Hayat Khan to Punjab Soldiers’ Board, 7 June 1919, in Punjab Government Home (Military) Proceedings, hereafter PHP(M), Punjab Archives, Lahore, Pakistan, ‘B’, pro 72, June 1920.

8 Note by Major H. S. L. Wolley, Divisional Recruiting Officer, Jullunder Division, to Adjutant General, 17 June 1919, PHP(M), ‘B’ File 127B, June 1920.Google Scholar

9 A list of grievances of demobilized soldiers was submitted by Umar Hayat Khan to the Punjab Soldiers’ Board on 7 June 1919, PHP(M),‘B’, pro 72, June 1920.Google Scholar

10 See Ali, Imran, Punjab under Imperialism: 1885–1947 (Delhi, 1989), p. 117.Google Scholar

11 Ibid.

12 Weekly Report on the political and economic situation in India, Gol to Sec. of State, India, 8 Feb 1921, OIOR: L/PJ/6/1726.

13 SirCleveland, C. R., Dir. of Central Intelligence, Gol, to H. D. Craik, 25 April 1919, Gol, Home (Pol), File 47, May 1919.Google Scholar

14 Major H. S. L. Wolley to Gwynne, Dy Sec, Gol, Home Dept, 12 Feb. 1919, PHP(M), ‘B’, pro 418, March 1919.Google Scholar

15 For an analysis of the disorder which erupted in Lahore in 1919, see Kumar, R., ‘The Rowlatt Satyagraha in Lahore’ in Kumar, R. (ed.), Essays on Gandhian Politics: The Rowlatt Satyagraha of 1919 (Oxford, 1971), pp. 236–97.Google Scholar

16 For a general narrative and analysis of the 1919 Disturbances, see Datta, V. N., 1919 Disturbances (Ludhiana, 1969);Google Scholar and Datta, V. N. (ed.), New Light on the Punjab Disturbances in 1919, vols VI and VII of Disorders Inquiry Committee Evidence (Simla, 1975).Google Scholar

17 Summary of reports concerning feeling among troops and of incidents indicating unrest among them, GoI, Home (Pol), ‘B’ File 373, Feb. 1920.Google Scholar

18 In view of the close connection between the army and the Punjab, which had been widely extended during the war, the Lieutenant-Governor decided to maintain the Recruiting Board on a permanent basis, with the reduction of the civilian element in the composition of the Board being the only change contemplated. L. French, Offg. chief Sec. to Punjab Govt to Adj.-Gen. in India, 7 Jan. 1919, in PHP(M), ‘B’, pros 95–8, March 1919.Google Scholar

19 Some of the representatives of the military classes included Umar Hayat Khan Tiwana, Sikander Hayat Khan, Syed Mehdi Shah of Gojra, Sardar Ragbhir Singh Sindhanwalia and Chhottu Ram. See Minutes of meeting of Punjab Soldiers’ Board, 11 Sept. 1920, PHP(M), ‘B’ File 41, 1921.Google Scholar

20 The function of the Indian Soldiers' Board was to duplicate the Ministry of Reconstruction set up in England in 1917, where the minister's responsibility was ‘to consider and advise upon the problems which may arise out of the present war and may have to be dealt with on its termination, and for the purposes aforesaid to initiate and conduct such enquiries, prepare such schemes and make such recommendations as he thinks fit’. Quoted in A Brief Account of the Work of the Indian Soldiers' Board (Delhi, 1930), OIOR: L/MIL/17/5/2417, p. 1.Google Scholar

21 Ibid.

22 The Indian Soldiers' Board as constituted in 1919, was presided over by the Law Member of the Viceroy's Council, Sir George Lowndes, and its members included the Lieut Gov. of Punjab, the Revenue and Finance Member of the Viceroy's Council, R. A. Mant, the Adj.-Gen. of the Indian Army, Secretary of the Government of India in the Army Department, A. H. Bingley, Financial Advisor in the Military Finance Department, Sir G. B. H. Fell, and the Maharajahs of Gwalior, Bikaner, and Patiala. See GoI, ibid.

23 In 1920, beside the Punjab, provincial boards were established in all other provinces except in Bengal.

24 The scheme was originally suggested by the Divisional Recruiting Officer of Jullunder to the Adj.-Gen. in India in November 1918 (corresponmdence no. 2044, dated 29 Nov. 1918), and was endorsed by the Indian Soldiers' Board in February 1919. See Major C. W. Gwynne, Secretary, Indian Soldiers' Board to the Punjab Soldiers' Board, 12 Feb. 1919, in PHP(M), ‘B’, pros 359–60, March 1919.Google Scholar

25 Gwynne to Punjab Soldiers' Board, 12 Feb. 1919, ibid.

26 Minutes of 10th meeting of the Indian Soldiers' Board, 30 April 1919 in PHP(M), ‘B’ pro 406, May 1919.Google Scholar

27 Note by Major H. S. L. Wolley, Divisional Recruiting Officer, Jullunder Division, 17 Jun 1919 in PHP(M), ‘B’ File 127B, June 1920.Google Scholar

28 Sir C. R. Cleveland, Director of Central Intelligence, to H. D. Craik, Dy Sec. GoI, Home Dept, 25 April 1919, in GoI, Home (Pol), pro. 47, May 1919.Google Scholar

29 This was to be paid out of a sum of Rs 2 lakhs placed at the disposal of the Punjab Government by the Indian Soldiers' Board. It is interesting to note that the Punjab was the only province in India to be awarded money for this purpose. See Press communiqué issued by Indian Soldiers' Board, 18 March 1919, in ibid.

30 This was the protest against the findings of the Hunter Commission on the Jallianwala Bagh massacre which the Congress regarded as a ‘whitewash’ of the dreadful deed. The Government of India disavowed Dyer's use of force, but the disciplinary action which was meted out–early retirement–was not regarded as strong enough.

31 For a fuller account of the Khilafat movement see Minault, Gail, The Khilafat Movement: Religious Symbolism and Political Mobilization in India (Delhi, 1982).Google Scholar

32 See Singh, Mohinder, The Akali Movement (Delhi, 1978)Google Scholar and Kapur, Rajiv, Sikh Separatism: The Politics of Faith (London, 1986).Google Scholar

33 Kaul, Harkishen, Deputy Commissioner, Jullunder District to V. Connolly, Home Sec. Punjab Govt, 12 Oct. 1921 in PHP(M), ‘B’ File 10, 1922.Google Scholar

34 See Cpt F. H. Malyon to Capt A. C. Blunden, 27 May 1920; Note by C. W. Jacob, CGS, 29 May 1920; and H. McPherson, Offg Sec. to GoI, Home Dept, to all provincial governments and administrations, 12 Jan. 1920, all in GoI, Home (Pol), ‘B’, pro 72, Jan. 1920.Google Scholar

35 The call was issued at a Khilafat Conference in Karachi in July 1921. Weekly Report, 8 July 1921, Punjab, OIOR: L/P&J/6/1726. See also telegram from Mitra, R., sec District Congress Committee, Etawah city to The Zemindar (Lahore) in Deputy Commissioner, Lahore to Commissioner, Lahore Division, 27 09 1921 in PHP(M), ‘B’ File 10, 1922.Google Scholar

36 Weekly Reports, 7 April 1920, Punjab, OIOR: L/P&J/6/1556.Google Scholar

37 Weekly Reports, 11 June 1920, Punjab, OIOR: L/P&J/6/1556.Google Scholar

38 Note by C. W. Jacob, 7 June 1920, GoI, Home (Pol), pro. 72, June 1920.Google Scholar

39 McPherson, H., Sec. to GoI, Home Dept, to all Local Govts and Admin, 12 June 1920, GoI Home (Pol), pro. 72, June 1920.Google Scholar

40 Report of Committee appointed by the Secretary of State to enquire into the Administration and Organization of the Army in India (Esher Committee), 1920. PP, 1919–20, Cmd 943, vol. XIV.

41 Esher Committee, 1920, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

42 Minutes of Meeting, Army in India Committee, 23 Jan. 1920, OIOR: L/MIL/17/5/1761.Google Scholar

43 Ibid.

44 Ibid.

45 Sheikh Asghar Ali, Addl Sec. to the Punjab Govt to all Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners in the Punjab, 3 Nov. 1920 in PHP(M), ‘B’ pro. 132B, Dec. 1920.Google Scholar

46 A. C. Blunden to Sir William Marris, 23 June 1919, Home (Pol), ‘B’ pro. 76, Jan. 1920.Google Scholar

47 There were three such officers operating in the Punjab in 1920: Risaldar-Major Harnam Singh, whose lecturing activities were confined to the Lahore Division; Khan Bahadur Zafar Muhhamud Khan, an Extra Assistant Commissioner, who worked in the Rawalpindi Division; and Risaldar-Major Prem Singh, who was employed as a propagandist lecturer in the Ambala Division. Sheikh Asghar Ali to all Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners, 3 Nov. 1920, PHP(M), pro. 132B, Dec. 1920.Google Scholar

48 Ali, Sheikh Asghar to Marris, W. S., 26 July 1919, PHP(M), ‘B’ pros 89–95B, Aug. 1919.Google Scholar

49 An Urdu pamphlet, dealing with the Khilafat question, was published and distributed to the Muslim population, while another, published in Gurumukhi, dealing with the benefits of British rule to the Sikhs, was circulated among them. PHP(M), ‘B’ pro. 132B, Dec. 1920.Google Scholar

50 Letter, dated 18 Dec. 1921, Home (Pol), 1922, File 669/1922.Google Scholar

51 Thompson, J. P., Chief Sec. Punjab Govt, to all Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners, 25 Aug. 1920, in PHP(M), ‘B’ pro. 132B, Dec. 1920.Google Scholar

52 Ibid.

53 Minutes of proceedings of Punjab Soldiers' Board, May 1915, PHP(M), ‘C’, File 418, 1926.

54 Ibid.

55 See pamphlet produced by General Staff, Indian Army, entitled ‘Notes for Assistance of Members of District Soldiers' Boards and Officers Touring in Recruiting Areas’ (Simla, 1935) in PHP(M), ‘B’ File 127, 1935.Google Scholar

56 Deputy Commissioner, Hoshiarpur District, to the Commissioner, Jullunder Division, 9 Oct. 1920, in PHP(M), ‘B’ File 30, 1922. See Table 1 for committee members of DSBs in the Punjab.Google Scholar

57 Minutes of Meeting of Punjab Soldiers' Board, 28 April 1921, in PHP(M), File 171, ‘B’, Nov. 1921.Google Scholar

58 French, L., Sec. to Punjab Govt to all Deputy Commissioners in the Punjab and Political Agents in the Phulkian States and Bawahalpur Agency, 2 April 1919, PHP(M), ‘B’, pros 138–9, March 1920.Google Scholar

59 Lieut-Col. F. G. Moore, Sec. Indian Soldiers' Boards to Addl. Sec. Punjab Government, 17 Nov. 1919 in PHP(M), ‘B’, File 13, 1921.Google Scholar

60 French, L., Addl. Sec. to Punjab Govt to all Deputy Commissioners, Punjab and Political Agents, Phulkian States and Bawahalpur Agency, 2 April 1919, in PHP(M), ‘B’, pros 138–9, March 1920.Google Scholar

61 This problem was not limited to the immediate post-war period, but was a perennial complaint amongst the soldier population throughout the 1920s and 1930s. See Tour Reports of Officers in Punjab in 1930, GoI, Home (Pol), 265/30.

62 See minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of Punjab Soldiers' Board, 6 Nov. 1920, in PHP(M), ‘B’, file 41, Jan. 1921.Google Scholar

63 Tour Report, Lyallpur District, 23 Feb. 1930, GoI, Home (Pol), 265/30.Google Scholar

64 Proceedings of the meeting of the Punjab Soldiers' Board held on 7 May 1925, in PHP(M), ‘C’, File 418, 1926.Google Scholar

65 The pay which ex-soldiers could get in civil employment was comparable to the salary they drew as soldiers. A gatesman, Class I in the railway would get Rs 14– 1–17 per mensem; chowkidars, Class A, Rs 15–1–19; pointsmen, Class 2, Rs115–1–19; porters, Class A, Rs 15–1–19. F. A. Hadow, Agent, Northwest Railway to Home Sec. Punjab Govt, 20 Aug. 1921, PHP(M), ‘B’, pros 28–30, June 1922.Google Scholar

66 PHP(M), ‘B’ File 14, 1928.

67 Gwynne, Major C. W. to Sec. Punjab Soldiers' Board, 9 May 1919, PHP(M), ‘B’ pros 490–1, May 1919.Google Scholar

68 Ibid.

69 Punjab Trades Association to Add. Sec. Punjab Govt, 2 June 1919, in PHP(M), ‘B’ pros 237, May 1919.Google Scholar

70 Ibid.

71 F. A. Hadow, Agent, N. W. Railway to J. P. Thompson, Chief Sec to Punjab Govt, 20 Aug. 1921, PHP(M), ‘B’, File 74, 1922.Google Scholar

72 The minimum qualification as set by the principal of the Central Training College in Lahore for a prospective candidate wishing to be trained as a school teacher was a second class regimental certificate, i.e. the minimum educational standard required in the army for promotion to the daffadar or havildar rank. Press communiqué from v. Connolly, Home Sec. GoP, 28 June 1921, in PHP(M), ‘B’, File 46, 1922.Google Scholar

73 Memo by H. A. Smith, Deputy Commissioner, Rawalpindi District, 1 Sept. 1921, in PHP(M), ‘B’ pros 32, File 46, April 1922.Google Scholar

74 It was reported that the first batch of twenty trainees passed the course in 1922 and were performing satisfactorily in the schools they were posted to. New teachers began with a salary of twenty rupees, an income which was an important supplement to the military pension they were drawing, and many of them had found employment near their homes to be a very satisfactory arrangement. See Note on the subject of training of discharged soldiers as school masters by G. Anderson, Director of Public Instruction, Punjab, 23 Nov. 1921, in PHP(M), ‘B’ pros 56–9, File 34, 1922.Google Scholar

75 Ibid.

76 Minutes of Proceedings of the Meeting of the Punjab Soldiers' Board, 11 Sept. 1920, PHP(M), ‘B’, File 41, 1921.Google Scholar

77 Ibid.

78 In districts where these two bodies existed, they were usually merged into a single district soldiers' board to coordinate their activities and make them more efficient. Where only ex-Indian officers' associations existed, they were renamed soldiers' boards and prominent civilians were invited to join. D. J. Boyd, Sec. Home Dept, GoP, to all Deputy Commissioners, Punjab, 24 Sept. 1923, File U/IX/40, Deputy Commissioner's Record Office, (DCRO) Rawalpindi District, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.

79 Report of Tour of Attock and Hoshiarpur District by Major Teague and Capt Broadway, Jan. 1936, in PHP(M), ‘B’, File 186, 1936.Google Scholar

80 Tour Report, Ferozepur District, 31 Aug. 1930, GoI, Home (Pol), 112/31.Google Scholar

81 Report of a tour carried out by Cpt. C. G. Wilson, 10/15th Punjab Regiment, in Lahore and Amritsar Districs, Jan. 1937, in PHP(M), ‘B’, File 143, 1937.Google Scholar

82 Minutes of Quarterly Meeting of Rawalpindi DSB, 22 Dec. 1926, PHP(M), ‘C’, File 12, 1927.Google Scholar

83 Major Gwynne, C. W., secretary Indian soldiers' Board to all secretatries, Provincial Soldiers' Boards, 12 Feb. 1919, in PHP(M), ‘B’, pros 359, March 1919.Google Scholar

84 see for example the functioning of the Sargodha and Mianwali district soldiers' boards in Tour Reports, Sargodha and Mianwali, Aug. 1930, GoI, Home (Pol) 112/31.

85 This exchange of information between the army and the local authorities of the districts from where the soldiers were recruited had in fact been recommended by the Esher Committee in 1920. See Esher Committee Report, p. 37.Google Scholar

86 Consolidated Circular from Home Sec. GoP, H. M. Cowan, 10 Dec. 1922, in PHP(M), ‘B’, File 32, March 1922.Google Scholar

87 Rai Bahadur Pandit Hari Kishen Kaul, Commissioner, Jullunder Division to J. Wilson-Johnston, Home Sec. GoP, 13 Feb. 1922, in PHP(M), ‘B’, File 32, March 1922.Google Scholar

88 Major A. F. R. Lumby, Sec. Indian Soldiers' Board to all local governments and administrations, 4 June 1930, File U/XIV/134, DCRO, Rawalpindi.Google Scholar

89 Mant, R. A., Sec. Revenue and Agriculture Dept, GoI to all local governments and administrations, 22 Feb. 1918, GoI, Home (Pol), 1924/403.Google Scholar

90 Major Lumby to all local governments and administrations, 4 June 1930, Rawalpindi DCRO, File U/XIV/134, Rawalpindi.Google Scholar

91 Prices began falling in 1929 and continued during the winter and spring of 1929–30. In the middle of May 1929, what was priced at Rs3–2-6 per maund, and by July 1930 this had fallen to Rs1–6-6. See Punjab Administrative Report (PAR), 1930–31 (Lahore, 1932).Google Scholar

92 Narain, Brij, India in Crisis (Allahabad, 1934), p. 2.Google Scholar

93 Fortnightly Reports, Punjab, (FR) 15 Jan. 1929. OIOR: L/P&J/12/22.Google Scholar

94 In 1921 Anup Singh presided over a local darbar to honour the visit of the Prince of Wales. The darbar, an assembly of four thousand soldiers and ex-soldiers, subsequently formed the basis of the local soldiers' association, a loyalist association which Anup Singh helped to establish. Upon his retirement from the army, Anup Singh was appointed to a senior position in the police department in the North-West Frontier Province. Things began to turn sour for him after a few months, however, and he was forced to resign and his properties forfeited. Thereafter the disillusioned Anup Singh went on a personal campaign to spread discontent amongst the soldiers and ex-soldiers in Lahore, Hoshiarpur, Jullunder, Ludhiana, Gurdaspur and Ferozepur, where he spoke to soldiers about the uncaring Raj and openly urged them to support Congress. Ibid.

95 According to the above fortnightly report, these rolls were collected for the purposes of allowing the authorities to investigate the individual cases of grievances of the protesters. However, it also suggests that the government was wanting to know the names of the demonstrators, for the purpose perhaps of keeping a surveillance on their future activities.

96 FR, 30 Jan. 1929.Google Scholar

97 FR, Punjab, 15 Dec. 1929.Google Scholar

98 Josh, Bhagwan, Communist Movement in the Punjab, 1926 to 1947 (Delhi, 1979), pp. 79–90.Google Scholar

99 Ibid., p. 94.

100 Ibid., p. 106.

101 Heeger, Gerald A., ‘Growth of the Congress Movement in the Punjab, 1920–40’ in Journal of Asian Studies (JAS), vol. 32 (1), 11 1972, p. 40.Google Scholar

102 FR, 15 July 1929.Google Scholar

103 Ibid.

104 FR, 15 March 1929.Google Scholar

105 If the number of arrests and convictions related to Civil Disobedience are to be taken as some index of the popularity of the movement, one could see that the movement in the Punjab was not as popular as in the other provinces; between 1932 and 1933, next to Madras, the Punjab was the province with the lowest convict-to-population percentage. See Brown, Judith, Gandhi and Civil Disobedience, The Mahatma in Indian Politics, 1928–34 (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

106 Grover, D. R., Civil Disobedience in the Punjab (Delhi, 1987).Google Scholar

107 FR, 15 Feb. 1931.Google Scholar

108 FR, 31 May 1930.Google Scholar

109 Concerned about the possibility that the military classes might be affected by the Civil Disobedience Movement, a number of British officers were despatched to the military districts in 1930–31 to assess the impact of the movement there.These reports can be found in GoI, Home (Pol), Files 265/1630 and 112/1931.

110 Captain H. B. Harrison, ‘Report of Tour of Jhelum District’, 11 Sept. 1930, in GoI, Home (Pol) File 265/1930.Google Scholar

111 Ibid.

112 Ibid.; cf. ‘Report of Tour of Rawalpindi District’, 31 May 1930 in GoI, Home (Pol) 265/1630; see also Brown, Gandhi and Civil Disobedience, p. 145.

113 Ibid.

114 Ibid.

115 Jones, J. M. to Vincent, William, 26 May 1919 in GoI, Home (Pol), File 37, July 1919.Google Scholar

116 Darling, Malcolm, Wisdom and Waste in the Punjab Villages (London, 1934), p. 23.Google Scholar

117 See Dewey, Clive, ‘Some consequences of the military expenditure in British India: The case of Upper Sind Sagar Doab, 1849–1947’ in Dewey, (ed.), Arrested Development in India: The Historical Dimension (New Delhi, 1988), pp. 93–169.Google Scholar

118 Captain E. R. M. Hall, ‘Report of Tour of Kangra District’, 14 Jan. 1931, GoI, Home (Pol), 112/31.Google Scholar

119 Ibid.

120 Ibid.

121 Captain G. E. Tinney, ‘Tour of Kangra District’, Aug. 1930, in GoI, Home (Pol), File 265/1930.Google Scholar

122 Tour of Kangra District, 14 Jan. 1931, GoI, Home (Pol), 112/31.Google Scholar

123 Captain H. R. Jackman, ‘Report of Tour in Amristsar District’, Feb. 1931, GoI, Home (Pol), 112/31.Google Scholar

124 Ibid.

125 Tour Report Amritsar District, Feb. 1931, GoI, Home (Pol), 112/31. See also Brown, , Gandhi and Civil Disobedience, pp. 146, 301;Google Scholar and Gulati, K. L., Akalis Past and Present (New Delhi, 1974), pp. 52–6.Google Scholar

126 ‘Tour Report’, Amritsar, Feb. 1931.Google Scholar

127 FR, 15 April 1931.Google Scholar

128 FRs, 15 May 1931 and 31 May 1931.Google Scholar

129 Captain T. S. Emery, ‘Report of Tour of Rohtak, Hissar and Karnal Districts, February 1930’, in GoI, Home (Pol), File 265/1930.Google Scholar

130 Chowdhry, Prem, ‘Social Support Base and Electoral Politics: The Congress in Colonial Southeast Punjab’ in MAS, 25, 4 (1991), p. 815.Google Scholar

131 Ibid.

132 During the war thousands of men from the Punjab were enlisted to fight in the European and Eastern fronts. Most of them served only for the duration of the war and were considered ‘Short Service’ men. With the exception of those in receipt of Wound and Invalid Pensions, ‘Short Service’ men did not qualify for pensions after their discharge fron the army.

133 Chowdhry, Prem, Punjab Politics: The Role of Chhottu Ram (New Delhi, 1984), pp. 154–5.Google Scholar

134 Ibid.

135 FR, 31 May 1931.Google Scholar

136 Ibid.

137 PAR, 1931–32 (Lahore, 1933), p. 4.Google Scholar

138 Tour Report of Jhelum District, 11 Sept; 1930, GoI, Home (Pol), 265/30.Google Scholar

139 see Tour Report, Amritsar District, 19 Feb. 1931, GoI, Home (Pol), 112/31.Google Scholar

140 ibid.

141 ‘Report on Workings of Indian Soldiers' Board, year ending March 1933’, OIOR: L/MIL/5/2318.Google Scholar

142 ‘Annual Report on the Workings of the Punjab Soldiers' Board and Organizations subordinate thereto for the year 1936'. PHP(M), ‘B’ File 76, 1937. For a comparison of the activities carried out by DSBs in the 1930s, see Table 3.

143 see for example ‘Report of Tour of Sargodha and Mianwali Districts’, 25 May 1930 in GoI, Home (Pol), 265/30.Google Scholar

144 Annual Report of the Working of the Punjab Soldiers' Board and its subordinate organizations for 1936. PHP(M), ‘B’ File 76, 1937.

145 The roles and functions of District Soldiers' Boards could be compared to the Courts of Wards in nineteenth-century Bengal. For a study of the latter, see Yang, Anand, ‘An Institutional Shelter: The Court of Wards in Late 19th Century Bihar’ in MAS, 13, 2 (1979), pp. 247–64.Google Scholar