Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:11:53.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Magic Lantern as a Lens for Observing the Eye in Tokugawa Japan: Technology, translation, and the Rangaku movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2019

LEWIS BREMNER
LEWIS BREMNER*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the thoughts and ideas associated with magic-lantern technology in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Japan. Its primary focus is on trends in Japanese thought from the 1770s until the 1820s, with specific reference to the Rangaku (‘Dutch Studies’) movement. The article examines connections between the magic lantern and a wider discourse within Japan on epistemology, knowledge about nature, and the study of the human body, centring upon the device's vital role in the endeavour to understand the workings of the human eye. Through this lens, a fresh perspective is offered on the role of critical analysis in the translation and interpretation of European texts in Tokugawa Japan, as well as on the shifting prominence of empiricism and deductive reasoning in Japanese epistemology. In this way, the history of the magic lantern is used to look beyond the prevailing West-centred narrative of global technological and intellectual development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , May 2020 , pp. 691 - 729
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers of Modern Asian Studies for their detailed feedback on this article. Archival research was made possible by the support of the Toshiba International Foundation, Toyota-Shi Trevelyan Trust, and St Edmund Hall, University of Oxford. This article benefited from suggestions made by participants at the Oxford Japanese History Workshop at the Nissan Institute of Japanese Studies, to whom I am deeply grateful. My thanks go also to Professor Sho Konishi at the University of Oxford for his generous support and advice.

References

1 Genpaku, Sugita, Rangaku kotohajime, Tokyo: Tenshinrō, 1869, vol. 1, p. 13Google Scholar; Genpaku, Sugita, ‘Rangaku kotohajime’, in Kokushokankōkai, ed., Benmei genryū sōsho, Tokyo: Kokushokankōkai, 1913, vol. 1, p. 9Google Scholar; Where possible, I have provided references both to archival sources and more readily accessible published versions of the same texts.

2 Genjirō, Kobayashi, Utsushie-shi, Tokyo: Kobayashi Genjirō, 1951Google Scholar; Genjirō, Kobayashi, Utsushi-e, Tokyo: Kobayashi Genjirō, 1967Google Scholar; Genjirō, Kobayashi, Utsushi-e tsuiho, Tokyo: Kobayashi Genjirō, 1975Google Scholar; Genjirō, Kobayashi, Utsushi-e, Tokyo: Chūō daigaku shuppan-bu, 1987Google Scholar.

3 Keiichi, Yamamoto, Edo no kage-e asobi: Hikari to kage no bunkashi, Tokyo: Sōshisha, 1988, p. 136Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., p. 140.

5 Ibid., pp. 135–150.

6 Screech, Timon, The Lens within the Heart: The Western Scientific Gaze and Popular Imagery in Later Edo Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 106–118Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., p. 1.

8 Ibid., pp. 2–3.

9 Ibid.; Yamamoto, Edo no kage-e asobi.

10 Kenji, Iwamoto, Gentō no seiki: eiga zenya no shikaku bunkashi, Tokyo: Shinwasha, 2002Google Scholar; Kenji, Iwamoto, ed., Nihon eiga no tanjō, Tokyo: Shinwasha, 2011Google Scholar; Ryō, Ōkubo, ‘Utsushi-e kara eiga e: eizō to katari no keifu’, in Kenji, Iwamoto, ed., Nihon eiga no tanjō, Tokyo: Shinwasha, 2011Google Scholar; Ryō, Ōkubo, ‘The magic lantern show and its spectators during late nineteenth century Japan: control of perception in lantern shows for education and news reporting of Sino-Japanese War’, Iconics, vol. 11, 2014Google Scholar; Ōkubo Ryō, Tsuchiya Shin'ichi, Endō, Miyuki, Eizō no arukeorojī: shikaku riron, kōgaku media, eizō bunka, Tokyo: Seikyūsha, 2015Google Scholar; Hiroshi, Komatsu, ‘Nihon ni okeru sukurīn purakutisu: arui wa eiga izen no ugoku eizō’, in Junpōsha, Kinema, ed., Shinema no seiki: eiga seitan 100nen hakurankai, Kawasaki: Kawasaki City Museum, 1995Google Scholar; Manabu, Ueda, ‘Gendai Nihon ni okeru shikaku media no tenkanki ni kansuru ichikōsatsu: nichironsensōki Kyōtō no dantai ni yoru gentō oyobi katsudōshashin no jōeikatsudō wo chūshin ni’, Art Research, vol. 4, 2004Google Scholar.

11 Kline, Stephen J., ‘What is technology?’, The Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, vol. 1, 1985, pp. 215–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Pacey, Arnold, Meaning in Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001, pp. 9–10Google Scholar.

13 The word gentō was only used in Japan from the 1870s onwards and, at the time, it referred exclusively to metal-built models of the magic lantern in most cases.

14 Kibyōshi (lit. ‘yellow covers’) was a genre of popular illustrated literature from the late eighteenth to the early nineteenth century.

15 Kunenbō, Hekizentei, Hōzuki chōchi no chikamichi, Edo: Daikichi, 1798, p. 14Google Scholar; Screech, Lens within, pp. 109–112.

16 Kunenbō, Hekizentei, Hōzuki chōchi no chikamichi, Edo: Daikichi, 1798, pp. 14–15Google Scholar; trans. Screech, Lens within, p. 111.

17 Harumachi Koikawa, Muda iki, in Masatane, Koike, Satoshi, Imota, Yushō, Nakayama, Masahiro, Tanahashi, eds., Edo no gesaku ehon, vol. 1, Tokyo: Shakai shisō-sha, 1980Google Scholar.

18 Harumachi, Muda iki, p. 115.

19 Ibid., pp. 118–119.

20 Jansen, Marius B., ‘Rangaku and Westernisation’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, 1984, p. 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Ibid., p. 541.

22 Kim, Hoi-eun, Doctors of Empire: Medical and Cultural Enroutes between Imperial Germany and Meiji Japan, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014, p. 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Jansen, ‘Rangaku and Westernisation’, p. 541.

24 Keene, Donald, The Japanese Discovery of Europe, 1720–1830, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969, p. 172Google Scholar; Screech, Lens within, pp. 2–4, 34.

25 Wittner, David G., ‘Japanese technology’, in Olsen, Jan Kyrre Berg, Pedersen, Stig Andur, Hendricks, Vincent F., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, p. 40Google Scholar.

26 On the notion of a universal and discoverable logic of nature in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century thought in Japan, see Konishi, Sho, ‘The emergence of an international humanitarian organization in Japan: the Tokugawa origins of the Japanese Red Cross’, American Historical Review, vol. 119, no. 4, 2014, pp. 1135–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Gentaku, Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, Tokyo: Yūzankaku, 1799, vols 1 and 2Google Scholar; Gentaku, Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, in Kokushokankōkai, ed., Benmei genryū sōsho, Tokyo: Kokushokankōkai, 1913, vol. 1Google Scholar.

28 An earlier version of Ransetsu benwaku was compiled, although possibly not completed, as early as 1788. The prefaces written by Arima Genchō and Udagawa Genshin, who were students at Ōtsuki's private school, the Shirandō, are both dated that year (Tenmei 8). Genchō’s preface asserts that the original text was written based upon a conversation between Ōtsuki and his students, including Genchō himself, over the course of a single night in the late 1880s. According to the afterword, written by Koshimura Mikura and dated 1798, the text then underwent revision before being put forward for publication. Without surviving copies of the original Tenmei draft for reference, the degree of variation between it and the version eventually published in 1799 remains unclear. Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 1, jo, pp. i–iii, fugen, pp. i–iii, vol. 2, furoku, pp. i–vi; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, pp. 487, 490–491, 517–518.

29 Goodman, Grant, Japan and the Dutch, 1600–1853, Richmond: Curzon, 2000, p. 120Google Scholar.

30 Jackson, Terrence, Networks of Knowledge: Western Science and the Tokugawa Information Revolution, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2016, pp. 89–93Google Scholar.

31 Ōtsuki, , Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 1, pp. 32–33Google Scholar; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, pp. 505–506.

32 Ōtsuki, , Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 1, pp. 14–16Google Scholar; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 494.

33 Ōtsuki dedicates an entry to kurobō (lit. ‘black boys’) later in the book, writing that: ‘It is said that they are a kind of monkey … but there is no difference between them any other human beings …. Any mention that they are less than human is wrong.’ Ōtsuki, 1799, vol. 2, pp. 4–5; Ōtsuki, 1914, p. 508.

34 With the exception of Shikoku, these are no longer in use as geographical names. Tōō was the old name for an area in Tōhoku roughly corresponding to Aomori Prefecture today. Hokuestu covered Echigo and Etchū provinces, in today's Niigata and Toyama Prefectures. Tsukushi, last of all, lay within what is now Fukuoka Prefecture.

35 Ōtsuki, , Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 1, pp. 14–15Google Scholar; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 494.

36 Konishi, ‘The emergence of an international humanitarian organization in Japan’, p. 1135.

37 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 17; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 513.

38 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, pp. 17–18; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 513.

39 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, pp. 7–8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, pp. 509–510.

40 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 509.

41 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 509.

42 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, pp. 509–510.

43 Shunichi, Itagaki, Edo-ki shikaku bunka no sōzō to rekishiteki tenkai: nozoki megane to nozoki karakuri, Tokyo: Miyai shoten, 2012, p. 65Google Scholar.

44 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 509.

45 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 509.

46 Groemer, Gerald, The Spirit of Tsugaru: Blind Musicians, Tsugaru-jamisen, and the Folk Music of Northern Japan, with the Autobiography of Takahashi Chikuzan, Warren, MI: Harmonie Park Press, 1999Google Scholar; Groemer, Gerald, ‘The guild of the blind in Tokugawa Japan’, Monumenta Nipponica, vol. 56, no. 3, 2001Google Scholar.

47 Tetsuo, Najita, Visions of Virtue: The Kaitokudō Merchant Academy of Osaka, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987, p. 256Google Scholar; Fukuoka, Maki, The Premise of Fidelity: Science, Visuality, and Representing the Real in Nineteenth Century Japan, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012, p. 42Google Scholar; Kuriyama, Shigehisa, ‘Between mind and eye: Japanese anatomy in the eighteenth century’, in Leslie, Charles, Young, Allan, eds., Paths to Asian Medical Knowledge, Berkley: University of California Press, 1992, pp. 24–25Google Scholar.

48 Mestler, Gordon E., ‘A galaxy of old Japanese medical books with miscellaneous notes on early medicine in Japan: part IV, ophthalmology, psychiary [sic], dentistry’, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, vol. 44, no. 3, 1956, p. 333Google Scholar; Saiichi, Mishima, The History of Ophthalmology in Japan, Ostende: Wayenborgh, 2004, pp. 92, 102Google Scholar.

49 Screech, Lens within, pp. 167–168.

50 Mishima, Ophthalmology in Japan, pp. 92–95, 134–135.

51 Koch, Angelika, ‘Sexual healing: regulating male sexuality in Edo-period books on “nurturing life”’, International Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, 2013, p. 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Mishima, Ophthalmology in Japan, p. 138; Michel-Zaitsu, Wolfgang, ‘The true shape of human bones: on the dawn of anatomical dissection in early modern Japan’, Proceedings of the ‘4th International Symposium on the History of Indigenous Knowledge’, 2014; Ogawa, Teizō, ‘The beginnings of anatomy in Japan’, Okajima's folia anatomica Japonica, vol. 52, 1975, pp. 62–63Google ScholarPubMed.

53 Mishima, Ophthalmology in Japan, pp. 137–138.

54 Anatomische Tabellen was simultaneously published in Latin as Tabulae Anatomicae: In Quibus Corporis Human in 1722.

55 Sugita, Rangaku kotohajime, 1869, vol. 1, pp. 22–23; Sugita, Rangaku kotohajime, 1913, pp. 13–14; Sugita refers to Kozukappara by its colloquial name Kotsugahara (lit. ‘field of bones’). Botsman, Daniel V., Punishment and Power in the Making of Modern Japan, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005, p. 23Google Scholar.

56 Sugita, Rangaku kotohajime, 1869, vol. 1, pp. 23–27; Sugita, Rangaku kotohajime, 1913, pp. 14–16.

57 Fukuoka, Premise of Fidelity, pp. 40–41.

58 Genpaku, Sugita, Kaitai shinsho, Edo: Suharaya Ichibee, 1774, vol. 1, pp. 17–21Google Scholar; Bidloo, Govard, Ontleding des menschelyken lichaams, Amsterdam: de weduwe van Joannes van Someren, de Erfgenamen Joannes van Dijk, Hendrik en de Weduwe Dirk Boom, 1690, pp. 171, 179, 200, 203Google Scholar.

59 Sugita, Kaitai shinsho, vol. 2, pp. 13–15.

60 Ibid., p. 13.

61 Ibid.

62 Ibid.

63 Dicten, Gerard, Ontleedkundige Tafelen, Amsterdam: de Janssoons van Waesberge, 1734, p. 110Google Scholar.

64 Hirase Hose was also known as Hirase Sukeyo.

65 Hose, Hirase, Tengu-tsu, Osaka: [Unknown], 1779, vol. 2, p. 6Google Scholar.

66 Rather than being placed into the lenses, the glass slide is placed in between either two lenses or two sets of lenses in the magic lantern, depending on the complexity of the device. The lens or set of lenses behind the slide is known as the condenser, and acts to converge the light from the lamp to illuminate the image on the slide. The lens or set of lenses in front of the slide is typically located in the outer tube and is known as the objective. It is this convex element that inverts the image and projects it outwards into an enlarged picture on a surface such as a screen or wall.

67 Screech, Lens within, pp. 182–183; Chaiklin, Martha, Cultural Commerce and Dutch Commercial Culture: The Influence of European Commercial Culture on Japan, 1700–1850, Leiden: Research School CNWS, 2003, p. 163Google Scholar.

68 Yamamoto, Edo no kage-e asobi, pp. 138–139.

69 Morishima Chūryō, Bango-sen, [Unknown]: [Unknown], 1798, p. 37; Chūryō, Morishima, Bango-sen, in Tsutomu, Sugimoto, ed., Yōgaku shiryō bunko, 2006, Tokyo: Kōseisha, p. 87Google Scholar.

70 Morishima, Bango-sen, 1798, p. 37; Morishima, Bango-sen, 2006, p. 87.

71 Iwamoto, Gentō no seiki, p. 90; Kobayashi, Utsushi-e, 1987, pp. 19, 64, 140.

72 Sugita, Rangaku kotohajime, 1869, vol. 1, p. 13; Sugita, Rangaku kotohajime, 1913, p. 9.

73 Kōkan, Shiba, Oranda tensetsu, Edo: Shunparō, 1795, p. 24Google Scholar; Kōkan credits Sugita Genpaku's Kaitai shinsho for this information.

74 Ibid.

75 Ibid.

76 Ibid.

77 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 509.

78 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 509.

79 Shiba, Oranda tensetsu, p. 24.

80 This title can also be read as Jūtei kaitai shinsho.

81 The work was released across the country in various forms. These included an expanded five-volume set released by Ōtsuki himself, with an appended sixth volume containing diagrams and illustrations copied from the 1774 version, and a nine-volume work released by the prominent Edo publishing house, Suharaya-Mohē.

82 Gentaku, Ōtsuki, Chōtei kaitai shinsho, Tokyo: Suharaya Mohee, 1826, vol. 5, p. 26Google Scholar.

83 Ibid., p. 25.

84 Ibid., p. 23.

85 Ibid.

86 Ibid., p. 25.

87 Ibid., p. 24.

88 Ibid.

89 Ibid.

90 Yakō, Chiba, ‘Edo jidan no ganka shōshi’, Chiba igaku zasshi, vol. 78, no. 6, 2002, p. 259Google Scholar; Plenck's full name was Joseph Jakob Ritter Plenk.

91 Screech, Lens within, pp. 168–169.

92 Chiba, ‘Ganka shōshi’, p. 259; Jackson, Networks of Knowledge, pp. 29, 83.

93 Ryūkei, Sugita, Ganka shinsho, Osaka: Gungyokudō, 1815Google Scholar; Pruys, Martinus, Verhandeling over de oogziekten, Rotterdam: J. Pols & J. Krap, 1787Google Scholar.

94 Sugita, Ganka shinsho, vol. 1, pp. i–iv; Mishima, Ophthalmology in Japan, p. 168.

95 Pruys, Oogziekten, p. 77.

96 Sugita, Ganka shinsho, vol. 1, p. iii.

97 Ibid.

98 Ibid., pp. 11–14.

99 Keill, John, Introductio ad veram astronomiam, seu lectiones astronomicae, London: G. Stratham, 1721Google Scholar; Keill, John, An Introduction to the True Astronomy; Or, Astronomical Lectures, London: Henry Lintot, 1739Google Scholar; Hoon, Jun Yong, ‘A comparison of Korean and Japanese scholars’ attitudes toward Newtonian science’, The Review of Korean Studies, vol. 13, no. 1, 2010, pp. 14–15Google Scholar.

100 Shizuki Tadao, Rekishō shinsho, [Unknown]: [Unknown], 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki Tadao, Rekishō shinsho, in Kokushokankōkai, ed., Benmei genryū sōsho, Tokyo: Kokushokankōkai, 1913, vol. 2, pp. 103–105.

101 Keill, Veram astronomiam, p. 2.

102 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, pp. 103, 105.

103 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 103.

104 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 103.

105 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 105.

106 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 103.

107 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, pp. 214–219; Jun, ‘A comparison’, p. 27.

108 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, pp. 210–214.

109 Shizuki used the characters for the important Taoist term bianhua, or henka in Japanese, for ‘transformation’, and mentioned the founder of Taoism, Laozi, by name. Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, pp. 148–149.

110 Quoted in Brewster, David, The Life of Sir Isaac Newton, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1840, vol. 2, p. 348Google Scholar.

111 Keill, Veram astronomiam, p. 20; Keill, True Astronomy, pp. 16–17.

112 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 111.

113 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 112.

114 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 113.

115 Goodman, Japan and the Dutch, p. 105; Shigeru, Nakayama, ‘Diffusion of Copernicanism in Japan’, in Dobrzycki, Jerzy, ed., The Reception of Copernicus’ Heliocentric Theory, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1972, p. 180Google Scholar.

116 Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1799, vol. 2, p. 8; Ōtsuki, Ransetsu benwaku, 1913, p. 509.

117 Ōtsuki, Chōtei kaitai shinsho, vol. 5, p. 25.

118 Kōmin, Kawamoto, Kikai kanran kōgi, Edo: Izumiya kichibee, 1851–58, vol. 1Google Scholar, hanrei, p. ii.

119 Ibid.

120 Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1798, vol. 1, unpaginated; Shizuki, Rekishō shinsho, 1913, p. 111.

121 See Honjō Fuichi's 1831 book, Ganka kinnō (‘Treasury of Ophthalmology’), which began expanding further into the refractive aetiology of conditions such as myopia. Fuichi, Honjō, Ganka kinnō, Edo: Hōjundō, 1831, vol. 1, pp. 4–7Google Scholar.

122 See Sakai, Naoki, ‘The West—a dialogic prescription or proscription?’, Social Identities, vol. 11, no. 3, 2005, p. 188CrossRefGoogle Scholar; van der Vleuten, Erik, ‘Toward a transnational history of technology: meanings, promises, pitfalls’, Technology and Culture, vol. 49, no. 4, 2008Google Scholar; Turchetti, Simone, Herran, Néstor, Boudia, Soraya, ‘Introduction: have we ever been “transnational”? Towards a history of science across and beyond borders’, British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 45, no. 3, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar.