Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
In Malaya, as in many underdeveloped nations, problems of the peasantry form a source of continual anxiety. One of the most intractable of these was described by the Malayan Government as ‘the unsatisfactory situation [of] overcrowding on the land and the frustration of ambitions to acquire land.’ How this situation has come about is the initial concern of this paper, which explores the historical record of agricultural development and land ownership in one area of western Malaya. By tracing changes that have taken place since 1890, it is hoped to demonstrate how and at what rates limited resources of land have become partitioned among increasing numbers of people, a process that, being the very antithesis of development, has been termed ‘agricultural involution’ by Geertz. The information is then supplemented with modern records from other areas to show typical features of ownership in the Malayan peasant sector of today. The findings suggest how traditional Malay society has responded to modern economic pressures, and may generate practical methods for dealing with some of the problems facing development planners today.
1 Government of Malaya,Second Five-year Plan 1961–65, Kuala Lumpur, 1961, p. 14.Google Scholar
2 Geertz, C., Agricultural Involution, the processes of ecological change in Indonesia, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1963.Google Scholar
3 Ho, R., ‘The Evolution of Agriculture and Land Ownership in Saiong mukim’, Malayan Economic Review, 13 02 1968, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
4 Kampong crops consist of fruits, spices and coconuts grown around Malay villages for domestic consumption.
5 Winstedt, R. O. and Wilkinson, R. J., ‘A History of Perak’, Journal, Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 12, Part 1, 1934.Google Scholar
6 Ho, R., Farmers of Central Malaya, Australian National University, Canberra, 1967.Google Scholar
7 Salim, A., The Impact of Adat Perpateh on Land Ownership, University of Singapore, Singapore, 1957.Google Scholar
8 Hock, Saw Swee, ‘Trends and Differentials in International Migration in Malaya’, Ekonomi, 6, 1967, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
9 Jackson, J. C., Planters and Speculators, University of Malaya Press, Kuala Lumpur, 1968.Google Scholar
10 The sample comprised 14 per cent of all lots in Saiong mukim.
11 Bauer, P. T., The Rubber Industry, a study in competition and monopoly, London, 1948.Google Scholar
12 Swift, M., ‘Capital, saving and credit in a Malay Peasant Economy’, in Capital, Saving and Credit in Peasant Societies, ed. Firth, R. and Yamey, B. S., Allen and Unwin, London, 1964, pp. 136 ff.Google Scholar
13 Since 1952, the government has paid a subsidy, now amounting to Malayan $750 per acre, to Malayan peasants who replant their land with approved types of new rubber. This has effectively increased the market price of rubber land by at least the same amount.Google Scholar
14 Narkswasdi, U., A Report to the Govt. of Malaysia on the Rice Economy of West Malaysia, Rome, 1968, p. 79.Google Scholar
15 Salim, A., op. cit.,Google ScholarDowns, R., ‘A Kelantanese Village of Malaya’, in Contemporary Change in Traditional Societies, ed. Steward, J. H., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1967, pp. 152–5.Google Scholar
16 Once during the International Rubber Regulation Scheme (1940–43) and again during the Japanese Occupation of Malaya (1942–45), see Chong-yah, Lim, Economic Development of Modern Malaya, Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur, 1967, pp. 76–96.Google Scholar
17 Wilson, T. B., The Economics of Padi Production in North Malaya, Pt. I, Land Tenure, rents, land use and Fragmentation, Ministry of Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, 1958.Google Scholar