Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:52:42.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation Adoption in Indian Agriculture—the High Yielding Varieties Programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Barbara Harriss
Barbara Harriss
Affiliation:
Cambridgeshire College of Arts and Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Whilst reading agricultural economics for the postgraduate Diploma in Agricultural Science at Cambridge University, the author's attention was caught by two reports on recent developments in Indian agriculture. These were the ‘I.A.D.P. Third Report 1965–7’, and the ‘First Evaluation Study of the High Yielding Varieties Programme for 1967–8’. Although the information was generalized and the samples involved biased towards most successful areas, certain trends and conclusions emerged relating to the progress of innovation adoption in simple agricultural communities and the influences at work on the mechanism. Subsequent field work in north-west India provided firstly some of the detail lacked by the All-India statistics and, secondly, some insight into the problems faced by economically progressive districts of relevance to less developed ones.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1972 , pp. 71 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The author wishes to thank the trustees of the Mary Euphrasia Mosley Travel Scholarship, Cambridge University, and the trustees of the Mary Ewart Graduate Travel Award, Newnham College, Cambridge, for their financial assistance; Sir Joseph Hutchinson for his comments on a draft version of this paper, Mr B. H. Farmer for his guidance and encouragement, and her husband for his help with the field work.

1 Expert Committee on Assessment and Evaluation, Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Community Development and Cooperation, Intensive Agricultural District Programme: Third Report, 1965–66 & 1966–67 (New Delhi, 1967).Google Scholar

2 Programme Evaluation Organisation, Planning Commission, Evaluation Study of the High Yielding Varieties Programme, Kharif 1967 (New Delhi, 1968).Google Scholar

3 Economic and Statistical Adviser, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Growth Rates in Agriculture (New Delhi, 1964), p. 16.Google Scholar

4 Johnston, B. F. and Cowrie, J., ‘The Seed—Fertiliser Revolution and the Labor Force Absorption Problem’, unpublished paper, Food Research Institute, Stanford University (1968).Google Scholar

5 Silvaraman, B. in Financial Times, 20 January 1969.Google Scholar

6 Ford Foundation for Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Community Development and Cooperation, Report on India's Food Crisis and Steps to Meet it (New Delhi, 1959), p. 248.Google Scholar

7 Ford Foundation, New Opportunities through I.A.D.P. for Growth in India's Agriculture (New Delhi, 1967).Google Scholar

8 Ford Foundation, op. cit. (1959), p. 180.

9 For example, in unpublished M.Sc. theses on various aspects of the High Yielding Programme by N. Singh, O. Prakash and V. P. Singh, Agra University, 1969.

10 See, for example, Mann, K. S., Moore, C. V. and Johi, S. S., ‘Estimates of Potential Effects of New Technology on Agriculture in Punjab’. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50, 1968, pp. 278–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and their ‘Projections of Shifts in Cropping Patterns in the Punjab’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 23, 1968, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar

11 N. S. Shetty, V. G. Panse, D. Singh and R. S. Savale, ‘Technological Change and Diffusion in Agriculture’, Ibid., 21, 1966, pp. 121–31 and 189–217.

12 S. P. Lalgupta and S. B. Singh, ‘Impact of Developmental Activities on Technological Change in Varanasi District’, Ibid., 21, 1966, pp. 154–60.

13 K. M. Choudhary and M. Maharaja, ‘Acceptance of Improved Practices and their Diffusion among Wheat Growers of Rajasthan’ Ibid., 21, 1966, pp. 161–5.

14 D. K. Desai and B. M. Sharma, ‘Technological Change and its Rate of Diffusion’ Ibid., 21, 1966, pp. 141–53.

15 Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Community Development and Cooperation, Report on the High Yielding Varieties Programme, Kharif 1967–68 (New Delhi, 1969).Google Scholar

16 Programme Evaluation Organisation, op. cit., p. 90.

17 Sinha, J. N., ‘The Concept of Unemployment in a Developing Economy’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economies, 23, 1968, pp. 15–25.Google Scholar

18 Programme Evaluation Organisation, op. cit., pp. 55, 58, 78, 79 and 117.

19 Lipton, M., ‘The Theory of the Optimising Peasant’, Journal of Developmental Studies, 4, 1968, pp. 327–51 at p. 329.Google Scholar

20 Singh, N., Prakash, O. and Singh, V. P., op. cit.Google Scholar; and Lipton, M., op. cit., pp. 330–5.Google Scholar

21 Programme Evaluation Organisation, Evaluation of Major Irrigation Projects (New Delhi, 1965), p. 2.Google Scholar

22 Programme Evaluation Organisation, op. cit. (1968), p. 21.

23 Ibid., pp. 84, 89 and 105.

24 Ibid., p. 70.

25 Farmer, B. H., ‘On Not Controlling Subdivision in Paddy Lands’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 1960, pp. 225–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Schultz, T. W., Transforming Traditional Agriculture (New Haven, 1964), pp. 36–53.Google Scholar

26 Government of India, A Directory of Certain Wholesale Agricultural Markets of Uttar Pradesh (New Delhi, 1950).Google Scholar

27 Programme Evaluation Organisation, op. cit. (1968), p. 1.

28 Lipton, M., op. cit., p. 334.Google Scholar

29 Johnston, B. F. and Cowrie, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

30 Rathaur, R. S., Impact of High Yielding Varieties on Farm Labour Use, unpublished M.Sc. thesis in Agricultural Economics, Agra University (1969).Google Scholar

31 Hagerstrand, T., The Propagation of Innovation Waves, Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, No. 4 (Lund, 1952), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar

32 National Council of Applied Economics Research, Fertiliser Consumption, Problems and Polisies (New Dethi, 1964), p. 38.Google Scholar

33 Expert Committee on Assessment and Evaluation, op. cit., p. 41.

34 National Council of Applied Economic Research, op. cit. (1964), p. 41; and Pesticides in Indian Agriculture (New Delhi, 1967), p. 41.Google Scholar

35 Kahlon, A. S., Johl, S. S., Moore, C. V., Kahlon, S. S. and Sharma, M. L., Dynamics of Punjab Agriculture (Ludhiana, 1966), p. 26.Google Scholar

36 Ibid., pp. 14–19.

37 I.A.D.P. District Ludhiana, Report for 1968 (Ludhiana, 1968), p. 4.

38 Myrdal, G., Asian Drama (Harmondsworth, 1968), p. 1251.Google Scholar

39 Deb, P. C., Sharma, M. L. and Singh, N., ‘Rationality in Decision Making in the Adoption of Improved Farm Practices’, Journal of Research, 5, 1968, pp. 125–8Google Scholar; and Deb, P. C. and Sharma, M. L., ‘Informal Leaders and Technological Change in Agriculture’, Sociological Bulletin, 17, 1968, pp. 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Deb, P. C., Singh, H. and Sharma, M. L., ‘Sources of Information Used in the Adoption of Improved Practices’, Man in India, 48, 1968, pp. 167–73Google Scholar; and Sandhu, M., Singh, H. and Khosla, A. K., unpublished M.Sc. theses in Agricultural Extension, Punjab Agricultural University (Ludhiana, 1968).Google Scholar

41 I.A.D.P. District Ludhiana, Annual Programme for 1969 (Ludhiana, 1969), p. 5.Google Scholar

42 I.A.D.P. District Ludhiana, op. cit. (1968), p. 3.Google Scholar

43 Gill, K. S., Wheat Market Behaviour in Punjab, Post Harvest Period 1968 (Ludhiana, 1969), p. 5.Google Scholar

44 Shukia, A. N. and Sohal, T. S., A Study of Panchayati Raj with Special Reference to Functioning of Panchayati Samitis in Punjab (Ludhiana, 1968).Google Scholar

45 See, for example, Johl, S. S. and Sandhu, H. S., Existing and Suggested Cropping Patterns in Different Districts of Punjab (Ludhiana, 1969).Google Scholar

46 Lal, B. B., ‘Haryana Villages’, Sunday Statesman, 3, 10 and 17 08 1969.Google Scholar

47 Lipton, M., op. cit., p. 343.Google Scholar

48 I.A.D.P. District Ludhiana, op. cit. (1969), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

49 Programme Evaluation Organisation, op. cit. (1968), pp. 74–80.

50 See, for example, Expert Committee on Assessment and Evaluation, op. cit., p. 40; and Programme Evaluation Organisation, op. cit. (1968), pp. 35–40.

51 Ford Foundation, A Prospective View of Intensive Agricultural District Programme (New Delhi, 1965).Google Scholar

52 As suggested form Streeten, P. and Lipton, M. (eds.), Crisis in Indian Planning (Oxford, 1968), p. 147Google Scholar; and Myrdal, G., op. cit., pp. 1356–66.Google Scholar

53 Lipton, M., op. cit., p. 331.Google Scholar

54 Singh, I. J. and Sharma, K. S., ‘Response of Some Mexican Red and Indian Amber Wheats to Nitrogen’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 23, 1968, pp. 86–93.Google Scholar

55 Lipton, M., op. cit., p. 332.Google Scholar

56 Schultz, T. W., op. cit., p. 167.Google Scholar

57 Gould, P., ‘Man against Environment, a Game Theoretic Framework’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 53, 1963, pp. 290–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar