Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:49:16.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Indian Press 1870–1880: A Small World of Journalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Uma Das Gupta
Affiliation:
Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan

Extract

A Unianimous decision of the Viceroy's Council was taken on 14 March 1878 to establish a check over the vernacular press in India. This was Act IX of 1878, an act for ‘the better control of publications in Oriental languages’. It was to control ‘seditious writing’ in the vernacular newspapers everywhere in the country, except the south. Too much was being written in these newspapers of the ‘injustice and tyranny’ of the British government, ‘its utter want of consideration towards its native subjects, and the insolence and pride of Englishmen in India’.One hundred and fifty-nine extracts from vernacular newspapers of the North-Western Provinces, Punjab, Bengal and Bombay were produced before the Supreme Council as evidence of existing sedition. Surprised at its own importance, the vernacular press staggered into the eighties of the nineteenth century. The crucial demand for ajudicial trial in case of an accusation of sedition against an editor was never conceded by the government, although in October 1878 the act was modified in minor respects. The important thing was that the government from an almost complete unawareness had come to be so preoccupied with the vernacular press. What was the nature of the vernacular press in India in the 1870s and how wide was its range?

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For the extracts of the vernacular papers submitted to the Supreme Council see Home (Judicial) Proceedings, National Archives of India, New Delhi [N.A.I.], April 1878, Pt B, No. 23, Appendix [hereafter, Home Judicial]; also, Dacosta, J., ‘Remarks on the Vernacular Press Laws of India’, pp. 6–16, in Political Tracts relating to India and China (London, 1878).Google Scholar

2 By this amendment the submission of proofs before publication was no longer insisted upon, although the bail-bond remained. Home (Legislative) Proceedings, N.A.I., October 1878, Pt B, No. 167; also Cranbrook to Lytton, 30 May and 4 June 1878, Lytton Papers, Vol. 516/3, MSS Eur. E 218, India Office Library, London.Google Scholar

3 Home (Public) Proceedings, N.A.I. [hereafter, Home Public], October 1878, Pt B, Nos 160–1.

4 Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, Nos 143–59.

5 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Bangla Samayik Patra (Contemporary Press of Bengal), in Bengali, pp. 34, 6, 8, 12.Google Scholar

6 For Calcutta, see Administrative Report for Bengal, 1878–9, Statistical Returns pp. ccixccxi;Google Scholar for Bombay, see McDonald, E.E., ‘The Modernizing of Communication: Vernacular Publishing in 19th Century Maharashtra’ in Asian Survey, Vol. 8, No. 7 (1968), pp. 604–6;CrossRefGoogle Scholar for N.W.P. see Tassy, Garcin de, La langue et la littérature hindoustanies de 1850 à 1869, (2nd ed., Paris, 1874), p. 10.Google Scholar

7 Sanial, S.C., ‘History of the Press in India—IV, Bombay’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 131 (1910), pp. 352–3.Google Scholar

8 Data obtained from the following sources: Home Public, January 1877, Pt B, No. 293; Home Public, September 1874, Pt B, No. 88; Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, Nos 298–9; Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, pp. 7–10 in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 85;Google Scholar also de Tassy, G., La langue et la littérature hindoustanies, p. 36.Google Scholar

9 Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, Nos 143–61.

10 Sastri, S., ‘Men I Have Seen’, The Modern Review, Vol. 8 (1910), pp. 271, 273–4.Google Scholar

11 Bose, P.N. and Moreno, H.W.B., A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press (Calcutta 1920), p. 93.Google Scholar

12 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charit Mala, No. 54 (Calcutta, 1945), p. 9. This is a series of short biographical essays in Bengali on the different literary figures, published separately.Google Scholar

13 Rao, V.D., ‘The Beginning and Growth of the Marathi Press’, in The Indian Press, ed. S.P., Sen (Calcutta, 1967), pp. 5960;Google Scholar also Arte, S.B., ‘Stray Thoughts about Marathi Journalism’, The Hindusthan Review, Vol. 65 (1920), pp. 179–81.Google Scholar

14 Ghosh, to Basak, , Calcutta, 9 July 1837 (Private Correspondence of Ram Gopal Ghosh and Gobind Chandra Basak),Google Scholar in Sanial, S.C., ‘History of the Press in India—XI, Bengal’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 132 (1911), p. 31.Google Scholar Ram Gopal Ghosh, son of a small shopkeeper, became a big merchant in the thirties and forties. He was educated at Hindu College, like many of his illustrious contemporaries, and became a member of the Bengal Education Council, being at the same time, and throughout, an active member of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce. See Misra, B.B., The Indian Middle Classes, Their Growth in Modern Times (Oxford, 1961), p. 345.Google Scholar

15 Rao, , ‘The Marathi Press’, in The Indian Press, pp. 57, 59.Google Scholar

16 de Tassy, G., La langue et la littérature hindoustanies, p. 46.Google Scholar

17 Report on the Urdu Newspapers of Madras Presidency (unpaginated) in Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, No. 159.

18 The Audit Bureau of Circulations (special number on the history of the press in India) (Bangalore, 1959), p. 6.Google Scholar

20 Karkaria, R.P., ‘The Revival of the Native Press in Western India—The Rast Goftar’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 107 (1898), p. 240.Google Scholar

21 The Calcutta paper, Sangbad Rasaraj, fell victim to a libel suit brought against its proprietor-editor by Raja Krishna Nath Rai of Cossimbazar in the year 1843 for having accused the raja and his wife of gross misconduct. The editor was imprisoned for six months and had to pay a fine of 500 rupees as well. The Calcutta Review, Vol. 132 (1911), p. 35.Google Scholar

22 Selections from the Records of Bengal, No. 32, p. xlii;Google Scholar also Narain, S., ‘The “Kohinoor” of 1851’, Journal of the Punjab Historical Society, Vol. 4 (1916), p. 56.Google Scholar

23 Natarajan, J., History of Indian Journalism, Pt II of the Report on the Press Commission (New Delhi, 1955), p. 71.Google Scholar

24 Bose, and Moreno, , A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press, pp. 68–9.Google Scholar

25 Natarajan, , History of Indian Journalism, p. 71.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., note on p. 71.

27 ‘A Chapter of Autobiography’ in Speeches and Writings of Dadabhai Naoroji, (Madras, 1910), p. 655.Google Scholar

28 Bose, and Moreno, , A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press, pp. 64–6.Google Scholar

29 Karkaria, R.P., ‘The Oldest Paper in India: The Bombay Samachar’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 212 (1898), p. 15.Google Scholar

30 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, pp. 7, 910, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.Google Scholar

31 Chand, B., ‘Urdu Journalism in the Punjab’, Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society, Vol. 2, Pt 1 (1933), p. 30.Google Scholar

32 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 1, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.

33 Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, Nos 298–9.Google Scholar

34 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Deshiya Samayik Patrer Itihas, in Bengali, Vol. I, pp. 63–5.Google Scholar

35 Report on the Urdu Newspapers of Madras Presidency (unpaginated), in Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, No. 159.Google Scholar

37 Banerjea, S.N., A Nation in Making (Reprint, Calcutta, 1963), p. 157.Google Scholar

38 Murthy, N.K., Indian Journalism (Mysore, 1966), p. 66.Google Scholar

39 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 13, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.Google Scholar

40 Proceedings of the Council of the Governor General of India, 1878, Vol. 17, pp. 177–87.Google Scholar

41 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 9, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.Google Scholar

42 Some of the Bengali journals which disappeared were the Gyanadipika (1840–1851), the Upadeshak (1846–1851), the Rasaratnakar (1849–1851), the Kanstabh Kiran (1846–1851). Selections from the Records of Bengal, No. 32, pp. xlv–xlvi.Google Scholar

43 Bose, and Moreno, , A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press, p. 69.Google Scholar

44 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charitmala, No. 31 (Calcutta, 1944).Google Scholar

45 Ibid., No. 54 (Calcutta, 1945).

46 Ibid., No. 39, (Calcutta, 1944).

47 Heimsath, C.H., Indian Nationalism and Hindu Social Reform (Princeton, 1964), p. 61;CrossRefGoogle Scholar also Chronicle of the British Indian Association (18511952), ed. P.N., Singh Roy (Calcutta, 1963), Preface.Google Scholar

48 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charitmala, No. 60 (Calcutta, 1947);Google Scholar also Sen, P.K., Keshav Chandra Sen (Calcutta, 1938), pp. 76–7, 78–9.Google Scholar

49 Ghose, N.N., Kristo Das Pal, A Study (Calcutta, 1887), pp. 68, 9–13.Google Scholar

50 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charitmala, No. 35 (Calcutta, 1945).Google Scholar

51 Home Judicial, July 1878, Pt B, No. 23.

52 Obituary notices on Maneckji Barjorji's death in the Mumbai Samachar, 30 and 31 March 1898. I am grateful for the translation from Gujerati to Miss Taraporevala of the Gujerati section, Asiatic Society, Bombay. Mandalik was then the editor of the Native Opinion in Bombay; Ardeshir Moos was an astronomer and Jehangir Moos was a writer.

53 The Jam-e-Jamshed Centenary Souvenir (Bombay, 1933), article in Gujerati on the Marzban family, pp. 279–80. I am again grateful to Miss Taraporevala for translating sections of the article for me.Google Scholar

54 Jeejeebhoy, J.R., ‘Historical Survey of Bombay Journalism’, Jam-e-Jamshed Centenary Souvenir, p. 12 (English Section).Google Scholar

55 Buckland, C.E., Dictionary of Indian Biography (London, 1906), p. 228 (hereafter referred to as Buckland, Dictionary).Google Scholar

56 Edwardes, S.M., Kharshedji Rustamji Cama, 1831–1909. A Memoir (Oxford, 1923), pp. 23, 6, 810;Google Scholar on Sorabji Shapurji Bengalee, see Famous Parsis, G. Natesan and Co. (Madras, 1930), pp. 81–3.Google Scholar

57 Natarajan, J., History of Indian Journalism, p. 60.Google Scholar

58 ‘Rao, The Marathi Press’, in The Indian Press, p. 59.Google Scholar

59 Parekh, C.L., Eminent Indians on Indian Politics (Bombay, 1892), pp. 135–8.Google Scholar

60 Bhatnagar, B.R., The Rise and Growth of Hindi Journalism (Allahabad, 1947), p. 698;Google Scholar also Buckland, , Dictionary, p. 190.Google Scholar

61 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 3, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88;Google Scholar also Selections from The Records of Bengal, No. 32, p. lxiii.Google Scholar

62 Murthy, , Indian Journalism, p. 317.Google Scholar

63 Report on the Urdu Newspapers of Madras Presidency (unpaginated) in Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, No. 159.

64 Birdwood, G., ‘The Native Press of India’, Journal of the Society of Arts, Vol. 25 (18761877), p. 400.Google Scholar

65 The circulation figure of the Oudh Akhbar for the year 1870–1871 was put at 22,800—surely an exaggeration. Source: Administrative Report for Oudh, 1870–71, statistical returns, p. ccxix.Google Scholar

66 Cotes, E., ‘The Newspaper Press of India’, The Asiatic Review, Vol. 19 (1923), p. 417;Google Scholar also Digby, W., ‘The Native Newspapers of India and Ceylon’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 65 (1877), pp. 362–3.Google Scholar

67 Proceedings of the Council of the Governor General of India, 1878, Vol. 17, pp. 157, 162–3, 165, 179.Google Scholar

68 Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, Nos 298–9.

69 A list of subscribers in 1871 is available at the Bombay Samachar, Bombay. I am grateful to Mr Cama, the present managing director of the Samachar, for access to such information.

70 Administrative Report for North Western Provinces, 18741875, pp. 197–8.Google Scholar

71 Divisional and District Annual Report, Rajshahye Division, 18771878, para. 48, p. 20 (hereafter I shall refer to these records as District Report with the name of the division).Google Scholar

72 District Report, 24-Parganas, Presidency Division, 18721873, p. 176.Google Scholar

73 Subscription lists in: Indian Mirror, 18 03 1873;Google ScholarHindoo Patriot, 5 01 1871;Google ScholarAmrita Bazar Patrika, 31 March 1878.Google Scholar

74 Selections from the Records of Bengal, No. 32, p. xlii.Google Scholar

75 Spectator, 16 03 1878.

76 Priolkar, A.K., The Printing Press in India (Bombay, 1958), Pt I, pp. 78–9.Google Scholar

77 Cotes, E., in The Asiatic Review, Vol. 19, pp. 417–18.Google Scholar

78 Ibid., p. 423. Everard Cotes was editor of the Indian Daily News in the 1890s.

79 Murthy, , Indian Journalism, pp. 54–5;Google Scholar also Golden Jubilee Supplement of The Statesman (Calcutta, 1945), article on Robert Knight (unpaginated).Google Scholar

80 Stocqueler, J.H., The Memoirs of a Journalist (London and Bombay, 1873), p. 92.Google Scholar

81 Banerjea, , A Nation in Making, p. 64.Google Scholar

82 Golden Jubilee Supplement of The Statesman, article on Robert Knight (unpaginated).Google Scholar

83 The Pioneer 1865–1964, Centenary Supplement (Allahabad, 1965), article on its history (unpaginated);Google Scholar also Buckland, , Dictionary, p. 11.Google Scholar

84 One Hundred Years in India, The Times of India Centenary Supplement (Bombay, 1935), pp. 57.Google Scholar

85 Ibid., p. 9; also Buckland, , Dictionary, p. 104.Google Scholar

86 One Hundred Years in India, The Times of India Centenary Supplement, pp. 78.Google Scholar

87 The Pioneer 1865–1964, Centenary Supplement (unpaginated); also Buckland, Dictionary, pp. 381, 391.Google Scholar

88 Sandbrook, J.A., ‘A Hundred Years of Journalism in India’, The Asiatic Review, Vol. 18 (1922), pp. 448–9.Google Scholar

89 Golden Jubilee Supplement of The Statesman, article on ‘One Anna Journalism—The Statesman’ (unpaginated).Google Scholar

90 India (public) Proceedings, India Office Library, London, June 1875, Pt A, Vol. 517, Nos 65–7.