Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
A Unianimous decision of the Viceroy's Council was taken on 14 March 1878 to establish a check over the vernacular press in India. This was Act IX of 1878, an act for ‘the better control of publications in Oriental languages’. It was to control ‘seditious writing’ in the vernacular newspapers everywhere in the country, except the south. Too much was being written in these newspapers of the ‘injustice and tyranny’ of the British government, ‘its utter want of consideration towards its native subjects, and the insolence and pride of Englishmen in India’.One hundred and fifty-nine extracts from vernacular newspapers of the North-Western Provinces, Punjab, Bengal and Bombay were produced before the Supreme Council as evidence of existing sedition. Surprised at its own importance, the vernacular press staggered into the eighties of the nineteenth century. The crucial demand for ajudicial trial in case of an accusation of sedition against an editor was never conceded by the government, although in October 1878 the act was modified in minor respects. The important thing was that the government from an almost complete unawareness had come to be so preoccupied with the vernacular press. What was the nature of the vernacular press in India in the 1870s and how wide was its range?
1 For the extracts of the vernacular papers submitted to the Supreme Council see Home (Judicial) Proceedings, National Archives of India, New Delhi [N.A.I.], April 1878, Pt B, No. 23, Appendix [hereafter, Home Judicial]; also, Dacosta, J., ‘Remarks on the Vernacular Press Laws of India’, pp. 6–16, in Political Tracts relating to India and China (London, 1878).Google Scholar
2 By this amendment the submission of proofs before publication was no longer insisted upon, although the bail-bond remained. Home (Legislative) Proceedings, N.A.I., October 1878, Pt B, No. 167; also Cranbrook to Lytton, 30 May and 4 June 1878, Lytton Papers, Vol. 516/3, MSS Eur. E 218, India Office Library, London.Google Scholar
3 Home (Public) Proceedings, N.A.I. [hereafter, Home Public], October 1878, Pt B, Nos 160–1.
4 Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, Nos 143–59.
5 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Bangla Samayik Patra (Contemporary Press of Bengal), in Bengali, pp. 3–4, 6, 8, 12.Google Scholar
6 For Calcutta, see Administrative Report for Bengal, 1878–9, Statistical Returns pp. ccix–ccxi;Google Scholar for Bombay, see McDonald, E.E., ‘The Modernizing of Communication: Vernacular Publishing in 19th Century Maharashtra’ in Asian Survey, Vol. 8, No. 7 (1968), pp. 604–6;CrossRefGoogle Scholar for N.W.P. see Tassy, Garcin de, La langue et la littérature hindoustanies de 1850 à 1869, (2nd ed., Paris, 1874), p. 10.Google Scholar
7 Sanial, S.C., ‘History of the Press in India—IV, Bombay’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 131 (1910), pp. 352–3.Google Scholar
8 Data obtained from the following sources: Home Public, January 1877, Pt B, No. 293; Home Public, September 1874, Pt B, No. 88; Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, Nos 298–9; Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, pp. 7–10 in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 85;Google Scholar also de Tassy, G., La langue et la littérature hindoustanies, p. 36.Google Scholar
9 Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, Nos 143–61.
10 Sastri, S., ‘Men I Have Seen’, The Modern Review, Vol. 8 (1910), pp. 271, 273–4.Google Scholar
11 Bose, P.N. and Moreno, H.W.B., A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press (Calcutta 1920), p. 93.Google Scholar
12 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charit Mala, No. 54 (Calcutta, 1945), p. 9. This is a series of short biographical essays in Bengali on the different literary figures, published separately.Google Scholar
13 Rao, V.D., ‘The Beginning and Growth of the Marathi Press’, in The Indian Press, ed. S.P., Sen (Calcutta, 1967), pp. 59–60;Google Scholar also Arte, S.B., ‘Stray Thoughts about Marathi Journalism’, The Hindusthan Review, Vol. 65 (1920), pp. 179–81.Google Scholar
14 Ghosh, to Basak, , Calcutta, 9 July 1837 (Private Correspondence of Ram Gopal Ghosh and Gobind Chandra Basak),Google Scholar in Sanial, S.C., ‘History of the Press in India—XI, Bengal’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 132 (1911), p. 31.Google Scholar Ram Gopal Ghosh, son of a small shopkeeper, became a big merchant in the thirties and forties. He was educated at Hindu College, like many of his illustrious contemporaries, and became a member of the Bengal Education Council, being at the same time, and throughout, an active member of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce. See Misra, B.B., The Indian Middle Classes, Their Growth in Modern Times (Oxford, 1961), p. 345.Google Scholar
15 Rao, , ‘The Marathi Press’, in The Indian Press, pp. 57, 59.Google Scholar
16 de Tassy, G., La langue et la littérature hindoustanies, p. 46.Google Scholar
17 Report on the Urdu Newspapers of Madras Presidency (unpaginated) in Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, No. 159.
18 The Audit Bureau of Circulations (special number on the history of the press in India) (Bangalore, 1959), p. 6.Google Scholar
19 Ibid.
20 Karkaria, R.P., ‘The Revival of the Native Press in Western India—The Rast Goftar’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 107 (1898), p. 240.Google Scholar
21 The Calcutta paper, Sangbad Rasaraj, fell victim to a libel suit brought against its proprietor-editor by Raja Krishna Nath Rai of Cossimbazar in the year 1843 for having accused the raja and his wife of gross misconduct. The editor was imprisoned for six months and had to pay a fine of 500 rupees as well. The Calcutta Review, Vol. 132 (1911), p. 35.Google Scholar
22 Selections from the Records of Bengal, No. 32, p. xlii;Google Scholar also Narain, S., ‘The “Kohinoor” of 1851’, Journal of the Punjab Historical Society, Vol. 4 (1916), p. 56.Google Scholar
23 Natarajan, J., History of Indian Journalism, Pt II of the Report on the Press Commission (New Delhi, 1955), p. 71.Google Scholar
24 Bose, and Moreno, , A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press, pp. 68–9.Google Scholar
25 Natarajan, , History of Indian Journalism, p. 71.Google Scholar
26 Ibid., note on p. 71.
27 ‘A Chapter of Autobiography’ in Speeches and Writings of Dadabhai Naoroji, (Madras, 1910), p. 655.Google Scholar
28 Bose, and Moreno, , A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press, pp. 64–6.Google Scholar
29 Karkaria, R.P., ‘The Oldest Paper in India: The Bombay Samachar’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 212 (1898), p. 15.Google Scholar
30 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, pp. 7, 9–10, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.Google Scholar
31 Chand, B., ‘Urdu Journalism in the Punjab’, Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society, Vol. 2, Pt 1 (1933), p. 30.Google Scholar
32 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 1, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.
33 Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, Nos 298–9.Google Scholar
34 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Deshiya Samayik Patrer Itihas, in Bengali, Vol. I, pp. 63–5.Google Scholar
35 Report on the Urdu Newspapers of Madras Presidency (unpaginated), in Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, No. 159.Google Scholar
36 Ibid.
37 Banerjea, S.N., A Nation in Making (Reprint, Calcutta, 1963), p. 157.Google Scholar
38 Murthy, N.K., Indian Journalism (Mysore, 1966), p. 66.Google Scholar
39 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 13, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.Google Scholar
40 Proceedings of the Council of the Governor General of India, 1878, Vol. 17, pp. 177–87.Google Scholar
41 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 9, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88.Google Scholar
42 Some of the Bengali journals which disappeared were the Gyanadipika (1840–1851), the Upadeshak (1846–1851), the Rasaratnakar (1849–1851), the Kanstabh Kiran (1846–1851). Selections from the Records of Bengal, No. 32, pp. xlv–xlvi.Google Scholar
43 Bose, and Moreno, , A Hundred Years of the Bengali Press, p. 69.Google Scholar
44 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charitmala, No. 31 (Calcutta, 1944).Google Scholar
45 Ibid., No. 54 (Calcutta, 1945).
46 Ibid., No. 39, (Calcutta, 1944).
47 Heimsath, C.H., Indian Nationalism and Hindu Social Reform (Princeton, 1964), p. 61;CrossRefGoogle Scholar also Chronicle of the British Indian Association (1851–1952), ed. P.N., Singh Roy (Calcutta, 1963), Preface.Google Scholar
48 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charitmala, No. 60 (Calcutta, 1947);Google Scholar also Sen, P.K., Keshav Chandra Sen (Calcutta, 1938), pp. 76–7, 78–9.Google Scholar
49 Ghose, N.N., Kristo Das Pal, A Study (Calcutta, 1887), pp. 6–8, 9–13.Google Scholar
50 Bandyopadhyaya, B.N., Sahitya Sadhak Charitmala, No. 35 (Calcutta, 1945).Google Scholar
51 Home Judicial, July 1878, Pt B, No. 23.
52 Obituary notices on Maneckji Barjorji's death in the Mumbai Samachar, 30 and 31 March 1898. I am grateful for the translation from Gujerati to Miss Taraporevala of the Gujerati section, Asiatic Society, Bombay. Mandalik was then the editor of the Native Opinion in Bombay; Ardeshir Moos was an astronomer and Jehangir Moos was a writer.
53 The Jam-e-Jamshed Centenary Souvenir (Bombay, 1933), article in Gujerati on the Marzban family, pp. 279–80. I am again grateful to Miss Taraporevala for translating sections of the article for me.Google Scholar
54 Jeejeebhoy, J.R., ‘Historical Survey of Bombay Journalism’, Jam-e-Jamshed Centenary Souvenir, p. 12 (English Section).Google Scholar
55 Buckland, C.E., Dictionary of Indian Biography (London, 1906), p. 228 (hereafter referred to as Buckland, Dictionary).Google Scholar
56 Edwardes, S.M., Kharshedji Rustamji Cama, 1831–1909. A Memoir (Oxford, 1923), pp. 2–3, 6, 8–10;Google Scholar on Sorabji Shapurji Bengalee, see Famous Parsis, G. Natesan and Co. (Madras, 1930), pp. 81–3.Google Scholar
57 Natarajan, J., History of Indian Journalism, p. 60.Google Scholar
58 ‘Rao, The Marathi Press’, in The Indian Press, p. 59.Google Scholar
59 Parekh, C.L., Eminent Indians on Indian Politics (Bombay, 1892), pp. 135–8.Google Scholar
60 Bhatnagar, B.R., The Rise and Growth of Hindi Journalism (Allahabad, 1947), p. 698;Google Scholar also Buckland, , Dictionary, p. 190.Google Scholar
61 Memorandum on the Vernacular Newspapers of Upper India, p. 3, in Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, No. 88;Google Scholar also Selections from The Records of Bengal, No. 32, p. lxiii.Google Scholar
62 Murthy, , Indian Journalism, p. 317.Google Scholar
63 Report on the Urdu Newspapers of Madras Presidency (unpaginated) in Home Public, October 1878, Pt B, No. 159.
64 Birdwood, G., ‘The Native Press of India’, Journal of the Society of Arts, Vol. 25 (1876–1877), p. 400.Google Scholar
65 The circulation figure of the Oudh Akhbar for the year 1870–1871 was put at 22,800—surely an exaggeration. Source: Administrative Report for Oudh, 1870–71, statistical returns, p. ccxix.Google Scholar
66 Cotes, E., ‘The Newspaper Press of India’, The Asiatic Review, Vol. 19 (1923), p. 417;Google Scholar also Digby, W., ‘The Native Newspapers of India and Ceylon’, The Calcutta Review, Vol. 65 (1877), pp. 362–3.Google Scholar
67 Proceedings of the Council of the Governor General of India, 1878, Vol. 17, pp. 157, 162–3, 165, 179.Google Scholar
68 Home Public, August 1879, Pt B, Nos 298–9.
69 A list of subscribers in 1871 is available at the Bombay Samachar, Bombay. I am grateful to Mr Cama, the present managing director of the Samachar, for access to such information.
70 Administrative Report for North Western Provinces, 1874–1875, pp. 197–8.Google Scholar
71 Divisional and District Annual Report, Rajshahye Division, 1877–1878, para. 48, p. 20 (hereafter I shall refer to these records as District Report with the name of the division).Google Scholar
72 District Report, 24-Parganas, Presidency Division, 1872–1873, p. 176.Google Scholar
73 Subscription lists in: Indian Mirror, 18 03 1873;Google ScholarHindoo Patriot, 5 01 1871;Google ScholarAmrita Bazar Patrika, 31 March 1878.Google Scholar
74 Selections from the Records of Bengal, No. 32, p. xlii.Google Scholar
75 Spectator, 16 03 1878.
76 Priolkar, A.K., The Printing Press in India (Bombay, 1958), Pt I, pp. 78–9.Google Scholar
77 Cotes, E., in The Asiatic Review, Vol. 19, pp. 417–18.Google Scholar
78 Ibid., p. 423. Everard Cotes was editor of the Indian Daily News in the 1890s.
79 Murthy, , Indian Journalism, pp. 54–5;Google Scholar also Golden Jubilee Supplement of The Statesman (Calcutta, 1945), article on Robert Knight (unpaginated).Google Scholar
80 Stocqueler, J.H., The Memoirs of a Journalist (London and Bombay, 1873), p. 92.Google Scholar
81 Banerjea, , A Nation in Making, p. 64.Google Scholar
82 Golden Jubilee Supplement of The Statesman, article on Robert Knight (unpaginated).Google Scholar
83 The Pioneer 1865–1964, Centenary Supplement (Allahabad, 1965), article on its history (unpaginated);Google Scholar also Buckland, , Dictionary, p. 11.Google Scholar
84 One Hundred Years in India, The Times of India Centenary Supplement (Bombay, 1935), pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
85 Ibid., p. 9; also Buckland, , Dictionary, p. 104.Google Scholar
86 One Hundred Years in India, The Times of India Centenary Supplement, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
87 The Pioneer 1865–1964, Centenary Supplement (unpaginated); also Buckland, Dictionary, pp. 381, 391.Google Scholar
88 Sandbrook, J.A., ‘A Hundred Years of Journalism in India’, The Asiatic Review, Vol. 18 (1922), pp. 448–9.Google Scholar
89 Golden Jubilee Supplement of The Statesman, article on ‘One Anna Journalism—The Statesman’ (unpaginated).Google Scholar
90 India (public) Proceedings, India Office Library, London, June 1875, Pt A, Vol. 517, Nos 65–7.