Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:16:10.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hunan: Laboratory of Reform and Land of Revolution: Hunanese in the Making of Modern China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

ZHENG YANGWEN
ZHENG YANGWEN*
Affiliation:
School of Arts, Histories and Cultures, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
*
* E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hunan produced the largest number and most able leaders for the Chinese Communist Party. How could this land-locked, sleepy and conservative province produce so many revolutionaries? This article examines the consequences of three consecutive political theatres and their actors that turned Hunan into a laboratory of reform and land of revolution. It focuses on what three generations of Hunanese did that pushed Hunan into and kept the province in the national spotlight. The Hunanese, be they Qing loyalists, constitutional reformers, Han nationalists or communists, dominated China's political stage from the 1850s to the 1980s. They were patriotic and pragmatic in their patriotism. Would the Communist Revolution have been so fundamental and bloody had Champagne liberals or those with no militarist tradition controlled the helm? With the tide of Hunan gone, we must re-examine this province to see how it had shaped and changed the course of modern China.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 1113 - 1136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lewis, Charlton M., Prologue to the Chinese Revolution: The Transformation of Ideas and Institutions in Hunan Province, 1891–1907 (Cambridge, MA: East Asia Research Center, Harvard University Press, 1976) (Foreword).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 McDonald, Angus W., The Urban Origins of Rural Revolution: Elites and the Masses in Hunan Province, China 1911–1927 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), p. 2.Google Scholar

3 Lewis, Charlton M., The Opening of Hunan: Reform and Revolution in a Chinese Province, 1895–1907 (Berkeley: University of California, 1966) (Unpublished PhD thesis)Google Scholar and Prologue to the Chinese Revolution; Esherick, Joseph, Reform and Revolution in China: The 1911 Revolution in Hunan and Hubei (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Angus W. McDonald, The Urban Origins of Rural Revolution. See also Shaffer, Linda, Mao and the Workers: The Hunan Labor Movement, 1920–1923 (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1982)Google Scholar; Bhalla, A.S., Economic Transition in Hunan and Southern China (London: Macmillan, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Perdue, Peter, Exhausting the Earth: State and Peasant in Hunan, 1500–1850 (Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shimizu, Minoru, Konan goshi undo shoshi (Kyoto-shi: Dohosha, 1992)Google Scholar; Stephen, Platt, Hunanese Nationalism and the Revival of Wang Fuzhi, 1839–1923 (New Haven, CT: Yale University, 2004) (Unpublished PhD thesis)Google Scholar. Books and articles published in Chinese are numerous. Liu Yanyan, Li Yu and Liu Jian'an are among the new generation of Hunan scholars in China. Zhang Pengyuan has written extensively on Hunan.

4 Charlton M. Lewis, Prologue to the Chinese Revolution.

5 Joseph Esherick, Reform and Revolution in China, pp. 2–3 (Introduction).

6 Angus W. McDonald, Urban Origins of Rural Revolution, p. 6 (Introduction).

7 Stephen Platt, Hunanese Nationalism and the Revival of Wang Fuzhi, 1839–1923.

8 Charlton M. Lewis, The Opening of Hunan, p. 7.

9 This can also be seen from the post-Mao Era when Hunan supplied Guangdong, especially the special economic zones of Shenzhen and Zhuhai with both skilled and unskilled labourers, giving this inland province a better economic edge than others.

10 Ping-ti, Ho, The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368–1911 (New York City, NY: Columbia University Press, 1962), p. 228.Google Scholar

11 Charlton M. Lewis, The Opening of Hunan, pp. 11–45, chapter 1.

12 Qian, Shipu, Qingdai zhiguan nianbiao (4 vols., Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1980), vol. 2, pp. 1478 and 1708.Google Scholar

13 Guanluo, Cai, Qingdai qibai minren zhuan (Shanghai: Shijie shuju, 1937), appendix 4.Google Scholar

14 Xianglin, Mao, Moyu lu (4 vols., Shanghai: Guji chubanshe, 1985), vol. 4, pp. 1A–B or 5471–72.Google Scholar

15 This Hunan tongzhi was compiled in the Guangxu emperor's eleventh year, 1885. The numbers were provided by Liu Yanyan, editor of the Hunan tongzhi, published by the provincial authority in the 1990s. See Liu Yanyan, Hunan tongshi: jindai bian (Hunan shuban she, 1994), p. 280.

16 McCord, Edward A., The Emergence of Modern Chinese Warlordism: Military Power and Politics in Hunan and Hubei (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1985) (Unpublished PhD thesis).Google Scholar

17 Morse, H.B., The International Relations of the Chinese Empire (3 vols., London: Hazell, Watson & Viney, 1918), vol. 3, p. 158.Google Scholar This was a report Morse sent to his boss Robert Hart on 25 November 1899. See also Charlton M. Lewis, Prologue to the Chinese Revolution, p. 9.

18 Charlton M. Lewis, Prologue to the Chinese Revolution, p. 46.

19 Yi Feizhou, Hunan weixin yundong yanjiu (Hunan jiaoyu chubanshe, 1999), p. 66. Unfortunately, neither the National University of Singapore nor the University of Manchester has the 94th issue of the Xiang Bao.

20 Sitong, Tan, Tan Sitong quanji: zengding ben (2 vols., Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1981), p. 343.Google Scholar

21 Liang Qichao, Liang Qichao quanji (21 vols., Beijing chubanshe, 1999), vol. 1, p. 249.

22 Liu Yanyan, Hunan tongshi, pp. 525–27. Liu's numbers are rough. Different historians have come up with different numbers. Japanese sources have the same problem. One issue is that registration did not mean graduation, as many registered and studied in Japan but did not graduate with a degree.

23 Chun-tu, Hsueh, Huang Hsing and the Chinese Revolution (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1961), p. 44.Google Scholar Zhang Kaiyun suggested that Tongmeng Hui enrolled 979 numbers in 1905–1906 and the number of Hunanese reached 158. See Zhang Kaiyun, ‘Hunan ren yu xinhai gemin’, in Xinhai gemin zai Hunan lunwen ji (Hunan renmin chubanshe, 1984), pp. 3–15.

24 Li Xisuo, et al., Huang Xin de junshi lilun yu shijian (Renmin chubanshe, 1999), p. 23.

25 Lujun, RibenXuexiao, Shiguan, Riben lujun shiguan xuexiao zhonghua minguo liuxuesheng minbo (Taipei: Guomin dahui tushuguan, 1975), p. 180, appendix. The numbers were compiled by Guo Rongsheng.Google Scholar

26 Fogel, Joshua (ed.), The Role of Japan in Liang Qichao's Introduction of Modern Western Civilisation to China (Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies, 2004).Google Scholar Jia Weicheng, ‘Hunan liuri xuesheng yu xinhai gemin’, in Xinhai gemin zai Hunan lunwen ji (Hunan renmin chubanshe, 1984), pp. 50–62.

27 Liu Yanyan, Hunan tongshi, p. 529.

28 Zhang Pengyuan, Hunan xiandaihua de zaoqi jinzhan, 1860–1916 (Yuelu shushe, 2002), p. 190. Zhang's source came from the journal Dongfang Zazhi, issues 8 and 9. Huang Fuqing's research showed that Hunan sent at least eighteen female students to Japan before 1911. See Fuqing, Huang, Qingmo liuri xuesheng (Taipei: Academia Sinica, 1975), appendix 6.Google Scholar

29 Zhang Pengyuan, Hunan xiandaihua de zaoqi jinzhan, 1860–1916, pp. 176–77.

30 Hobsbawm, Eric J., The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1994).Google Scholar

31 It seems that Mingguo Ribao, ‘Republican Daily’, first broke the news in Shanghai.

32 Yunhou, Zhang, et al. , Liu Fa qingong jianxue yundong (2 vols., Shanghai: Renmin chubanshe, 1980)Google Scholar, vol. 1, appendix. See also Qinghua daxue zhonggong dangshi jiaoyanshi, Fu Fa qingong jianxue yundong shiliao (3 vols., Beijing chubanshe, 1979), vol. 1, p. 84. The number here is more than ninety. See also Yuhao, Xuan, Liu Fa qingong jianxue yundong shigao (Chengdu: Bashu shushe, 1994), p. 56.Google Scholar The number here is ninety-one.

33 Landis, Richard B., ‘The origins of Whampoa graduates who served in the northern expedition’, in Sakai, Robert K. (ed.), Studies on Asia: 1964 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1964), pp. 149–63.Google Scholar

34 Renxin, Yao (ed.), Nanchang Qiushou Guangzhou qiyi renminglu (Beijing: Changzheng chubanshe, 1987)Google Scholar, appendix. The calculation is my own.

35 Ditto. The Guangzhou Uprising was dominated by Cantonese.

36 Ven Van de, Hans J., War and Nationalism in China 1925–1945 (London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003), p. 255.Google Scholar

37 Klein, Donald W. and Clark, Anne B., Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Communists (2 vols., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), vol. 2, pp. 1046–51.Google Scholar

38 Mitter, Rana, The Bitter Revolution: China's Struggle With the Modern World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar