Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:47:02.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Home and the World’: Cosmopolitan, transnational identities of courtly Indian women in the late imperial zenana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

ANGMA D. JHALA
ANGMA D. JHALA*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Bentley University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the cosmopolitan world of the colonial zenana through the marriages of two mid-twentieth-century royal Indian women, Maharani Brijraj Kumari of Dhrangadhra and Maharani Krishna Kumari of Jodhpur. In particular, it analyses the close connection between zenana women's education and emergent adolescent sexuality. These women ordinarily began their studies in mixed-gender classrooms with their brothers and male cousins as children. As they neared the age of menarche, girls were extracted from the formal schoolroom and undertook instruction in household management and childcare in preparation for their expected roles as wives and mothers. Despite being prematurely cut off from the childhood classroom, women's educational backgrounds (in both Western and Indic forms of knowledge) and future learning potential remained an important part of their postmarital identity. Young, anglicized Indian men increasingly desired wives who reflected the modernity that they hoped to represent as imperial subjects and were encouraged to adopt by British advisors and tutors. They required wives who would not wear pardah and thus reflect more Western ideals of companionate marriages of friendship, yet simultaneously live in gender-segregated palace quarters, uphold traditional kinship networks, perform religious duties, and engage in the maintenance of a large polygamous household. Definitions of sex, marriage, and domesticity were increasingly cross-cultural and pan-historical in nature, incorporating aspects both of the ‘modern’ and the ‘traditional’, the Indic and the European, the regional and the transnational.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 1704 - 1731
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Joshi, V. (1995). Polygamy and Purdah, Rawat Publications, Jaipur, pp. 87–88Google Scholar.

2 For a more detailed history of the zenana practices in the princely states, refer to my book: (2008). Courtly Indian Women in Late Imperial India, Pickering and Chatto Press, London.

3 Lal, R. (2005). Domesticity and Power in the Early Mughal World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 166–75Google Scholar.

4 Refer to Jhala, Courtly Indian Women; Joshi, Polygamy and Purdah; Khan, S. M. (2000). The Begums of Bhopal: A Dynasty of Women Rulers in Raj India, I. B. Tauris, LondonGoogle Scholar; Lal, Domesticity and Power; Lambert-Hurley, S. (2006). Muslim Women, Reform and Princely Patronage: Nawab Sultan Jahan Begam of Bhopal, Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar; Peirce, L. (1993). The Imperial Harem, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar.

5 Lal, Domesticity and Power.

6 For an account of elite Indian women's experiences with European travel, refer to Grewal, I. (1996). Home and Harem: Nation, Gender, Empire, and the Cultures of Travel, Duke University Press, Durham, North CarolinaCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Maharani Sunity Devi of Cooch Behar was the first Indian woman to write her autobiography in English. Devi, S. (1995). Autobiography of an Indian Princess, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi, p. 11Google Scholar.

8 Maharani Chimnabai II of Baroda wrote an important treatise on the status of women in India and around the world in her 1911 volume, The Position of Women in Indian Life, Longmans, Green & Co., London.

9 Maharani Vijaya Raje Scindia of Gwalior's mother was the first Nepalese woman to matriculate to university. Scindia, V. R. (1987). The Last Maharani of Gwalior: An Autobiography, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, p. 16Google Scholar.

10 The Begum of Bhopal, Maharani of Travancore, Maharani of Baroda, and Maharani of Jaipur were among several royal Indian women involved in national women's organizations and movements. Lambert-Hurley, Muslim Women, Reform and Princely Patronage; Lateef, S. (1990). Muslim Women in India: Political and Private Realities, 1890s–1980s, Zed Books, New Delhi, p. 84Google Scholar; Devi, G. (1995). A Princess Remembers, Rupa & Co., New DelhiGoogle Scholar.

11 Fitze, K., (1956). Twilight of the Maharajas, John Murray, London, p. 28Google Scholar; Jacob, G. Le Grand (1871). Western India: Before and During the Mutinies, H. S. King & Co., London, p. 18Google Scholar; Khan, The Begums of Bhopal.

12 For a more detailed discussion of this transcultural, imperial style, refer to my book: (2011). Royal Patronage, Power and Aesthetics in Princely India, Pickering and Chatto Press, London.

13 There is a wide literature on cosmopolitanism. Refer to Breckenridge, C. A., Pollock, S., Bhabha, H. K., and Chakbrabarty, D. (eds) (2002). Cosmopolitanism, Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Appiah, A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers, W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar; Dharwadker, V. (ed.) (2000). Cosmopolitan Geographies, New Locations in Literature and Culture, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar; and Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. (eds) (1998). Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar.

14 Refer to Rushdie, S.'s idea of mongrelization in his 1991 book, Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism, 1981–1991, Granta Books, London, p. 394Google Scholar.

15 Refer to the idea of hybridity as the creation of new transcultural forms in the contact zone created by colonization in Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar.

16 Woolacott, A. (2006). Gender and Empire, Palgrave MacMillan, New York, p. 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pierson, R. R. and Chaudhuri, N. (eds) (1998). Nation, Empire, Colony: Historicizing Gender and Race, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p. 2Google Scholar; Levine, P. (2004). Gender and Empire. The Oxford History of the British Empire, Companion Series, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. viiiGoogle Scholar.

17 For an in depth discussion on the construction of the palace, refer to Nath, A., Holmes, F. R., and Holmes, A. Newton (2008). Jodhpur's Umaid Bhawan: The Maharaja of Palaces, India Book House Publishing, MumbaiGoogle Scholar.

18 J. Jhala (1991). ‘Marriage, Hierarchy and Identity in Ideology and Practice: An Anthropological Study of Jhala Rajput Society in Western India, against a Historical Background’, PhD thesis, Harvard University, Ch. 6, Pt. 2, p. 16.

19 Ibid, p. 21.

20 Ibid, p. 17.

21 Said, E. (1978). Orientalism,Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar.

22 Chatterjee, P. (1990). ‘The Nationalist Resolution of the Women's Question’, in Sangari, K. and Vaid, P. (eds), Recasting Women, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 233–53Google Scholar; Mani, L. (1998). Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India, University of California Press, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar; Spivak, G. (1988). ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Illini Books, Illinois, pp. 271–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Anagol, P. (1998). ‘Indian Christian Women and Indigenous Feminism, c. 1850–1920’ in Midgley, Clare (ed.), Gender and Imperialism, Manchester University Press, Manchester, p. 80Google Scholar; Visweswaran, K. (1996). ‘Small Speeches, Subaltern Gender: Nationalist Ideology and Its Historiography’ in Amin, S. and Chakrabarty, D. (eds), Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society, Volume 9, Oxford University Press, Delhi, p. 115Google Scholar.

24 Burton, A. (2003). Dwelling in the Archive: Women Writing House, Home, and History in Late Colonial India, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 17, 26–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 For a discussion on the tensions between tradition and modernity, refer to Dube, S. (2004). Stitches on Time: Colonial Textures and Postcolonial Tangles, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, pp. 184–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Joshi, S. (2001). Fractured Modernity: Making of a Middle Class in Colonial North India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp. 18, 74Google Scholar.

27 Cannadine, D. (2001). Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar.

28 Ghosh, D. (2006). Sex and the Family in Colonial India, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dalrymple, W. (2003). White Mughals: Love and Betrayal in Eighteenth Century India, HarperCollins, LondonGoogle Scholar.

29 Jassanoff, M. (2005). Edge of Empire: Lives, Culture, and Conquest in the East, 1750–1850, Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar.

30 Haileybury was founded in 1806 as a training institution for future East India Company civil servants, but after a brief closure during the Mutiny of 1857, it reopened in 1862 as a British public school. Haileybury tended to emphasize healthy athleticism in its curriculum, instructing its graduates to be skilled in shooting and riding. Such abilities were seen as fundamental for East India Company officials to effectively engage with Indian rulers and indigenous leaders. Gilmour, D. (2005). The Ruling Caste: Imperial Lives in the Victorian Raj, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York, pp. 37–66Google Scholar.

31 Hyam, R. (1990). ‘The Sexual Life of the Raj’ in Hyam, R. (ed.), Empire and Sexuality, Manchester University Press, Manchester, p. 118Google Scholar; B. Bush (2004). ‘Gender and Empire: The Twentieth Century’ in Levine, Gender and Empire, p. 90.

32 Allen, C. and Dwivedi, S. (1984). Lives of the Indian Princes, Crown Publishers, New York, pp. 41–42Google Scholar.

33 Allen and Dwivedi, Lives of the Indian Princes, p. 34; B. Kumari interview with the author, Suraj Mahal Palace, Dhrangadhra, 27 July 1999; S. Devi, interview with the author, St. Helen's Cottage, Mussoorie, 27 June 1999. For a more extensive discussion, please see my book, Courtly Indian Women in Late Imperial India.

34 K. Kumari, interview with the author, Umaid Bhavan Palace, Jodhpur, 2 July 1999.

35 Kumari, B. (1942). ‘Time Table’, Exercise Notebooks, Umed Palace School, Jodhpur, IndiaGoogle Scholar.

36 B. Kumari, interview with the author, Suraj Mahal Palace, Dhrangadhra, 3 August 2002.

37 Allen and Dwivedi, Lives of the Indian Princes, p. 34; B. Kumari, interview with the author, 27 July 1999; S. Devi, interview with the author, 27 June 1999.

38 K. Kumari, 2 July 1999.

39 Sita Devi, 27 June 1999.

40 Allen and Dwivedi, Lives of the Indian Princes, p. 37.

41 B. Kumari, 17–19 July 1999. This was not an unusual occurrence. Indeed, as the Nawab of Rampur recalled, he ‘trusted’ and had more confidence in his governess than his own mother. Allen and Dwivedi, Lives of the Indian Princes, p. 42.

42 Shruti Kapila provides a fascinating exposition on the colonial regulation of Indian princely sexuality in her article, ‘Masculinity and Madness: Princely Personhood and Colonial Sciences of the Mind in Western India, 1871–1940’, Past and Present, 187 (May 2005), pp. 121–56.

43 For greater detail on colonial engagement in princely marriages, refer to Chapter 3 of my book, Courtly Indian Women in Late Imperial India.

44 Note F. Paisley's reference to the removal of native children from their parents and communities in colonial Australia, which was incorporated into government policy. F. Paisley (2004). ‘Childhood and Race: Growing Up in the Empire’ in P. Levine (ed.), Gender and Empire.

45 Kapila, ‘Masculinity and Madness’, p. 126; for prescriptions of appropriate imperial masculinity, see Bush, ‘Gender and Empire: The Twentieth Century’, p. 85.

46 Nair, J. (2000). ‘Uncovering the Zenana: Visions of Indian Womanhood in Englishwomen's Writings, 1813–1940’ in Hall, C. (ed.), Cultures of Empire: Colonizers in Britain and the Empire in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Routledge, New York, p. 230Google Scholar.

47 Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 224–28Google Scholar.

48 S. Devi, Autobiography of an Indian Princess, pp. 54–55; Moore, L. (2004). Maharanis: The Lives and Times of Three Generations of Indian Princesses, Penguin Books, London, p. 61Google Scholar.

49 For an account of an elite Javanese woman in colonial Indonesia whose family put similar emphasis on Western education and social etiquette as desirable qualities for prospective brides, refer to Coté, J. (2002). ‘Raden Ajeng Kartini: The Experience of Politics of Colonial Education’ in Goodman, J. and Martin, J. (eds), Gender, Colonialism and Education, Woburn Press, London, pp. 199–224Google Scholar.

50 Bannerji, H. (1998). ‘Age of Consent and Hegemonic Social Reform’ in Midgley, C. (ed.), Gender and Imperialism, Manchester University Press, Manchester, p. 21Google Scholar.

51 K. Kumari, 2 July 1999.

52 S. Devi, 27 June 1999.

53 Ibid.

54 Refer to Devi, Maharani Brinda's memoirs (1954), Maharani: The Story of an Indian Princess, as Told to Elaine Williams, Henry Holt & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar.

55 G. Devi, interview with the author, Cadogan Square, London, 6 June 1999.

56 K. Kumari, 2 July 1999.

57 G. Devi, interview with the author, Cadogan Square, London, 18 June 1999.

58 B. Kumari, interview with the author, Surajmahal Palace, Dhrangadhara, India, 26 July 1999.

59 K. Kumari, 2 July 1999.

60 G. Devi, 18 June 1999.

61 B. Kumari, 28 July 1999.

62 Jhala, ‘Marriage, Hierarchy and Identity’, pp. 33–34.

63 B. Kumari, interviews with the author, Suraj Mahal Palace, Dhrangadhra, 26 July–10 August 1999.

64 For fuller discussion of these wedding nights, refer to Chapter 3 of my book, Courtly Indian Women in Late Imperial India.

65 K. Kumari, 2 July 1999.

66 Ibid.

67 Ibid.

68 Ali, D. (2004). Courtly Culture and Political Life in Early Medieval India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 75–77Google Scholar.

69 Ibid, pp. 223–24.

70 Refer to Devi's autobiography, A Princess Remembers.

71 B. Kumari, 17–19 July 1999.

72 Ibid.

73 Ibid.

74 Ibid.