Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:40:13.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hobson and Lenin in Johore: Colonial Office Policy towards British concessionaires and investors, 1818—1907

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Keith Sinclair
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the opinions of J. A. Hobson and Lenin European imperial expansion during several decades following 1870 was caused by the need to export surplus capital, and aimed at expediting this process. Hobson saw this necessity as arising from over-production (or under-consumption), a curable defect of capitalism; Lenin as an inherent quality of ‘monopoly-capitalism’ which was directed principally by bankers and was heading for revolution.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , July 1967 , pp. 335 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘“Imperialism”: An Historiographical Revision’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, XIV, 2, 1961, p. 191.Google Scholar

2 Dobson, , Imperialism: The Last Stage of Capitalism, London (The Lenin Library), n.d., p. 146.Google Scholar

3 Imperialism. A Study, London, 2nd ed., 1905, p. 83.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., p. 53, cit. Fieldhouse, loc. cit.

5 Op. cit., p. 90.Google Scholar

6 Op. cit., p. 35.Google Scholar

7 Fieldhouse, p. 199.Google Scholar

8 Hon-Chan, Chai, The Development of British Malaya, 1896–1909, Kuala Lumpur, 1964, pp. 155–8.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., pp. 162 ff; Ken, Wong Lin, The Malayan Tin Industry to 1914, Tucson, 1965, Chapter 4.Google Scholar

10 Johore in 1911 (Annual Report).Google Scholar

11 Johore State Secretary to Rubber Estate Cos., 28 May 1907, State Secretariat Official Letter Book 1902–09, Johore Archives, State Secretariat, Johore Bahru, lists 18 companies.Google Scholar

12 Johore in 1910. (Annual Report).Google Scholar

13 Sinclair, K., ‘The British Advance in Johore, 1885–1914’, Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, XL, Pt. 1, 1967.Google Scholar

14 Pauncefote, J. (F.O.) to C.O., 27 October 1885, C0273/137. SeeGoogle ScholarCowan, C. D., Nineteenth Century Malaya, London, 1961, pp. 18–20 on the use of this term.Google Scholar

15 Maxwell, W. G. and Gibson, W. S., Treaties and Engagements Affecting the Malay States and Borneo, London, 1924, pp. 132–3.Google Scholar

16 Mighell v. Sultan of Johore [1894], I Q.B. 149.Google Scholar

17 Sinclair, , loc. cit.Google Scholar

18 Church, T. to Butterworth, 20 June 1852, India Boards Collections, Vol. 2587, 155221, enclosed Butterworth ‘Narrative … for the First Quarter of 1853’, 6 september 1854, Commonwealth Relations Office.Google Scholar

19 Concession by Unku Abdulrahman, 1872, Johore Archives. Dr Christopher Wake of the University of Western Australia kindly informs me that ‘Padang’ was the coastal area between the Muar River and Pinang Sa-ribu.Google Scholar

20 Minute on Napier, W. to Hicks Beach, 5 October 1878, CO 273/97.Google Scholar

21 Hicks Beach to Napier (draft), 23 October 1878, CO 273/97; Anson to Hicks Beach, 16 August 1879, enclosing Abu Bakar to Anson, 15 August 1879, CO 273/99.Google Scholar

22 Robeck, G. W. de minute on Malay Peninsular Agency Ltd. to Herbert, 6 August 1884, CO 273/232.Google Scholar

23 On this Agency see correspondence, minutes and the printed Convention in CO 273/132.Google Scholar

24 Alice, , Lovat, Lady, The Life of Sir Frederick Weld, London, 1914, p. 19;Google Scholar

Scholefield, G. H. (ed.), Dictionary of New Zealand Biography, Wellington, 1940.Google Scholar

25 CO 273/132, Convention, p. 14.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., minutes, pp. 144–5.

27 Draft despatch, Derby to Weld, 6 september 1884, Ibid.

28 The Colonial Office took the view, when it put pressure on the Maharaja, that the concession had already lapsed. But the Agency was, at that time, seeking some official approval before commencing operations.Google Scholar

29 Weld to Sultan, 23 October 1886, Governors' Letters, National Library, Singapore; Sultan to Weld, 6 and 11 January 1887, Johore State Secretariat Letter Book, 1885–93, Johore Archives.Google Scholar

30 Sinclair, K., loc. cit.Google Scholar

31 Ibid., note 58.

32 Lake, H. W. to Under-Secretary, 10 April 1905, CO 273/313.Google Scholar

33 Erlanger to Lyttelton, 24 May 1905, CO 273/316.Google Scholar

34 Draft despatch, 13 April 1905, and minutes, CO 273/313.Google Scholar

35 Ibrahim to Smith, enclos. Anderson to Lyttelton, 4 May 1905, CO 273/311.Google Scholar

36 Abdul Rahman to Smith, 13 July, 10 October 1905, CO 273/313.Google Scholar

37 Lyttelton to Abdul Rahman, 9 November 1905, CO 273/316.Google Scholar

38 Minutes on Ibrahim to Elgin, 16 March 1906, CO 273/324.Google Scholar

39 C.O. Confidential Print, Eastern No. 102, 3 April 1906.Google Scholar

40 Minutes on Lake to Under-Secretary, 10 April 1905, CO 273/313 and reference in note 33.Google Scholar

41 Lenin, , pp. 64, 74.Google Scholar

42 Hobson foreshadowed Lenin's views on monopolies. See his discussion of ‘trusts’ and ‘combines’, pp. 66–68, 75.Google Scholar

43 See, e.g., Fieldhouse, , p. 197.Google Scholar

44 E.g. Lenin, , p. 246.Google Scholar

45 Minute on Anderson to Elgin, 2 March 1906, CO 273/320.Google Scholar

46 Anderson to Lucas, 18 January 1907, CO 273/326.Google Scholar

47 Minute on Ibrahim to Elgin, 16 March 1906, CO 273/324.Google Scholar

48 Anderson to Lyttelton, 27 June 1905, CO 273/312.Google Scholar

49 See, e.g., minutes on Smith to Ripon, 29 November 1892, CO 273/183, re Pahang concessions.Google Scholar

50 Lucas minute on Ibrahim to Elgin, 16 March 1906, CO 273/324;Google Scholar

Bogaars, G., The Tanjong Pagar Dock Company, 1864–1905, Singapore, 1956;Google Scholar

Veloo, Saminathan, ‘The Tanjong Pagar Dock Board 1905–1915’, unpub. thesis, University of Singapore, 1959.Google Scholar

51 Emerson, R., Malaysia, 2nd ed., Kuala Lumpur, 1964, p. 255.Google Scholar

52 Ken, Wong Lin, pp. 127 ff., 144.Google Scholar

53 Ibid., p. 39. The Colonial Office seems to have recognized and encouraged only one significant company, the Pahang Corporation Ltd., which held an important tin mine.

54 8 July, 9 July 1887, Governors' Letters, National Library, Singapore. Wong, Cf., p. 130 and passim.Google Scholar

55 Elgin to Ibrahim, 9 April, and Ibrahim's reply, 26 April 1906, CO 273/324.Google Scholar

56 Cf. Rosebery's remark about Africa, cited Robinson, R., Gallagher, J. and Denny, A., Africa and the Victorians, London, 1961, p. 398.Google Scholar

57 British Malaya, London, 1955 ed., p. 237; Mitchell to Chamberlain, 23 March 1896, CO 273/213.Google Scholar

58 Swettenham, , op. cit., passim. See also minutes on Smith to Ripon, 29 November 1892, CO 273/183; Weld to Abu Bakar, 9 July 1887, Governors' Letters, National Library, Singapore.Google Scholar

59 Ken, Wong Lin, p. 144.Google Scholar

60 In connexion with railway development. See below.Google Scholar

61 Rodyk, and Davidson, letter, 24 April 1912, General Adviser's file 113/1912; also file 115/1912, General Adviser's files, Johore Archives; Rubber Estates of Johore Ltd. to C.O., 21 October 1907, CO 273/334; minute on Anderson to Elgin, 2 March 1906, CO 273/320. Swettenham advocated that British civil servants in Malaya should be permitted to speculate in land and did so himself in the eighties. See Smith to Knutsford, 16 December 1890, CO 273/169; Smith to Ripon, 30 June 1893, CO 273/188, Fairfield memo, 17 August 1892. There has been unfounded speculation about the reasons for Swettenham's retirement. An unpublished thesis by Y. E. Parry, ‘Sir Frank Swettenham as Governor and High Commissioner’, U. of Singapore, argues that he retired because he let the opium and spirit farms illegally or dishonestly. In fact the dispute to which the writer refers occurred under Governor Anderson. I have also heard it suggested in Malaysia that Swettenham was forced to retire because of his land concession, but this grant followed his retirement.Google Scholar

62 See below, note 65.Google Scholar

63 Lovat, Alice Lady, p. 414.Google Scholar

64 Herbert minute on Maharaja to Hicks Beach, 23 July 1878, CO 273/97; Weld to Maharaja, 5 December 1880, Governors' Letters, National Library, Singapore.Google Scholar

65 Fairfield minute, 2 March 1892, on Smith to Knutsford, 25 June 1892, CO 273/181. See also correspondence in CO 273/153, 170, 171, 193.Google Scholar

66 Ommanney to Under Secretary, 16 July 1890, Fielding, W. to Ommanney, 4 July 1890, CO 273/170.Google Scholar

67 Hon-Chan, Chai, p. 189.Google Scholar

68 Mitchell to Chamberlain, 25 August 1899, CO 273/248.Google Scholar

69 Correspondence in CO 273/252, 260, 265, 273.Google Scholar

70 Ibrahim to Swettenham, 12 May 1900, enclos. Swettenham to Chamberlain, 24 May 1900, CO 273/261; Herbert, R. to Under-Secretary, 24 May 1902, CO 273/288; Lucas minute on Harris to Chamberlain, 16 November 1901; Swettenham to Thurn, 23 October 1901, CO 273/277.Google Scholar

71 Correspondence in CO 273/277.Google Scholar

72 Chamberlain minute, 31 January 1902, CO 273/288; minutes on Swettenham to Chamberlain, March 1903, CO 273/293. See also,Google ScholarTregonning, K. O., Under Chartered Company Rule, Singapore, 1958, pp. 56 ff.Google Scholar

73 Swettenham to Chamberlain, 16 December 1902, CO 273/284.Google Scholar

74 Swettenham to Ibrahim, 2 March 1903 and other letters, Johore State Secretariat Letter Book 1902–09, Johore Archives.Google Scholar

75 Swettenham to Lucas, 26 July 1902, CO 273/283.Google Scholar

76 Ibrahim to Elgin, 26 March 1906, CO 273/324.Google Scholar

77 Anderson to Elgin, 19 June 1907, CO 273/330; Barry to Hopwood, 6 August 1907, CO 273/334. A very extensive correspondence on the Johore railway, including the Barry and Pauling negotiations is in the CO 273 series and in the Johore State Secretariat Letter Books.Google Scholar

78 Stubbs, R. E. memo on Herbert to Under-Secretary, 10 February 1903, CO 273/297.Google Scholar

79 See Sinclair, K., loc. cit.Google Scholar

80 Meldrum to Abu Bakar, 8 July 1878, CO 273/97; Erlanger to Lyttelton, 24 May 1905, CO 273/316.Google Scholar

81 Staley, E., War and the Private Investor, New York, 1935, p. 387.Google Scholar

82 Cf. Cambridge History of the British Empire, III, London, 1959, p. 766, and the general observations by A. F. Madden on fin de siècle imperialism in Chapter 10.Google Scholar