Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
This paper is an attempt to understand one case of ‘ethnic’ conflict in India—Assam. By looking closely at this one case I hope we will understand better the phenomenon of India's persistent dilemma of micro-nationalist politics that from time to time seems to be fundamentally at odds with India's macro-nationalist project. To be sure, despite the seriousness of some of these conflicts—say Punjab and Kashmir at present, or Assam until recently—the incidence of micro-nationalist dissent should be kept in perspective. The Indian state can claim quite a bit of success in its project of ‘nation building’-it has been able to incorporate micro-nationalist dissent of a number of peoples by using persuasive and coercive means at its disposal. Moreover, cven conflicts that appear stubborn at one time turn out to be surprisingly amenable to negotiated settlement. Irrespective of the Indian state's ability to manage micro-nationalist dissent, the assumption that nationalisms have a telos that inevitably leads to a demand for separation relies on a rather sloppy and lazy naturalist theory of the nature and origins of nations and nation states. What the Indian experience forces us to confront is the fate of nationalism and the nation state as they spread worldwide as a modal form. In the Indian subcontinent these new forms that privilege 'formal boundedness over substantive interelationships," come face to face with a civilisation that represents a particularly complex way of ordering diversity.2 In a subcontinent where the historical legacy of state formation is marked by an intermittent tension between the imperial state and regional kingdoms, nationalisms and the nation state may have proved to be rather unfortunate modern transplants.3
1 Handler, Richard, ‘On Having a Culture: Nationalism and the Reservation of Quebec's Patrimoine,’ in Stocking, George W. (ed.), Objects and Others: Essays on Museums and Material Culture [History of Anthropology, vol. 3] (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985), p. 198.Google Scholar
2 Cohn, Bernard S., ‘Networks and Centers in the Integration of Indian Civilization,’ in An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 78–87.Google Scholar
3 Rudolph, Lloyd I. and Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber. ‘The Subcontinental Empire and the Regional Kingdom in Indian State Formation,’ in Wallace, Paul (ed.), Region and Nation in India (New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., 1985), pp. 40–59.Google Scholar
4 Hirschman, Albert, ‘The Rise and Decline of Development Economics,’ in Hirschman, Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond (New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
5 The phrase ‘imagined communities’ is of course from Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 1983).Google Scholar The notion of poetics is an extension of Bachelard’s idea of the poetics of space. Bachelard, Gaston, The Poetics of Space, trans. Jolas, Maria (New York: Orion Press, 1964).Google Scholar
6 Said, Edward W., Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books, 1979), pp. 54–5.Google Scholar
7 For a discussion of the political turmoil in Assam caused by the issue of immigration see Baruah, Sanjib, ‘Immigration, Ethnic Conflict and Political Turmoil: Assam, 1979–85,’ in Asian Survey 26, 11 (11 1986), pp. 1184–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Anderson, , Imagined Communities, p. 19.Google Scholar
9 Casette tape. For a large selection of Hazarika's songs until 1980 see Dutta, Dilip Kumar, Bhupen Hazarikar Geet Aru Jeevan Rath [The Songs and Life of Bhupen Hazarika] (Calcutta: Sribhumi Publishing Company, 1984).Google Scholar
10 Dutta, Dilip Kumar, Bhupen Hazarikar Geet Aru Jeevan Rath pp. 310–11.Google Scholar
11 Ibid., pp. 306–7.
12 Ibid., pp. 345–7, 392.
13 Casette Tape.Google Scholar
14 Anderson, , Imagined Communities, p. 17.Google Scholar
15 Casette Tape.Google Scholar
16 Casette Tape.Google Scholar
17 This phrase is from Said, Orientalism, p. 55.Google Scholar
18 Bayart, Jean-François, ‘African Civil Society,’ in Chabal, Patrick (ed.), Political Domination in Africa: Reflections on the Limits of Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 111–12.Google Scholar
19 Ibid., pp. 117–19.
20 Rybczynski, Witold, Home: A Short History of an Idea (New York: Viking, 1986), pp. 26–8.Google Scholar
21 Nakul Chandra Bhuyan, Presidential Speech, Asom Sahitya Sabha, 34th session, Dibrugarh, 1967,Google Scholar in Neog, Han Prasad (ed.), Asom Sahitya Sabha Barshiki [Asom Sahitya Sabha Annual] (Jorhat, Assam: Asom Sahitya Sabha, n.d.), pp. 22–3.Google Scholar
22 Cited in Misra, Udayon, ‘Asom Sahitya Sabha: Retreat From Populist Politics,’ in Misra, , North-East India: Quest for Identity (Guwahati: Omsons Publications, 1988), pp. 123–4.Google Scholar
23 Goswami, Jotin (ed.), Asom Sahitya Sabha Barshiki [Asom Sahitya Sabha Annual]. Dhing, 37th Session (Jorhat, Assam: Asom Sahitya Sabha, 1971), p. 103.Google Scholar
24 Misra, , ‘Asom Sahitya Sabha,’ p. 122.Google Scholar
25 Resolutions published in Asom Sahitya Sabha Barshiki [Asom Sahitya Sabha Annual], Annual Sessions, 1964, 1967, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972 and 1973.Google Scholar
26 Goswami, Jotin (ed.), Asom Sahitya Sabha Barshiki [Asom Sahitya Sabha Annual], Dhing, 37th Session, pp. 140–6.Google Scholar
27 Misra, Udayon, ‘Culture and Politics’ in Misra, North-East India: Quest for Identity, pp. 114.Google Scholar
28 Cited in Misra, ‘Asom Sahitya Sabha,’ p. 126.Google Scholar
29 Misra, Udayon, ‘All Assam Students Union: Crisis of Identity,’ in Misra, NorthEast India: Quest for Identity, pp. 144–51.Google Scholar
30 Freitag, Sandra B., Collective Action and Community: Public Arenas and the Emergence of Communalism in North India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989). She uses Jurgens Habermas' notion of the public sphere.Google Scholar
31 Appadurai, Arjun, ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,’ in Public Culture 2, 2 (Spring 1990), p. 6.Google Scholar
32 Casette Tape.Google Scholar
33 Arjun Appadurai writes about ‘the French idea of the imaginary (imaginaire), as a constructed landscape of collective aspirations.’ See Appadurai, , ‘Disjuncture and Difference,’ p. 5.Google Scholar
34 See note 1.Google Scholar